After learning about the God Dagon and how this deity is worshiped in the Roman Catholic Church, only then I began to see how much History has been changed, and how people have been lied to. I remember a book years ago (when Iiving in Upstate New York), on a particular book detailing the similarities of the Great Genghis Khan and King David in the Bible, but haven't found any information on this book to this day (on the Internet). But seeing the descriptions of the great Plague that had occured to the Philistines, and how they were worshipers of Dagon, turns out this land is really Europe.
Dagon is really the Hindu God Vishnu, who in turn is Buddha , Kristna, Bacchus to Jesus Christ the God of the Cross. Then I begin to understand why History has been changed. There is a topic called "Mud flood", to which people detail how the pictures of the past doesn't fit into the category of today's supposed Historic subjects. There would be lands like the wiped out "Tataria", to which engulfed the whole of Central Asia. And based from understanding what the "Real Tabernacle" is based on, tells me that everything is based on the people Central Asia, India and China.
If the Europeans had Dagon, and Dagon is called "The Holy Black Son", and the Queen of Heaven, to which is a Black Goddess. Then I can see how Europe was really ruled by the Black people, even during the tumultuous times of the Black plague. The Cross of Dagon (who is the Black Jesus Christ) existed before the man now called Jesus ever came into this world.
Interesting enough, many Biblical Scholars would detail the Chinese, Mongolians, Indians to being from Japheth, and "Gog and Magog". However, based from these claims would backfire, as the real lands are in China and India, and even the practices go back to Hinduism the other way around. So many people want to claim the lands of the Israel (Palestine) as the Holy Land, however, after understanding (and traveling) the truth, I see that people are just told this but have no clue the changes to today's History.
(Interesting enough, Anatoly Fomenko had stated if the City of Jerusalem was in Russia, and how the Israelites was based on the "Russian Horde". This is probably where the "Turkic Mongolian" relations come into play)
Now, what if Genghis Khan is the real "King David" of the Bible, and thus coincidently had a vast empire that took over those lands? It's no wonder that certain people of India would have the name "Khan", thus pertaining to the lineage of Genghis. Interesting enough, like King David, he would have many children in which the God of fire had promised to him, that "from his loins would come forth Kings".
Here in "The Anacalypsis" VOLUME I - BOOK X - CHAPTER III Page 631 states this: "Gengis Khan was considered a prophet; the Turkish emperors called Khans, are also considered to be prophets. This is the Tibetian superstition; hence the Khans or Tartary.* Guichart derives Khan from 0% (??), ken, in Greek cohj.** From this he derives Diaconus. * Sandy's Travels, p.37. **
Let's look further in "The Anacalypsis" VOLUME II - BOOK X - CHAPTER VII Page 740: "…The natives of Cashmere as well as those of Afghanistan, pretending to be descended from the Jews, give pedigrees of their kings reigning in their present country up to the sun and moon : and along with this, they shew you Temples still standing, built by Solomon, statues of Noah, and other Jewish patriarchs. Concerning these matters, when our travellers are told of the descent from the Jews they make no inquiry; at the same time they are occasionally obliged to allow, that the descent form the Jews is, for many reasons, totally incredible. Then how is this to be explained ?"
"Simply by the fact, that the traditions of the Afghans tell them, that they are descended from the tribe of Ioudi or Yuda : and in this they are right; for it is the tribe of Joudi noticed by Eusebius to have existed before the Son of Jacob in Western Syria was born, the Joudi of Oude, and from which tribe the Western Jews with the Brahmin (Abraham) descended and migrated. … How extraordinary that it should never occur to this writer to inquire, how these subjects of Solomon and Saul should live near the temple of Solomon in Cashmere, or the mountains of Solomon in Mewar or Malwa ! In the fragments xxxiv. xxxv., Calmet's editor shews, that a great part of the Jewish history of Samuel, Saul, David, and Solomon, is to be found in the history of the Afghans."
"From this I have been led to a suspicion, that the reason for the monstrous numbers of soldiers, chariots, horses, &c., of which we read in the Bible, applied not to Western, but to Eastern, Judea; and the same of the gold used in the temple. All this, as applied to Western Syria, is ridiculous; but not so as applied to the state and the enormous city of Oudia of India."
(This details further of Afghanistan and kashmir, to being part of the lands of Israel. And that the temple of Solomon is stated to be in Mewar, Kashmir and not in Palestine.....)
VOLUME II - BOOK X - CHAPTER VIII Page 770: "I think I may venture to assume, that I have connected the Masons, the Templars, and the Ishmaelians, and I beg leave to observe that, by means of the red eight-point cross, I connect the Templars also with the Manichæans and the Buddhists of India. …"
"The truth is, that the religion of the Ras, of Buddha, of Metis, of Sophia, of the Crhjoj, of Bafomet, of Acamoth or the Intelligence Universelle, extended over the whole world, and was the universal esoteric, ancient and modern religion; —the religion of Tibet, of Sion or Siam, of the Monks of the lake of Paremboli, (Embolima of India,) of Dodona or Bodona, of Eleusis, of Ephesus, of Delphi, of Virgil, of the Gnostics, of the Manichæans, and of the Pope—for which reason he very properly calls himself a CATHOLIC, and his religion Catholic or Pantheistic, and his followers Catholics or Pandees, or Saints of Pan-ism or Catholicism."
"I beg to repeat to such of my readers as are Royal-Arch Masons, that Solomon was a Ras or wise man, and that a Mason in Rajapoutana is called a Raz, which also means mystery; and now I take the liberty of observing to my brethren, that they are called ROYAL-ARCH MASONS, not because they have anything to do with kings, but because they are Raja-pout-an Masons, as the persons who conquered Egypt were Royal Shepherds or Shepherd Kings, or Raja-pout-an Shepherds, from Pallitana. Pout is Buddha, who is Arch, who is Ras."
"If my reader recollect that the Queen of Sheba came from Ethiopia, and that the African Ethiopians, the Royal family at least, pretend to be the descendants of Solomon and this Queen, whose name was Helena, he will not be surprised to find the King of the Ethiopians taking the name of that virtue for which this prince was in a particular manner celebrated—Wisdom. Thus he is called, not the king but the Ras of Abyssinia. Why was Solomon so celebrated for this virtue ? It was no doubt from being the protector, or perhaps the renovator, of the doctrine of the emanation of the Rasit."
"… Page 771 In the valley of Cashmere, on a hill close to the lake, are the ruins of a temple of Solomon. The history states that Solomon finding the valley all covered with water except this hill, which was an island, opened the passage in the mountains and let most of it out, thus giving to Cashmere its beautiful plains.* The temple which is built on the hill is called Tucht Suliman. Afterward Forster** says, "Previously to the Mahometan conquest of India, Kashmere was celebrated for the learning of its Brahmins and the magnificent construction of its temple." Now what am I to make of this ? Were these Brahmins Jews, or the Jews Brahmins ? The inadvertent way in which Forster states the fact precludes all idea of deceit. * Forster's Travels, Vol. II. p.11. ** P. 17."
"Page 772 … I apprehend that the temple was a type of the universe, and that all the temples were the same; all parts of the one universal mythos which extended, as is evident, from the same sacred names of places being found every where, to the farthest points of the globe. … I entertain a persuasion that the Solomonian mythos, which we have found in China, in Cashmere, in Oude, in Persia, in Asia Minor, and in Matura of the Carnatic, as described by Bouchet, in the temple of the Brahmins, with its passage of the sea, &c., &c., were all the same with that of Western Syria; that they all had at the bottom the same recorded transactions; and that this was a part of the secret Jewish religion.…"
"Page 774 … That the tribe of Juda did exist almost all over the world cannot possibly be denied : the city of Judia in Siam, the mythos at Cape Comorin, the temple of Solomon in Cashmere, the Montes Solumi in Mewar, the great city of Oude or Juda, are facts which prove it, and admit of no dispute."
(Here He questions if the Brahmins are the Jews)
"Page 775 … When I consider the little, obscure, mountain tribe of Jews in Western Syria, and I again contemplate the Judæa in the mighty cities of Agra, Oude, Mundore, &c., I cannot doubt that North India must have been the birth-place of the mythos; and the mistake of all these people in supposing themselves descended from the Jews of the little tribe of Western Syria, is easily accounted for; it is the natural effect of the loss by them of their real history, and of the stories told them by proselyting Christians, that they must have come from Western Syria."
"To these causes of mistake may be added the account of these people retailed and misrepresented to us by the same Christians, who, from prejudice, overlook important facts, (such, for instance, as that of the existence of an old temple of Solomon in Cashmere,) and who misrepresent others to make them suitable to their own superstitions and creeds. Thus, to believe them, all the Jews or Youdi, scattered in ancient times over the world, and forming great nations, were part of the mountain tribe of Western Syria, which Herodotus did not observe, or, in his search for nations, discover; the capital of which, with its temple, would not now have been in existence, had it not been preserved by Helena and the Christians."
"To return to the assertion I have so often made, that the Hebrew is the first language. This assertion I must now qualify, in order to answer a question which will be asked, viz. What I mean by the first language. It is very clear that the Hebrew, when a spoken language, must have changed like all other languages, and must have undergone this change when it advanced from sixteen to twenty-two letters, and this change must have been very considerable. We have formerly seen, from the works of various learned men, that the Afghan language, called Pushto, is very similar to the Chaldee."
"We have seen the same Pushto very similar to the Tamul. We have seen that the Tamul is very similar to or identical with the Aramean Syriac or Pushto of Western Syria, and that this, which is the dialect of the time of Jesus Christ, is but a dialect of the Chaldee or Hebrew in which the Synagogue Pentateuch is written. All these similarities are as near identities as can be expected, and more than would have been ever discovered, had not the common mythos operated in a direction contrary to the tendency to change—the natural effect of time—united to the circumstance of the recluse Pentateuch in the Jewish temple having been fortuitously preserved. In fact, all the written languages are but dialects of a sixteen-letter language, as Mr. Gilchrist has judiciously observed…"
(The real ZION or Sion is Siam of Thailand... Today's maps have been changed from right side up to upside down. Lower Egypt is near the Mediterranean, and upper Egypt is towards South Africa. The Netherlands is called "Nether", meaning "lower" or to the bottom point. Europe is really in the South not the North. So, I question the lands that have been changed and the maps that have been set up this way)
So, when learning about the changed Timelines (as you can look up Anatoly Fomenko's "Fiction or Science"), I see things differently now. The names of these locations that are in the Bible are constantly changed, thus covering up where certain situations had occured.
When learning about the People called the Yezidis, I see that their origins are really towards the lands of India. Even though they state that the being called Satan (as Melek Taus) is their protector, it's shown that the being called "Azazil" in the Islamic sources is based on Michael the Archangel who is based on Garuda that battles the demons..
You can see the painting of the Deepa lamp, and how they used to dress showing that they came from India.
Now, there is another group of people that came from India towards the lands of Europe, and they are called "Roma". Apparently, when learning about the Roma people, there are many Documentaries detailing how they got into the worship of the "Queen of Heaven", to which is the Goddess Kali. This was not surprising to me, for I begin to see the correlations of those that wanted to go to the lands of Egypt (as it's written down in the Bible), and the coincidental curse that is shown amongst the Roma people.
From this info, I had wondered if Egypt is somewhere near Eastern Europe (possibly the Black Sea Region), as these particular group from India had came to that part of the world, but then was brought down by something to which got them into this position. When looking up the Documentaries and stories of the Roma, they are shown in a decrepit state. The Houses that they live in, and how they got the term "Gypsy" (as this derogatory term is based on "Gyp", meaning stole or swindled).
In the book of Jeremiah states of those Jews who wanted to go to Egypt to worship the “Queen of Heaven”, and how they didn’t to listen to the God of fire’s words to stay in the land of Judah (India), but wanted to leave before the coming invasion of the Babylonians.
Jeremiah 44:8,12-14 states “In that ye provoke me unto wrath with the works of your hands, burning incense unto other gods in the land of Egypt, whither ye be gone to dwell, that ye might cut yourselves off, and that ye might be a curse and a reproach among all the nations of the earth? And I will take the remnant of Judah that set their faces to go into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, and they shall all be consumed and fall in the land of Egypt; they shall even be consumed by the sword and the famine: they shall die, from the last even unto the greatest by the sword and by the famine: and they shall be an execration, and an astonishment, and a curse, and a reproach."
"For I will punish them that dwell in the land of Egypt, as I have punished Jerusalem, by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence: So that none of the remnant of Judah, which are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall escape or remain that they should return into the land of Judah, to which they have a desire to return to dwell there: for none shall return but such as shall escape.”
This sounds like this God cursing the people, because they wanted to go to land of Egypt, and wanted to worship the Queen of Heaven. It synchronizes with the book of Jeremiah, as it states, as "soon as they went to Europe", then they became a “reproach and a curse.” Therefore, the term “the curse of the Gypsies” became infamous, even though they are called the "Roma" nowadays. And just like the God of fire had said to the Prophet Jeremiah, of those Jews going to Egypt to worship the gods, they were punished and cursed in those lands, and are never to come back. So, where they were going is probably where they came out from, which is the possibly the written down "Egypt", as Eastern Europe.
(Another statement include India to being Egypt as stated in "Persian Connections part 1))
You can see the Roma people, who left India to go to Europe, are those same Jews who left the land of Judah (India) in the Bible. One of the pictures shows a woman from Peru, and the woman next to her is a Roma from Spain. (They look similar in appearance) So, maybe we can see why they are called “Indians” in the first place.
Now, it was said that King Solomon had married the daughter of Pharaoh King of Egypt, and was said to be “black” before the daughters of Jerusalem in the Songs of Solomon. Chapter 1:5,6 “I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, as the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon. Look not upon me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my mother’s children were angry with me; they made me the keeper of the vineyards; but mine own vineyard have I not kept.”
This description shows the Egyptians as black people, thus connecting to the lands of Egypt to be Europe. However, the name of this location and where it's written down (As I find the current lands of Egypt/Khem is where a remnant of the Atlanteans came through, thus the towers were built) sounds like the Byzantine Empire.
The Bible states that the Jews from India (Judea) had gone to Europe (Egypt), and this was the time when the Byzantine Empire had ruled in those lands. Let’s look at Exodus 13:17 “And it came to pass, when Pharaoh had let the people go, that God led them not through the land of the Philistines, although that was near; for God said, lest peradventure the people repent when they see war, and they return to Egypt.”
When the God of fire stated that the lands of the Philistines was “near” the land of Egypt, (as Eastern Europe) meaning this is where the plague of mice and Emerods took place when the Ark of the covenant was taken. So, does this mean the rulers in the lands of Europe were black people? If not, then how else do I keep finding people worshiping the black Jesus and the Black Madonnas of Europe?
(After understanding who Dagon is, and how he is put up on the Cross. Then I began to see how much of the Bible has been altered to fit a certain narrative. It is apparent that this plague had taken place in Europe)
Since they already have a black Jesus that is worshiped in the lands of Europe and India, along with the Black Madonna as the Queen of heaven, then what about this Jesus that came later? From Anatoly’s research, he already showed how the Chronology of the Bible has no history prior to B.C. (before Christ) but afterwards.
However, in today’s history, we are given timelines which are somehow annexed 1000 years extra in the past, just after the formation of the Gregorian calendar in the 1500s. And yet, we are following this same calendar to this day? This does not make sense? Because here in the book of Samuel, gives a clear description of what happened to the Philistines, when they took the Ark to their land and yet, this all takes place before the man called David who became King. Does it count that “the victors are the ones who write the history?”
This can connect to "Alaz Khan". In the Wiki states this: "Alaz is the god of fire in Turkic mythology. Also known as Alas-Batyr or sometimes Alaz Khan. He is an important deity in folk beliefs and son of Kayra. Alaz Khan is depicted as an old man with a torch in his hand. He lives in Ulugh Od (Turkish; Uluğ Od, means “Great Fire”)."
"His dress is flames. Alaz Khan has all power of fire. If became angry, makes and causes by fires on the earth. All of the hearths and stoves are in the command of Alaz Khan. He sends spirits to all hearths. Every fire or hearth has an İye (protector spirit or deity). The Turkic concept of the god seems to associate him both to the destructive and the purifier powers of fire."
"According to ancient Turkic traditions and opinions fire is a sacred phenomenon, and can purify all things, even spirits or souls. The people obliged to respect the fire in family or in social life. In fire sits and lives a protector spirit (familiar spirit). If he was angry, then can be harmful to humans. Because of this disrespectful behavior, fire may be extinguished. Therefore, Turkic or Mongolian traditional, oral narratives told horrible stories of irreverence to fire. Great Law of Genghis Khan (Dead Law) has serious penalties, when anyone shows disrespect to fire."
"The origin of the name is very clear. The word Alaz (or Yalaz) means fire or flame in Turkic languages. The root of word is “Al”. This root contains the meaning of red color and capture anything. Turkish tradition maintained that it was related to Persian words connected to blaze (Alaw, Alav, Alev), which in turn was thought of as related to flames."
Now, based on understanding who the God of fire is, and who the Aryans are, then things start to connect to the Bible, as this God is called "A Consuming Fire". People nowadays are trying to say that this is Jesus Christ, but that isn't so, for this God has nothing to do with the God of the Cross. It becomes apparent that learning about how the Black Gods were worshiped from the East to the West, details who the beings called "Sons of God" are, and how this pertains to why the world is the way it is.
In general, when seeing the Gods being changed to appeal to the color or race, this drives an example to History being changed. Since learning about the true origin of Shiva, then everything starts to make sense and where the Pillar is based on. Here the fire deity is considered a ruddy deity, has a fiery presence, carries a bow and arrows, a flaming sword, all links to the God of fire in the Bible. As stated in previous Chapters, the fire God battling the dragon god is where the Bible has God fighting against the dragon, in Isaiah 51:9, states how he “cut Rahab into pieces”, which can connect to Job 41 on Leviathan.
In the Chinese story states Zhurong (fire god) defeating Gonggong (water god), and yet the elements are reversed as the thunder and water god Huang-di, battles his opponent Chiyou, who is the God of fire. In the Greco Roman story shows Dionysus being cut up by the Titans, and thus is resurrected by the thigh of Zeus. Then Indra, in one story was said to have been cut up by a deity, because of his flings with women (as one source states), as it's similar to Osiris, who was cut up by Set, and Llao the Underworld deity who was cut up by Skell the sky deity.
Here in Ezekiel 29 details this God comparing Egypt to a great dragon that resides on the waters. Then in verse 4 and 5 states "But I will put hooks in thy jaws, and I will cause the fish of thy rivers to stick unto thy scales, and I will bring thee up out of the midst of thy rivers, and all the fish of thy rivers shall stick unto thy scales. And I will leave thee thrown into the wilderness, thee and all the fish of thy rivers: thou shalt fall upon the open fields; thou shalt not be brought together, nor gathered: I have given thee for meat to the beasts of the field and to the fowls of the heaven." Apparently, this would be similar to Set who cuts up Osiris and gives his body to the animals to eat, and Osiris is known for the "Phallic Symbology". This is why I had to question if the pillar symbolism also would belong to the God of fire even though these other Gods would have pillars.
However the case, the description of the God AGNI is obviously the "Consuming Fire" who brought the Aryans in the lands of India and China. The story of the Emperor Jimmu sounds somewhat like Joshua, who in turn was to lead the people in the East. The Three legged Crow story, states that this bird was sent by God to lead the people.
Now, comes the story of "Samiri" to which is stated to be an Egyptian man who wanted the Israelites to worship the golden calf. Based from some of the information read, they state that Samiri is either a person or a rebellious person that had conflicts with Moses.
Here are some of the Excerpts to which will be compared. In the Wiki states this: "Samiri or the Samiri (Arabic: السامري, romanized: as-Sāmirī) is a phrase used by the Quran to refer to a rebellious follower of Moses who created the golden calf and attempted to lead the Hebrews into idolatry. According to the twentieth chapter of the Quran, Samiri created the calf while Moses was away for 40 days on Mount Sinai, receiving the Ten Commandments. In contrast to the account given in the Hebrew Bible, the Quran does not blame Aaron for the calf’s creation."
"In Ta-Ha, the Quran’s twentieth surah, Moses is informed that Samiri has led his people astray in Moses’ absence. He returns to his people to berate them, and is informed of what Samiri has done. They said, ‘We did not fail our tryst with you of our own accord, but we were laden with the weight of the people’s ornaments, and we cast them [into the fire] and so did the Samiri throw.’"
"Then he produced for them a calf —a [lifeless] body with a low— and they said, This is your god and the god of Musa (Moses), so he forgot! Did they not see that it did not answer them, nor could it bring them any benefit or harm? Haroun (Aaron) had certainly told them earlier, ‘O my people! You are only being tested by it. Indeed your Lord is the All-beneficent. So follow me and obey my command!’ [Moses] said, “And what is your case, O Samiri?” He said, “I saw what they did not see, so I took a handful [of dust] from the track of the messenger and threw it, thus did my soul entice me.” [Moses] said, “Then go. And indeed, it is [decreed] for you in [this] life to say, 'No contact.’ And indeed, you have an appointment [in the Hereafter] you will not fail to keep. And look at your 'god’ to which you remained devoted. We will surely burn it and blow it [i.e., its ashes] into the sea with a blast."
"The Quran’s statement that Samiri’s calf made a "lowing" sound has resulted in much speculation. A number of Islamic traditions say that the calf was made with dust trodden upon by the horse of the angel Gabriel, which had mystical properties. Some traditions say that the calf could also move, a property granted to it by the dust of the “horse of life”.
"Other traditions suggest that Samiri made the sound himself, or that it was only the wind. Still others say that the calf was formed by Allah himself, as a test for the Hebrew people. Later traditions expand upon the fate of those who worshiped the calf. Works by al-Tabari include a story in which Moses orders his people to drink from the water into which the calf had been flung; those guilty of worshiping it were revealed when they turned a golden hue."
"Moses ordered his people to kill themselves as a result of their clear disobedience to Allah just couple of weeks ago they were saved by Allah when Moses parted the sea by the permission of Allah for them to crossover and they make a Golden Calf as an idol against Allah even though they know what the consequences are to be, resulting in thousands of casualties, but the carnage stopped after they did what they were ordered to do even though it was very hard on them to act upon what Allah told them. Samiri's punishment has been interpreted as total social isolation by most scholars."
"Samiri has been linked to the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri on the basis of their similar names and a shared theme of rebellion against Moses’ authority. Others link him to the Mesopotamian city of Samarra and suggest that he came from a cow-worshiping people, giving his name as Musa bin Zafar. There is no consensus among Islamic scholars on which, if any, of these identifications is correct. The Baháʼí Faith portrays Samiri as a magician who led people away from the “knowledge and justice” of Moses to ignorance. He is mentioned in the “Kitáb-i-Íqán”, the primary theological work of the Baháʼí religion."
Then based from the Shia's stand point, they state that "Samiri" could be based from Banu Israel, while others state it could be "Samaritan" (though that has been refuted certain website "answering-Islam.org"). If you put in "As-Samiri", you may get certain information trying to detail who the Samiri or Samiri is (as some state is "the" Samiri to which is not deemed a name of a person). Then based from the Rabbi Maller (rabbimaller.com) details that Samiri was an Egyptian Magician (like other non Jews) came out of the land of Egypt.
Now, is it possible that the Samiri is an Egyptian Magician who came with the Children of Israel? (along with the other accounts?) Or is there more to this statement than what has been provided? The reason why I layed down the information based on the God of fire, and His connections to the Chinese, the Japanese, Koreans, etc. Is to show that those people in the Bible are the Aryans, and also connecting to show the true reality of who their God is. Amongst the information based from Islam (whether by Quran or Hadith) states that Allah was giving Moses the Commandments until the golden calf was made, but based from the information and evidence given from above (also see "Legend of the Bird God series") shows that the "Consuming fire" is Agni.
Based from the National Geographic Magazine's picture on the "Tablet of Shang-ti", confirms that Sir Godfrey Higgins was correct on the Chinese to worshiping the everliving "Spirit" (which is the Energy), and the Physical God to which is their protector, Guardian and law giver. This destroys the modern Christian, Jewish and Islamic accounts of who, and where the Israelites went, and who "God" really is. Since learning about how the Vatican created Judaism, then I can't state that all of those people in the lands of Israel are the real people of the Book, but this is the kind of History that rulers don't want the world to learn. Again, these three Abrahamic faiths have nothing to do with the God of fire, but is based on the worship of the Queen of Heaven and Baal.
Apparently, it was the black people who gave and taught the world their symbols, all based from the God of the Cross (Dagon) and the Queen of Heaven. So, if the God of fire is the God that gave Moses the Commandments to the Children of Israel, and is the being called the God of fire, then books like the Kabbalah, the Torah, the Quran, the Bible etc. has been altered to hide the truth of who this God is, and who the real Aryans are.
Now, based on understanding who the real Aryans are and who their God is, then it's possible that the term "the Samiri" could really be "the Samurai", pertaining to the Aryans. After observing the other websites based on this term, they were debates based on the origins, and if this is a person or a person in rebellion (like people of Belial statement). But after clearly detailing the connections of the Japanese and Chinese to the God of fire,( this can most likely be the case) but this is as far as I can go for now.
Here are some of the Children of Israel in their traditional dresses in Central, and Eastern parts of Asia.
Then those Israelites that were taken out of the land managed to keep some of their traditional items. They kept the traditional umbrellas as they were taken away to Africa. All the Israelites would have umbrellas as part of their customs. AGNI said to the Israelites that they were going to be different than all the nations on the earth, and be blessed. Here they give their “first fruits” of the offering just like in the bible like in Exodus 22:29 “Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits, and of thy liquors: the first of thy sons shalt thou give unto me:
Then in Exodus 25 details the lamps as having “almond shaped” bowls which seems like the Indian Deepa lamps in India:
The lamps of Agni may not fit the Menorahs of the European Jews, but it is quite close for having the "almond shaped" bowls and branches as stated in Exodus 25:32-35. (Almonds have a connection to the King of the world) I also find it interesting how the word “Menorah” is similar to the bird Menurah which is called the Lyrebird. Some of these lamps depict peacocks and what looks like the Lyre bird (Similar is the Yoruban "Iron Chalice of Osun", which features the Cockatrice)
The Sikhs in Amritsar India would hold the annual birthday Of Guru Nanak which is on April 15 every year. They would carry the Palanquin with the holy book of the Guru much like the testimony inside of the ark in Exodus 25. Then they would have a fan called the "Chaur Sahib" to wave it over the Palanquin and the holy book of the Guru:
In Matthew 3:11,12 tells of John prophesying the coming of Jesus who will be coming with a “fan” in his hand and to baptize the people with fire. And the Guru would be called the “King of kings” which sounds like Jesus in the bible. (see "Jesus is Muhammad") Here the Japanese Shinto Priest would do the same for the Exorcism ceremonies. Then the Shewbread that Agni tells the Israelites to have is similar to the bread from Samarkand:
They would have the shewbread and the flat unleavened bread as stated in Exodus 25. In Sir Godfrey Higgins book “The Anacalypsis” details the chapter of the Brahmins having a passover in the form of the Yajna fire ceremony for the offerings to the God of fire, and from Marco Polo’s account of the Chinese worshiping one God through liquors and animal sacrifices all should tell you who the Israelites (Aryans) are. In India there are many sacrifices being done towards the gods like Durga, Kali, Vishnu and Agni. Then there are the Puranas and other scriptures that recommend the diet of Vegetarianism, and stopping the harm of animals.
In the Wiki states this on "Animal sacrifices in India": "The modern practice of Hindu animal sacrifice is mostly associated with Shaktism, and in currents of folk Hinduism strongly rooted in local popular or tribal traditions. Animal sacrifices were part of the ancient Vedic religion in India, and are mentioned in scriptures such as the Yajurveda. Some Puranas forbid animal sacrifice."
"A Sanskrit term used for animal sacrifice is bali, in origin meaning "tribute, offering or oblation" generically ("vegetable oblations [... and] animal oblations,"). Bali among other things "refers to the blood of an animal" and is sometimes known as Jhatka Bali among Hindus. The Kalika Purana distinguishes bali (sacrifice), mahabali (great sacrifice), for the ritual killing of goats, elephant, respectively, though the reference to humans in Shakti theology is symbolic and done in effigy in modern times."
".....During the Bali Jatra, male goats are offered as a sacrifice to the goddess Samaleswari in her temple in Sambalpur, Orissa.......In some Shakta Hindu communities, the slaying of buffalo demon and victory of Durga is observed with a symbolic sacrifice instead of animal sacrifice.....The Rajput of Rajasthan worship their weapons and horses on Navratri, and formerly offered a sacrifice of a goat to a goddess revered as Kuldevi – a practice that continues in some places. The ritual requires slaying of the animal with a single stroke.....The tradition of animal sacrifice is being substituted with vegetarian offerings to the Goddess in temples and households around Banaras in Northern India."
"In some Sacred groves of India, particularly in Western Maharashtra, animal sacrifice is practiced to pacify female deities that are supposed to rule the Groves. Animal sacrifice is also practiced by some rural communities around Pune to placate deities at temples of Waghjai and Sirkai. In region around Pune, Goats and fowls are sacrificed to the God Vetala."
(The animal sacrifices would mostly be towards the Goddess, and also to Vishnu's Narasimha form. They also state that they would do animal sacrifices towards Vishnu, but is later stopped)
"Agnisomiya was the simplest of all Soma sacrifices in which animal sacrifice played an important part; it required that a goat be sacrificed to Agni and Soma preceding the day of offering of nectar to the gods. In the Savaniya sacrifice, victims were offered throughout the day of offering to Agni. These rituals didn't focus on the killing of the animal but as a symbol to the powers it was sacrificed."
Then in the Wiki states on "Cattle slaughter in India": "Maharishi Dayanand Saraswati, one of the great vedic scholar of this millenium had written a book named Gokarunanidhi in which he had shown the importance of cows not just from the spiritual point of view but from economical and environmental point of views also. He strongly emphasized the importance of Cow Protection and had quoted various shlokas from Vedas which condemns the slaughtering of cows. Yajurveda: Protect the cattles or animals.
(Yajurveda 1.1) Kill not man nor any being with life.
(Yaju 3.91) Kill not the subjects.
(Yajurveda 12.32) Oh men! Protect or guard the cattle.
(Yajurveda 6.11) Protect the bipeds and quadrupeds.
(Yajurveda 14.8) Kill not the cows.
(Yajurveda 13.43) O sagacious king! Don't harm this bull, the giver of thousands of comforts, the source of immense milk and worthy of protection. Harm not the God's creation, the cow, the giver of milk for mankind and of innocent nature.
(Yajurveda 13.49) Beyond all measure is the cow (Griffith) i.e. there is no limit to the benefits she confer upon humanity.
(Yajurveda 23.48) Kill not the animals, the bipeds (Griffith)."'
(Yajurveda 13.47) Dayanand says in his commentry "Let no one kill animals that are useful to all but protect them and make use of them to make all happy. But the wild animals who injurious to the animals and to the cultivation of the villages and their inhabitants may be killed or driven away by the ruler." O ruler! You have received education, do not kill two footed beings like men, nor birds nor four footed beings like cows or other animals. In giving the object of the hymn Dayanand says 'O ruler! You should punish those wicked people who kill sheep, camels and other animals which are all useful to men."
(Yajurveda 13.50) "According to Nanditha Krishna, the cow veneration in ancient India "probably originated from the pastoral Aryans" in the Vedic era, whose religious texts called for non-violence towards all bipeds and quadrupeds, and often equated killing of a cow with the killing of a human being especially a Brahmin. The hymn 10.87.16 of the Hindu scripture Rigveda (≈1200–1500 BCE), states Nanditha Krishna, condemns all killings of men, cattle and horses, and prays to god Agni to punish those who kill."
In Isaiah 66:3 states this: "He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations."
Genesis Chapter 9: "1And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. 2And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. 3Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. 4But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. 5And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. 6Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man."
Why did this God detail Noah to eat "the moving creatures that liveth", and not the creatures that have the flesh with the life? What is the difference here?
In Genesis 1:20 states this: "And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. 21And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good."
Then on the creatures that "liveth" states this: "24And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 25And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."
So, from these verses states that the "living creatures" are created from the Earth, but the "moving creatures" came from the waters. Does this mean that the People of Noah (or a specific race) wasn't supposed to eat the flesh of the creatures from the earth, but the fish of the Oceans and the Herbs of the fields?
So, to conclude on this subject, I can now see the cover ups based on who the God of the Aryans is and who the Children of Israel are. After seeing the Communist takeover in the Countries of Asia, I start to see a pattern amongst them. In China, Mao Zedong learned about Communism from Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, in the "French concession of Shanghai" in 1921 as a study society and informal network.
Now, question! What is the French concession? In the Wiki states this: "The Shanghai French Concession (French: Concession française de Changhaï; Chinese: 上海法租界; pinyin: Shànghǎi Fǎ Zūjiè; Shanghainese pronunciation: Zaonhe Fah Tsuka) was a foreign concession in Shanghai, China from 1849 until 1943, which progressively expanded in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The concession came to an end in 1943 when the French State under German pressure signed it over to the pro-Japanese Reorganized National Government of China in Nanjing. For much of the 20th century, the area covered by the former French Concession remained the premier residential and retail district of Shanghai, and was also one of the centres of Catholicism in China. Despite re-development over the last few decades, the area retains a distinct character and is a popular tourist destination."
Now, look up "foreign concession": "Concessions in China were a group of concessions that existed during the late Imperial China and the Republic of China, which were governed and occupied by foreign powers, and are frequently associated with colonialism and imperialism. The concessions had extraterritoriality and were enclaves inside key cities that became treaty ports. All the concessions have been dissolved in the present day."
Now, based from this details that the French Communist organization was present during this time, and was teaching the people the ideaology of Communism. This has similarly occurred with the French in Vietnam, and Cambodia with Pol pot. Why is it that while the French were there, then all of a sudden Communism just pops up out of nowhere?
It also states that, in that same area in China, Catholicism was rampant as well. I could only put two and two together, because after learning about the Saturnian symbol amongst the Communist, turns out that it's a symbol based on Saturn worship, leading back to the Black God Dagon (As this God pertains to the Jesuits).
Then there is the Philippines, to which were hit hard by the Jesuits, who almost obliterated their language. They never spoke Spanish in the beginning, but originally had their own language. But as you see in some pictures, they are taught the worship of the Black God Dagon to this day. If you don't question what's going on, and are told to not question, then something is wrong.
It’s just like the people in America, who are now called “Latinos”, but have nothing to do with the real Latin speaking people. Due to the invasion of the Roman Catholic religion, there hasn't been peace. The people very much mixed, are given a false identity, and are taught the worship of Dagon from the Roman Catholic Church. And they know that some of those people are the "children of AGNI", so they went to destroy them with this religion. At this point, you can see that many are turned to the worship of the Goddess as the Queen of Heaven.
It's interesting as you see the Cross being distributed everywhere, people think this is a holy symbol. That's up to the person's perspective at this point, but based from what I'm seeing, Crosses are shown to be worn by Criminals, Prostitutes, drug dealers, Murderers, Celebrities, witches, porn stars, rap stars, rock stars, politicians etc. Nothing has change from this point.
Then the irony of it all is, the Aryans do not know that the Bible is really talking about them!! They are being lied about who "their" God is, but instead don't know they are worshiping Dagon. So, many things has happened to the Israelites in their lands, as well to those that were taken away to Africa, to Europe, and those that reside in the Americas.
However, despite what people think (based on current events), and how the "New World Order" is based on Communism, this has to happen. Everything has to come into play, but knowledge of what's happening and who the people are worshiping must be exposed. The real Children of Israel or Aryans never wore rags or plain clothing, as we are shown in these paintings.