Persian connection: The Abrahmic lineages

Now, before I begin this Chapter, it's important to read the Chapters "The Real Aryans series", "Aryans of America 1&2", and "Changing the Bible", in order to understand the connections of why Adolf Hitler, Late Emperor Hirohito and Benoto Mussolini, because there is a lot of History that is not being told of these connections for a good reason. Now, I will tell the reader this....If Adolf Hitler was based on the "blue eyed, blonde haired Aryan" ideology, then why would he form the "Axis" with Japan and Italy? As they do not have the required description....... 

Now personally, I am not a "politically correct" type to just accept the History as it is, for I know there were many things that are not being stated in today's History books. But as you see the descriptions of these Leaders, you can clearly see how they do not fit the "blonde haired, blue eyed" Aryan theory that has been projected by Propaganda. So what is the real reason today's History books are not portraying the truth? First, we have to go and understand the Israelite connections to the lands of "Persia"......

Now, before I could understand the connections of Persia, I had to connect to where the Children of Israel had traveled to. This is where the "Aryan" immigration theory had been applied, as they came over the Indus river, and then passing "Eastward". I had already established the Japanese, Chinese and Indian connections to the God of Fire in the Bible, and what had occurred to the Israelites, but now we are going to detail the Children of Israel that stayed "Westward" from the Indus river. 

First, let's detail the people called the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the Half Tribe of Manessah in the Bible: 

Deuteronomy 3:12 “And this land, which we possessed at that time, from Aroer, which is by the river Arnon, and half mount Gilead, and the cities thereof, gave I unto the Reubenites and to the Gadites.”

Deuteronomy 3:16 “And unto the Reubenites and unto the Gadites I gave from Gilead even unto the river Arnon half the valley, and the border even unto the river Jabbok, which is the border of the children of Ammon;”

Deuteronomy 4:43 “Namely, Bezer in the wilderness, in the plain country, of the Reubenites; and Ramoth in Gilead, of the Gadites; and Golan in Bashan, of the Manassites.”

Joshua 13:8 “With whom the Reubenites and the Gadites have received their inheritance, which Moses gave them, beyond Jordan eastward, even as Moses the servant of the LORD gave them;”

2 Kings 10:33 “From Jordan eastward, all the land of Gilead, the Gadites, and the Reubenites, and the Manassites, from Aroer, which is by the river Arnon, even Gilead and Bashan.”

1 Chronicles 5:6 “Beerah his son, whom Tilgathpilneser king of Assyria carried away captive: he was prince of the Reubenites.”

1 Chronicles 12:37 “And on the other side of Jordan, of the Reubenites, and the Gadites, and of the half tribe of Manasseh, with all manner of instruments of war for the battle, an hundred and twenty thousand.”

1 Chronicles 26:32 “And his brethren, men of valour, were two thousand and seven hundred chief fathers, whom king David made rulers over the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half tribe of Manasseh, for every matter pertaining to God, and affairs of the king.”

Numbers 32:1 “Now the children of Reuben and the children of Gad had a very great multitude of cattle: and when they saw the land of Jazer, and the land of Gilead, that, behold, the place was a place for cattle;”

Numbers 32:29 “And Moses said unto them, If the children of Gad and the children of Reuben will pass with you over Jordan, every man armed to battle, before the LORD, and the land shall be subdued before you; then ye shall give them the land of Gilead for a possession:”

Numbers 32:33 “And Moses gave unto them, even to the children of Gad, and to the children of Reuben, and unto half the tribe of Manasseh the son of Joseph, the kingdom of Sihon king of the Amorites, and the kingdom of Og king of Bashan, the land, with the cities thereof in the coasts, even the cities of the country round about.”

Joshua 4:12 “And the children of Reuben, and the children of Gad, and half the tribe of Manasseh, passed over armed before the children of Israel, as Moses spake unto them:”

Joshua 13:23 “And the border of the children of Reuben was Jordan, and the border thereof. This was the inheritance of the children of Reuben after their families, the cities and the villages thereof.”

Joshua 20:8 “And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward, they assigned Bezer in the wilderness upon the plain out of the tribe of Reuben, and Ramoth in Gilead out of the tribe of Gad, and Golan in Bashan out of the tribe of Manasseh.”

Joshua 22:10 “And when they came unto the borders of Jordan, that are in the land of Canaan, the children of Reuben and the children of Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh built there an altar by Jordan, a great altar to see to.”

Joshua 22:25 “For the LORD hath made Jordan a border between us and you, ye children of Reuben and children of Gad; ye have no part in the LORD: so shall your children make our children cease from fearing the LORD.”

Joshua 22:32 “And Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, and the princes, returned from the children of Reuben, and from the children of Gad, out of the land of Gilead, unto the land of Canaan, to the children of Israel, and brought them word again.”

Now, based from the excerpts above, you can clearly see how the borders of the Jordan River (which is really the Indus River), was what seperated the 3 tribes from the rest. It is also important to also understand that the Bible was "rewritten" to hide the true lands of Isreal, so I can't state the Egyptians of today, to be the Egyptians in the Bible, nor the lands of Assyria, Lebanon, Babylon, and Greece and Persia (as Cyrus the Great).

Now, when learning about the conquest of Joshua in the Bible, I had often thought "What if Joshua in the Bible was really Alexander the Great?" And the reason I state this because, Alexander's Army had came into the lands of Persia and bordered the lands of India at that point of History. When I was learning about the "Aryans of Ladhak", the Article had suggested many times that they could be the people that was a apart of his Army (due to the blonde hair and blue eyes etc.).

However, it is also strange that many people depict Alexander in different images as if they do not know what he really looks like. Some would show him with blonde hair or red hair, while others detail him to having black hair and a darker complexion. Ignatius Donnelly would mention how the Greeks are the Aryans many times in his book "Atlantis the Antediluvian World" (See "Legends of Atlantis", Aryans of America 1&2"), but when observing the Greek and Macedonian People, majority do not have "blonde hair", but dark hair and olive skin. And I definitely know those Greek Gods (which are originally black complexioned) do not fit the modern Greeks of today. Let's observe the different images of "Alexander the Great".... 

Now, based from the description above, he is shown with red hair, blonde hair, or dark hair, and of course, there are many bust detailing what Alexander of Macedonia would look like as well. However, when I was observing Alexander the Great's Armor, I started to see a resemblance to the Japanese Armor from which the Samurai would wear. It seems that the "Dark hair", and the side burns, along with the style of this particular Armor is revealing that Alexander the Great of the "Aryans", might not be what today's History is trying to portray. Let's observe the Armor paddings for the shoulders, the tied knots around the arms and body to which looks like the Samurai. Now, is this a coincidence? 

But let's observe the different looks of the Macedonians, as this is where the Great Alexander was supposed to have been from.....

After observing the People of Macedonia (to which Alexander was supposed to have come from), I can see how the looks of the people do not fit into the blonde haired European category, but the look of the Middle Eastern people (will detail this in the 2nd part of this chapter). There are also those that would have the "oriental" eyes, to that of the Central Asian people as well. 

In their dances, the men would dance side by side, and one leading the dance is shown spinning a cloth material. This is very similar to the Kurdish men's dance style, the Palestinian, the Syrian, the Greek, the Albanian, the Jewish, the Saudia Arabian, the Turkish, the Lebanese "Dabke" etc. They are also shown with sashes around the waist, and also playing the cornet and the drum just like the other nations in the Middle East. Then the women's dress code is shown with an Apron with fringes to which fits the Levitical style dress in the Bible. Their dances are similar to the Irish and the Basque (to which these are the Celtic lands that Abraham came from), and to which the Scottish bagpipes, and the Irish "Uilleann", is probably where the cornets of the Middle East most likely came from. Among the Jewish, the Palestinian, the modern Egyptians, the Turkish etc., the women would do the "cooing" of the dove. Some of the dances are shown with people lifting their hands as well. Then the Central Asians dance is very similar to the people of India as well. All of these people are clearly the seed of Abraham....

Now, it is also important to understand the difference in European description, as there are people that are considered as "Blonde", "Red haired", and "Black", as in having "Black hair". The term "Black" does not mean having Black skin, but having "Black hair", thus connecting to the Middle Eastern, Mediterreanean, and Asian regions. It's quite clear that "Alexander the Great's" dark haired appearance would fit into the category of the "dark haired" people of Europe and other Middle Eastern people. Let's observe the dance style:

Now, people will state that the Greeks were blonde haired people and so forth, and though that could be true, but as far as the Gods to having black complexion and negroid features, I'm finding this otherwise. Sir Godfrey Higgins has been correct so far as to the Ancient Greek Gods, the Black Buddha, the Black Virgin Goddess and child worship as shown throughout the world, were originally black, and in most cases haven't changed the colors at all. You can see the Italians having the "Black Madonna and Child" to this day, in which is basically "Baal and Ashtoreth", and the Black Goddess "Diana of the Ephesians" in the Bible. And after seeing how the Kings were Black in Europe, now I know that History is not what seems. Here you could see the original Gods to being black complexioned, and to the inhabitants is telling. Here the Goddess of witchcraft "Circe" is where the name "Church" came from. Based from the etymology, the Church is based from "Kirke" which is Circe as the Goddess. Jordan Maxwell broke this down as the Church is based on the "Mother" as those Arches has specific symbolism when you enter her domain....

Now, based from the Documentary called "Redheads: Skeletons in the Cupboard", they had shown the legends of people with red and blonde hair living in New Zealand etc. Until then, they had shown a woman of the Kuai tribe named "Monica Matamua", to which she states she has lineage coming from the lands of "Persia". It is a very interesting Documentary, (in which I would highly recommend) because this details how there were a race of red haired people "prior" to the arrival of the Modern East Asians. 

However, based from this Documentary details how Monica would have lineage coming from Peru (to which they state connects to the Red Headed people), and the lands of Persia. But one thing that got my intention, was when she stated their dispersion from the lands of Persia, and if she was an Arab. They detail how this connects to the Exodus from "India", as they had wars against the Dark Skinned folks (as noted by Elsdon Best). They state that this is the History of the "Tuhoe" people, to which some people do have "red hair" and "blonde hair", and also black hair as well. But does this mean that they were there before the Modern tribes of New Zealand came? Because this situation would be similar to the arrival of the Yayoi Japanese people as they met the (as they state) more different and Ancient Ainu people. The Ainu people are said to be more hairy than the Japanese stock, and are said to look more "Cacausoid". But here is what Monica Matamua looks like: 

Clearly, you can see the "Middle Eastern" look, as she does look Persian. Now, based from her description, I can definitely see the connections. Now, I have stated that Abraham (as the Book "Ireland:Ur of the Chaldees") may have came from the lands of Ireland (or the Iberian Peninsula), to which he would be one of the survivors of the great cataclysm that took place. And based from observing the Basque people of Spain, the Catalonians and the Irish, they would have this particular dance to which details Abraham's lineage doing the samething. This is where the Jewish, the Central Asian, Palestinian, Saudi Arabian's etc. would have this particular dance as well (and as well the Irish/Scottish instruments). Then from there, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob would definitely be from the Ancient Atlantis, to which leads to the Middle Eastern and East Asian connections. Clearly, the East Modern Asians weren't there in Asia as of yet, but the Black inhabitants.    

But based from the Documentary, this is the clue I needed to learn about the other tribes that were on the "Western" side of the Indus river, to which the Kingdom of the Reubenites, Gadites and the Half Tribe of Manessah was said to reside in. Now, I remember that the Children of Israel are supposed to be there, but also the other nations as well (so I will try not to lump them together). Because clearly in Numbers and Deuteronomy 9, details how the God of fire would destroy the Kingdom of the Giants before and after the Jordan river (Indus river). And based from this info, I would think those are the remnants of the red headed Giants in the lands of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran etc. to which the God of fire came and destroyed them.

If you read the Chapter "Alien Mysteries: Red headed Giants" then you can connect to how the Red headed people were an Ancient race alongside of the Black nations. There were red headed and black nations in the lands of China, India, America. However, I can't state that the red headed people are generally the Israelites, unless they are mixed in with or are based from the Lineage of Abraham. I have also seen Jews with "red hair", but based on learning about the how the Vatican created Judaism sets a part certain information that will be stated. But first let's get back to the Documentary....

Now, when Monica Matamua of the Kuai tribe had stated of her lineage from Persia, thus showing the lands of the Ancient Persian Empire, then that's when I started to connect the Persian Empire to the Reubenites in the Bible. As you can see, the Persian Empire went all the way from the "Indus River", to which is written down as the "Jordan River" in the Bible. The Bible also states that the Reubenites went East, but actually they went West, as this is where the Aryans immigrated to being led by the God of fire. Then states that the Empire expanded all over Central Asia, Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Egypt and North Africa, Ethiopia (as I will address later on), Turkey, then to Greece and Macedonia. This will connect to the "dispersion" of the Reubenites and the decline of the Empire, but first let's detail the people called the "Tocharians". Here in the Wiki states this:

"The Tocharians, or Tokharians, were speakers of Tocharian languages, Indo-European languages known from around 7600 documents from around 400 to 1200 AD, found on the northern edge of the Tarim Basin (modern Xinjiang, China). The name "Tocharian" was given to these languages in the early 20th century by scholars who identified their speakers with a people known in ancient Greek sources as the Tókharoi (Latin Tochari), who inhabited Bactria from the 2nd century BC."

"This identification is generally considered erroneous, but the name "Tocharian" remains the most common term for the languages and their speakers. Their actual ethnic name is unknown, although they may have referred to themselves as Agni, Kuči and Krorän, or Agniya, Kuchiya as known from Sanskrit texts. Agricultural communities first appeared in the oases of the northern Tarim circa 2000 BC. Some scholars have linked these communities to the Afanasievo culture found earlier (c. 3500–2500 BC) in Siberia, north of the Tarim or Central Asian BMAC culture."

"The earliest Tarim mummies, which may not be connected to the Tocharians, date from c. 1800 BC. By the 2nd century BC, these settlements had developed into city-states, overshadowed by nomadic peoples to the north and Chinese empires to the east. These cities, the largest of which was Kucha, also served as way stations on the branch of the Silk Road that ran along the northern edge of the Taklamakan desert. From the 8th century AD, the Uyghurs – speakers of a Turkic language – settled in the region and founded the Kingdom of Qocho. The peoples of the Tarim city-states intermixed with the Uyghurs, whose Old Uyghur language spread through the region. The Tocharian languages are believed to have become extinct during the 9th century."

"Around the beginning of the 20th century, archaeologists recovered a number of manuscripts from oases in the Tarim Basin written in two closely related but previously unknown Indo-European languages, which were easy to read because they used a close variation of the already deciphered Indian Middle-Brahmi script. These languages were designated in similar fashion by their geographical neighbours: A Buddhist work in Old Turkic (Uighur), included a colophon stating that the text had been translated from Sanskrit via toxrï tyly (Tωγry tyly, "The language of the Togari"). Manichean texts in several languages of neighbouring regions used the expression "the land of the Four Toghar" (Toγar~Toχar, written Twγr) to designate the area "from Kucha and Karashar to Qocho and Beshbalik."

"Friedrich W. K. Müller was the first to propose a characterization for the newly discovered languages. Müller called the languages "Tocharian" (German Tocharisch), linking this toxrï (Tωγry, "Togari") with the ethnonym Tókharoi (Ancient Greek: Τόχαροι) applied by Strabo to one of the "Scythian" tribes "from the country on the other side of the Iaxartes" that overran the Greco-Bactrian kingdom (present day Afghanistan-Pakistan) in the second half of the 2nd century BC. This term also appears in Indo-Iranian languages (Sanskrit Tushara/Tukhāra, Old Persian tuxāri-, Khotanese ttahvāra), and became the source of the term "Tokharistan" usually referring to 1st millennium Bactria, as well as the Takhar province of Afghanistan."

"The Tókharoi are often identified by modern scholars with the Yuezhi of Chinese historical accounts, who founded the Kushan Empire. Müller's identification became a minority position among scholars when it turned out that the people of Tokharistan (Bactria) spoke Bactrian, an Eastern Iranian language, which is quite distinct from the Tocharian languages. Nevertheless, "Tocharian" remained the standard term for the languages of the Tarim Basin manuscripts and for the people who produced them."

"A few scholars argue that the Yuezhi were originally speakers of Tocharian who later adopted the Bactrian language. The name of Kucha in Tocharian B was Kuśi, with adjectival form kuśiññe. The word may be derived from Proto-Indo-European *keuk "shining, white". The Tocharian B word akeññe may have referred to people of Agni, with a derivation meaning "borderers, marchers". One of the Tocharian A texts has ārśi-käntwā as a name for their own language, so that ārśi may have meant "Agnean", though "monk" is also possible. Tocharian kings apparently gave themselves the title Ñäktemts soy (in Tocharian B), an equivalent of the title Devaputra ("Son of God") of the Kushans."

"Origin: J. P. Mallory and Victor H. Mair argue that the Tarim was first settled by Proto-Tocharian-speakers from the Afanasevo culture to the north, who migrated to the south and occupied the northern and eastern edges of the Tarim Basin. The Afanasevo culture itself resulted from the eastward migration of the Yamnaya culture, originally based in the Pontic steppe north of the Caucasus Mountains. The Afanasevo culture (c. 3500–2500 BC) displays cultural and genetic connections with the Indo-European-associated cultures of the Central Asian steppe yet predates the specifically Indo-Iranian-associated Andronovo culture (c. 2000–900 BC). The early eastward expansion of the Yamnaya culture circa 3300 BC is enough to account for the isolation of the Tocharian languages from Indo-Iranian linguistic innovations like satemization."

"The oldest of the Tarim mummies, bodies preserved by the desert conditions, date from 2000 BC and were found on the eastern edge of the Tarim basin. They seem to be Caucasoid types with light-colored hair. A genetic study of remains from the oldest layer of the Xiaohe Cemetery found that the maternal lineages were a mixture of east and west Eurasian types, while all the paternal lineages were of west Eurasian type. It is unknown whether they are connected with the frescoes painted at Tocharian sites more than two millennia later, which also depict light eyes and hair color."

"Later, groups of nomadic pastoralists moved from the steppe into the grasslands to the north and northeast of the Tarim. They were the ancestors of peoples later known to Chinese authors as the Wusun and Yuezhi. At least some of them spoke Iranian languages, but a minority of scholars suggest that the Yuezhi were Tocharian speakers. During the 1st millennium BC, a further wave of immigrants, the Saka speaking Iranian languages, arrived from the west and settled along the southern rim of the Tarim. They are believed to be the source of Iranian loanwords in Tocharian languages, particularly related to commerce and warfare."

"Most of the Tocharian inscriptions are based on Buddhist monastical texts, which suggests that the Tocharians largely embraced this particular religion. The pre-Buddhist beliefs of the Tocharians are largely unknown, but several Chinese goddesses are similar to the speculated Proto-Indo-European sun goddess and the dawn goddess, which implies that the Chinese influenced the pre-Buddhist beliefs of the Tocharians when they traveled on trade routes which were located in Tocharian territories."

"Tocharian B has a noun swāñco derived from the name of the Proto-Indo-European sun goddess, while Tocharian A has koṃ, a loanword etymologically connected to the Turkic sun goddess Gun Ana. Besides this, they might have also worshipped a lunar deity (meñ-) and an earth one (keṃ-). The murals found in the Tarim Basin, especially those of the Kizil Caves, mostly depict Jataka stories, avadanas, and legends of the Buddha, and are an artistic representation in the tradition of the Hinayana school of the Sarvastivadas."

"When the Chinese Monk Xuanzang visited Kucha in 630 CE, he received the favours of the Tocharian king Suvarnadeva, the son and successor of Suvarnapushpa, whom he described as a believer of Hinayana Buddhism. In the account of his travel to Kucha (屈支国) he stated that "There are about one hundred convents (saṅghārāmas) in this country, with five thousand and more disciples. These belong to the Little Vehicle of the school of the Sarvāstivādas (Shwo-yih-tsai-yu-po). Their doctrine (teaching of Sūtras) and their rules of discipline (principles of the Vinaya) are like those of India, and those who read them use the same (originals)."

Now, based from these excerpts, you should have gotten the term "People of Agni", to which they categorize as "Tocharian B". However, they also state that the people would have connections to Buddhism, and may have another religion based on the Sun Goddess worship. It surprises me how they didn't connect the dots based on the God of fire (AGNI), to the People themselves (which could be deliberate). Obviously, in the Bible states that the Children of Israel's God fits the description to AGNI of the Rig Vedas.

Now, based from the description of the Tocharian people, they would show them as having red hair in most of the Asian arts. Now, they state there could be a Turkic-Iranian connections to the People, and to which they would have stemmed from Iran or some place around that region. Now, based on the Biblical perspective, Jacob's two wives came his mother's tribe, and then there are the two maids to which he had children as well. But then I can see how the Israelites had also intermingled with the neighboring tribes and nations, to which some didn't cast nor destroy from the lands.

Then there is Jacob's brother Esau, to which was described as being "red and hairy", while Jacob was smooth skinned. So, could the Esau's people have red hair as well? And thus, lived with the tribes of the Israelites? I have heard stories based on the birth of Genghis khan to having reddish hair and grey eyes as well. If that is the case, then of course, the people would had to be of the Eurasian stock, as they are heavily blended with oriental features and reddish/blonde hair from Russia and Eastern Europe. This could be where Jacob's mother's tribe be based from, as she told him to get a wife from that region of the world. 

But based from the "Persian" Empire, this is where the Reubenites was supposed to have reside, as the lands of Iran, Afghanistan and Central Asia. However, there are other people that are supposed to have lived in that region like the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Ishmaelites, and the Children of Esau. Then the people that are written down as the "Canaanites" in the Bible, to which the Israelites were fighting against would definitely be the Dravidian and black tribes in that region.

(Interesting enough, I have seen Chinese Bakery shops called "Canaan Bakery" and such. Whatever the connections, the lands of China and India are the considered lands of Canaan that the God of fire brought them to)

Now, the Kingdom of Reuben are really be based from the West side of the Indus River, to which leads to the great Persian Empire. However, nowadays with today's History, they will try to make them seperated from the other Kingdoms. I remember reading a book (to which I want to find again) that details the "similarites" between Genghis Khan and King David in the Bible. But what I remember the most was that Genghis Khan would detail "The Mandate of Heaven", while others would qoute how he was "sent by God to punish the nations" etc. However, I have also heard and read from these "said" History books that Genghis Khan would drink from the skulls of their enemies, and do other murderous and crazy things. He was said to have fought against Islam, while other state that he converted to Islam. 

Now, based from "Islam", it's important to understand the difference between Ancient Islam or "Muhammedism" and the current Islam which is based on the worship of the Black Goddess Diana of the Ephesians ( because many Muslims do not know what the Black stone is really based on). After studying Islam for many years, I had found that the Children of Israel based from the Western parts of China, Central Asia (Tartarian Kingdoms), and Iran are really Muslims, but something had occured to which they had switched from praying from the original area to Mecca. Now, just because a person speaks Arabic does not mean that he or she is Arabic, for the Aryans could speak many languages, but that is the problem of today, for the Children of Israel do not recognize each other. When Joshua had came across the Jordan River (Indus River), it states that he took twelve stones to be a "marker" as the point where they came across and where the waters resided as they came over. 

Joshua Chapter 4 1And it came to pass, when all the people were clean passed over Jordan, that the LORD spake unto Joshua, saying, 2Take you twelve men out of the people, out of every tribe a man, 3And command ye them, saying, Take you hence out of the midst of Jordan, out of the place where the priests' feet stood firm, twelve stones, and ye shall carry them over with you, and leave them in the lodging place, where ye shall lodge this night."

"4Then Joshua called the twelve men, whom he had prepared of the children of Israel, out of every tribe a man: 5And Joshua said unto them, Pass over before the ark of the LORD your God into the midst of Jordan, and take ye up every man of you a stone upon his shoulder, according unto the number of the tribes of the children of Israel: 6That this may be a sign among you, that when your children ask their fathers in time to come, saying, What mean ye by these stones?"

"7Then ye shall answer them, That the waters of Jordan were cut off before the ark of the covenant of the LORD; when it passed over Jordan, the waters of Jordan were cut off: and these stones shall be for a memorial unto the children of Israel for ever. 8And the children of Israel did so as Joshua commanded, and took up twelve stones out of the midst of Jordan, as the LORD spake unto Joshua, according to the number of the tribes of the children of Israel, and carried them over with them unto the place where they lodged, and laid them down there."

"9And Joshua set up twelve stones in the midst of Jordan, in the place where the feet of the priests which bare the ark of the covenant stood: and they are there unto this day. 10For the priests which bare the ark stood in the midst of Jordan, until every thing was finished that the LORD commanded Joshua to speak unto the people, according to all that Moses commanded Joshua: and the people hasted and passed over. 11And it came to pass, when all the people were clean passed over, that the ark of the LORD passed over, and the priests, in the presence of the people."

"12And the children of Reuben, and the children of Gad, and half the tribe of Manasseh, passed over armed before the children of Israel, as Moses spake unto them: 13About forty thousand prepared for war passed over before the LORD unto battle, to the plains of Jericho. 14On that day the LORD magnified Joshua in the sight of all Israel; and they feared him, as they feared Moses, all the days of his life. 15And the LORD spake unto Joshua, saying, 16Command the priests that bear the ark of the testimony, that they come up out of Jordan."

"17Joshua therefore commanded the priests, saying, Come ye up out of Jordan. 18And it came to pass, when the priests that bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD were come up out of the midst of Jordan, and the soles of the priests' feet were lifted up unto the dry land, that the waters of Jordan returned unto their place, and flowed over all his banks, as they did before. 19And the people came up out of Jordan on the tenth day of the first month, and encamped in Gilgal, in the east border of Jericho. 20And those twelve stones, which they took out of Jordan, did Joshua pitch in Gilgal."

"21And he spake unto the children of Israel, saying, When your children shall ask their fathers in time to come, saying, What mean these stones? 22Then ye shall let your children know, saying, Israel came over this Jordan on dry land. 23For the LORD your God dried up the waters of Jordan from before you, until ye were passed over, as the LORD your God did to the Red sea, which he dried up from before us, until we were gone over: 24That all the people of the earth might know the hand of the LORD, that it is mighty: that ye might fear the LORD your God for ever."

It's supposed to be near the regions of Gilgal, to which this day is "Gilgit" Baltistan, "Kashmir", and the regions of Northern India. Now, this is also where the regions of the "Aryans of Ladhak", people of "Chitral", and other Aryan tribes was supposed to reside at: 

As you can see above, there are some with blonde hair, black hair, those that look very Central American, and those that have red hair, to those that have green eyes. Now, based from the Chapters "Aryans of America 1&2", I detail how there is a connection between the Aryans of Ladhak, the Roma People, the Yezidis, and how they are based from the lands of India and China, but also how those people had went towards the Americas as well. It seems that these could be the Gadites and some other tribes as well. 

The Reubenites was said to have been the first to be taken away from the lands, so this is where I will connect the dots. First, if Islam came from the Prophet Muhammed, but the current is based on the worship of the Queen of Heaven, then what was the "original" lslam like back then? The reason I state this is because, when I look up the "Persian Art paintings", I find the people to look like this:

In the Chapters "The real Aryans series", I detail the connections of those Jews that was scattered to Europe, and how they are really based from the lands of Central Asia. This would most likely be the reason why the Jews would have the curls hanging to the sides, because they are those remnants that was cast out of the land to Europe (The original Japanese hairstyle is the "Mizura", to which is the hair hanging down on the sides). Now, many either don't know, or are trying to hide the truth, but those lands of Palestine was ruled by the Ancient Persian Empire. These people are defintely those scattered Reubenites and Half tribe of Mannessah, that ruled over those lands. Now, this is what they have become to this day:

Now, today's Jews are seperated into three groups, one is the Sephardic (Spanish Jews), Ashkenaz (European Jews), and Mizrahi (Arab Middle Eastern looking Jews). However, based from learning about what had occured on the "dispersion", I'm finding them to actually be some of the Reubenites and Mannasites that were taken into the different lands (They are really Persians). Now, I'm going to do this one at a time based on the Persian Empire's expansion, because from this you will see how people actually look like the Iranian/Zoroastrian and Central Asian people that got scattered all over the world. 

Now, people will state that the Israelites were under Cyrus King of Persia and the Babylonians etc. However, that wouldn't be so, for the lands are "rewritten" to be somewhere else when they are not. The Assyrians of today are not the Assyrians of the Bible, the Egyptians, Babylonians are not the same as what is written down in the Bible. It is "riddled" to get people to think that's where it's located when it's not. The people got scattered, got converted to Christianity, Buddhism and the (current) Islam to destroy their identity for a reason, keeping the people from recognizing each other. There are people that state that they are Arabs, but don't know that they are not, but are the Israelites in the Bible. People can speak Arabic but are not the true Arabs. Based from Gerald Massey and Godfrey's works, the true Arabs were the Black Kushites whose cultural influenced that part of the world (and elsewhere). First let's see some of the People of Central Asia: 

If you read the Chapter "The real Aryans series", I had put up the Article that is titled "Will the real Tabernacle of Moses please stand up", to which a man calculates the measurements in the Bible, and thus comes to find out that the Tabernacle is a "Yurt". This was one of the turning points to this website to which "solidifies", who the people of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are. The Mongolian Turkic style house called "Yurts", is the real Tabernacle of Moses. Then comes the Uyghur people of the Western China region:

These people are those from Western China called Uyghurs. Now, it is said that they are not considered Chinese, but more of the Turkic people. Though, I can't state that the Turkish people have a specific look for there are many with the Eurasian blood altogether, however, from what the Bible states of the Israelites fighting each other, this would be very common to this day. Now, based on Communist China, and what they are doing to the Uyghur people is terrible, and thus not recognizing that the people went towards China to be called "Chinese", "Koreans", and Japanese", when these wouldn't really be their names at all. If a nation comes into another's territory, wouldn't that previous nation also be called Chinese as well? Or "Native American"? Or "European?" After the Israelites came over the River, it is said that they had fought against the "people of Jerusalem", meaning that these lands was already named Jerusalem "prior" to the Aryan arrival. So again, these names doesn't define them if it has been "adapted" when coming into the lands.