So, the best way to start this is by studying the God of fire in the bible and how He connects to all mythologies. And I’ve already shown who the God of fire is through Hinduism and the Japanese myths, as He is Agni with the braided red hair connecting to the Japanese Acala/Fudo myoo (See "The God of fire").
Then from there comes the documentary on BBC about the Brahmins of India, to which states on the legend (as indicated in the Rig Vedas) of being led by the God of fire into new lands towards the lands India and China. All of this evidently puts the notion that the Bible has nothing to do with the Middle East, but is towards the lands of India and China.
And then there is "Jacob’s dream" and the "pillar of God", to which he erected to honor, proves by its description of where he went and why he did this. Then of course, there is the practice of Moloch, to which is basically fire walking (See "The Black God"), is described as the Murugan festival in India.
Now, before heading forward, I want to consider a great man by the name of Benjamin Freedman, who was a Catholic Jew, and is known for his speech called the “Balfour Declaration Act.” In his speech, he gives further details of how the Zionist Jews formed an agreement with Britain, and how they would get the land of Palestine as a place for them to settle. Then he also states, how they all converted to Judaism coming from the lands of Khazaria in the black sea region along with a different culture (not all Jews are considered "Zionist", and I can't consider all of them to be of the Children of Israel, but are people from other nations).
Based from his speech of what truly occured in World War 2, he states this interesting segment. He states how they would "worship some phallic stone", and how he deemed it to be "distgusting". However, even if he did not know why they do this, this phallic worship was what Jacob did to honor the God of the pillar in Genesis 28, 31 and 35. And based from this description details where they really came from, and how this will give me more leverage in this chapter.
Now, to understand this whole situation, I needed to study the “Aryan Invasion Theory.” Though it is written in the bible that they had come across the red sea, and then to the lands of modern day Israel, however, the description and symbolism clearly directs to Hinduism. As the Rig Vedas states, the people that are called "Aryans", (or Puru) are said to have entered China and India with their God Agni. Then upon entering the land (as they cross the "Hindus River") had fought the other nations, that had their own culture and their gods in the lands. This is synonymous to the four books of Moses, as it details the Israelites doing the same thing, as they going over the Jordan river.
Now, the from the stories of Exodus to Deuteronomy, shows that they were "plundering and destroying" villages left and right, based from the orders of the God of fire. In Deuteronomy details that their God Agni, was the one who even took down their kingdoms, as soon as they crossed the Jordan river.
In Deuteronomy 9:1 and 3 states this “Hear oh Israel: Thou art pass over Jordan this day, to go in to possess nations greater and mightier than thyself, cities great and fenced up to heaven. Understand therefore this day, that the Lord thy God is He which goeth before thee; as a consuming fire He shall, and He shall bring them down before thy face: so shalt thou drive them out, and destroy them quickly as the Lord hath said unto thee”
Now, let’s look at the Rig Vedas on Agni and see the comparisons: R.V. 6.5.6 “Do this, O Agni, when we urge thee, quickly, triumphant in thy might subdue our foemen. When thou art praised with words and decked with brightness, accept this chanted hymn, the singer's worship” R.V.7.5.3 states “For fear of the forth fled the dark hued races, scattered abroad, deserting their possessions; when, Oh Vaiashvanara, for Puru (Aryan) thou Agni didst light up and rend their castles.” Thou dravest the Dasyus from their home, O Agni, and broughtest forth broad light to light the Ārya” R.V.5.14.4 “Agni shone bright when born, with light killing the Dasyus and the dark: He found the Kine, the Floods, the Sun.”
Now the term Dasyus applies to the black nations (as well as the other nations) that were there prior to their arrival. Here the Britannica states this on the term "Dasyus": "Dasyu, Sanskrit dāsa (“servant”), an aboriginal people in India who were encountered by the Indo-European-speaking peoples who entered northern India about 1500 BCE. They were described by the Indo-Europeans as a dark-skinned, harsh-spoken people who worshipped the phallus."
"Some Western scholars who view the lingam (a Hindu votary object) as a phallic symbol have conjectured that it originated with the dasyu; others hold that this description of the dasyu may have referred to their sexual practices. The dasyu lived in fortified places from which they sent out armies. They may have been among the Shudras, or labourers, who served the three higher classes— Brahman (priests), Kshatriya (warriors), and Vaishya (merchants)—from whose ritual communion they were excluded."
Interesting enough, Deuteronomy 12:3 states this “And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.”
When learning about the "pillar" worship, I would have conflicts as to which God this Pillar is being addressed to. In the Chapter Stairway to Heaven, I detail how Genesis 28 shows Jacob erecting a pillar towards a certain God, and Abraham in Genesis 21:33 planting a grove. Apparently, the "grove" worship is a practice towards Baal, and is not affiliated with the God of fire who states that He hates groves. And as for the pillars, it appears that the Gods in the lands have their pillars, and based on this particular God's orders, wanted them destroyed and their names blotted out.
Now, to further the evidence of the "Black Dasyus" of India, this is further introduced in the Documentary called "Skeletons in the Cupboard", to which details the Red haired people in New Zealand. However, in this show details a small segment about the people called "Tuhoe", studied by Elsdon Best, and how they have a History mirgating from the hot country of India. And due to the cause of the Exodus, details that they warred against the Dark skinned folks of India. This is further shown that one of the members, was shown to have DNA going to the lands of Persia (See "Persian Connection 1 and 2").
So, as Deuteronomy states, when they started to cross over the Indus river, their God "AGNI" came before them destroying their castles and fortresses (as the Rig Vedas states). But lets' connect this to Sir Godfrey Higgins' book (The "Anacalypsis") about the black Gods and the black people of the land, as this will unfold the truth of what occured in this part of History.
VOLUME I - BOOK IV - CHAPTER I Page 135 "For reasons which the reader will soon see, I am inclined to think that Osiris was not the copy of Cristna, but of the earlier God, Buddha. That by Osiris was meant to Sun, it is now allowed by every writer who has treated on the antiquities of Egypt. Mr. Maurice, as the reader sees, states him to have been black and that the Mnevis, or sacred bull, of Heliopolis, the symbol of Osiris, was also black. Osiris is allowed, also, to be the Seeva of India,* one of the three persons of the Indian God—Bramha, Vishnu or Cristna, and Seeva, of whom the bull of the zodiac was the symbol."
"Maurice, Ant. Ind. It is curious to observe the number of trifling circumstances which constantly occur to prove the identity of the Hindoos and Egyptians, or rather the Ethiopians. The word Nile, in the Indian language, means black. … But the name of Nile was a modern one, (comparatively speaking,) a translation of the ancient name of this river, which last Siri. … Page 136 The ancient name, as we have said, was Sir, or Siri, the same as O-sir, or Osiris, who was always black; after whom it was called, and by whom was meant the sun. Thus it was called the river of the sun, or the river sun, or the river of Osiris—as we say, the river of the Amazons, or the river Amazon." "… Page 137 I have some suspicion that O-siris is a Greek corruption; that the name ought, as already mentioned, to be what is called by Hellanicus, Ysiris or Isiris, and that it is derived from, or rather I should say is the same as, Iswara of India. Iswara and Isi are the same as Osiris and Isis—the male and female procreative powers of nature. ... Eusebius says the Egyptians called Osiris, Surius, and that, in Persia, was the old name of the sun. Page 138 Osiris and his Bull were black; all the Gods and Goddesses of Greece were black: at least this was the case with Jupiter, Bacchus, Hercules, Apollo, Ammon."
"The Goddesses Venus, Isis, Hecati, Diana, Juno, Metis, Ceres, Cybile, are black. The Multi-mammia is black in the Campidoglio at Rome, and in Montfaucon, Antiquity explained. On the colour of the Gods of the ancients, and of the identity of them all with the God Sol, and with the Cristna of India, nothing more need be said. The reader has already seen the striking marks of similarity in the history of Cristna and the stories related of Jesus in the Romish and heretical books. He probably will not think that their effect is destroyed, as Mr. Maurice flatters himself, by the word Cristna in the Indian language signifying black, and the God being of that colour, when he is informed, of what Mr. Maurice was probably ignorant, that in all the Romish countries of Europe, in France, Italy, Germany, &c., the God Christ, as well as his mother, are described in their old pictures and statues to be black."
"The infant God in the arms of his black mother, his eyes and drapery white, is himself perfectly black. ... There is scarcely an old church in Italy were some remains of the worship of the BLACK VIRGIN and BLACK CHILD are not to be met with. Very often the black figures have given way to white ones, and in these cases the black ones, as being held sacred, were put into retired places in the churches, but were not destroyed, but are yet to be found there. ... They are generally esteemed by the rabble with the most profound veneration.
BOOK I - CHAPTER IV in "The Anacalypsis" page 51 states this: "… but I shall, in the course of this work, produce a number of extraordinary facts, which will be quite sufficient to prove, that a black race, in very early times, had more influence over the affairs of the world than has been lately suspected; and I think I shall shew, by some striking circumstances yet existing, that the effects of this influence have not entirely passed away. It was the opinion of Sir William Jones, that a great nation of Blacks* formely possessed the dominion of Asia, and held the seat of empire at Sidon. These must have been the people called by Mr. Maurice Cushites or Cuthites, described in Genesis; and the opinion that they were Blacks is corroborated by the translators of the Pentateuch, called the Seventy, constantly rendering the word Cush by Ethiopia. …"
"Of this nation we have no account; but it must have flourished after the deluge. … If I succeed in collecting a sufficient number to carry conviction to an impartial mind, the empire must be allowed to have existed. The religion of Buddha, of India, is well known to have been very ancient. In the most ancient temples scattered throughout Asia, where his worship is yet continued, he is found black as jet, with the flat face, thick lips, and curly hair of the Negro."
"Several statues of him may be met with the East-India Company. There are two exemplars of him brooding on the face of the deep, upon a coiled serpent. To what time are we to allot this Negro ? He will be proved to have been prior to Cristna. He must have been prior to or contemporaneous with the black empire, supposed by Sir William Jones to have flourished at Sidon. The religion of this Negro God is found, by the ruins of his temples and other circumstances, to have been spread over an immense extent of country, even to the remotest parts of Britain, and to have been professed by devotees inconceivably numerous. …"
Page 57 states: "Mr. Wilsford, in his treatise on Egypt and the Nile, in the Asiatic Researches, informs us, that many very ancient statues of the God Buddha in India have crisp, curly hair, with flat noses and thick lips; and adds, "nor can it be reasonably doubted, that a race of Negroes formerly had power and pre-eminence in India." This is confirmed by Mr. Maurice, who says, "The figures in the Hindoo caverns are of a very different character from the present race of Hindoos : their countenances are broad and full, the nose flat, and the lips, particularly the under lip, remarkably thick."
"… Justin states, that the Phœnecians being obliged to leave their native country in the East, they settled first near the Assyrian Lake, which is the Persian Gulf; and Maurice says, "We find an extensive district, named Palestine, to the east of the Euphrates and Tigris. The word Palestine seems derived from Pallisthan, the seat of the Pallis or Shepherds."
"Palli, in India, means Shepherd. … It is a well-known fact that our Hindoo soldiers when they arrived in Egypt, in the late war, recognized the Gods of their country in the ancient temples, particularly their God Cristna. The striking similarity, indeed identity, of the style of architecture and the ornaments of the ancient Egyptian and Hindoo temples, Mr. Maurice has proven beyond all doubt. …" (You can see "The Black God" series for further investigation)
Page 59 continuing… "In my Essay on The Celtic Druids, I have shewn, that a great nation called Celtæ, of whom the Druids were the priests, spread themselves almost over the whole earth, and are to be traced in their rude gigantic monuments from India to the extremities of Britain. Who these can have been but the early individuals of the black nation of whom we have been treating I know not, and in this opinion I am not singular. The learned Maurice says, "Cuthites, i. e. Celts, built the great temples in India and Britain, and excavated the caves of the former." And the learned Mathematician, Reuben Burrow, has no hesitation in pronouncing Stonehenge to be a temple of the black, curly-headed Buddha." (Seems like they have traveled all the way to Ireland, in which reveals the true origin of Christianity)
VOLUME I - BOOK V - CHAPTER I Page 161 "The figure in the plates numbered 8, descriptive of Buddha or Cristna, is given by Mons. Creuzer. The following is the account given of this plate by Mons. Guigniault :* Crichna 8e avatar ou incarnation de Vichnou, sous la figure d'un enfant, allaité par Devaki, sa mère, et recevant des offrandes de fruits; près de là est un groupe d'animaux rassembés dans une espèce d'arche. La tête de l'enfant-dieu, noir, comme indique son nom, est ceinte d'une auréole aussi bien que celle de sa mère. On peut voir encore, dans cette belle peinture, Buddha sur le sein de Maya."** * 61, xiii."
"Of the two trays which are placed by the figure with the infant, one contains boxes, part of them exactly similar to the frankincense boxes now used in the Romish churches, and others such as might be expected to hold offerings of Myrrh or Gold. The second contains cows, sheep, cattle, and other animals. If my reader has ever seen the exhibition of the nativity in the church of the Ara Cœli at Rome, on Christmas-day, he will recollect the sheep, cows, &c., &c., which stand around the Virgin and Child. It is an exact icon of this picture. Hundreds of pictures of the Mother and Child, almost exact copies of this picture, are to be seen in Italy and many other Romish countries. … But yet there is one circumstance of very great importance which is peculiar to Buddha, and forms a discriminating mark between him and Cristna, which is, that he is continually described as a Negro, not only with a black complexion, in which he agrees with Cristna, but with woolly hair and flat face."
"M. Creuzer observes, that the black Buddha, with frizzled or curled hair, attaches himself at the same time to the three systems into which the religion of India divides itself. Mr. Moore, on his woolly head, says, "Some statues of Buddha certainly exhibit thick Ethiopian lips;* but all woolly hair : there is something mysterious, and unexplained, connected with the hair of this, and only of this, Indian deity. The fact of so many different tales having been invented to account for his crisped, woolly head, is alone sufficient to excite suspicion, that there is something to conceal—something to be ashamed of; more than meets the eye."
"The lips are often tinged with red to shew that the blackness does not arise from the colour of the bronze or stone of which the image is made, but that black is the colour of the God. ** Moore's Pantheon, p.232. The reason why Buddha is a Negro, at least in the very old icons, I trust I shall be able to explain in a satisfactory manner hereafter. The Brahmins form a species of corporation, a sacerdotal aristocracy, possessing great privileges; but the Buddhists have a regular hierarchy; they form a state within a state, or a spiritual monarchy at the side of a temporal one. "They have their cloisters, their monastic life, and a religious rule. Their monks form a priesthood numerous and powerful, and they place their first great founder at their head as the sacred depositary of their faith, which is transmitted by the spiritual prince, who is supported by the contributions of the faithful, from generation to generation, similar to that of the Lamas of Thibet."
"M. Creuzer might have said, not similar to, but identical with the Lama himself; who, like the Pope of Rome, is God on Earth, at the head of all, a title which the latter formerly assumed. Indeed the close similarity between the two is quite wonderful to those who do not understand it. The monks and nuns of the Buddhists, here noticed by M. Creuzer, take the three cardinal vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience,—the same as the monks and nuns of the European Christians. This singular fact at once proves the identity of the orders in the two communities, and that they must have had a common origin. I know not any circumstance of consequence in their economy in which they differ."
In J. A. Rogers' book "Nature Knows no Color-line" states this in Chapter "Where did the color problem originate? And Why?. Here he goes through mentions of finding the root (or roots) of the prejudice shown throughout History. Since reading this first chapter I wanted to reveal what he states on the Aryan invasion to India. "The first recorded instance of color prejudice I have been able to find is in India of some five thousand years ago when the Aryas or Aryans, invaded the valley of the Indus and found there a black people- the Dasysus. In any case we find very clear evidence of it in Aryan writings. In the Rig Veda (Book9 Hymn 42:1) Indra, their national God, is depicted as "blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the black skin which Indra hates." The black were called "Anasahs" (noseless people). Book 5 Hymn 29:10, tells how Indra "slew the flat-nosed barbarians."
"India's caste system was based on color. The word varna (caste) literally means "color". Arya Varna (white skin); Krishna varna (black skin). "The Aryans of India", says the Encyclopedia of religion and Ethics, "prided themselves on their fairer skins and more aquiline features and held in derision the black color and flatter physiognomies of the aborigines, regarded them much as conquering whites regared blacks in Africa."
This is where the Aryan invasion is based on as the God of fire, leads the people into the lands of India and China to overthrow the original inhabitants of those lands, namely the black skinned and flat nosed races living there. This is where things get interesting based from J. A. Rogers' book just as I had stated on the "emnity" between the Garuda and the Naga, is based on this feature alone, as the story states of one God's battles against the other God. This shows further that the original symbolism of the Aryans and before the intermingling and changes to much of their features, were depicted as having sharp features like that of the bird (as I will detail later on in the next Chapter), hence the Garuda, whereas the dragon god or Naga would be refered to the black nations for their apparent negroid features. Interesting enough, here states that they are referenced as "Krishna varna", which in obvious terms Krishna is a black God by origin and is based on "Christ".
A little excerpt details this segment: 2) The Aborigines were not the Barbarians Aryan legends say they were. These blacks, now known as "Dravidians", had a mighty civilization of their own. From them came the Buddhas, James Bird (Historical Researches on the Origin of the Buddhas) says, "Buddhist of a black complexion are common in the Fresco paintings of Ajunta and that of the Arishtanemi, or race of Vishnu, who is the twenty second Jain saint is described as of a black complexion on the authority of the Hemachandras vocabulary".
As stated, there are large amount of factors connecting Krishna, Vishnu and the Black Buddha together, even before the start of the Aryans changing that part of the History. Here he does mention with this note, Godfrey Higgin's "The Anacalypsis" and the origin of Christianity from Buddhism. He does mention this interesting segment from Gerald Massey's works. "The next evidence of it I have been able to find is in Ancient Egytp. Herald Massey, perhaps the greatest of all authoriest on Ancient Egyptian Lore, said "On the monument the dark people are commonly called "the evil race of Kush", but when the Ethiopian element dominates the dark people retort by calling the light complexions, the pale, degraded race of Arvad." (4) But this prejudice of fair for dark and the converse was, it is safe to say, never nearly as strong as in India. The whites did not come in any considerable number of Egypt until the Ptolemaic invasion of the third century B.C., by which time inermixture had already taken too firm a root for any aprecciable degree of color prejudice, as I shall show later..."
This evidence will prove that these are the black people of the lands of India and China "prior" to arrival of the Aryans.
Let’s look at Numbers 34:51-53 “Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, when ye are passed over Jordan into the land of Canaan: Then ye shall drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you, and destroy all their pictures, and destroy all their molten images, and quite pluck down all their high places: And ye shall dispossess the inhabitants of the land, and dwell therein: for I have given you the land to possess it.”
Deuteronomy 2:25,34,35 “This day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear report of thee, and shall tremble, and be in anguish because of thee. And we took all his cities at that time, and utterly destroyed the men, and the women, and the little ones, of every city we left none to remain, Only the cattle we took for a prey unto ourselves, and the spoil of the cities which we took.”
2:4-7 of Deuteronomy “And we took all his cities at that time, there was not a city which we took not from them, threescore cities (60) all the region of Ar’gob, the kingdom of Og in bashan, All these cities were fenced with high walls, gates and bars; beside un-walled towns a great many. And we utterly destroyed them, as we did unto Sihon king of Hesh’bon, utterly destroying the men, women and children, of every city. But all the cattle, and the spoil of the cities, we took for a prey.” You see, in the scriptures shows that they were taking the cattle of land and pillaging the cities, as the God of fire led them into the lands of India and China.
Based on the Giants, the Bible details that prior to crossing the Jordan River (as the Hindus River), there were Giants in the Lands to which they had to fight against. In Deuteronomy 9 details that AGNI, who is called "The Consuming fire", is shown destroying them right before their eyes. There are rumors and stories of Giant red haired people, residing in the lands of Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. (See "Red Haired Giants" and "The God of Fire")
However, before the Israelites went over the Hindus river, the three tribes, Reuben, Gad and the half tribe of Manasseh, was said to have the lands before they crossed the Hindus River (Jordan River), to which would be the lands of Afghanistan, Iran and the Stans. So, the Bible states that Moses gave them the lands, but only after they helped their brethren to destroy the nations from the Hindus river to China. However, as the Bible states, Moses apparently, couldn't go over the Indus river, but died in the land of Moab, to which is possibly the lands of Pakistan.
So, as the Israelites came across and started to destroy the different nations in the land, they had taken the lands of Gilgal to the lands of Israel (which is Gilgit Baltistan to Nepal, Tibet, North India, all of China, Korea, Japan, Thailand and then southwards to Indonesia).
Now another connection may indicate their travels, are these mysterious altar-like stones called "Dolmens". In Deuteronomy 27:2-6 states this “And it shall be, on the day when ye shall pass over Jordan unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, that thou shalt set thee up great stones, and plaister them with plaister. And thou shalt write upon them all the words of this law, when thou art passed over, that thou mayest go in unto the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, a land that floweth with milk and honey; as the Lord God of thy fathers hath promised thee."
"Therefore, it shall be when ye be gone over Jordan, that ye shall set up these stones, which I commanded you this day, in mount Ebal, an altar of stones: thou shalt not lift up any iron tool upon them. Thou shalt build the altar of the Lord thy God of whole stones: and thou shalt offer burnt offerings thereon unto the Lord thy God.”
Joshua 8:31 “…an altar of whole stones, over which no man hath lift up any iron: and they offered thereon burnt offerings unto the Lord, and sacrificed peace offerings...” Verse 32 states “And he wrote there upon the stones a copy of the law of Moses, which he wrote in the presence of the children of Israel.” Exodus 20:25 “And if thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone: for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it.”
Now, could these be the stones that the God of fire commanded Moses and the Israelites to build? These Dolmens are said to be located along the eastside of the Black Sea, as well as Ireland, India, Korea, Northern Europe, and North Africa.
Now, most of the Dolmens are said to be located in Korea. But does this not seem like the altars that is described in the bible? And they are described as unhewn and great? (giant) Also, how did they get it up there in the first place? What was the actual purpose for these stones to being built up like this?
Then as the Rig Vedas and the Bible states, The God of fire would be the one to give wealth to the Aryan people. Deuteronomy 11:14 “That I will give you the rain of your land in due season, the first rain and the latter rain, that thou mayest gather in thy corn, and thy wine and thine oil.” And chapter 7:18 “But thou shalt remember the Lord thy God: for it is He that giveth wealth that He may establish His covenant which He sware unto thy fathers, as it is this day.”
In Deuteronomy 11:10,11,12 details the Land of Canaan (China/India) to be well watered and having hills and valleys. Does this not resemble the lands of China and the surrounding areas? "For the land , whither thou goest to possess it, is not as the land of Egypt, from whence ye came out, where thou sowedst they seed, and wateredst it with thy foot, as a garden of herbs: But the land, whither ye go to possess it, it is a land of hills and valleys, and drinketh water of the rain of heaven: A land which the Lord thy God careth for: the eyes of the Lord thy God are always upon it, from the beginning of the year even unto the end of the year."
Upon visiting places like China, Japan, India, Korea etc. I find that the Bible details the true land to be well watered, and having "mountains and valleys". This is something that I have not encountered when visiting the land of Modern Israel, to which is a complete contrast.
Now, below is a place in Western China called "Jiaohe" which was a big city that was built upon a cliff of a plateau. There is a documentary based on this particular place, and states how this place didn't need walls, because it was built on the natural wall-like cliffs before the Mongols had destroyed it.
However, the interesting part was when the man doing the Documentary pronounces the city "Jiaohe" as "Jiaoheo", like it's the city of Jericho that the Israelites had sacked when they went over the Jordan river. Is this a coincidence that the Mongols had destroyed this place, as well the Israelites also had destroyed the walls of Jericho?
Then there is the description of the apparels that the women in India would wear, in Isaiah 3:16,18-23 states “...and making a tinkling with their feet: In the day, the Lord will take away their tinkling ornaments about their feet, and their cauls, and their round tires like the moon. The chains, and the bracelets and the mufflers, the bonnets and the ornaments of their legs, and the headbands, and the tablets, and the earrings. The rings and nose rings, the changeable suits of apparel, and the mantles and the wimples, and the crisping pins, the glasses, and the fine linen, and the hoods, and the veils.”
The cauls are basically the hair nets, the round tires like the moon are the necklaces they wear around their necks, the tinkling ornaments is obviously the ankle bracelets around their feet, and then states that they would have nose rings, earrings in the ears, with mantles and veils upon their heads.
Even the “Book of Mormon” details the chapter of Alma 3:13, showing the Israelites as having the “red dot” on their forehead, indicating them to be the Jews who came from India. Alma 3:13 "13Now we will return again to the Amlicites, for they also had a mark set upon them; yea, they set the mark upon themselves, yea, even a mark of red upon their foreheads."
(Hence the Indians) The red dot is called the "Bindi", which is what the Indians would ordain themselves with.
I have came across some of the symbolism that is worn and used around the world. I know that the American Indian tribes would have the swastika symbolism before the United States Government had them sign a petition to stop using the symbol during WW2. It shows that people have been brainwashed to thinking the symbol is meant for something else when it's the contrary. Here is one Photograph of one such example.
Then when learning about the Tabernacle of Moses, I came across an interesting website detailing what the "real" Tabernacle is supposed to look like, compared to the modern versions displayed nowadays. Now, based on Article "Will the real Tabernacle please stand up!" by Dean Smith states this: (openword.org Published on August 24, 2016)
Left: A model of the Traditional perception of the Tabernacle of Moses (Bibleplaces.com); Right: Andrew Hoy’s depiction of a six-story Tabernacle (Diagram Andrew Hoy) "You are probably familiar with drawings and even full-scale models (seen above on the left) displaying the Tabernacle of Moses. When Moses was given the instructions for the Tabernacle, most envisioned it as a small rectangular tent constructed to house the Ark of the Covenant (Exodus 36:8 – 39:43). This tent building served Israel for nearly 400 years, sitting for 300 years at Shiloh, until Solomon constructed the Temple. There was just a brief interlude when David constructed a tabernacle for the Ark of the Covenant (1 Chronicles 15:1)."
"But recently Andrew Hoy, a mechanical engineer from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has challenged this traditional notion of what the Tabernacle looked like by suggesting it was instead a larger tent, nearly six stories high. According to Breaking Israel News, Hoy’s journey started when he left the Lutheran church he was attending in America to study Hebrew at a Jewish seminary in Israel. He wanted to learn the original language to better understand the Old Testament. As he looked at the passages describing the Tabernacle, he began to envision something much different from long-held opinions."
"Moses was instructed to create 11 large sheets of cloth, four cubits by 30 cubits in size, with rings on each end. When they were told to join the sheets together, most traditionally thought they made one large rectangular sheet. This was then laid over a small rectangular building (seen right). However, this resulted in a multilayered covering leaving some sheets with un-joined edges. Hoy wondered if instead these massive sheets were intended to create a single layered and ultimately much larger tent."
"As he worked on this new design, Hoy ended up with a ten-sided decagon similar to the Mongolian Yurts. One of the first things Hoy noticed is that the circumference of the lower layer was 314 cubits.The sheets when laid out were 315 cubits, but Israel was told to fold an end, leaving it 314 cubits. This is the mathematical π — pi that expresses the ratio of a circle’s circumference to its diameter. It is the mathematical representation of a circle."
"Secondly, he noted is that there were very specific references on how much material could be used in construction. For example, they were told to use 100 talents of silver (1,100 pounds). As Hoy studied the full-scale models made of the Tabernacle, he saw they used more wood and silver to secure it on the outer fence than the Scripture allowed. Rather than using the wood for large posts secured in the ground with heavy silver foundations, he believes the silver and brass were intended for the struts forming the dome’s inner structure over which the tent was laid."
"When he studied the fence used to create the court-yard that surrounded the Tabernacle, Hoy envisioned a more circular fence structure. Using the Biblical description of a 100 cubits long as its diameter and 50 cubits wide as the radius, it easily surrounded the Tabernacle inside. Hoy then used a computer program to create a tent and fence that meticulously met both the Biblical quantities and descriptions while at the same time followed engineering principles. This new Tabernacle ended up being six stories high, a much more imposing structure than traditionally envisioned. As Israel camped around the large tent, it would be visible to nearly every one, no matter how far back they were."
Overlaying Hoy’s design of the Tabernacle over the traditional view. "Source: Andrew Hoy According to Hoy, similar to the Mongolian Yurt, the Tabernacle’s rounded shape would stand up to the winds better than a rectangular construction. Hoy’s perception of the Tabernacle is unique and will certainly challenge many long-held perceptions of what it actually looked like."
"World’s largest Mongolian Yurt in Turkmenistan. Photo: Amustard/Wikipedia" It’s pretty cool as you see the design to be that of the Mongolian yurts. (This is the largest Yurt in Turkmenistan) Then there is the similar set up by the Indigenous tribes in America.
Now, upon seeing this Article, this can heavily confirm that the Mongolian people (as the Stans) would be the Children of Israel (Aryans) in the Bible, and that Genghis Khan is the Biblical King David.
So, upon learning new information overtime, I start to see that the three supposed Abrahamic faiths of "Christianity, Judaism, and Islam", are mere sub categories from the religion of Hinduism. When listening to Jordan Maxwell's talks on "Gnostic warrior #13 (Angels, Aliens and Demons), he details that Abraham never started the three religions, but is really based on the Brahmans, thus Brahma and Sarasvati. When learning about this (of course, I had to do my own research), I start to see that Brahma is Abram (or Abraham), and his wife Sara is Sarasvati the Goddess consort. Things are breaking down to the religion of Hinduism being the source of where the Bible is based from, and thus destroys the narrative and plagarized forms of religions of today.
Now, when looking up today's people called the Jews, I start to see that some do have the resemblance to the Indians, Persian and Chinese people. I had recently found that some of the Italians are actually the Jews that were taken from the Middle East (Specifically the lands of Persia and Central Asia), and is why they would look like the Iranians, Indians and North Africans.
I had originally thought that the Moors (the Black people) were the ones who came and intermingled with the people, thus changing the genetic identity of the Italians, but this is only partly the truth. If you read about the captivities in the Bible, you will see that the Babylonians, Assyrians, Chaldeans, even the Edomites (and even the tribe of Ephriam enslaving their own brethren), mostly were taken captive out of the "real" lands of Israel, which are the lands of Iran, Central Asia, India and China.
It seems that some of these Israelites are now called "Italians", but are not the original Italians (as mixed in), but are some of the Reubenites from the lands of Central Asia and Persia. But based on the Jews of today (as many are mixed with other nations), many do not have the true of the Aryans, but are mixed with white, Middle Eastern, and Black.
Below, I can’t forget about Netanyahu’s father, as he looks just like the people that went into India and China.
Now, let's take a look on the "Payot", to which are the curls that the Hassidic Jews would have. Personally, when I was observing the looks of the Jews, I would see the Indian and "Persian" features. In the Chapter "Persian connection 1 and 2", I detail how in the Miniature Persian art paintings would display the people as having the same curls coming down on the sides of the ears. Plus, much of the people shown in the painting resemble that of the Central Asian people of the Stans. It does the difference of beauty and apparel, and how the Children of Israel really dressed compared to now. All of this wearing the "Black and white" western wear, to the "Yamulk" is based on the Vatican Church. There is too much evidence that the Bible is based on Hinduism and the Persian religion, and not the formed modern religions of today.
Here the hairstyle of the "Yayoi" of Japan, shows the people wearing a hair lock style similar to the Payot of the Jews. There is a show in Japan detailing the "Japanese Jewish connections" and "The roots of Japan were Ancient Hebrews". However, the though they would find similarities, it rather "snubs" the fact that the Jews are the Japanese (rather the Aryans), and that their culture is what the Modern Jews have to this day (not the other way around). Here are the hairstyles:
Now, when you look at the Jews with the Phylacteries on their heads, the Japanese Yamabushi priest (mountain worshipers) would wear a similar attire. When learning about the "Cube" symbolism, I start to see how this pertains to the God of the Cube (as some pertain to the "Kabba", refering to the Goddess). However, from the Japanese stand point, I can see that it's shape is different in comparison, and will detail how this form is more towards the "Real God" in the Bible.
Leviticus 8:9 “And he put the Mitre upon him: also upon the upon the Mitre, even upon his forefront, did he put the golden plate, the holy crown; as the Lord, commanded Moses.” In China, the Emperor would be called the “Son of heaven” as he would do the animal sacrifices, and wine offerings to appease AGNI.
And yes, like I mentioned before in the bible the God of fire would eat their sacrifices and drink the wine that is given. As for the Yamabushis, I find it connects to the God of fire appearing on top of the mountain, and how Moses had to go up to meet the God of fire, thus giving him the laws to live by.
Here is the verse of the Pomegranate. (Interesting enough, the pomegranate originally was called the "Chinese apple")
In Exodus 39:24-26 states “And they made upon the hems of the robe pomegranates of blue and purple and the scarlet and twined linen. And they made bells of pure gold, and put the bells between the pomegranates upon the hem of the robe, round about between the pomegranates; A bell, and a pomegranate, round about the hem of the robe to minister in; as the Lord, commanded Moses.”
So, they would have the Mitre on their foreheads, the bells and pomegranates, in which are considered as Poms.
The Japanese headwear is called a "Tokin". Based from the Wikipedia states this: "The tokin(頭襟、兜巾、頭巾、ときん)is a small, black, box-shaped hat traditional to Japan, which Yamabushi (mountain ascetic hermits) of Shugendo wear on their foreheads. Thetokinhas been worn since the Kamakura Period (1185–1333) or the Muromachi Period (1336–1573).The tokinis one of the standard items which Yamabushi wear as a uniform. When practising "Shugendo" in the deep mountains, they wearsuzukake, yuigesaon the body, irataka nenjuon the side, atokinon the head, Kyahan on the calves, hold metalshakujōin hand, wearoi and katabakoon their back, and blow ahoragai(conch-shell horn). These sacred items may guard them from the malicious spirits, thus they are safe in the deep forests. This style was established in the Kamakura or Muromachi period, and the contemporary yamabushi keep this tradition today. Tengu, dangerous yet protective spirits of the mountains and forests, are depicted in the style ofyamabushi, and are also shown wearing the tokin."
Forms and symbolism: "The tokinis usually a small, black box-shaped hat, which is made of lacquered and hardened cloth or wood. The top of thetokinlooks like a small round tower. It has the pentagonal box shape, and twelve folds surround this pentagon.
Its pentagonal form representsgochi no hōkan, the jeweled crown of the five wisdoms, which is the crown of the buddha Vairocana. Twelve folds representjūni-innen(Twelve Nidanas); the color black represents the kleshas of human beings.
There are also different forms oftokin. Large-typetokincover the head entirely.
Tokinandzukin: "In common and modern Japanese, the wordtokinis rendered in kanji like the word zukin (頭巾), another type of Japanese headgear that mainly wraps or folds cloth to cover the head and face;however, despite being written identically,tokinandzukinare quite different.
(Now, this reveals the truth as to who the real Brahmins are in India. When look up the Brahmins, I start to see that there are changes amongst some sects, as it seems that other nations can do this practice and be called Brahmins) Now, below you will see the apparent Mitre that the Jewish priest would wear when they do the animal sacrifice and rituals, however now look to the person on the right, this is a "Brahmin" in Indonesia who has a mitre as well.
(This will continue to "The Real Aryans 2")