(Not for the faint of Heart....)

Here in this chapter, we will be going into "Adrenochrome", and what it's really all about. Here is what the Wiki states on the term "Adrenochrome": "Adrenochrome is a chemical compound with the molecular formula C9H9NO3 produced by the oxidation of adrenaline (epinephrine). The derivative carbazochrome is a hemostatic medication. Despite a similarity in chemical names, it is unrelated to chrome or chromium." 

"In vivo, adrenochrome is synthesized by the oxidation of adrenaline. In vitro, silver oxide (Ag2O) is used as an oxidizing agent. In solution, adrenochrome is pink and further oxidation of the compound causes it to polymerize into brown or black melanin compounds."

"Several small-scale studies (involving 15 or fewer test subjects) conducted in the 1950s and 1960s reported that adrenochrome triggered psychotic reactions such as thought disorder and derealization. Researchers Abram Hoffer and Humphry Osmond claimed that adrenochrome is a neurotoxic, psychotomimetic substance and may play a role in schizophrenia and other mental illnesses. In what they called the "adrenochrome hypothesis", they speculated that megadoses of vitamin C and niacin could cure schizophrenia by reducing brain adrenochrome. The treatment of schizophrenia with such potent anti-oxidants is highly contested. In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association reported methodological flaws in Hoffer's work on niacin as a schizophrenia treatment and referred to follow-up studies that did not confirm any benefits of the treatment. Multiple additional studies in the United States, Canada, and Australia similarly failed to find benefits of megavitamin therapy to treat schizophrenia. The adrenochrome theory of schizophrenia waned, despite some evidence that it may be psychotomimetic, as adrenochrome was not detectable in people with schizophrenia. In the early 2000s, interest was renewed by the discovery that adrenochrome may be produced normally as an intermediate in the formation of neuromelanin. This finding may be significant because adrenochrome is detoxified at least partially by glutathione-S-transferase. Some studies have found genetic defects in the gene for this enzyme."

Then when you look up "Adrenaline", it states this: "Adrenaline, also known as epinephrine, is a hormone and medication. Adrenaline is normally produced by both the adrenal glands and a small number of neurons in the medulla oblongata, where it acts as a neurotransmitter involved in regulating visceral functions (e.g., respiration). It plays an important role in the fight-or-flight response by increasing blood flow to muscles, output of the heart, pupil dilation response and blood sugar level. It does this by binding to alpha and beta receptors. It is found in many animals and some single-celled organisms. Polish physiologist Napoleon Cybulski first isolated adrenaline in 1895."

Then the term "Fight or Flight" states this: "The fight-or-flight response (also called hyperarousal or the acute stress response) is a physiological reaction that occurs in response to a perceived harmful event, attack, or threat to survival. It was first described by Walter Bradford Cannon. His theory states that animals react to threats with a general discharge of the sympathetic nervous system, preparing the animal for fighting or fleeing. More specifically, the adrenal medulla produces a hormonal cascade that results in the secretion of catecholamines, especially norepinephrine and epinephrine. The hormones estrogen, testosterone, and cortisol, as well as the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin, also affect how organisms react to stress. The hormone osteocalcin might also play a part. This response is recognised as the first stage of the general adaptation syndrome that regulates stress responses among vertebrates and other organisms"

Now, based from this website "The Spinoff" by Josie Adams, seperates the fact and the fiction of Adrenochrome. Here are some excerpts: ".....Where have I heard of adrenochrome? Aldous Huxley’s 1954 essay “The Doors of Perception”, written mostly about his experiences with mescaline, discusses the possibility that adrenochrome is a compound with similar effects to the psychedelic cactus. He has not taken it, and doesn’t know how one would obtain it, saying just that it’s spontaneously produced by the human body. He describes it as “a product of the decomposition of adrenaline”, which is, surprisingly, correct. There’s a brief mention of “drencrom” in the 1962 novel A Clockwork Orange, where it’s an optional addition to the cocktail (glass of milk) Moloko Plus, but probably the most cited use of the compound is in Hunter S Thompson’s Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. It might be a novel, but many assumed it was a real thing that people really did. Thompson did not explain the adrenochrome buzz in great detail, but this probably isn’t too far from his vision...It’s important for anyone reading Fear and Loathing to remember that Gonzo journalism, the writing style Thompson invented, is based around fictionalisation and exaggeration of real-life events. In the DVD commentary on the 1998 Fear and Loathing adaptation, director Terry Gilliam said Thompson told him he made the whole adrenochrome thing up."

"Does adrenochrome exist at all? Yes. Just like Huxley said, adrenochrome is a compound formed by the oxidation of adrenaline. Its main medical use is to slow blood loss by promoting clotting in open wounds. It’s available for purchase online by researchers, with most outlets stating its source is synthetic and its uses are the inhibition of COMT (which deactivates certain neurotransmitters), and the synthesis of prostaglandins (fats involved with blood clotting). When asked for comment, the University of Auckland neuropharmacology and neuroscience departments said it wasn’t on their radar. It’s got a cool name, and some medical uses, but by and large it’s not a very exciting compound. Sorry."

"Is there a hallucinogenic drug called adrenochrome? In his 1973 book Legal Highs, Adam Gottlieb described adrenochrome as being “physically stimulating” and inducing “a feeling of well-being, slight reduction of thought processes”. It’s unknown whether he ever took the drug or if this was based on hearsay. Legal Highs also contained entries on catnip and guarana, so the bar for a “high” was low. Most reports of adrenochrome throughout literature sound a lot like DMT — it’s very possible Beatniks just gave DMT the cool name “adrenochrome” and the real compound got caught up in the mix."

"Why are people talking about it now? Adrenochrome is a popular topic in conspiracy circles: it’s a drug of the Hollywood elite, it’s addictive, it’s harvested from tortured children in Satanic rituals, they reckon. The current strain of theory is that a huge amount of celebrities have come down with Covid-19 due to a tainted batch of adrenochrome. Most celebrities classified as “liberal Hollywood elite” are American or British, two nations that have been struggling to manage the Covid-19 outbreak, so it’s not hugely surprising that many have contracted the virus. Adrenochrome harvesting, according to the conspiracies, is done by: drinking blood, heart surgery, or tapping into the brainstem. The adrenal glands are located above the kidneys, so that’s probably where you really want to look."

"Why does anyone believe children are tortured to harvest adrenochrome? The blame must land on Hunter S Thompson. In Fear and Loathing, the character Dr Gonzo says: “There’s only one source for this stuff… the adrenaline glands from a living human body. It’s no good if you get it out of a corpse.” You could also argue that this conspiracy is weirdly similar to the plot of the film Monsters Inc., and maybe that’s part of the cultural background making this theory seem reasonable to some....."

It's interesting as the term "Adrenochrome", is said to be based upon these Conspiracy theories (as they state), and yet, it's also interesting on how the people trying to debunk the topic, doesn't detail certain subtle blood rituals that is used around the world. Here is the website from "" states:

"He said that since then he has been “working outside of the system” which has given him a fresh perspective, saying: “It’s difficult to comprehend, I know, and I’m sorry that I am the one to break this to you, but Hollywood is an institutionalized pedophile ring. They use and abuse kids for their own sick ‘spiritual beliefs,’ if you can even call them that. I don’t fully understand it myself, but they harvest these kids for their energy and feast on their blood. They don’t do it mercifully either, they scare the sh*t out of them before they sacrifice them. The more innocent the child, the more terrified they are, the more they thrive on it,” said the Braveheart star. What does that mean? They aren’t doing this as some form of artistic expression, they are harvesting the blood of children and eating their flesh because they think it gives them some sort of ‘life force.’"

“If the child was mentally and physically suffering when they died, then it gives them ‘extra life force. I don’t understand why they do that, but that’s what they do. Most of us have a moral compass that guides us through life, right? These people don’t have that, or if they do, it’s pointing in the opposite direction.”Gibson, who has spent the last 30 years working inside and outside of the Hollywood regime, says that the industry’s hierarchy “thrives on abuse, pain, torture, stress, and suffering. According to Gibson, the desire to inflict such abuse isn’t limited to just the elite, but only “those at the top of the food chain can afford such a ‘luxury,’” although, it’s a “goal for most people in the industry.” “Hollywood is drenched in innocent children’s blood. The references to pedophilia and cannibalism have always been there, but for years they cryptic or symbolic. I was introduced to these practices in the early 2000s and was threatened with serious repercussions should I ever speak out. And, I don’t just mean my career, I mean my life was threatened, my family’s life would be in danger. I can only talk about it now as those people, those industry executives, they’re all dead now.” “They see the blood of a sexually abused infant as the ‘ultimate prize’ and say that it’s ‘highly enriched. Babies are like a ‘premium currency’ and hold a higher value of anything else you can think of: Diamonds, drugs, caviar, you name it. They are literally trading these kids like a currency for favors, movie roles, kickbacks…”

"According to Gibson, this perversion isn’t just the latest fad but has been a deep-threaded culture in Hollywood for generations, and is something popular among both men and women. “This isn’t anything new and has been taking place since before Hollywood was even founded. If you research this phenomenon, you will find lurking in the shadows of every dark era in history. These dark, multidimensional occult practices have been used in secret societies for hundreds of years. Hollywood is being used for social programming and mind control and their message is being projected into the psyche of the American people…People everywhere.” And it’s not just Hollywood!"

Now, when reviewing Adrenochrome, we tend to get images looking like this: 

It's interesting (and Hilarious), to see images of Elites being portrayed as this, but there are many things that don't add up on the subject of Adrenochrome. Now, I can't say that there is no such thing as "Human trafficking", or "Child sacrifice" (including Human Sacrifice and the "Pizza Gate" ordeal), but as far as drinking blood and getting a high, I think there is more to this than that meets the "eye". But based from these symbols above, I already know that it has nothing to do with the being now called "Satan" by many religions, but is based on the Goddess Ashtoreth and Baal that defeated this being called the "Red Dragon". However, I began learning how people have been doing do this for hundreds (if not) thousands of years, all from enslavements, sex trafficking, cannibalism, to genocide among the killing fields. There are many cases of people doing this to appease the Gods they worship, whether they are from the Gods in the Biblical stand point or elsewhere.

(Through wars, the many deaths of soldiers is considered "Human sacrifice" as well. Plus, the Channel "ODDTV" details more on the subject of "Adrenochrome" in the title "Doctor Sleep". Here he details the connections of the villain wearing "top hat", in which I find connects to the Voodun Orisha "Baron Samedi")

Now, I have looked around the subjects on Adrenochrome, and how it's based on the subject's adrenaline being increased from the "fight or flight" response, but I know there is a lot of disinformation that is being distributed on purpose to lead many away from the real truth. Among the UFO community, there were so called "whistleblowers" who told about the Reptilians and how they drink the blood based from Adrenochrome. There were other people detailing how Baal was used for Human (child) sacrifices, and how this is being done to this very day (in which I will get to later), then to the Elites drinking blood to attain immortality and such.

I also would hear that these people are "Rh negative", and the rumor is said that they drink the blood of children. Now, from that stand point that wouldn't be true, for the Rh negatives cannot recieve Rh positive blood type into their system (either by donating or drinking), because it would be like a poison to them. An Rh negative can give blood to Rh positive, but not the other way around because it's incompatible, and the percentage of RH negatives is supposed to be around 10 to 15 percent, while the Rh positives are 90 to 85 percent. Also, the Rh negative has more copper elements than the Rh positives, in which they have more Iron elements, so again, that wouldn't make sense.

Now, I personally didn't dive into this subject until I started to learn about the "blood offerings" that are made to the Gods in the Bible. But first, let's see the infamous "Dracul", who is known as "Vlad the Impaler". Here is what the Wiki states of him: "Vlad III, most commonly known as Vlad the Impaler (Romanian: Vlad Țepeș or Vlad Dracula (/ˈdrækjələ/; Romanian: Vlad Drăculea [-ˈdrəkule̯a]; 1428/31 – 1476/77), was Voivode of Wallachia three times between 1448 and his death. He is often considered one of the most important rulers in Wallachian history and a national hero of Romania. He was the second son of Vlad Dracul, who became the ruler of Wallachia in 1436. Vlad and his younger brother, Radu, were held as hostages in the Ottoman Empire in 1442 to secure their father's loyalty."

"Vlad's father and eldest brother, Mircea, were murdered after John Hunyadi, regent-governor of Hungary, invaded Wallachia in 1447. Hunyadi installed Vlad's second cousin, Vladislav II, as the new voivode. Hunyadi launched a military campaign against the Ottomans in the autumn of 1448, and Vladislav accompanied him."

"Vlad broke into Wallachia with Ottoman support in October, but Vladislav returned and Vlad sought refuge in the Ottoman Empire before the end of the year. Vlad went to Moldavia in 1449 or 1450, and later to Hungary. Relations between Hungary and Vladislav later deteriorated, and in 1456 Vlad invaded Wallachia with Hungarian support. Vladislav died fighting against him. Vlad began a purge among the Wallachian boyars to strengthen his position. He came into conflict with the Transylvanian Saxons, who supported his opponents, Dan and Basarab Laiotă (who were Vladislav's brothers), and Vlad's illegitimate half-brother, Vlad the Monk."

"Vlad plundered the Saxon villages, taking the captured people to Wallachia where he had them impaled (which inspired his cognomen). Peace was restored in 1460. The Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed II, ordered Vlad to pay homage to him personally, but Vlad had the Sultan's two envoys captured and impaled. In February 1462, he attacked Ottoman territory, massacring tens of thousands of Turks and Bulgarians."

"Mehmed launched a campaign against Wallachia to replace Vlad with Vlad's younger brother, Radu. Vlad attempted to capture the sultan at Târgoviște during the night of 16–17 June 1462. The sultan and the main Ottoman army left Wallachia, but more and more Wallachians deserted to Radu. Vlad went to Transylvania to seek assistance from Matthias Corvinus, King of Hungary, in late 1462, but Corvinus had him imprisoned. Vlad was held in captivity in Visegrád from 1463 to 1475. During this period, anecdotes about his cruelty started to spread in Germany and Italy. He was released at the request of Stephen III of Moldavia in the summer of 1475."

"He fought in Corvinus's army against the Ottomans in Bosnia in early 1476. Hungarian and Moldavian troops helped him to force Basarab Laiotă (who had dethroned Vlad's brother, Radu) to flee from Wallachia in November. Basarab returned with Ottoman support before the end of the year. Vlad was killed in battle before 10 January 1477. Books describing Vlad's cruel acts were among the first bestsellers in the German-speaking territories. In Russia, popular stories suggested that Vlad was able to strengthen central government only through applying brutal punishments, and a similar view was adopted by most Romanian historians in the 19th century. Vlad's reputation for cruelty and his patronymic inspired the name of the vampire Count Dracula."

The term "Dracul" is based on the Dragon, or some would say "Son of the Dragon". Interesting enough, when looking up the lineage of Vlad the Impaler, it shows that his early ancestor is called "Radu Negru": "Radu Negru (born 13 February 1269) (Radu [the] Black) also known as Radu Vodă (Voivode Radu), Radu Negru, or Negru Vodă, was the legendary Great Voivode of Wallachia. According to Romanian traditions, Radu would have been the founder and ruler of Wallachia at a date around 1290. The legend was first mentioned in 17th century Cantacuzino Annals, which also state that the prince built large churches in Câmpulung and Curtea de Argeş, successive capitals of Wallachia. This is probably a confusion with Radu I of Wallachia, who reigned 1377–1383. Legends surrounding Meşterul Manole also mention Radu Negru as the commissioner of the church and blend his image with that of Neagoe Basarab, who ruled at a much later date than Radu I. Radu is a name derived from the Slavic word for "joy". Today, the name Radu is a very common name in Romania and Moldova." Interesting as he is called "Radu the Black".

Now, I know the term "Black", doesn't always necessarily mean having black skin, but instead having Black hair. This terminology has based people with Black hair to not be of "real" European origin, but rather of "Middle Eastern", "Mediterranean", or "Central Asian" descent. So, it's possible that they may connect to those that are listed. But after seeing how European History have been obscured, from hiding the origins of Christianity, to the Black rulers in Europe and their Gods, then from the term "History has been written by the rulers", shows that History are written down from their own perspectives given to the masses. Here the symbol of "Wallachia" looks like this:

"...The stories about Vlad made him the best-known medieval ruler of the Romanian lands in Europe. However, Bram Stoker's Dracula, which was published in 1897, was the first book to make a connection between Dracula and vampirism. Stoker had his attention drawn to the blood-sucking vampires of Romanian folklore by Emily Gerard's article about Transylvanian superstitions (published in 1885). His limited knowledge about the medieval history of Wallachia came from William Wilkinson's book entitled Account of the Principalities of Wallachia and Moldavia with Political Observations Relative to Them, published in 1820. Stoker "apparently did not know much about" Vlad the Impaler, "certainly not enough for us to say that Vlad was the inspiration for" Count Dracula, according to Elizabeth Miller. For instance, Stoker wrote that Dracula had been of Székely origin only because he knew about both Attila the Hun's destructive campaigns and the alleged Hunnic origin of the Székelys. Stoker's main source, Wilkinson, who accepted the reliability of the German stories, described Vlad as a wicked man. Actually, Stoker's working papers for his book contain no references to the historical figure, the name of the character being named in all draughts but the later ones 'Count Wampyr'. Consequently, Stoker borrowed the name and "scraps of miscellaneous information" about the history of Wallachia when writing his book about Count Dracula."

Now, if the story of "Dracula" is based on the "Atilla and the Huns", then when you look at the origin, they state that they came from Central Asia, Eastern Europe, to the Caucasus Mountains. They state that the Huns are considered to be Nomads, and to be synchronized with an "Iranian" people called "The Alans". Now, when you look up the word "Alans", it states this: "The Alans (Latin: Alani) were an Iranian nomadic pastoral people of antiquity. The name Alan is an Iranian dialectal form of Aryan. Possibly related to the Massagetae, the Alans have been connected by modern historians with the Central Asian Yancai and Aorsi of Chinese and Roman sources, respectively. Having migrated westwards and become dominant among the Sarmatians on the Pontic–Caspian steppe, they are mentioned by Roman sources in the 1st century AD. At the time, they had settled the region north of the Black Sea and frequently raided the Parthian Empire and the Caucasian provinces of the Roman Empire. From 215–250 AD, their power on the Pontic Steppe was broken by the Goths...." 

On the term "Aryan" states this: "Aryan is, originally, a term used as a self-designation by Indo-Iranian peoples in ancient times, in contrast to "non-Indo-Aryan" or "non-Iranian" peoples. In Ancient India, the term ā́rya- was used by the Indo-Aryan speakers of the Vedic period as a religious label for themselves, as well as the geographic region known as Āryāvarta, where the Indo-Aryan culture emerged. Similarly, ancient Iranian peoples used the term airya- as an ethnic label for themselves and in reference to their mythical homeland, Airyanem Vaejah, in the Avesta scriptures. The root also forms the etymological source of the place names Iran and Alania. Aryavarta, which meant "the home of Aryas" Although the root *h₂er(y)ós ("a member of one’s own group", in contrast to an outsider) is most likely of Proto-Indo-European (PIE) origin, the use of Arya as an ethno-cultural self-designation is only attested among Indo-Iranian peoples, and it is not known if PIE speakers had a term to designate themselves as a group. In any case, scholars point out that, even in ancient times, the idea of being an "Aryan" was religious, cultural and linguistic, not racial."

Based from the Chapter "The Real Aryans series", I detail how the invasion of the Aryans synchronizes with the East Modern Asians being led by "their" God, who is the God of fire in the Bible. Those apparent "Iranian" people that came over to those lands, are most likely those tribes that didn't cross over the Indus river, and in which stayed while the other tribes crossed over with Joshua. Those particular tribes would be the Rubenites, the Gadites, the half tribe of Manasseh, and the Ephraimites, in which most likely would connect to the Mongols and other Central Asian tribes. I can't really trust the timelines of this new History, since finding the Bible is really based on "Medieval" times. You can see "Anatoly Fomenko's" History: Fact or Fiction, as he details the problems with these said timelines.

But as far as the "torturing" and "killings", this is no different than the Biblical stand point of what the Israelites were doing. Numbers 25:4 “And the LORD said unto Moses, Take all the heads of the people, and hang them up before the LORD against the sun, that the fierce anger of the LORD may be turned away from Israel.”

Psalms 68:21 “But God shall wound the head of his enemies, and the hairy scalp of such an one as goeth on still in his trespasses.”

Numbers Chapter 31: "7And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they slew all the males. 8And they slew the kings of Midian, beside the rest of them that were slain; namely, Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor they slew with the sword. 9And the children of Israel took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods. 10And they burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire. 11And they took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beasts. 12And they brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, unto Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and unto the congregation of the children of Israel, unto the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by Jordan near Jericho. 13And Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them without the camp."

"14And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle. 15And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? 16Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD. 17Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.18But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves."

"19And do ye abide without the camp seven days: whosoever hath killed any person, and whosoever hath touched any slain, purify both yourselves and your captives on the third day, and on the seventh day. 20And purify all your raiment, and all that is made of skins, and all work of goats' hair, and all things made of wood. 21And Eleazar the priest said unto the men of war which went to the battle, This is the ordinance of the law which the LORD commanded Moses; 22Only the gold, and the silver, the brass, the iron, the tin, and the lead, 23Every thing that may abide the fire, ye shall make it go through the fire, and it shall be clean: nevertheless it shall be purified with the water of separation: and all that abideth not the fire ye shall make go through the water."

"24And ye shall wash your clothes on the seventh day, and ye shall be clean, and afterward ye shall come into the camp. 25And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 26Take the sum of the prey that was taken, both of man and of beast, thou, and Eleazar the priest, and the chief fathers of the congregation: 27And divide the prey into two parts; between them that took the war upon them, who went out to battle, and between all the congregation: 28And levy a tribute unto the LORD of the men of war which went out to battle: one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the beeves, and of the asses, and of the sheep: 29Take it of their half, and give it unto Eleazar the priest, for an heave offering of the LORD. 30And of the children of Israel's half, thou shalt take one portion of fifty, of the persons, of the beeves, of the asses, and of the flocks, of all manner of beasts, and give them unto the Levites, which keep the charge of the tabernacle of the LORD."

"31And Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the LORD commanded Moses. 32And the booty, being the rest of the prey which the men of war had caught, was six hundred thousand and seventy thousand and five thousand sheep, 33And threescore and twelve thousand beeves, 34And threescore and one thousand asses, 35And thirty and two thousand persons in all, of women that had not known man by lying with him. 36And the half, which was the portion of them that went out to war, was in number three hundred thousand and seven and thirty thousand and five hundred sheep: 37And the LORD'S tribute of the sheep was six hundred and threescore and fifteen. 38And the beeves were thirty and six thousand; of which the LORD'S tribute was threescore and twelve. 39And the asses were thirty thousand and five hundred; of which the LORD'S tribute was threescore and one."

"40And the persons were sixteen thousand; of which the LORD'S tribute was thirty and two persons. 41And Moses gave the tribute, which was the LORD'S heave offering, unto Eleazar the priest, as the LORD commanded Moses. 42And of the children of Israel's half, which Moses divided from the men that warred, 43(Now the half that pertained unto the congregation was three hundred thousand and thirty thousand and seven thousand and five hundred sheep, 44And thirty and six thousand beeves, 45And thirty thousand asses and five hundred, 46And sixteen thousand persons;) 47Even of the children of Israel's half, Moses took one portion of fifty, both of man and of beast, and gave them unto the Levites, which kept the charge of the tabernacle of the LORD; as the LORD commanded Moses."

"48And the officers which were over thousands of the host, the captains of thousands, and captains of hundreds, came near unto Moses: 49And they said unto Moses, Thy servants have taken the sum of the men of war which are under our charge, and there lacketh not one man of us. 50We have therefore brought an oblation for the LORD, what every man hath gotten, of jewels of gold, chains, and bracelets, rings, earrings, and tablets, to make an atonement for our souls before the LORD. 51And Moses and Eleazar the priest took the gold of them, even all wrought jewels."

"52And all the gold of the offering that they offered up to the LORD, of the captains of thousands, and of the captains of hundreds, was sixteen thousand seven hundred and fifty shekels. 53(For the men of war had taken spoil, every man for himself.) 54And Moses and Eleazar the priest took the gold of the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and brought it into the tabernacle of the congregation, for a memorial for the children of Israel before the LORD."

So again, the casualties of war......

Now, back to the term "Adrenochrome", here the etymology of "Blood" states this: "Old English blod "blood, fluid which circulates in the arteries and veins," from Proto-Germanic *blodam "blood" (source also of Old Frisian blod, Old Saxon blôd, Old Norse bloð, Middle Dutch bloet, Dutch bloed, Old High German bluot, German Blut, Gothic bloþ), according to some sources from PIE *bhlo-to-, perhaps meaning "to swell, gush, spurt," or "that which bursts out" (compare Gothic bloþ "blood," bloma "flower"), from suffixed form of root *bhel- (3) "to thrive, bloom." But Boutkan finds no certain IE etymology and assumes a non-IE origin."

"There seems to have been an avoidance in Germanic, perhaps from taboo, of other PIE words for "blood," such as *esen- (source of poetic Greek ear, Old Latin aser, Sanskrit asrk, Hittite eshar); also *krew-, which seems to have had a sense of "blood outside the body, gore from a wound" (source of Latin cruour "blood from a wound," Greek kreas "meat"), but which came to mean simply "blood" in the Balto-Slavic group and some other languages. Inheritance and relationship senses (also found in Latin sanguis, Greek haima) emerged in English by mid-13c. Meanings "person of one's family, race, kindred; offspring, one who inherits the blood of another" are late 14c. As the fluid of life (and the presumed seat of the passions), blood has stood for "temper of mind, natural disposition" since c. 1300 and been given many figurative extensions. Slang meaning "hot spark, a man of fire" [Johnson] is from 1560s. Blood pressure attested from 1862. Blood money is from 1530s; originally money paid for causing the death of another. Blood type is from 1928."

"That there were different types of human blood was discovered c. 1900 during early experiments in transfusion. To get blood from a stone "do the impossible" is from 1660s. Expression blood is thicker than water attested by 1803, in reference to family ties of those separated by distance. New (or fresh) blood, in reference to new members of an organization or group, especially ones bringing new ideas and fresh vigor or strength, is from 1880."

Now, if "Adrenochrome" is based on feeding fear from Children (and people), or getting the blood from this state of Adrenaline, then we should know that people also can do this to animals as well. Remember Psalms 50:13 “Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?” Does this mean that God drinks blood and eats the flesh of cattle? There are people that drink the animal's blood among several parts of the world, like the Massaai (and certain tribes) who drink Cow's blood. Now, based from them doing this, does this mean that the animal is in a state of fear, while the blood is being drained and drunk?

Now, the Massaai (and other tribes) that practice this, tends to close up the wound so that the animal doesn't die. Here in this website "", states this: "The Maasai people of southern Kenya and northern Tanzania know how to make the most of their cattle. They incorporate milk into meals, enjoy raw and cooked beef, use cowhides for bedding and dung to strengthen walls, and regularly consume cow’s blood. Both blood and milk are consumed during rituals and celebrations, such as weddings, but also serve as regular sources of calories and nutrients. In this sense, scholars view the Maasai treatment of blood as “both ordinary and sacred food.” Cattle blood is high in protein and, among the Maasai, it’s considered beneficial for people with weakened immune systems, particularly those who have just given birth, been circumcised, or fallen ill. Elders who’ve had a rough night might also reach for a cup to sober up or reduce the intensity of hangovers."

"They may drink fresh, warm blood straight after it’s drawn, use it as an ingredient in cooked dishes, or mix it with milk. Some describe it as sweet and thick, with a film that forms over the surface just seconds after collection. In order to maximize the amount of blood each cow can produce, Maasai men don’t slaughter their cows during the bloodletting. Instead, a group holds an animal down as one man nicks its jugular (typically via an arrow shot at close range) once a month. They catch the blood in a clay pot or calabash (bottle gourd) below the incision, then quickly clot the wound once the vessel is full. Smearing mud or hot ash over the cut stops the bleeding, and the animal lives to see another day. The result is sustainable bloodletting that minimizes injury."

"The bloodletting process isn’t just humane; it’s essential. Since cattle play a key role in Maasai culture, they are also a status symbol. Herd size dictates social standing, and collecting cattle is common practice. Keeping these animals alive and well provides the dairy and blood that fortifies Maasai herders and their families, both physically and culturally. Need to Know If you visit the Maasai people in Kenya or Tanzania, you may be allowed to taste some harvested blood. But please don't try this at home."

In the website "" details the "drinking of goat's blood" as a Masonic ritual: "Founded by three brothers in 1892, DeMoulin Bros. & Co. put out their final “side degree” (a term used to define other Masonic bodies or orders) catalog in 1930. The catalog offers a wide variety of sophisticated devices used to haze incoming Masonic candidates before the practice of hazing new initiations was banned some time in the 1930s. According to people familiar with Masonic history, there was a large influx of membership to the Masons following WWI. This influx drove an increase in the popularity of hazing, thus making the business of selling hazing contraptions quite profitable until the arrival of the Great Depression. Among the hazing accessories sold by DeMoulin Bros. & Co were a trick guillotine and something called “Drinking the Goat’s Blood.”

"According to well-informed Masons, “Drinking the Goat’s Blood” is culled from the expression “Kiss the Goat,” and the established Masonic acronym, GAOTU, or “Grand Architect of the Universe.” The gag-me gag is basically an amped-up version of the game we all played as kids, daring someone to drink an undisclosed glass full of something, all of it gross, or never live down the fact you wimped out."

"In the case of DeMoulin Bros. & Co.‘s “Drinking the Goat’s Blood,” they suggest the bucket be filled with all kinds of detritus like old shoes, rags, leaves, sticks, cigar butts, already-chewed tobacco, and presumably anything else that would churn the candidate’s gut. The cost of this tricked out bucket to mindfuck prospective members? A mere $12.50. But don’t trust my endorsement (because it had me at “drinking the goat’s blood”), here’s an actual testimonial about DeMoulin Bros. & Co.‘s blood bucket from Thos. Goughler, of the Amurath Siesta Princes of Bagdad “77” (a side order of the Knights of Malta) operating in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: “The paraphernalia that we have received has been very satisfactory in all ways and has proved very successful to this organization. We always look forward to putting it in action, and we have also increased our membership with the articles that we have received from your Company.”

I take it that people have been putting new "hazing" methods in these Freemasonic orders (if that is ever true). In religions like Voodun (depending who gives the ritual) among others, are shown doing animal sacrifices done with bloodletting, and afterwards blood drinking. Then there are people that do animal sacrifice by the hundreds everyday for food as well. But is this any different than people sacrificing an animal, and that animal being in the state of fear, be the same as "Adrenochrome" being deprived from humans? There are debates among people that detail how the animal should be slaughtered/sacrificed without having it to feel suffering. Among the Muslims state that the animal is considered "Halal", if it was blessed in the name of Allah as you do slice the neck with a sharp knife.

Now, from what I heard among a Sikh, states they tend to disagree with the Muslim's practice, but instead just cut the whole head off, so that the energy of it's suffering doesn't hit the blood. And based from others, just have their own ideology of lessening the suffering of the animal during the sacrifice. In China, there is a festival where a province (and other places in China) eat dog meat with Lychee fruit.

In the wiki states this: "The Lychee and Dog Meat Festival (or Yulin Dog Meat Festival) is an annual festival held in Yulin, Guangxi, China, during the summer solstice in which festival goers eat dog meat and lychees. The festival began in 2009 and spans about ten days during which thousands of dogs are reportedly consumed. The festival has drawn criticism both domestically and abroad." "The festival is celebrated annually in Yulin, Guangxi, China, during the summer solstice in June, by eating dog meat and lychees. Early on, it was reported that roughly 10,000 dogs had been consumed for each annual occurrence of the festival. This number is estimated by some to have decreased to 1,000 in 2015. The festival organizers claim that the dogs are killed humanely and that "eating dog is no different from eating pork or beef". Animal rights activists and campaigners, however, claim that the animals are treated cruelly. Some media outlets, including tabloids, have reported that dogs are intentionally tortured or boiled alive to improve the taste of their meat. A couple other reports have stated that since 2015 there has been little evidence for those allegations."

"Throughout the years, it has been studied that many of the dogs eaten appeared to be stolen household pets from local villages, judging by their collars, and sometimes by family members who identify their own pets. Despite widespread belief that dogs consumed at the festival were bred from dog farms, a study done by Animals Asia Foundation reported that most dogs that are consumed are strays or stolen pets. Approximately 70% of rural villages surveyed in China have suffered mysterious dog losses." (And these are the Aryans doing this....)

Now, based from this excerpt details the dog eating festival to be very controversial. There are ways that they tend to "boil" the dog alive, as some would think it's good for the Chi (which I call B.S.). This boiling the dog alive is in a way, similar to the "adrenochrome", as the animal is in a state of shock in the moment of being boiled alive. But fortunately, there are political groups in China that are fighting and standing against these inhumane practices in the long run.

Here are some excerpts on "Blood" in the Bible: 

Genesis 4:10 “And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground.”

Genesis 4:11 “And now art thou cursed from the earth, which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood from thy hand;”

Genesis 9:5 “And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man.”

Genesis 9:6 “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

Exodus 4:9 “And it shall come to pass, if they will not believe also these two signs, neither hearken unto thy voice, that thou shalt take of the water of the river, and pour it upon the dry land: and the water which thou takest out of the river shall become blood upon the dry land.”

Exodus 12:7 “And they shall take of the blood, and strike it on the two side posts and on the upper door post of the houses, wherein they shall eat it.”

Exodus 22:3 “If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be blood shed for him; for he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.”

Exodus 24:8 “And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the LORD hath made with you concerning all these words.”

Exodus 29:20 “Then shalt thou kill the ram, and take of his blood, and put it upon the tip of the right ear of Aaron, and upon the tip of the right ear of his sons, and upon the thumb of their right hand, and upon the great toe of their right foot, and sprinkle the blood upon the altar round about.”

Exodus 29:21 “And thou shalt take of the blood that is upon the altar, and of the anointing oil, and sprinkle it upon Aaron, and upon his garments, and upon his sons, and upon the garments of his sons with him: and he shall be hallowed, and his garments, and his sons, and his sons' garments with him.”

Leviticus 3:17 “It shall be a perpetual statute for your generations throughout all your dwellings, that ye eat neither fat nor blood.”

Leviticus 4:6 “And the priest shall dip his finger in the blood, and sprinkle of the blood seven times before the LORD, before the vail of the sanctuary.”

Leviticus 4:30 “And the priest shall take of the blood thereof with his finger, and put it upon the horns of the altar of burnt offering, and shall pour out all the blood thereof at the bottom of the altar.”

Leviticus 5:9 “And he shall sprinkle of the blood of the sin offering upon the side of the altar; and the rest of the blood shall be wrung out at the bottom of the altar: it is a sin offering.”

Leviticus 7:26 “Moreover ye shall eat no manner of blood, whether it be of fowl or of beast, in any of your dwellings.”

Leviticus 8:23 “And he slew it; and Moses took of the blood of it, and put it upon the tip of Aaron's right ear, and upon the thumb of his right hand, and upon the great toe of his right foot.”

Leviticus 8:30 “And Moses took of the anointing oil, and of the blood which was upon the altar, and sprinkled it upon Aaron, and upon his garments, and upon his sons, and upon his sons' garments with him; and sanctified Aaron, and his garments, and his sons, and his sons' garments with him.” 

Leviticus 17:14 “For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life thereof: therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.”

Leviticus 19:26 “Ye shall not eat any thing with the blood: neither shall ye use enchantment, nor observe times.”

These are just examples of blood in the Bible. The verses states that they would sprinkle blood upon the people and even the clothes of the Priest. I often wondered how much of the Bible was changed, since the Palm leaf symbol is based on Baal as an example (See "Thoth is Enoch", "Lord of Sirius 2" and "Legend of the Bird") Now, let's take the "Lamb" that was slaughtered for the sins of mankind, in which is based on Jesus Christ dying on the cross. Does this mean that due to his suffering on the cross, and being covered in his blood, that people are taking the adrenochrome in the same manner? I know they state it to be on the spiritual aspect, but even the  Matthew27 states this: "24When Pilate saw that he could prevail nothing, but that rather a tumult was made, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent of the blood of this just person: see ye to it. 25Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children." 

There are Catholic/Christian ideologies that try to spin this verse to being something else, however, after seeing how this connects to Dagon/Baal, then I know that it has nothing to do with the God of fire. So, here are some verses that details the "Blood of Jesus Christ":

Revelation 12:11 “And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.”

Revelation 7:14 “And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.”

Revelation 1:5 “And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,”

1 John 5:6 “This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.” (The life is in the Blood)

Romans 3:25 “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;”

Romans 5:9 “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.”

1 Corinthians 10:16 “The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?”

Ephesians 1:7 “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;”

Colossians 1:14 “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins:”

Hebrews 9:12 “Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.”

Hebrews 9:14 “How much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?”

Hebrews 9:22 “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission.”

1 John 1:7 “But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.”

1 Peter 1:19 “But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:”

1 Peter 1:2 “Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.”

Hebrews 12:24 “And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.”

Hebrews 12:4 “Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.”

Hebrews 10:4 “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.”

Acts 20:28 “Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.”

Now personally, I find the sprinkling of the blood to be unnecessary and distgusting. Just from the descriptions of blood being sprinkled, and put onto the altar and such, wouldn't make sense as the people would be many, with individual thoughts of wanting to do something (whether good or bad). And if there was an evil (if not many) thought and act done in the process (as God knows their hearts), then there would be a river of blood coming forth from the many sacrifices of animals from the altar (When you look up "Animal Sacrifices in India" in the Wiki, they state how there would be hundreds of animal sacrifices towards the Goddesses Durga, Kali, Shakti in Nepal and other places. It seems that animal sacrifices are more towards the Goddess worship than the male ones). Would God then just bring Jesus to sacrifice himself for man's sins early, instead of later on? If God knows the "beginning and end", then why would God "repent" from that He was going to do to the Children of Israel?

Exodus 32: "9And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: 10Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation. 11And Moses besought the LORD his God, and said, LORD, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people, which thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power, and with a mighty hand?"

"12Wherefore should the Egyptians speak, and say, For mischief did he bring them out, to slay them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth? Turn from thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against thy people. 13Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou swarest by thine own self, and saidst unto them, I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit it for ever. 14And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people."

Now, let's look at the word "Repent" in the Etymological stand point: "c. 1300, "to feel such regret for sins or crimes as produces amendment of life," from Old French repentir (11c.), from re-, here probably an intensive prefix (see re-), + Vulgar Latin *penitire "to regret," from Latin poenitire "make sorry," from poena (see penal). The distinction between regret (q.v.) and repent is made in many modern languages, but the differentiation is not present in older periods. Also from c. 1300 in Middle English and after in an impersonal reflexive sense, especially as (it) repenteth (me, him, etc.). And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. [Genesis vi.6, KJV, 1611] Related: Repented; repenting.

Now, many Christians would be ask this question, and some would state that God "knew" Moses was going to say this to Him (as he knows the Beginning and the End). But wouldn't make sense, because it shows that God knew better, but still let it happen. If this was the case, then God in the Garden,or the one called "Trinity" (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), wouldn't have state Genesis 3:22 “And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:” This means that God (or the Gods) knows Good and evil but didn't want man to know good and evil. But until man had attained that same knowledge, then they knew that he would be like "them", and if he took of the tree of life and live forever, then he would become a God just like them. That's the real reason "they" kick them out of the Garden. (See "Garden of Eden")

Here let's see the term "Repent" in the Bible: Genesis 6:7 “And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.”

Numbers 23:19 “God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?”

1 Samuel 15:29 “And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent.”

Judges 2:18 “And when the LORD raised them up judges, then the LORD was with the judge, and delivered them out of the hand of their enemies all the days of the judge: for it repented the LORD because of their groanings by reason of them that oppressed them and vexed them.”

1 Samuel 15:11 “It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments. And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night.”

2 Samuel 24:16 “And when the angel stretched out his hand upon Jerusalem to destroy it, the LORD repented him of the evil, and said to the angel that destroyed the people, It is enough: stay now thine hand. And the angel of the LORD was by the threshingplace of Araunah the Jebusite.”

Jeremiah 18:8 “If that nation, against whom I have pronounced, turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil that I thought to do unto them.”

He will "repent" of the evil that would be done unto that nation, detailing that He would "regret" or "hold back" against that person or nation etc. In the Genesis 18 states this: "20And the LORD said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous; 21I will go down now, and see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know." He states "to see whether they have done altogether according to the cry of it", meaning He came to "check" if it's true. That means that God came to check if it's true, in which conradicts from which He knows the beginning to the end.

But again, it doesn't mean that there is just one God that Abraham had met, for there is the God who also made a covenant with him as well.

1 Kings Chapter 18: "24And call ye on the name of your gods, and I will call on the name of the LORD: and the God that answereth by fire, let him be God. And all the people answered and said, It is well spoken. 25And Elijah said unto the prophets of Baal, Choose you one bullock for yourselves, and dress it first; for ye are many; and call on the name of your gods, but put no fire under. 26And they took the bullock which was given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning even until noon, saying, O Baal, hear us. But there was no voice, nor any that answered. And they leaped upon the altar which was made."

"27And it came to pass at noon, that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud: for he is a god; either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or peradventure he sleepeth, and must be awaked. 28And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them. 29And it came to pass, when midday was past, and they prophesied until the time of the offering of the evening sacrifice, that there was neither voice, nor any to answer, nor any that regarded."

Now, let's take a look into the world of "Mortification". Here the etymology states this: "late 14c., mortificacioun, "mortifying of the flesh, act of subduing the passions and appetites, suppression of bodily desires," from Late Latin mortificationem (nominative mortificatio) "a killing, putting to death," from past-participle stem of mortificare (see mortify). Meaning "death of one part of the body while the rest is still alive" is from early 15c. Sense of "feeling of humiliation" is recorded by 1640s."

"mortify (v.) late 14c., mortifien, "to kill, destroy the life of," from Old French mortefiier "destroy, overwhelm, punish," from Late Latin mortificare "cause death, kill, put to death," literally "make dead," from mortificus "producing death," from Latin mors (genitive mortis) "death" (from PIE root *mer- "to rub away, harm," also "to die" and forming words referring to death and to beings subject to death) + combining form of facere "to make, to do" (from PIE root *dhe- "to set, put"). Religious sense of "subdue the flesh by abstinence and discipline" is attested from early 15c. Sense of "humiliate, chagrin, vex" is recorded by 1690s (compare mortification). Related: Mortified; mortifying."

Now, let's look at "Self-flagellation": "Self-flagellation is the disciplinary and devotional practice of flogging oneself with whips or other instruments that inflict pain. In Catholicism, self-flagellation is practiced in the context of the doctrine of the mortification of the flesh and is seen as a spiritual discipline. It is often used as a form of penance and is intended to allow the flagellant to share in the sufferings of Jesus, bringing his or her focus to God (cf. Christian prayer). The main religions that practice self-flagellation include Christianity, Judaism, and Shia Islam. The ritual has been practiced among members of several Egyptian and Greco-Roman cults."

"Pain and suffering has always been a major part of one’s understanding of religion. Practices that induce pain have been able to transcend many different religions and cultures. While the methods used to inflict this pain may vary, the reasons behind this peculiar ritual seem to be very similar. A common goal of self-flagellation is the desire to emulate a certain prophet. Another main reason for this ritual is the idea that pain causes evil to exit the body. Self-flagellation was often seen as a form of punishment and penance. Despite the gruesome nature of this ritual, many cultures associate it with redemption and purity. While it emerged centuries ago, it is still a ritual that exists today in many parts of the world."

"Through the years, Christianity has formed a permanent tradition surrounding the doctrine of mortification of the flesh, ranging from self-denial, wearing hairshirts and chains, fasting and self-flagellation using the discipline. Many Christians use excerpts from the Bible to justify this ritual. For example, some interpreters claim that St. Paul’s statement: ‘I chastise my body’ refers to self-inflicted bodily scourging (1 Corinthians 9:27)."

"There are many prominent Christians who have practiced self-flagellation. Martin Luther, the Protestant Reformer, regularly practiced self-flagellation as a means of mortification of the flesh. Likewise, the Congregationalist writer Sarah Osborn also practiced self-flagellation in order "to remind her of her continued sin, depravity, and vileness in the eyes of God". It became "quite common" for members of the Tractarian movement within the Anglican Communion to practice self-flagellation using a discipline."

"Historically speaking, in the 11th century, Peter Damian, a Benedictine Christian monk in the Roman Catholic tradition, taught that spirituality should manifest itself in physical discipline; he admonished those who sought to follow Christ to practice self-flagellation for the duration of the time it takes one to recite forty Psalms, increasing the number of flagellations on holy days of the Christian kalendar."

"For Damian, only those who shared in the sufferings of Christ could be saved. Throughout Christian history, the mortification of the flesh, wherein one denies themselves physical pleasures, has been commonly followed by members of the clergy, especially in Christian monasteries and convents. Self-flagellation was imposed as a form of punishment as a means of penance for disobedient clergy and laity. In the 13th century, a group of Roman Catholics, known as the Flagellants, took this practice to its extreme ends. For example, it became a way to try to combat the plague through mitigation with the divine. The Flagellants were later condemned by the Roman Catholic Church as a cult in the 14th century. This ritual was also found in 16th century Japan. Japanese of the time who were converted to Christianity by Jesuit missionaries, were reported to have had sympathy for the Passion of the Christ, and they readily practiced self-flagellation to show their devotion."

"The earliest records of self-flagellation practiced by Japanese converts appeared in the year 1555 in the regions of Bungo and Hirado in Kyushu. These Japanese Christians wore crowns of thorns and bore crosses on their backs during the procession, which led to the place they had designated as the Mount of the Cross."

"Christians give various reasons for choosing to self-flagellate. One of the main reasons is to emulate the suffering of Christ during his Passion. As Jesus was whipped before his crucifixion, many see whipping themselves as a way to be closer to Jesus and as a reminder of that whipping. Many early Christians believed that in order to be closer to God, one would need to literally suffer through the pain of Christ."

"Saint Paul also alluded to inflicting bodily harm in order to feel closer to God in his letters to the Romans and to the Colossians. Self-flagellation was also seen as a form of purification, purifying the soul as repentance for any worldly indulgences. Self-flagellation is also used as a punishment on earth in order to avoid punishment in the next life. Self-flagellation was also seen as a way to control the body in order to focus only on God. By whipping oneself, one would find distraction from the pleasures of the world and be able to fully focus on worshiping God. Self-flagellation is also done to thank God for responding to a prayer or to drive evil spirits from the body (cf. Exorcism in Christianity)."

"The popularity of self-flagellation has abated, with some pious Christians choosing to practice the mortification of the flesh with acts like fasting or abstaining from a pleasure (cf. Lenten sacrifice). There is a debate within the Christian tradition about whether or not self-flagellation is of spiritual benefit, with some religious leaders condemning the practice and others, such as Pope John Paul II, having practiced self-flagellation. People who self-flagellate believe that they need to spiritually share in the suffering of Jesus, and continue this practice, both publicly and privately."

Then there is the practice before "Yom Kippur": "Another religion that participates in self-flagellation is Judaism. The Jewish community has practiced self-flagellation as a way to create a high moral standard. Many religions believe that pain and suffering leads to salvation and purity. During the Middle Ages, Jewish men would practice self-flagellation on the day before Yom Kippur. Passages such as “it shall be a holy convocation unto you; and ye shall afflict your souls” (Leviticus 23:27) were used to justify these actions. They used whips to themselves on the back 39 times. To put this into context, Norman Toby Simms explained, “Understanding what this kind of collective blood-letting means or how it functions in the middle of a civilized society is one thing — a study of the anthropology of culture, a history of religion, a deep psychological analysis of troubled souls; seeing the way in which it could be used at many levels of conscious and unconscious simulation/dissimulation by diverse groups of people seeking to deny, defer, define and redefine their place in history is another — a study, such as this, with aesthetic, dramatic and witty aims in mind."

Now, in that particular verse of Leviticus 23:27 states this: “Also on the tenth day of this seventh month there shall be a day of atonement: it shall be an holy convocation unto you; and ye shall afflict your souls, and offer an offering made by fire unto the LORD.” Now, it's not known what "afflicting the soul" actually means (as it could be fasting), but it does not state to afflict the "flesh", but the "Soul". However, if it's the same stated above, then it's no different than the Baal worship that Elijah had to deal with. Here in the etymology states this: "late 14c., "to cast down" (a sense now obsolete), from Old French aflicter, from Latin afflictare "to damage, harass, torment," frequentative of affligere (past participle afflictus) "to dash down, overthrow," from ad "to" (see ad-) + fligere (past participle flictus) "to strike," from PIE root *bhlig- "to strike" (source also of Greek phlibein "to press, crush," Czech blizna "scar," Welsh blif "catapult"). The weakened or transferred meaning "to trouble in body or mind, harass, distress," is attested from 1530s. Related: Afflicted; afflicting."

Then on the term "Soul" states this: "A substantial entity believed to be that in each person which lives, feels, thinks and wills" [Century Dictionary], Old English sawol "spiritual and emotional part of a person, animate existence; life, living being," from Proto-Germanic *saiwalō (source also of Old Saxon seola, Old Norse sala, Old Frisian sele, Middle Dutch siele, Dutch ziel, Old High German seula, German Seele, Gothic saiwala), of uncertain origin. Sometimes said to mean originally "coming from or belonging to the sea," because that was supposed to be the stopping place of the soul before birth or after death [Barnhart]; if so, it would be from Proto-Germanic *saiwaz (see sea). Klein explains this as "from the lake," as a dwelling-place of souls in ancient northern Europe. Meaning "spirit of a deceased person" is attested in Old English from 971. As a synonym for "person, individual, human being" (as in every living soul) it dates from early 14c. Soul-searching (n.) is attested from 1871, from the phrase used as a present-participle adjective (1610s). Distinguishing soul from spirit is a matter best left to theologians." 

It seems that it's more likely towards the sense of "Soul" than the flesh. Then there is a part of Deuteronomy where it details the criminal getting whipped: Deuteronomy Chapter 25 "1If there be a controversy between men, and they come unto judgment, that the judges may judge them; then they shall justify the righteous, and condemn the wicked. 2And it shall be, if the wicked man be worthy to be beaten, that the judge shall cause him to lie down, and to be beaten before his face, according to his fault, by a certain number. 3Forty stripes he may give him, and not exceed: lest, if he should exceed, and beat him above these with many stripes, then thy brother should seem vile unto thee."

Back to the "Self flagellation" in the Wiki: "Much of the Twelver Shia Islam community tries to emulate Imam Husain through self-flagellation in the same ways that the Christians tried to emulate Jesus Christ. This is exhibited through the public performance of matam. The Shia counterpart to a Christian flagellant was called a matamdar. This ritual of matam is meant to reaffirm one's faith and relationships by creating a deep bond among the participants through their shared religious devotion. Despite the violent nature of this ritual, the love and vulnerability associated with it makes it a fundamentally positive and affirmational ritual performance. Many Shia communities worldwide march in massive parades every year on the Day of Ashura, during the mourning of Muharram, to commemorate the Battle of Karbala and the martyrdom of Imam Hussein."

"During these parades, devotees hit themselves on the chest or slash themselves with blades on chains called zanjerzani. Though it is uncommon, some Shia communities hit themselves on the back with chains and sharp objects such as knives. This happens in many countries including India, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, United States, and Australia. Self-flagellation is just as controversial in Islam as it is in Christianity. There was a case in Manchester UK where a Shia family forced their children to self-flagellation, which brought condemnation upon the entire practice. Muslims responded saying that forcing your children to do this is wrong, but the practice as done by a consenting adult should not be condemned as it is essential to their faith. However, many Shia leaders realize that this practice, though only performed during Ashura, is another thing that could give the world a bad view of Muslims. Some leaders have recommended donating blood instead of self-flagellation in order to bleed in remembrance of Hussein's sacrifice."

This bloodletting practice or the practice of self-flagellation rituals, are merely towards the God Dagon (Baal). It's no surprise that even the Jews do this before the day of "Yom Kippur", or as they call "The Day of Atonement". This applies to the Baal worship that is shown throughout the world, the "passing your children through the fire", the "blood spilling", the grove worship, piercing the body, and even human sacrifice, are what the God of Fire told the Israelites to not get into, because as you can clearly see, Jesus Christ is Baal, and the Queen of Heaven is Ashtoreth. Here in the festival of "Shiva Gajan", the devotees are put on crosses. Then there is the Murugan Festival, the Vegetarian and the 9 Emperor Gods festivals just to name a few.... 

Amos 5:25,26: “Have ye offered unto me sacrifices and offerings in the wilderness forty years, O house of Israel? But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.”

Deuteronomy 7:5 “But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.”

Deuteronomy 14:1 “Ye are the children of the LORD your God: ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes for the dead.”

This reminds me of the movie "Hellraiser", when the demons (or Angels) would come to tear and cut the flesh apart (somewhat sadomasochist). Based from that movie, you can connect the dots from there..... (There is a scene with the character Frank being pulled by chains into a "crucifix" position, but before he is torn a part he says "and Jesus wept". The "torn apart" reference is based on Dionysus being torn apart, but then is "resurrected" with either just the heart or the phallus)

Clearly the God of fire is correct as the Children of Israel got into all sorts of abominations to this day. The Bible also clearly states that Jesus Christ, the "Lord and Saviour" of the world, is based on Dagon worship. The Adrenochrome, is also shown among the ancient Aztecs and other tribes that would offer "blood", piercing themselves, and Human sacrifice to Baal. So again, it's no different than what people have been doing in these religions for hundreds of years.... Psalms 16:4 “Their sorrows shall be multiplied that hasten after another god: their drink offerings of blood will I not offer, nor take up their names into my lips.”

Now with all of this said, I can safely state that the God of fire (AGNI) is the real God of the Children of the Aryans, and not these ones called Baal and Ashtoreth. It also becomes clear that there were many changes to the Bible just to fit the narrative of the coming of Jesus Christ and to amalgamate this God with the life of the real Prophet, just to hook people back to worship the Dragon Gods of old (As Dagon/Baal/Moloch and Ashtoreth). But with the bloodletting, the mortification of the flesh, the grove worship, the fire walking etc. I would say that nothing is new here, it just has to be reprised is all. 


Everett Clark

07.07.2022 08:37

They dont drink the blood. They torture, pump adrenaline to the pineal gland, and extract the pineal gland. Then synsythize it and inject it.