Now, in the chapter "War of the Gods: Revisiting Michael as Indra vs Thoth the Dragon God" I did not have the full conclusion to whom the very Gods or "fallen angels" are based on the information stated. First, I had to deconstruct Thoth and the Atlanteans as the Red-haired Giants as the "Jinn" is based on Ginger and how they came against the Heavenly armies which had warred against. They would have six fingers and six toes to which some stories do connect to their description. I even broke down how the Angel called "Iblis" amongst the Muslims is really Michael the Archangel and amongst the Yezidis is the "Peacock Angel" as they call it, to the Native American "Red Horn" to whom had fought against the red-haired Giants that was said to ravaged the Earth and mankind. We either find that this was either before mankind was created from the Islamic perspective or the Giants came upon Mankind tying into the "Book of Enoch" and Genesis 6 situation. We see this as the Titans in the Greco Roman story, the monsters in Sumerian war of the Gods to the Asuras, Rakshasa and Nagas in Hinduism.
Then comes the "Water spirits" as the term "Dagon" or Dragon who is Saturn is based on the same story as they warred against the "Celestials", as stated from Paul Stonehill's research. Then we tie this to Credo Mutwa's story on the Chitauri interviewed by David Icke on "The Reptilian Agenda" as this story is based on a mysterious race that interacted with mankind and how they took control over the earth. Based on this connects to the coming of the Nommo which are an amphibious race to which had taught the people the Eucharist practice connecting to the Bacchic and later Christian religion. This is where we find this is Thoth and the Atlanteans from the Emerald Tablets to which coincides with them encountering a primitive race and overcoming and teaching them their culture of civilization and such. This is where the "Gods coming forth from the seas" are based on and how these stories are tied in the "Noah's flood" story as this race symbolize the God Vishnu, Quetzalcoatl, Oannes and Dagon. Interesting enough, the Nommo came in on ships or "Arks" as Robert Temple's book "The Sirius Mystery" is based on, to which ties into The Emerald Tablets as Thoth and the Atlanteans coming in a spaceship to Credo's story on the Chitauri coming in ships as well.
Then we come to Wesley Swift's information on the Dragon God Lucifer coming with his fallen Angels and states how there are stories on the coming of the negroid people with these angels. Just as I had started this research, much of it would be from Godfrey Higgin's "The Anacalypsis" on the Black Gods being worshiped throughout Asia to Europe, to which becomes astounding as to why the black people had contributed this religion. Even based on J.A. Roger's books had also filled in some blanks on the Black civilizations to which destroys the narrative of today's History on the origin of these cults, especially on the origin of the Dragon worship.
Now, I have read some of Wesley Swift's sermons and see that he tries to tie into some things to narrate a connection. He does mention Michael the Archangel battling the dragon to have occurred in space, how Lucifer had brought down the Negro race from space as they were axman and warriors of the dragon god and how they were part of the army of Lucifer, to his research on the Asiatic races as the first creation before the white people were created, and how they had been affected by Lucifer's invasion on the coming of the "Dragon Gods" in boats coming from space. He connects the God Marduk and Indra to Michael as he fights against the dragon god, he also details the Aztec God "Melechaos" (Melek Taus) as the peacock serpent deity as Lucifer to which human sacrifices were done (Quetzalcoatl). He details how the Indians came from Asia and how they were some white ones compared to the Asian ones and did mention some tribes that got mixed with the negro stock and how they were sacrificing them to Lucifer. He mentions the Giants and their connection to cannibals, the strange gods of Asia looking like gargoyles, how Lucifer had brought the black people to mix with the other races, to his view on the Anglo Saxon and Germanic nations as being the Israelites in the Bible and how race mixing destroys the original root race. He details importance of Christianity as the white man's religion and the KKK ideology to the Jews being the seed of Lucifer and how they're destroying the white race with communism. He calls the whites the "eagle people" to which are the people of the white god who defeated the dragon god as stated in all mythologies. It shows that he researched the occult on the destruction of Atlantis and Lemuria civilization and how Asia became the heart of Lucifer's Kingdom, to the Jews coming from the Mongolian stock (interesting enough). He says Lucifer's wife is Kali the assassin Goddess, in which we know is Siva and how he brought his monstrous armies.
Clearly, Wesley Swift's perspective on race is subjective, but from what I gather is that kind begets kind amongst the different races. History today tries to put this narrative that Noah had a white, black, red and yellow to which was sprung from the 3 (or 4) sons. However, it's obviously shown through his narration views on the KKK ideology and "White Christian race and America", but that goes to show that even people with their ideology don't know they're worshiping the Christian Black God on the cross called "Dagon" also called Saturn. I already know who the real Aryans are, but just as Jordan Maxwell always states "Knowledge is power". But it's interesting how he states that mythologies on the coming of the "dark and curly headed" from the skies as Lucifer's warriors and how they were spread about to have them intermingle with the other races, and states that Lucifer's wife is Kali meaning that this is Siva. This is pretty much the lore of "Lord of the Rings" as states, but it's shown that he learned about this from the knowledge from the occult and mythology.
Now, based on this information on the black people connecting to the Dragon symbolism ties into Godfrey's and J.A. Roger's works on the black influence throughout the whole world. Even though this pretty much solidifies them bringing the cult to the whole world, but I want to find if them spreading this cult connects to Thoth and the Atlanteans teaching the primitive people, the story of the Nommo that taught the Dogon tribe, to the Chitauri encounter story from Credo Mutwa. Now, the red headed people to which both (black and red headed) have an ancient connection to all this which is why I want to get to the bottom of this. Just as stated on the red-haired Gods having black skin, or the red headed Shiva having the black wife Kali has this weird connection between the two races. The red headed people are persecuted to which are often labeled the spawn of the Devil, to which interesting enough the Devil was said to have red hair to whom is identified as Siva or "AGNI".
Then I came across the Documentary "Skeletons in the Cupboard" and the second part "Under the Carpet" detailing the blonde and red headed people of Polynesian Islands. The first part I had detailed on the woman having genealogy links to Persia, Germany, Russia and Peru, then to the Polynesian Islands. The Documentary pretty much portrays this group of people as the first tribes to which the Asiatic Polynesian Maori had encountered and how some had intermingled with. They are a peaceful people, but also struggled through retaining their identity based on their family lineage. Then comes the second part of the series to which details the Volcanic Sedimentary, to the story of a real life to legend on the God Mauri, the legend of the Giants, to the Asiatic origins of the Polynesian people, the Chinese and Indian influence and a mere mention on the Melanesian people.
Even though it's interesting but there have been somethings that are missing. For example, the woman's lineage who was said to have been of the Persian descent while retaining blonde does mention that they have other mixtures. Even though Persia do have some red- and blonde-haired people, but she also states German and Russian in the lineage to which isn't specific. That means that of course, they had traveled from wherever and intermingled to some degree until they had landed in the Polynesian Islands. Then comes the input on Elsdon Best's book "The Tuhoe People" to which the people came from a hot country called India as they try to make it based on their situation, but that ties into a very different people. Then comes the Polynesian people coming from Asia to which it was revealed that one of the men in the second part of the Documentary, had mention a God called "Kiwa" who is identified as Shiva the god of the Ocean. It's been noted that there are two books that detail the Tuhoe people, their language to Sanskrit, the Gods connecting to Hinduism and their travels to whom had encountered other people, as this connects to the Aryan migration story. In the second part they even show how the Chinese dragon symbolism changed from where they came from etched to the Polynesian version. There are Native American and Chinese accounts on how they had encountered the red-haired people, whether Giant or normal sized. People state that the red-haired people are the Aryans, but as research and practices shows to that the people in the Bible are these of Indian-Turkic/Mongolian like people who had encountered these great ancient people.
There is a mention on the "Rh-negative" blood to which those red-haired people fair skinned people have "Celtic" lineage hence going back to the Iberian Peninsula such as Ireland, Scotland and the Guanches. There would be a style of Polynesia art that is Celtic influence which stands out above the rest. Based on said information would state that these people are of Thoth to which connects to "Tuatha de Danaan", the Children of Danu or the Asuras, however, before I dive into that category, I want to mention how this Documentary doesn't mention further on the people called the "Melanesians".
Now, in "Under the Carpet" they would mention "fair skinned" blonde- and red-haired people, but they don't mention how these Melanesians have "blonde" and "red hair" with black skin. So, when I came across this information my initial thought is "Are they mixed with Caucasian?" due to them having blonde and red hair, but is shown that through DNA they don't have any connection to the European counterpart. They state that they "supposedly" came from Africa and having to develop this unique trait over time due to some gene mutation. What's interesting is that they tend to be blacker than most Africans in Africa and have various features but a particular feature I will detail later on will resemble something. Then studies shows that there are 5-10 % of the population that are born with blonde and red hair, while in adulthood the color tends to fade to black though some still retain the natural red and blonde tint. No further explanation other than evolution would be the answer (as they say).
The people of Bougainville of the Solomon Islands tend to have blonde hair and don't consider themselves as "Austronesians" to which I see are a people described as a mixture of negrito and Asian coming from Indonesia. Some Documentaries states they are connected to the people of the Andaman Islands, the Indigenous people of Australia, the Ainu and the surrounding Islands of Melanesian and Papa new guinea. Interesting enough, the Australian natives would have straight hair with some reddish tint. Now, this is strangely omitted from the Documentary to which is not surprising because this details that there a group of black people with red and blonde hair. Based from the connections of the people of the Andaman Islands to the Dravidians with black skin (even though they would be mixed with Aryan and other) details that these people are "exactly" the original inhabitants of the land of Asia. This will tie into the Asura called Vritrasura who is Typhon of Lemuria, The black tortoise and serpent and Gong gong in the Chinese myths.
The Polynesian man in the Documentary "Skeletons under the carpet" calls this God "Kiwa" who is Shiva but also is called Vritrasura. Let's see what the Wiki states:
Vritra is a Danava in Hinduism. He serves as the personification of drought, and is an adversary of the king of the devas, Indra. As a Danava, he belongs to the race of the asuras. Vritra is also known in the Vedas as Ahi (lit.' snake 'IAST: ahi). He appears as a human-like serpent blocking the course of the Rig Vedic rivers, and is slain by Indra with his newly forged vajra.
Puranas:
As told in the narration given to King Yudhishthira in the Mahabharata, Vritra was an asura created by the artisan god Tvashtri to avenge the killing of his son known as Triśiras or Viśvarūpa by Indra. Vritra won the battle and swallowed Indra, but the other deities forced him to vomit Indra out. The battle continued and Indra was eventually forced to flee. Vishnu and the rishis (sages) brokered a truce, with Indra swearing that he would not attack Vritra with anything made of metal, wood or stone, nor anything that was dry or wet, or during the day or the night.
After this, Indra managed to befriend Vritra. Once, while Vritra was asleep on the seashore at twilight, Indra collected sea-foam as a weapon to kill Vritra, as it was neither wet nor dry, neither wood nor any metal and it certainly could not be categorized as a weapon. Indra summoned Lord Vishnu to enter the foam. When the Vishnu entered the foam, Indra used that foam to kill him.
The Srimad Bhagavatam recognizes Vritra as a bhakta (devotee) of Vishnu who was slain only due to his failure to live piously and without aggression. This story runs thus:
SB 6.9.11: After Visvarupa was killed, his father, Tvashta, performed ritualistic ceremonies to kill Indra. He offered oblations in the sacrificial fire, saying, "O enemy of Indra, flourish to kill your enemy without delay."
SB 6.9.12: Thereafter, from the southern side of the sacrificial fire known as Anvaharya came a fearful personality who looked like the destroyer of the entire creation at the end of the millennium.
*SB 6.9.13-17: Like arrows released in the four directions, the demon's body grew, day after day. Tall and blackish, he appeared like a burnt hill and was as lustrous as a bright array of clouds in the evening. The hair on the demon's body and his beard and moustache was the color of melted copper, and his eyes were piercing like the midday sun. He appeared unconquerable as if holding the three worlds on the points of his blazing trident. Dancing and shouting with a loud voice, he made the entire surface of the earth tremble as if from an earthquake. As he yawned, again and again, he seemed to be trying to swallow the whole sky with his mouth, which was as deep as a cave. He seemed to be licking up all the stars in the sky with his tongue and eating the entire universe with his long, sharp teeth. Seeing this gigantic demon, everyone, in great fear, ran here and there in all directions.
SB 6.9.18: That very fearful demon, who was actually the son of Tvashta, covered all the planetary systems by dint of austerity. Therefore, he was named Vritra, or one who covers everything.......
Now, based upon description describes the Demon Vritra as having hair like "melted copper" and black skin. We see this in the description of Typhon who is Vritra to Ahi who is Agni. Shiva who is Kiwa amongst the Polynesian legend is Agni. Based on Shiva Mahapuran episode 21 features Vritra having the attire like the Indian, African, Australian and people of Papa new guinea and Melanesia. Typhon of Greek Mythology came from the Hindu story of Vritra who would be described as having the color of "Sut" and red hair. This is the "Red Dragon" in the Bible.
Now, let's connect this to "The Aryan Maori". Here states some interesting facts about the Maori migration from India, on how they are the children of Abraham and how their Maori language is shown sounding similar to Ancient Sanskrit, Greece and Latin. Aside from this, here are some excerpts in pg4:
"I must impress upon my reader the necessity of remembering that the Aryans, who became the ruling and exclusive people of India, were not the original owners of the soil. The magnificent temples, the great cities, the wonderful systems of religion and philosophy were not the work of the first inhabitants of Hindustan. They were the outcome of that tribal intelligence, that vitality of mind and body, which evolved the art of Greece, the strength of Rome, the commerce of Britain. In the forests of Ceylon, on the hills of Assam, in the recesses of the Himalaya dwell the descendants of those savage people whose ancestors fled before the Aryan tidal- wave. These aborigines were called Nagas, the serpent worshippers— Naga meaning great serpent. They were supposed, in the poetry of the later Sanskrit, to be demons and giants, and to inhabit a place called Patala; their king, Ananta, is said to have had a thousand hooded heads, on each of which was the " Swastika,^^ the mystic cross. They arc always mentioned with abhorrence as the enemies of gods and men. Although we seem here to be dealing with fables, it is certain that there was an aboriginal race so called. Naga-dvipa was one of the seven divisions of Old India, and kings of this race ruled at Mathura, Padinati, &c. Nagpur is a name derived from Naga. They were probably a Scythic race, and derived their name from their deadly mode of fighting, and their worship of the serpent. There are about sixty thousand Nagas still living in the Naga Hills of Assam, India."
(Now, when the Author had detailed there are Nagas still living in Assam India, he's talking about the Asians that are nowadays called Nagas, but they are not the original inhabitants as they were the Dravidian and Black nations of those lands. He speculates and questions on the Naga identity, as he must not know they were black people in the land. He also details the Maori language sounding to Sanskrit to which is interesting)
Continuing in Introduction:
In using the name '' Maori " I shall confine it generally to the Maori of New Zealand, as being the type best known to myself; yet, in its larger sense, I include the Maori spoken of in the following extract, wherein Mr. Sterndale, treating of the light-colored branch of the Polynesian islanders and comparing them with those of New Zealand, says, ^^ Their language is so far identical that they readily understand one another, without the intervention of an interpreter. Their social customs are analogous ; their traditions and habits of thinking are the same. They have but one ancient name whereby they distinguishing themselves from the rest of humanity — Maori."^
I now proceed to assert — Positively,
1. That the Maori is an Aryan.
2. That his language and traditions prove him to
be the descendant of a pastoral people, afterwards warlike and migratory.
3. That his language has preserved, in an almost
inconceivable purity, the speech of his Aryan forefathers, and compared with which the Greek and Latin tongues are mere corruptions.
4. That this language has embalmed the memory of animals, implements, &c., the actual sight of which has been lost to the Maori for centuries. Probably,
1. That he left India about four thousand years
ago.
2. That he has been in New Zealand almost as
long as that time.
To prove these bold assertions is my task in the following chapters.
pg87: "...If this be the case, then the Maoris would not have so far to go on leaving Asia, and there is some difficulty the less to be faced. Mr. Thomson, writing in the *' Transactions,'''^ notices that the Malays call the wind from India '' angin barata," Bharata being the old name for India. Bharata is generally supposed to be derived from a king or chief named Bharat, and that the Indian Aryans are his descendants; but, as the old word for brother was " bharatar," it is exceedingly likely that the chief was only a genealogical fiction, and that the Bharatas were men feeling themselves as brothers ''in a strange land." That the word Bharat is an old name is proved by the poem " Maha-barata," the great, heroic poem of India, which recites the deeds of the Aryans, destroyers of the aboriginal inhabitants; this, though not so old as the Vedas, being of extreme antiquity. This word was taken by the Maoris on the journey towards '' the rising of the sun and star," a father in Maugaiia (Cook's Islands) changing the previous name of his son to '' Barapu," meaning " West, India lying in that direction from Mangaiia. The ''angin bharata," the breeze from the "brother-land,'* is represented in Maori by " angi," a gentle wind, and "joaraki," a north wind; also, " parera," a northwest wind, which would be the breeze which was blowing when they turned and ran down to the south-east from New Caledonia.
pg89: It has been asserted lately that the Maoris are children of Abraham, &c.
pg:13 "Agni, fire : the god of fire. (Lat.) ignis; (Eng.) ignite. (M.) AM, fire — sacred, of a chief. (See next word.)
Ahi-s, the serpent: (M. pr.) ahi. (Gr.) ophis ; (Lat.) anguis. (This is agni, with the " ng " turned round to " gn.")
After the Aryans had been some time in India, the dread and hatred they felt for the nagas (great serpents), worshipped by their foes, gradually changed first into respect then into worship. Agni became at last the great red serpent Ahi (our exact word), the demon of drought, who licked up the waters with his tongue of flame. One of his names was Surya, which the Maoris call Uira, the lightning.
The God called Ahi is Agni who is Vritra as the Rig Vedas states that dries up the waters. He is the burning god and is Leviathan the Sea dragon that fought the other God. The battle between Agni and Indra are then placed as the serpent representing the Asuras being defeated by the Peacock Angel Murugan amongst these legends. This then goes to Michael the Archangel who fights against the God of the Naga race.
Now, based on this mentions the people called the Nagas to whom are these people who were the original inhabitants of Asia and India. It states this:
"These aborigines were called Nagas, the serpent worshippers— Naga meaning great serpent. They were supposed, in the poetry of the later Sanskrit, to be demons and giants, and to inhabit a place called Patala; their king, Ananta, is said to have had a thousand hooded heads, on each of which was the " Swastika,^^ the mystic cross. They arc always mentioned with abhorrence as the enemies of gods and men. Although we seem here to be dealing with fables, it is certain that there was an aboriginal race so called. Naga-dvipa was one of the seven divisions of Old India, and kings of this race ruled at Mathura, Padinati, &c. Nagpur is a name derived from Naga. They were probably a Scythic race, and derived their name from their deadly mode of fighting, and their worship of the serpent. There are about sixty thousand Nagas still living in the Naga Hills of Assam, India."
Now, the author questions if this is the "Scythic" race but is actually based on the black skinned folks of those lands. The Aryans were there in India for "4,000" years coincides with the 400 years being in captive in Egypt. The Aryans were under the rulership of the Black people who are dubbed "Nagas", "Demons" or "Dasyus" before their God Indra brought them out of India and to which the Aryan migration began from there. Interesting enough, the Aryans would go travel to India just as the Bible details the Israelites going to Egypt. The original inhabitants were the considered "Phallic worshipers" meaning these are the people of Shiva. So, when Benjamin Freedman had stated on these people converting to Judaism to which were "phallic worshipers" it's noted that this is where they got this practice from which is India. There is also another hidden connection the Pacific location because this is where the Legend of the Lemurian civilization takes place and probably where the worship of the seven headed serpent came to be. Just as I had stated in "Thoth is Enoch" chapter on the Naacals and Lemurian connection, I had detailed how Thoth was not really Atlantean but "Lemurian" which connects to the cult of the Dragon coming up from "Southern India". The cult of Dagon which is based on the religion of the seven headed Serpent is based around the Indian and Pacific areas. Just as the Book of Adam details the Angel "casting" the serpent to the shores of India symbolizes the location where the cult of Dagon came from and how it's called "Hinduism" and "Buddhism".
Then we come to the people referred to as the Ainu of Japan in which are a people that were there "prior" to the people called Japanese. It's important to note that there was a forced inclusion by the Japanese Government to have these people "assimilate" into their society, so the looks of the people are not their true features. They are now depicted as Asian but with a more Caucasian detail in which people think that these were white people. However, based on their description shows that their features resemble the Australian indigenous people especially with nose and head structure. These people were hairy compared to the Japanese and it's shown that these "Black" Caucasian looking people or rather "true Dravidian" were there before the arrival of the Modern East Asians or Aryans of today. The Australian people are black people with straight to curly hair and beards based on their depictions, but let's see what this website states "www.science-frontiers.com":
The Samurai and the Ainu:
Findings by American anthropologist C. Loring Brace, University of Michigan, will surely be controversial in race conscious Japan. The eye of the predicted storm will be the Ainu, a "racially different" group of some 18,000 people now living on the northern island of Hokkaido. Pure-blooded Ainu are easy to spot: they have lighter skin, more body hair, and higher-bridged noses than most Japanese. Most Japanese tend to look down on the Ainu. Brace has studied the skeletons of about 1,100 Japanese, Ainu, and other Asian ethnic groups and has concluded that the revered samurai of Japan are actually descendants of the Ainu, not of the Yayoi from whom most modern Japanese are descended. In fact, Brace threw more fuel on the fire with:
"Dr. Brace said this interpretation also explains why the facial features of the Japanese ruling class are so often unlike those of typical modern Japanese. The Ainu-related samurai achieved such power and prestige in medieval Japan that they intermarried with royalty and nobility, passing on Jomon-Ainu blood in the upper classes, while other Japanese were primarily descended from the Yayoi." The reactions of Japanese scientists have been muted so. One Japanese anthropologist did say to Brace," I hope you are wrong."
The Ainu and their origin have always been rather mysterious, with some people claiming that the Ainu are really Caucasian or proto-Caucasian - in other words, "white." At present, Brace's study denies this interpretation.
(Wilford, John Noble; "Exalted Warriors, Humble Roots," New York Times, June 6, 1989. Cr. J. Covey.)
Comment. Fringe anthropology notes many "white" races in strange places; viz., the white Indians of Panama and the Mandans of the American West.
Now, this is pretty much where Robert Sepehr's research would detail on the Samurai coming from these people which were described as white Caucasian and are rumored to have been the original Samurai. Then on the other side someone came with some proverb stating, "For a Samurai to be brave, he must have a bit of black blood" to which many Black researchers would take this upon detail despite any evidence. It's noted that the Japanese and other Asians do have Gods depicted with black skin with blonde or red colored hair, but before I get to that let's see the comparisons on the Ainu to the Australian people.
Those "Ainu" people are of Australian descent. They look Caucasian because they can grow beards and hair like that of the European even mixed with Asian but are of the Dravidian stock. Just as the people of Melanesian can grow "blonde" and "red hair", even these people would have similar traits as well. Hence, the guy above with red hair and beard even resembles God of fire Mahakala and is most likely where these Muslims get that "red hair" Hadith because Muhammed had done so. There is a correlation to this because Dagon or Buddha is a Black God with red hair.
So, based upon these features I can now see that the people of India would have those same features through various means. When people label those that are called "Dravidian" they tend show the Southern Indian people with various features of dark skin and straight hair, but when we observe the different people's features, it's shown that there are Indians with the same features as the Australian type people to those with dark skin and aquiline features resembling like that of the Native Americans. It's shown that there would be intermingling between the two groups to which reveals various features as shown below. Here is a comparison to the American Indians and the different people of India that have aquiline features (Aryan) and then those that look more like the Australian indigenous people as more negroid in appearance. There are Mongolian type people from areas like Southeast Asia, China and Japan etc. (as those Japanese mixed with those original inhabitants) that would have those features like that of the negroid & Australian types.
Now, comes this book from J.A Rogers. In J. A. Rogers' book "Nature Knows no Color-line" states this in Chapter "Where did the color problem originate? And Why?. Here he goes through mentions of finding the root (or roots) of the prejudice shown throughout History. Since reading this first chapter I wanted to reveal what he states on the Aryan invasion to India.
"The first recorded instance of color prejudice I have been able to find is in India of some five thousand years ago when the Aryas or Aryans, invaded the valley of the Indus and found there a black people- the Dasysus. In any case we find very clear evidence of it in Aryan writings. In the Rig Veda (Book9 Hymn 42:1) Indra, their national God, is depicted as "blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the black skin which Indra hates." The black were called "Anasahs" (noseless people). Book 5 Hymn 29:10, tells how Indra "Slew the flat-nosed barbarians. India's caste system was based on color. The word varna (caste) literally means "color". Arya Varna (white skin); Krishna varna (black skin). "The Aryans of India", says the Encyclopedia of religion and Ethics, "prided themselves on their fairer skins and more aquiline features and held in derision the black color and flatter physiognomies of the aborigines, regarded them much as conquering whites regarded blacks in Africa."
A little excerpt details this segment: 2) The Aborigines were not the Barbarians Aryan legends say they were. These blacks, now known as "Dravidians", had a mighty civilization of their own. From them came the Buddhas, James Bird (Historical Researches on the Origin of the Buddhas) says, "Buddhist of a black complexion are common in the Fresco paintings of Ajunta and that of the Arishtanemi, or race of Vishnu, who is the twenty second Jain saint is described as of a black complexion on the authority of the Hemachandras vocabulary".
As stated, there are large number of factors connecting Krishna, Vishnu and the Black Buddha together, even before the start of the Aryans changing that part of the History. Here he does mention with this note, Godfrey Higgin's "The Anacalypsis" and the origin of Christianity from Buddhism. He does mention this interesting segment from Gerald Massey's works. "The next evidence of it I have been able to find is in Ancient Egypt. Gerald Massey, perhaps the greatest of all authorities on Ancient Egyptian Lore, said "On the monument the dark people are commonly called "the evil race of Kush", but when the Ethiopian element dominates the dark people retort by calling the light complexions, the pale, degraded race of Arvad." (4) But this prejudice of fair for dark and the converse was, it is safe to say, never nearly as strong as in India. The whites did not come in any considerable number of Egypt until the Ptolemaic invasion of the third century B.C., by which time intermixture had already taken too firm a root for any appreciable degree of color prejudice, as I shall show later..."
It states Indra to being the original God of the Aryans whereas these Gods like Krishna, Vishnu, Buddha and Shiva were the original Gods of the Black people. Though they state the Brahmins to being light skinned, but based on the clothing details it's really based on the Ancient Black God and the Naga culture, and which leads me to find the corruption in Brahminism as I see the Brahmins that are the color of Black people and some with negroid features (even from old photos). So, with all the apparent caste system, it defeats the purpose on race difference, unless there was later corruption to admissions like the Tamil and blacks into Brahminism. Based on a Documentary on the Thai Kingdom, it's stated that the Brahmins would be brown skin (as if they were Native American looking) and would be the ones to bless the King in the coronation ceremony, and based on the practices is shown to be similar to the Levitical Priest in the Bible. However, considering the Aryans as the Turkic Mongolian origin, I doubt the God of the Aryans ever gave them this Hindu/Buddhist culture because of where it came from. What was the original culture and religion of the Aryan prior to the changes? I see the Aryans in Hinduism and Buddhism are into worshiping the black gods like Shiva, Vishnu to Murugan, Parvati, and Kali, Buddha all belonging to the Gods of the Naga race to this day.
Considering the Caste system, since the Gods mentioned were black in complexioned, then with this issue with the Aryan racism shows that they love these black Gods even if they had changed their image. This is like the KKK clan members who are all about the white National Christian ideology and thinking Jesus Christ is white while having the cross, and yet they don't know that the cross is based on the black god Christ or Krishna from India (the irony).
Below, the hair style with the top is based on the Buddha hair bundled up also shown on Shiva to which later in Mithraism becomes the "Phrygian cap" to Mithra and Cybele. Then there is the Egyptian priest to which they bald themselves in the same manner as Buddhist priest and wear the toga as well. This again shows that the Egyptian religion came from Hinduism and Buddhism to which are one and the same "regardless" of what people think. The symbolism can't be denied on this cult going back to the land of the seven headed serpent.
Now, based on the case of the Dravidian, it's shown that the people labeled as "Egyptians" in the Bible are actually the Dravidians of India. Here it's shown in the "Song of Solomon" talking about the Princess of Egypt who is described as Black skinned. The Song of Solomon states this excerpt on the Egyptian Princess:
Chapter 1
1The song of songs, which is Solomon's.
2Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth: for thy love is better than wine.
Then in Song of Solomon Chapter 5 states this excerpt on the description of Solomon:
10My beloved is white and ruddy, the chiefest among ten thousand.
11His head is as the most fine gold, his locks are bushy, and black as a raven.
12His eyes are as the eyes of doves by the rivers of waters, washed with milk, and fitly set.
I am going to find this video, but there is an interview from which Jordan Maxwell had done a "Freudian slip" mentioning India as Egypt. Since he knew about the 3 religions coming from Hinduism then hence, "Egypt is India and India is Egypt" and is called "Land of the Nagas" in which is where most of the Bible is based on. Then comes this excerpt from Ezekiel 29:3:
"In the tenth year, in the tenth month, in the twelfth day of the month, the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,2Son of man, set thy face against Pharaoh king of Egypt, and prophesy against him, and against all Egypt:3Speak, and say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, Pharaoh king of Egypt, the great dragon that lieth in the midst of his rivers, which hath said, My river is mine own, and I have made it for myself.4But I will put hooks in thy jaws, and I will cause the fish of thy rivers to stick unto thy scales, and I will bring thee up out of the midst of thy rivers, and all the fish of thy rivers shall stick unto thy scales.5And I will leave thee thrown into the wilderness, thee and all the fish of thy rivers: thou shalt fall upon the open fields; thou shalt not be brought together, nor gathered: I have given thee for meat to the beasts of the field and to the fowls of the heaven.6And all the inhabitants of Egypt shall know that I am the LORD, because they have been a staff of reed to the house of Israel."
Egypt is represented as the "Dragon" that lieth in the midst of the rivers to which is cast out and not be brought or gathered together, is a reference towards the Dragon god that was cut up into pieces. It's the Bacchic cult to which is based on the Lingam of Shiva, Osiris or the story of his wife Sita for after death her body was cut into pieces. Then there is the Nommo and Chitauri story with the same pattern as this connects to the "Water Spirit" Leviathan which is Dagon. Then we come to the Black God with red hair who is Typhon who is identified as "Vritrasura" the Red Dragon that fought against Indra as Yamantaka, Acala, Fudo Myoo and the five Wisdom Kings of Buddhism, Shiva and Mahakala amongst those epithets and forms. He is described as the color of "Sut" and having hair like "melted copper". Just as the Jinn would be made from "Smokeless fire" details this is Typhon which is Siva the Dragon God and Gong Gong the water God.
Now, this section will upset many people for its shown that we can have cognitive dissonance even when evidence is shown right in front of our faces. Since now I have already established that Thoth was not Atlantean but a Lemurian coming from the continent of "Mu". People can say that they are referenced as Muur, Mur, to Moor like the North African Muslim groups that situated themselves in Europe. Now, I came across this man name Frank Joseph who teaches Ancient History on the black civilizations of America. Based on the segment of the "Olmecs" he details their connection to the continent of Mu or Lemuria. Based on this segment, he states that the continent of Mu had 3 races, the white, the black and the brown. The last race he says is brown but not Mongolian, so something like the Polynesian or "Mayan" people. Then states that after the sinking of Mu the black people came to, India, Southeast Asia, the Polynesian Islands and were said to have started the civilization of Mexico and America (I also think this continent connected to India's lost sunken city called "Dwarka").
The Land of Mu would be surrounded by the Ring of fire in the Pacific Ocean, but now it's known that the sinking of Atlantis is actually the sinking of Lemuria and Thoth and his people had come from that part of the world. Just as I had stated on the "Thoth is Enoch: India is Egypt and the land of the Nagas..." it is mentioned from Churchward had learned about this mysterious continent in India and how it was the origin of mankind's civilization. In the beginning of Genesis states the spirit flowing through the waters, whereas based on Lemuria is the seven headed serpent flowing over the waters. There is a truth that needs to be addressed here and that is the people that came from there were a "specific" Black people that went to India, East Africa, Australia, Pap new guinea, the South of Japan, the Islands of the Pacific and the Western parts of the Americas. I did not realize this myself, but it flew right by me, but I kept saying that the Asuras would have red hair and black skin and thought that it's probably based on two groups as the blacks and the red heads.
Now, it's not known if Frank Joseph knew the connection between the sunken continent of Lemuria or Mu and Atlantis, but he detailed something interesting. Based upon the video "Frank Joseph the Olmec Dynasty" he states that there would be different waves of different black people to the Americas, such as the people of Mali came to the Americas from the East and then another group of black people to which have no affiliation with Africa that had come to the Americas. The people that were responsible for the Olmec Civilization and to which are the black Indians of America are from the Pacific Ocean region. Now, in another video he states that the people from West Africa have a connection to Olmec heads as they would have an influence on the Natives. However, Frank Joseph also states that the people who built the civilizations in America are a black people with no relations to Africa, in which I find connect to the negritos of Asia and the Australian indigenous people. He states that America has been influenced through trade which is why those giant Olmec heads are based on the people of West Africa while there are other influences that came from the Australian people and the negritos of the Pacific Islands.
Then based on the Europeans who were describing the Indians of America as black skinned is really based on these people from the continent of Mu/Lemuria. This would be the reason why the images of these Black Indian people are really based on the Pacific Islanders (like the people of Papa new guinea, Solomon Islands and Melanesian) and why their etchings are shown in this manner. The Moors are the people of Mu or Lemurians as the people of Thoth (Dagon), and how they came to the Western parts of America which is why they would be the black Indians of Ancient America. The rumor states that "California" connects to the black Indian "Calafia" who was queen of the Amazonians.
Quetzalcoatl above is shown as a "Giant" God with black skin and "blonde hair" which connects to those people. Then when we see the influence from the people of the Pacific area to which came from the sunken land called "Mu" or "Lemuria", only then can you see how the other people in America and Asia would later integrate into their custom. Based on the Asian people called "Nagas" to the Brazilian Indians also dressing in the same manner. Then Frank Joseph also states that the Okinawans of Japan are not exactly Japanese, in which I think the people had also integrated into Japanese Society like the Ainu.
Considering the Mayans as a part of the Civilization of Lemuria on then we connect them to the God of fire called Kinich Ahau. Based from the wiki states this:
"K'inich Ahau is the 16th-century Yucatec name of the Maya sun god, also referred to as God G when referring to the codices. In the Classic period, God G is depicted as a middle-aged man with an aquiline nose, large square eyes, cross-eyed, and a filed incisor in the upper row of teeth. Among the southern Lacandons, K'inich Ahau continued to play a role in narrative well into the second half of the twentieth century. K'inich Ahau was the patron of one of the four years of the 52-year cycle (Landa). In the rituals introducing this year, war dances were executed.[1]He may conceivably be related to the patron deity of Izamal, K'inich Kakmo 'Sun-Facing Fire Parrot', who was reported to descend to earth while the sun was standing in the zenith in order to consume offerings.
Diego de Landa's Relación de las cosas de Yucatán:
In his account, Bishop Diego de Landa attests to K'inich Ahau a number of times. He refers to a statue or image of the god receiving offerings "egg yolks, others with deer hearts, and another made with their mild pepper."[2]He additionally claims that many performed autosacrifice from their ears and smeared it on the statues of the gods, a ritual practice that Bishop de Landa would attest to again in his account.[3]K'inich Ahau was perhaps considered an aspect of the upper god, Itzamna. Although this possibly a result of a misunderstanding by de Landa, who later in the account refers to a deity by the name of Cinchahau Yzamna, clearly the combination of the names for K'inich Ahau and Itzamna.
Land of the Sunrise: Eastern Paradise
The Sun God is associated with an aquatic eastern paradise,[4]where he can assume the shape of a chimerical water bird,[5]or be shown as a young man, paddling a canoe.[6]Such imagery could suggest lyric religious poetry comparable to the Aztec evocations of a 'flower paradise' (Taube).
Ancestral Solar Kings:
The sun deity can be shown as a king (ajaw) seated high on a throne cushion (as on the famous, narrative 'Rabbit Vase' from Naranjo), or as a ruler carrying the bicephalic 'ceremonial bar'. Inversely, the Maya king is repeatedly assimilated to the sun deity. The emblematic double-bird of the early Copan king, Yax Kʼukʼ Moʼ'Great Quetzal-Parrot', shows the head of the sun deity within its beaks. Ancestral Maya royalty could occasionally be see assimilated to the sun god and moon goddess.[7]The solar aspect of a king often suggests a possible apotheosis and life after death. See Lintel with Royal Woman in Lunar Cartouche in the collection of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for an example of this."
Now, just to recap Kiniche Ahau is described as "cross eyed" and having incisors for teeth, thus I already established that this is Fudo Myoo going back to Acala as the God of fire. Interesting enough, it's claimed that the people would do "auto sacrifice" which is basically bloodletting. This is shown in the Murugan festival in India (Siva Gajan), vegetarian festival of Southeast Asia, to the Islamic Shiite and the Christian practices of mortification of the flesh. Based upon the destruction of Lemuria details that this worship of the God called Acala, Mahakala, Fudo Myoo then goes to India and Asia to which is adopted or spread in the Buddhist cult, and then to America as Kiniche Ahau and Quetzalcoatl. Even the "double headed bird" shown all over the world is said to represent this deity. This emblem is shown as a symbol of Enki in the Middle East, symbol of Kiniche Ahau in the Americas, and Vishnu in India. It's noted that in India it's called "Gandaberunda" as the symbol of Vishnu who is Dagon. In a video called "Jordan Maxwell: Money & Symbolism" he starts taking in calls from the people. There was one call of an "ex freemason" telling him that he disagreed with one thing and then details on the symbolism of the double headed bird is based on one half as white and the other half as black, and how one is based on the God of the sky and the other the God of the underworld and how they are two powers equal to each other in conquest. This ties into the Devas and the Asuras conflict each other.
Frank Joseph also further mentions how the people of Mali and West Africa had encountered a being who taught them civilizations and arts to whom (as he states) is called Vodun or Votan. Votan is Thoth of the Americas who is the serpent God Quetzalcoatl.
Based from the Wiki states on Votan:
Votan is a legendary or mythological figure mentioned in early European accounts of the Maya civilization.
Origins of the Votan story:
The story of Votan in Mexico dates back to at least the late 17th century. It was first published in Constituciones diocesanas del obispado de Chiappa(1702) by Francisco Núñez de la Vega, Bishop of Chiapas. According to Francisco Javier Clavijero:
"F. Núñez de la Vega, bishop of Chiapa, says, in the preface to hisSynodal Constitutions, that in the visit which he made to his diocese towards the end of the last century [i.e. the late 1600s], he found many ancient calendars of the Chiapanese, and an old manuscript in the language of that country, made by the Indians themselves, in which it was said, according to their ancient tradition, that a certain person named Votan was present at that great building, which was made by order of his uncle, in order to mount up to heaven; that then every people was given its language, and that Votan himself was charged by God to make the division of the lands of Anahuac. The prelate adds afterwards, that there was in his time in Teopixca a great settlement of that diocese, a family of the surname of Votan, who were the reputed descendants of that ancient populator. We are not here endeavoring to give the antiquity to the populator of America on the faith of the Chiapanese, but merely to shew that the Americans conceived themselves the descendants of Noah."
"In his account, Bishop Núñez de Vega also states that Votan belonged to the royal lineage of "Cham" (probably "chan" or snake) and that he established a kingdom called "Na Chan" (Snake House) on the Usumacinta River that eventually extended across Chiapas and Soconusco to the Pacific Coast.[2]Additional information can be found in a 1786 publication by Antonio del Río[that cites the same sources as Clavijero and speculates at length on Votan's identity and travels to the Old World.
At a time when the origins of pre-Columbian cultures were poorly understood, these clerics associated Votan with the Biblical stories of the Tower of Babel and Noah, speculating that he had come to Mexico from the Old World. This tradition has been perpetuated by additional fantastic speculations that have been sharply critiqued by subsequent scholarship. This includes the association of Votan with Palenque by Ramon de Ordoñez y Aguilar, a priest who had lived near the site and wrote one of the earliest descriptions of the ruins in 1773. Ordoñez apparently incorporated some of the information that had been collected earlier by Bishop Núñez de la Vega into a document called the Probanza de Votan. "This strange work contained some fragments from Ximénez and a confused account of Votan, culture hero of the Tzeltal people, who, according to Ordoñez, had built Palenque. Fantastic details described Votan's four trips back to the Middle East."
The Tzeltalare an ethnic group that occupies the region that includes Teopisca, Chiapas, about 113km southeast of Palenque. In the late 17th century, two hundred Tzeltal families "of Votan's ancestry" are said to have been living in Comitlan.
Assertion of a relationship between Votan and Odin is found in the work of the distinguished geographer Alexander von Humboldt, who wrote in Vues des Cordillères (1810):
"We have fixed the special attention of our readers upon this Votan, or Wodan, an American who appears in the same family with the Wods or Odins of the Goths and of the people of Celtic origins. Since, according to the learned researches of Sir William Jones, Odin and Buddha are probably the same person, it is curious to see the names of Bondvar,Wodansdag, and Votan designating in India, Scandinavia, and in Mexico the day of a brief period. In Histoire des nations civilisées du Mexique et de l'Amérique Centrale (1857), Charles Étienne Brasseur de Bourbourg claimed Votan was an ancient Phoenician legislateur who had migrated from the Middle East to the Maya area, defeated a race called the Quiname, built the city of Palenque, and established an empire called Xibalba that was postulated by Brasseur de Bourbourg to have once covered all of Mexico and part of the United States. Subsequent Mayanist scholarship has found little support for Phoenician contact with ancient Mesoamerica, and identifies Xibalba as a mythical place rather than a political entity."
Influence on Mormonism:
Extensive analysis of the story of Votan appeared as commentary on the work of Antonio del Río by Paul Felix Cabrera in 1822. Critics of the LDS church have claimed that Cabrera's work had a strong influence on Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, founders of the Latter-Day Saint movement. Smith reported having a vision in 1823 that eventually led him to the claimed discovery of golden plates that documented a group of ancient Israelites journey to the Americas, 960 years of their descendant's history and their dealings with the god of the Israelites. These plates are the origin of the Book of Mormon.
Similarity to Wotan:
The similarity between the names Votan and Wotan has also been the source of much confusion. Chapter IV of Atlantis: The Antediluvian World(1882) by Ignatius L. Donnelly, titled "The God Odin, Woden, or Wotan", repeats Clavijero's reference in the context of speculation about Atlantis and (following Brasseur de Bourbourg) also suggests that Votan built Palenque. Donnelly quotes Clavijero as saying that Votan "conducted seven families from Valum-Votan to this continent, and assigned lands to them",[7]and implies that "Valum-Votan" may have been a reference to Atlantis.[8]The story of Votan was further associated with the Atlantis legend by Lewis Spence in Atlantis in America(1925), who identifies Votan as "a local name for Quetzalcoatl" and provides a synopsis of the account by Núñez de la Vega.
So, now we are getting somewhere. The story of the "Nommo" from the Dogon, to the South African Chitauri, to Sumerian Oannes and Dagon, to the Indian Vishnu/Shiva, to the Americas as Quetzalcoatl & Kukulkan details the very "Gods coming forth from the seas" originates to this being. So, the question comes to this. Did these "Black people" teach the black people in Africa this culture? Based on the Quetzalcoatl story states that this was a man who came forth from the sea, had taught the people and then went back to the sea. But based upon description says that he had red hair in which naturally people would think a red-haired man of Celtic origin, however, it's shown that this is Thoth who is a Black God with red hair, thus resembling those of the Pacific islanders like the Australian and Negritos. Based on this lecture by Dr. Michael Coe, he details the parallel temple structures between the Mayans and those that built "Angkor Wat" in Cambodia. He reveals the Mayans built a "Stupa" in the exact way as those found in Asia.
The story can get a little exaggerated to the point that this is a fish man entity, when it's a "being" with black skinned while having red or blonde hair. Hence, Jesus having red hair is actually supposed to have red hair and black skin in this manner. Dagon is Jesus & Buddha with the same description going back to Lemuria. Hence, Votan dividing the languages is depicted in Genesis in the Tower of Babel and the Chitauri story. This is also why they would be called the "People of Poseidon" who is Typhon and is known for the black conical stone which is the Sivalingam and which ties to Saturn. Amongst the Yezidis, Melek Taus had divided the language of Adam and is identified as the Peacock Angel, Quetzalcoatl linked to Siva and Typhon. Here see the Gods in these images and are they are presented.
Now, as far as the Gods to having black complexion and negroid features is what Sir Godfrey Higgins has been correct so far as to the Ancient Greek Gods, the Black Buddha, the Black Virgin Goddess and child worship as shown throughout the world, were originally black, and in most cases haven't changed the colors at all. You can see the Italians having the "Black Madonna and Child" to this day, in which is basically "Baal and Ashtoreth", and the Black Goddess "Diana of the Ephesians" in the Bible. And after seeing how the Kings were Black in Europe, now I know that History is not what it seems. Here you could see the original Gods to being black complexioned and to the inhabitants is telling. Here the Goddess of witchcraft "Circe" is where the name "Church" came from. Based from the etymology, the Church is based from "Kirke" which is Circe as the Goddess. Jordan Maxwell broke this down as the Church is based on the "Mother" as those Arches has specific symbolism when you enter her domain.
Now, it's known that Shiva is the God of the Black nations and were known for the pillar worship. It made sense as to why the Britannica states this:
"Dasyus, an aboriginal people in India who were encountered by the Indo-European-speaking peoples who entered northern India about 1500bce. They were described by the Indo-Europeans as a dark-skinned, harsh-spoken people who worshipped the phallus. Some Western scholars who view the lingam (a Hindu votary object) as a phallic symbol have conjectured that it originated with the dasyu; others hold that this description of the dasyu may have referred to their sexual practices...."
The Phallic symbolism came from the Black nations, but there is something more to this and this a problem. How can a God who tells the people to destroy the pillars and images in the land be the very same God that was already worshiped in the land? As Shiva who is known for the pillar! Deuteronomy 12:3 “And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.” So, what happened? If Jacob had made a pillar towards the "Almighty God" in Genesis 28, 31 and 35, then why state this if this is the same God? I can detail how much there has been changes to the Bible and the culture of the Aryan people, as the Aryan invasion is based on Indra and not really Agni as the latter connects to Shiva who is really a black God who is worshiped with the pillar. It's noted that the pillar of Jacob symbolism belongs to the black nations as they were already in the land, and the Aryans never had anything to do with them, and their national God was Indra originally.
The symbol of the Naga race was always based on the serpent and not the eagle, but it's shown that these Gods are based on the two races that have History with each other. Hence, the God of the underworld would be based on the Dragon whereas the God of the sky would be based on the Eagle. Now, what is interesting is that amongst certain Native American Tribes would detail how their ancestors came from the Underworld, whereas those have some legends of how they came from the Heavens or some star system, but it's known that those particular groups that came from Asia are those people of the book. Based on the book the Anacalypsis reveals how these images and symbolism all got mixed up in these religions. The real God of the Aryans had brought a different culture to his people, but are then mixed with the Naga race's symbolism and their religions. This is why everything has been confusing and the corruption based on these books from Hinduism and the Rig Vedas as they demoted Indra who represented the Aryans, are then upholding the Black Gods of the Naga races as their symbol and gods to be worshiped.
Now, based on the Chinese and other Asian neighbors, its shown that when they did the DNA on the Chinese tribes, the results are shown to have black in them (every one of them that did the DNA). This is where the term "Dragon faced" is based on, as this is having "negroid features" and how the people had taken up the dragon symbolism of Dagon. Then comes those American Indians with admixtures of negroid features as shown. Now, remember the movie "Apocalypto" directed by Mel Gibson? Here are the "scarification" markings on the Mayan people's faces are shown resembling the same markings done by the Africans.
Now, based on the Philistines are said to be a mystery. Let's see "www.biblicalarchaeology.org"
on:
"Who Were the Philistines, and Where Did They Come From?"
(Investigating the biblical and archaeological evidence for the Philistines’ origins)
The Philistines are best known from the Bible as the Israelites’ enemies, but they were much more than that. Recent archaeological discoveries help inform our understanding of their culture, economy, and even origins. In the Spring 2022 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, Daniel M. Master of Wheaton College looks at the biblical and archaeological evidence for the Philistines’ roots in “Piece by Piece: Exploring the Origins of the Philistines.”
Who Were the Philistines?
In the Bible, the Philistines are remembered as an uncircumcised people with advanced technology and a formidable military (Judges 14:3; 1 Samuel 13:19–20; Exodus 13:17). The Philistines frequently encroached on Israelite territory, which led to some battles, including the famous clash between David, the Israelite, and Goliath, the Philistine (1 Samuel 17). They were condemned for being idol worshipers (1 Samuel 5:1–5) and soothsayers (Isaiah 2:6). In short, the Philistines are portrayed quite negatively in the Bible.
They lived in the cities of Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath, and Gaza—the heartland of ancient Philistia on the Mediterranean Sea’s southeastern shore. Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, and Gath have been excavated in recent decades. The findings from these cities show that the Philistines had distinct pottery, weapons, tools, and houses. They also ate pork and had vast trade networks. Philistine culture flourished during the Iron Age (12th through sixth centuries B.C.E.). Similar to the kingdoms of Israel and Judah, the Philistines lost their autonomy toward the end of the Iron Age. They became subservient and paid tribute to the Assyrians, Egyptians, and then Babylonians, the great superpowers of the region who severely punished rebellion. For example, the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar destroyed disloyal Ashkelon and Ekron and carried off many Philistines into exile.
Where Did the Philistines Come From?
In his article, Daniel Master looks at archaeological and biblical evidence for the Philistines’ origins. He considers the accounts at Ramesses III’s mortuary temple at Medinet Habu. In the 12th century B.C.E., during the reign of Ramesses III, a confederation of tribes from the “islands” of the “northern countries” attacked Egypt—several times, both on sea and land. The Peleset, whom scholars connect with the Philistines, was named as one of these tribes. On the way to Egypt, the confederation had traveled through the eastern Mediterranean and destroyed numerous cities, including Ugarit on the Syrian coast. Ammurapi, the last king of Ugarit, had written to surrounding kingdoms for help, when the “seven ships of the enemy” had arrived to ransack his kingdom. By the time help had come, though, it was too late: Ugarit lay in ruins. Egypt defeated the confederation, as recorded on one of the temple walls at Medinet Habu. A relief from that temple also depicts a sea battle between the island tribes and the Egyptians. In it, the islanders wear distinct headdresses, which clearly set them apart from the Egyptians. After being defeated, some of these tribes settled on the southern coast of Canaan—in what would become the land of the Philistines. Egyptian sources, thus, seem to record a migration of people from the “islands” to Philistia.
Master also examines the evidence for Philistine origins in the Bible. The biblical authors remembered the Philistines as coming from a foreign land, from “Caphtor” (Genesis 10:14; Deuteronomy 2:23; 1 Chronicles 1:12; Amos 9:7; Jeremiah 47:4). Scholars have long drawn a connection between Caphtor and Crete. This is largely based on Egyptian inscriptions and paintings of “Keftiu” from the 15th and 14th centuries B.C.E., wherein the Keftiu are linked to the Minoan civilization, which was centered on Crete. Excavations have shown that the Philistines had a distinct assemblage of artifacts. Master notes parallels between some early Philistine objects, especially from the 12th and 11th centuries B.C.E., and Aegean and Cypriot artifacts. Elements of Philistine material culture, then, also hint at an Aegean or Mediterranean origin for the Philistines.
New evidence from Ashkelon further supports this connection. The Leon Levy Expedition excavated at Ashkelon from 1985–2016 under the direction of the late Lawrence Stager at Harvard University; for the last decade, Daniel Master co-directed excavations. They found some infant burials from the 12th century B.C.E., as well as a Philistine cemetery with burials from the 11th through eighth centuries B.C.E. Teaming up with scientists at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, they were able to analyze DNA from seven of these individuals. When they looked at the 12th-century infants’ DNA, they discovered that the infants had some European ancestry. Crete proved to be one of the best matches for the infants’ heritage—when considering all of their genetic material. Yet other places in the western Mediterranean, such as Iberia, also provided a good match.
Interestingly, in the later individuals from Ashkelon’s cemetery, this European ancestry had been so diluted to barely register. Master explains that, by the tenth century B.C.E., enough intermarriage had taken place between the Philistines and the local Levantine population that the Philistines looked a lot like their neighbors:
While there was some evidence of the same Western European Hunter-Gatherer genetic input, for all statistical purposes, it could not be identified for certain. The best models showed that these people [the tenth- and ninth-century individuals buried in Ashkelon’s cemetery] were descendants of both the 12th-century inhabitants and the earlier Bronze Age inhabitants. It appears from these results that so much intermarriage had taken place between the original immigrants and the people around them that the genetic makeup of Ashkelon’s inhabitants had lost its immigrant distinctiveness. Yet Master clarifies that, at this point in history, the Philistines still thought of themselves as distinct, as evident in a seventh-century inscription from the Philistine city of Ekron. The inscription names Ekron’s king as Ikausu, which means “Achaean” or “Greek.” The name Ikausu (or Achish) also appears in 1 Samuel 21:10 as Gath’s king.
The Philistines remembered their foreign origins
Master concludes that the new DNA evidence, coupled with the biblical and archaeological testimonies, suggests that the Philistines originated in Crete. That is not to say that the Philistines were a homogenous group, all coming from the Aegean world, but it seems that many Philistines did indeed migrate from there, bringing with them vestiges of Minoan culture.
Now, based in "otincontext.com" states this:
What Do Philistine Helmets Reveal About Their Origins?
What We Know:
"Philistine pottery, weapons, and burial customs show Aegean influence, which is crucial for understanding their origins and settlement patterns. The distinctive Mycenaean-style bichrome pottery and unique burial practices found in archaeological sites like Ashkelon and Tell es-Safi provide tangible evidence of their Aegean roots. Egyptian battle scenes, particularly those at Medinet Habu, describe invaders from 'the Sea Peoples,' specifically naming the Peleset, who are identified with the biblical Philistines. These depictions illustrate warriors adorned with feathered helmets and body armor, suggesting a sophisticated culture that had migrated rather than simply raided."
"Understanding the Philistine arrival requires aligning these artistic representations with historical texts and archaeological findings. The Medinet Habu reliefs, dating to around 1177 BC, depict a significant naval engagement between the Egyptians and the Sea Peoples, confirming that the Peleset were part of this group attempting to invade Egypt. The accompanying hieroglyphics detail their migration, as they are shown with ox-drawn carts carrying families, indicating a movement toward permanent settlement rather than a transient military campaign. This aligns with the biblical narrative, which places the Philistines in Canaan during the period of the Judges, as seen in Amos 9:7 and Judges 13:1.
Moreover, the archaeological evidence from sites like Ekron and Gath reveals a complex society organized into five city-states, each governed by a lord. This political structure, unique among their Canaanite neighbors, further emphasizes their distinct identity. The gradual Canaanization of Philistine culture, evidenced by changes in pottery styles and religious practices, illustrates their adaptation over time while retaining elements of their Aegean heritage."
"The feathered headdresses depicted at Medinet Habu appear again in Philistine archaeological contexts at Ashkelon, Tell es-Safi, and other sites across the southern coastal plain - the same distinctive gear shown on warriors fighting Ramesses III reappearing in the settlements of their descendants a generation later. Yet the reliefs also show the Peleset alongside other Sea Peoples groups (Tjeker, Shekelesh, Denyen, Weshesh) who wore different headgear and carried different weapons, raising a question the Egyptian sources never resolve: whether the Philistines who settled Canaan arrived as a coherent ethnic group or as a mixed coalition that coalesced into a distinct culture only after settlement. The material evidence at the five cities suggests the latter - a blend of Aegean, Cypriot, and Anatolian elements that became "Philistine" on Canaanite soil rather than before arriving on it."
Now, it's obvious that the land of Israel doesn't have History especially when we know about the cult of Dagon. I had addressed how the religion of Dagon is the God of the Cross to which people call Jesus Christ as this is the religion that the Black people had brought. So, History says the people called the Philistines are a mysterious group that either came from Crete or around that region and that the Egyptians had interacted with them, but what's interesting is that they described the Philistines as wearing "feathered head dress".
Now, if the Philistines would have Giants on their side with six fingers and toes, to having their God who is Dagon who is identified as Thoth, then this narrows down things as these people would be like the Native Americans. They state that these people were called the "Sea peoples" and had come from Crete, but it's noted that there were black people in those parts in which modern History tends to deny this (cover up where the cult of Dagon originally came from), but if I had to guess these Sea peoples wearing feathered head dresses are described as having the attire of the Indians of America. Much of the Bible details the people having wars against the Giants, but then comes the different nations in the land of America that have different origins, and that includes the black Indian population. These "Feathered" head dresses resembles the Indian apparels of America, and those apparent Giant Indians as well. Now, it's noted that there were Black people in Europe and how they connect to the God Poseidon who is Siva and Dagon, but it's interesting that considering these etchings and art often depicts black people with the "feathered" head dresses as described like the head dress of the Philistines.
Now, if Dagon is the God of the Philistines and is the God that told the Noah like figure to survive from the flood from which came from "Mu" which is Lemuria or Moor, then we have to see the Bible in another perspective. The "Sea people" connects to the Land of Mu or Lemuria and those people going to India, the Islands of the Pacific and America. The Europeans worship this God called Dagon in Christianity and is being hidden on purpose based on origin. Jordan Maxwell had detailed that the God Saturn who is Dagon was worshiped by Philistines and Canaanites in the video titled "Jordan Maxwell/Pyramids" on Raymond L Finch channel.
Now, let's recall on the Philistines being called the "Sea people", and connect them to the Fomorians. In the Wiki states this on the Fomorians:
"The Fomorians or Fomori are a supernatural race in Irish mythology, who are often portrayed as hostile and monstrous beings. Originally, they were said to come from under the sea or the earth. Later, they were portrayed as sea raiders and giants. They are enemies of Ireland's first settlers and opponents of the Tuatha Dé Danann, the other supernatural race in Irish mythology; although some members of the two races have offspring. The Tuatha Dé Danann defeat the Fomorians in the Battle of Mag Tuired. This has been likened to other Indo-European myths of a war between gods, such as the Æsir and Vanir Warin Norse mythology, the Titanomachy (Olympian-Titan War) in Greek mythology,[3]and the Devas and Asuras inIndian mythology. One theory is that the Fomorians were supernatural beings representing the wild or destructive powers of nature; personifications of chaos, darkness, death, blight and drought.
".....The etymology of the name is debated. The first part is generally agreed to be the Old Irish fo, meaning under, below, lower, beneath, nether, etc. The meaning of the second part is unclear. One suggestion is that it comes from Old Irish Mur (sea), and that the name means something like "the undersea ones".[8]This was the interpretation offered by some medieval Irish writers. Another suggestion is that it comes from mór (great/big) and means something like "the great under(world) ones", "the under(world) giants" or "the nether giants". A third suggestion, which has more support among scholars, is that it comes from a hypothetical Old Irish term for a demon or phantom, found in the name of The Morrígan and cognate with the archaic English word "mare" (which survives in "nightmare"). The name would thus mean something like "underworld demons/phantoms" or "nether demons/phantoms". Building on this, Marie-Louise Sjoestedt interprets the name as meaning "inferior" or "latent demons", saying the Fomorians are "like the powers of chaos, ever latent and hostile to cosmic order". John T. Koch suggests a relationship with Tartessian omuŕik."
"Originally the Fomorians seem to have been regarded as malevolent spirits dwelling underwater and in the nether regions of the earth.[1]In one of the earliest references to them, a probably 7th-century elegy for Mess-Telmann, they are said to dwell "under the worlds of men".[2]Later they were portrayed as sea raiders. This was influenced by the Viking raids on Ireland that were taking place around that time. They are often portrayed as monstrous. Sometimes they are said to have the body of a man and the head of a goat, according to an 11th-century text in Lebor na hUidre (the Book of the Dun Cow), or to have had one eye, one arm and one leg. However, those Fomorians who have relationships with the Tuath Dé, such as Elatha and his son Bres, were portrayed as darkly beautiful. The Fomorians are the enemies of Ireland's first settlers and of the supernatural Tuath Dé, with whom they are contrasted. However, in some sources there is an overlap between the Fomorians and Tuath Dé. A figure called Tethra is named as presiding over both races.
The conflict between the Tuath Dé and Fomorians has been likened to other Indo-European myths of a war between gods: between Æsir and Vanir in Norse mythology, between Olympians and Titans in Greek mythology, and between Devas and Asuras in Vedic mythology. Dáithí Ó hÓgáin writes that the Tuath Dé gaining agricultural knowledge from the Fomorians is similar to the Norse and Vedic versions, where the defeated races represent the fertility of the soil.
"The medieval myth of Partholón says that his followers were the first to invade Ireland after the flood which occurred in Genesis, but the Fomorians were already there:Geoffrey Keating reports a tradition that the Fomorians, led by Cichol Gricenchos, had arrived two hundred years earlier and lived on fish and fowl until Partholon came[14] (this detail only appears in the 3rd Redaction of theLebor Gabála Érenn), bringing the plough and oxen. Partholon defeated Cíocal in theBattle of Mag Itha, but all his people later died of plague.[15]
Then came Nemed and his followers. Ireland is said to have been empty for thirty years following the death of Partholon's people, but Nemed and his followers encountered the Fomorians when they arrived. At this point, Céitinn reports another tradition that the Fomorians were seafarers from the Middle East, descended from Ham, son of Noah. Nemed defeated them in several battles, killing their kings Gann and Sengann,[a]but two new Fomorian leaders arose:Conandson of Faebar, who lived in Conand's Tower on Tory Island, County Donegal, and Morc son of Dela (note that the first generation of the Fir Bolg were also said to be sons of Dela).
After Nemed's death, Conand and Morc enslaved his people and demanded a heavy tribute: two thirds of their children, grain and cattle. Nemed's son Fergus Lethderg gathered an army of sixty thousand, rose up against them and destroyed Conand's Tower, but Morc attacked them with a huge fleet, and there was great slaughter on both sides. The sea rose over them and drowned most of the survivors: only thirty of Nemed's people escaped in a single ship, scattering to the other parts of the world. The next invasion was by the Fir Bolg, who did not encounter the Fomorians.
Next, the Tuatha Dé Danann, who are usually supposed to have been the gods of the Goidelic Irish, defeated the Fir Bolg in the first Battle of Mag Tuiredand took possession of Ireland. Because their king, Nuada Airgetlám, had lost an arm in the battle and was no longer physically whole, their first king in Ireland was the half-Fomorian Bres. He was the result of a union between Ériu of the Tuatha Dé Danann and the Fomorian prince Elatha, who had come to her one night by sea on a silver boat. Both Elatha and Bres are described as very beautiful. However Bres turned out to be a bad king who forced the Tuatha Dé to work as slaves and pay tribute to the Fomorians. He lost authority when he was satirised for neglecting his kingly duties of hospitality. Nuada was restored to the kingship after his arm was replaced with a working one of silver, but the Tuatha Dé's oppression by the Fomorians continued. Bres fled to his father, Elatha, and asked for his help to restore him to the kingship. Elatha refused, on the grounds that he should not seek to gain by foul means what he couldn't keep by fair. Bres instead turned toBalor, a more warlike Fomorian chief living on Tory Island, and raised an army.
The Tuatha Dé Danann also prepared for war, under another half-Fomorian leader, Lug. His father was Cian of the Tuatha Dé, and his mother was Balor's daughter Ethniu. This is presented as a dynastic marriage in early texts, but folklore preserves a more elaborate story, reminiscent of the story of Perseus fromGreek mythology. Balor, who had been given a prophecy that he would be killed by his own grandson, locked Ethniu in a glass tower to keep her away from men. But when he stole Cian's magical cow, Cian got his revenge by gaining entry to the tower, with the help of a druidess called Biróg, and seducing her. She gave birth to triplets, which Balor ordered drowned. Two of the babies either died or turned into the first seals, but Biróg saved one, Lug, and gave him to Manannán and Tailtiu to foster. As an adult, Lug gained entry to Nuada's court through his mastery of every art, and was given command over the army.
The second Battle of Mag Tuired was fought between the Fomorians under Balor and the Tuatha Dé under Lug. When the two forces met on the field of battle, it was said that to attack the fierce Fomorian flank was like striking a head against a cliff, placing a hand into a serpent's nest, or facing up to fire. Balor killed Nuada with his terrible, poisonous eye that killed all it looked upon. Lug faced his grandfather, but as he was opening his eye Lug shot a sling-stone that drove his eye out the back of his head, wreaking havoc on the Fomorian army behind. After Balor's death the Fomorians were defeated and driven into the sea. According to the Irish version of the Historia Britonum of Nennius, the Fomorians are referred to as mariners who were forced into a tower near the sea by the Tuatha Dé Danann. Then the Irish or otherwise descendants of Nemed with Fergus red-side at the lead, pushed all the Fomorians into the sea, with the exception of one ship that survived.
Now, it's obvious that this story is where the David and Goliath story is based on. I had already established that the people of Lemuria pertain to the black people, but is also solidified when it's written that the term "Fomorians" are the Giants that came from the seas, just as the Gods coming forth from the seas is based on Dagon, and that these "Fomorians" are the people of "Mu" or Lemuria. These "Black Indians" that came with their "feathered" head dress are the Philistines in the Bible that had battled the Israelites. So, let's recap again in the Wiki:
"The Fomorians or Fomori are a supernatural race in Irish mythology, who are often portrayed as hostile and monstrous beings. Originally, they were said to come from under the sea or the earth. Later, they were portrayed as sea raiders and giants. They are enemies of Ireland's first settlers and opponents of the Tuatha Dé Danann, the other supernatural race in Irish mythology; although some members of the two races have offspring. The Tuatha Dé Danann defeat the Fomorians in the Battle of Mag Tuired. This has been likened to other Indo-European myths of a war between gods, such as the Æsir and Vanir Warin Norse mythology, the Titanomachy (Olympian-Titan War) in Greek mythology,[3]and the Devas and Asuras inIndian mythology. One theory is that the Fomorians were supernatural beings representing the wild or destructive powers of nature; personifications of chaos, darkness, death, blight and drought."
".....The etymology of the name is debated. The first part is generally agreed to be the Old Irish fo, meaning under, below, lower, beneath, nether, etc. The meaning of the second part is unclear. One suggestion is that it comes from Old Irish Mur (sea), and that the name means something like "the undersea ones". This was the interpretation offered by some medieval Irish writers. Another suggestion is that it comes from mór (great/big) and means something like "the great under(world) ones", "the under(world) giants" or "the nether giants". A third suggestion, which has more support among scholars, is that it comes from a hypothetical Old Irish term for a demon or phantom, found in the name of The Morrígan and cognate with the archaic English word "mare" (which survives in "nightmare"). The name would thus mean something like "underworld demons/phantoms" or "nether demons/phantoms". Building on this, Marie-Louise Sjoestedt interprets the name as meaning "inferior" or "latent demons", saying the Fomorians are "like the powers of chaos, ever latent and hostile to cosmic order". John T. Koch suggests a relationship with Tartessian omuŕik."
It states they represented "chaos" which should give you a hint. The "Sea people" are the people of Poseidon who is Dagon and the Sea God Yamm who is noted for being angry and chaotic thus causing tsunamis and Earthquakes. As much as I can disagree with somethings but based on Wesley Swift's research details Lucifer the "Chaos monster" and his host being black people as warriors along with other entities. Take it with the "Lord of the Rings" as Lord Sauron tries to control the world with the Orcs, Dark elves and other Monstrous creatures. Then details how they would be referred to as the "nether Giants" or Giants that came forth from the sea, and that the suggested name would be "Mur" meaning sea. Now, Joseph Frank had detailed this on the Black people being the people of "Mu", "Mur" to "Moor". Then comes the Giants and the other inhabitants which came from that part of the Pacific which is Lemurian or Mu and had brought their God called "Dagon" who is Saturn. Then based on the Biblical standpoint, we see that the Israelites fighting against the Philistines are the people of the Tuatha De Danann against the Fomorians. David defeating Goliath is Indra of the Devas defeating Vritra of the Asuras. It's interesting that they would detail how they were intermingling at some point because just like the Srimad Bhagavatam states that the Gods like Agni, Vayu and such were stating that Indra was going to overthrow Vritra their "father", like the Cronus story in Greco Roman accounts. So, there are two races and that some would intermingle with each other and are interpretated as the "Aryans" battling the "Nagas". Then when we go to the Norse Mythos, we can see that the battle between the Aesirs and the Vanir is based on the Devas and the Asuras. It's states that the leader of the Vanir would have battles but there is a member of the Vanir called "Njord" who is depicted as the God of the sea, crops and fertility and may have a connection to Saturn, thus Osiris and Dagon.
Now, I had also thought that the Tuatha De Danann are the people of the Red Dragon, because the term "Danu" is based on the Hindu story of the mother of Vritra which throws things off. It seems that the alternative should be based on the Saraswati who is known as the "river of Saraswati" who is the Biblical Sarah and the ancestress of the Israelites. It's also noted that the story "resets" as the coming Milesians battle the Tuatha De Danann, and them taking each world as the Milesians take the surface and the Tuatha takes the underworld, is the story of the Devas of the Heavens and the Asuras of the underworld. However, based on the previous version states the Tuatha Da Danan are obviously based on the Israelites in the Bible whereas these Fomorians are the "Philistines" and are identified as the Black people that came from the submerged continent of Mu and brought the cult of the Seven Headed serpent Dagon.
Now, it's shown that Moloch is worshiped through the "fire walking" practices that is mentioned in the Bible.
Leviticus 18:21: “And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD.”
Ezekiel 20:31: “For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols, even unto this day: and shall I be enquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be enquired of by you.”
Jeremiah 32:35: “And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.”
Ezekiel 20:26: “And I polluted them in their own gifts, in that they caused to pass through the fire all that openeth the womb, that I might make them desolate, to the end that they might know that I am the LORD.”
Ezekiel 23:37: “That they have committed adultery, and blood is in their hands, and with their idols have they committed adultery, and have also caused their sons, whom they bare unto me, to pass for them through the fire, to devour them.”
Ezekiel 16:20: "Moreover, thou hast taken thy sons and thy daughters, whom thou hast borne unto me, and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured. Is this of thy whoredoms a small matter,21That thou hast slain my children, and delivered them to cause them to pass through the fire for them?"
2 Kings 23:10: “And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the children of Hinnom, that no man might make his son or his daughter to pass through the fire to Molech.”
Now, based on understanding this practice that is done in India, is also shown in Japan towards Fudo Myoo. Then the practice of self-mortification is seen in the Murugan festival towards the Peacock Angel or Melek Taus, Siva to Quetzalcoatl in America and other places. Then comes the fire walking or "passing through the fire" practices amongst the Yamabushi and the Hindu festivals. Even though the Yamabushi don't do the bloodletting practice, but they'll walk through the fire as a form of purification. It does state in the Bible to pass certain objects that are cursed through the fire or through water.
Now, let's see who what God was really being sacrificed towards to. Based on "Human sacrifice in Maya culture" states this:
During the pre-Columbian era, human sacrifice in Maya culture was the ritual offering of nourishment to the gods and goddesses. Blood was viewed as a potent source of nourishment for the Maya deities, and the sacrifice of a living creature was a powerful blood offering. By extension, the sacrifice of human life was the ultimate offering of blood to the gods, and the most important Maya rituals culminated inhuman sacrifice. Generally, only high-status prisoners of war were sacrificed, and lower status captives were used for labor.
Human sacrifice among the Maya is evident from at least the Classic period (c. AD 250–900) right through to the final stages of the Spanish conquest in the 17th century. Human sacrifice is depicted in Classic Maya art, is mentioned in Classic period glyph texts and has been verified archaeologically by analysis of skeletal remains from the Classic and Postclassic (c. AD 900–1524) periods. Additionally, human sacrifice is described in a number of late Maya and early Spanish colonial texts, including the Madrid Codex, the Kʼicheʼ epic Popol Vuh, the KʼicheʼTítulo de Totonicapán, the Kʼicheʼ language Rabinal Achi, the Annals of the Kaqchikels, the Yucatec Songs of Dzitbalche and Diego de Landa's Relación de las cosas de Yucatán.
Decapitation:
Important rituals such as the dedication of major building projects or the enthronement of a new ruler required a human sacrificial offering. The sacrifice of an enemy king was the most prized offering, and such a sacrifice involved the decapitation of the captive ruler in a ritual reenactment of the decapitation of theMaya maize godby the Maya death gods.[1]In AD 738, the vassal king Kʼakʼ Tiliw Chan Yopaat ofQuiriguá captured his overlord, Uaxaclajuun Ubʼaah Kʼawiilof Copán and a few days later he ritually decapitated him;[2]such royal sacrifices were often recorded in Maya script with the "ax event" glyph. The decapitation of an enemy king may have been performed as part of a ritual ballgame reenacting the victory of the Maya Hero Twins over the gods of the underworld.
Sacrifice by decapitation is depicted in Classic period Maya art, and sometimes took place after the victim was tortured, being variously beaten,scalped, burnt ordisembowelled.[3]Sacrifice by decapitation is depicted on reliefs at Chichen Itza in two of the ballcourts (the Great Ballcourt and the Monjas Ballcourt).[4]The Hero Twins myth recounted in the Popol Vuh relates how one of each pair of twins (the Hero Twins themselves and their father and uncle) was decapitated by their ballgame opponents.
Heart removal:
Heart extractions and sacrifice have been viewed as a "supreme religious expression among the ancient Maya".[6]The removal of the still-beating heart, or sometimes self-immolation, was considered a great offering and meal for the gods. It began with a dispersal of blood extracted either from the mouth, nose, ears, fingers, or penis, typically with a sharp tool made from animal bone, such as a stingray spine.[7]The victim would then be positioned on a stone or wooden altar, and access to the heart would be achieved with a variety of procedures and techniques. Most of these techniques were proved by examination of the post-mortem injuries on bones surrounding the heart, such as the sternum, and ribs. Methods include vertical axial sternotomy, left transverse thoracotomy, transverse bilateral sternothoracotamy, or trans diaphragmatic access. The preferred method was most probably from below the diaphragm, as this allowed for easy access and not much blockage from bones (nicks, segmenting, and fracturing of the sternum and ribs indicate this). After this, the heart was exposed to retrieval. If accessed through the sternum the ribs would be pulled apart, or if via the diaphragm tissue would be cut. The actual removal of the heart was achieved by cutting the attaching ligaments with abifacialtool. Finally, offering of the heart would take place with either special positioning or through burning. At this time, blood would also be collected from the victim. The ritual will end with mutilation of the body, usually through dismemberment, or burned. They would then dispose of the body or reutilize it for other purposes.
During the Postclassic period (c. 900–1524), the most common form of human sacrifice was heart extraction, influenced by the method used by the Aztecs in the Valley of Mexico; this usually took place in the courtyard of a temple, or upon the summit of the pyramid-temple.[9]The sacrifice was stripped and painted blue, which was the colour representing sacrifice, and was made to wear a peaked headdress.
Four blue-painted attendants representing the four Chaacs of the cardinal directions stretched the sacrifice out over a convex stone that pushed the victim's chest upwards.[10]An official referred to as a nacom in Landa's Relación de las cosas de Yucatán used a sacrificial knife made from flint to cut into the ribs just below the victim's left breast and pull out the still-beating heart.[11]The nacom then passed the heart to the officiating priest, orchilan, who smeared blood upon the image of the temple's deity.
Depending upon the exact ritual, sometimes the four Chaacs would throw the corpse down the pyramid steps to the courtyard below, where it would be skinned by assistant priests, except for the hands and feet. Thechilanwould then remove his ritual attire and dress in the skin of the sacrificial victim before performing a ritual dance that symbolised the rebirth of life. If it was a notably courageous warrior who had been sacrificed, then the corpse would be cut into portions and parts would beeatenby attending warriors and other bystanders. The hands and feet were given to thechilanwho, if they had belonged to a war captive, wore the bones as a trophy.[9]Archaeological investigations indicate that heart sacrifice was practised as early as the Classic period.
Bloodletting:
Blood served a very important purpose in Maya culture. It was believed to contain a "life-force" orchu ‘lelthat was required by supernatural forces.[18]Blood was offered to the gods or deities by auto-sacrificial bloodletting. Practitioners would cut or pierce themselves with a variety of tools such as bone awls and needles, obsidian blades, or maguey thorns. Blood would be obtained from areas such as ears, cheeks, lips, nostrils, tongue, arms, legs, and the penis.[19]Taking blood from areas such as the penis was symbolic of reproduction and fertility. Once bleeding, the blood would be caught on an item such as bark paper, cotton, animal feathers, and then burned as to deliver it to the gods.
In the Bible also states that Moloch would have a star, in which is the six-pointed star of Saturn. This is also where things get interesting because here this version Murugan is shown with the six-pointed star.
Amos 5:26: “But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves.”
Acts 7:43: “Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to worship them: and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.”
Let's see its meaning in Hinduism as it's called "Shaktona:. Based on the Wiki states this:
Shatkona is a symbol used in Hindu yantra; a "six-pointed star" is made from two interlocking triangles; the upper stands for Shiva, Purusha, the lower for Shakti, Prakriti. Their union gives birth to Kumara (Kartikeya), whose sacred number is six. The Shatkona represents both the male and female form, as a symbol of the divine union of masculine and feminine and as a source of all creation; more specifically it is supposed to represent Purusha (the supreme being), and Prakriti (mother nature, or causal matter). Often this is represented as Shiva/Shakti. It is often referenced that the Shatkona is the symbol of the Hindu deity known as Kumara (and by many other names). The Shatkona is a hexagram and is associated with the son of Shiva and Shakti, Kartikeya. Stylistically, it is identical to the Jewish Star of David and the Japanese Kagome crest.
Based on Huitzilopochtli states this:
Sacrifice:
Ritual sacrifice and self-bloodletting were key offerings to Huitzilopochtli. The Aztecs performed ritual self-sacrifice (also called auto sacrifice or bloodletting) on a daily basis. The Aztecs believed that Huitzilopochtli needed daily nourishment (tlaxcaltiliztli) in the form of human blood and hearts and that they, as "people of the sun", were required to provide Huitzilopochtli with his sustenance.[19]
When the Aztecs sacrificed people to Huitzilopochtli, the victim would be placed on a sacrificial stone. The priest would then cut through the abdomen with an obsidian or flint blade. The heart would be torn out still beating and held towards the sky in honor to the Sun-God. The body would then be pushed down the pyramid where the Coyolxauhqui stone could be found. The Coyolxauhqui Stone recreates the story of Coyolxauhqui, Huitzilopochtli's sister who was dismembered at the base of a mountain, just as the sacrificial victims were. The body would be carried away and either cremated or given to the warrior responsible for the capture of the victim. He would either cut the body in pieces and send them to important people as an offering, or use the pieces for ritual cannibalism. The warrior would thus ascend one step in the hierarchy of the Aztec social classes, a system that rewarded successful warriors.
During the festival of Panquetzaliztli, of which Huitzilopochtli was the patron, sacrificial victims were adorned in the manner of Huitzilopochtli's costume and blue body paint, before their hearts would be sacrificially removed. Representations of Huitzilopochtli called teixiptla were also worshipped, the most significant being the one at the Templo Mayor which was made of dough mixed with sacrificial blood.
Warriors who died in battle or as sacrifices to Huitzilopochtli were called quauhteca ("the eagle's people"). War was an important source of both human and material tribute. Human tribute was used for sacrificial purposes because human blood was believed to be extremely important, and thus powerful. According to Aztec mythology, Huitzilopochtli needed blood as sustenance in order to continue to keep his sister and many brothers at bay as he chased them through the sky.
Then based on Coyolxāuhqui states this excerpt:
Birth of Huītzilōpōchtli and Coyolxāuhqui's defeat at Coatepec
On the summit of Coatepec("Serpent Mountain") sat a shrine for Coatlicue, the maternal Earth deity. One day, as she swept her shrine, a ball of hummingbird feathers fell from the sky. She "snatched them up; she placed them at her waist." Thus, she became pregnant with the deity Huītzilōpōchtli.
Her miraculous pregnancy embarrassed Coatlicue's other children, including her eldest daughter, Coyolxāuhqui. Hearing of her pregnancy, the Centzonhuītznāhua, led by Coyolxāuhqui, decided to kill Coatlicue. As they prepared for battle and gathered at the base of Coatepec, one of the Centzonhuītznāhua, Quauitlicac, warned Huītzilōpōchtli of the attack while he was in utero. Hearing of the attack, the pregnant Cōātlīcue miraculously gave birth to a fully grown and armed Huītzilōpōchtli who sprang from her womb, wielding "his shield, teueuelli, and his darts and his blue dart thrower, called xinatlatl."[8]
Huītzilōpōchtli killed Coyolxāuhqui, beheading her and throwing her body down the side of Coatepec: "He pierced Coyolxauhqui, and then quickly struck off her head. It stopped there at the edge of Coatepetl. And her body came falling below; it fell breaking to pieces; in various places her arms, her legs, her body each fell." As for his brothers, the Centzonhuītznāhua, he scattered them in all directions from the top of Coatepec. He pursued them relentlessly, and those who escaped went south. Some authors have written that Huītzilōpōchtli tossed Coyolxāuhqui's head into the sky, where it became the Moon, so that his mother would be comforted in seeing her daughter in the sky every night, and that her scattered brothers became the Southern Star deities. It is difficult to verify these variations of the narrative with 16th century sources."
Now, based on the God shown above is being worshiped through cannibalism is the goddess "Coyolxāuhqui" and is shown with "eyes on its body like that of a peacock. I had to addressed in this in the Chapter "Legend of the Aryans" on the Aryan migration to the Americas and the Dragon gods of America, and how this is the "Bacchic" God worshiped and not Huitzilopochtli. This is what I had caught about this segment on practices done towards the Christian God is the same practice towards Baal based on the bloodletting and mortification of the flesh. This is mentioned in Ignatius Donnelly's "Atlantis the Antediluvian world as the Catholic Priest found that these Indians had crosses, were doing water baptism and were flogging themselves just like the Catholics. The Cross of Quetzalcoatl is identified as the Peacock angel Dagon the Dragon God that came forth from the seas.
Now, based on the Testament of Amram describes the war between the Michael and his angels and Belial and his angel, whereas the latter is described as a serpent with peacock symbolism. Though this becomes dark because then we trace back to where these strange practices came from and how some had survived through other nations. The "bloodletting" practices are based on Dagon in which came from that part of the world and spreading everywhere. This is what it meant that Thoth teaching the different nations the cult of Dagon which becomes the 3 Abrahamic religions. There are two groups being dealt with here. Just as there are "two" entities called Thoth, there are two Enochs in the form of Micheal as Indra and Satan as Agni. Based on the Emerald Tablets details the sons of light and the sons of darkness to the Devas and Asuras.
Here the Goddess that is called Coyolxauhqui is known as Cipactli:
Cipactli (Classical Nahuatl: Cipactli "crocodile" or "caiman") was the first day of the Aztec divinatory count of 13 X 20 days (the tonalpohualli) and Cipactonal "Sign of Cipactli" was considered to have been the first diviner.[1]In Aztec cosmology, the crocodile symbolized the earth floating in the primeval waters. According to one Aztec tradition, Teocipactli "Divine Crocodile" was the name of a survivor of the flood who rescued himself in a canoe and again repopulated the earth.[2]In the Mixtec Vienna Codex (Codex Vindobonensis Mexicanus I), Crocodile is a day associated with dynastic beginnings.[3]
In Aztec mythology, Cipactli was a primeval sea monster, part crocodilian, part fish, and part toad or frog. Always hungry, every joint on its body was adorned with an extra mouth. The deity Tezcatlipoca sacrificed a foot when he used it as bait to draw the monster nearer. He and Quetzalcoatl created the earth from its body.
Karl A. Taube has noted that among the Formative-period Olmec and the pre-Hispanic Maya peoples, crocodilians were identified with rain-bringing wind, probably because of the widespread belief that wind and rain clouds are "breathed" out of cave openings in the earth. A series of Olmec-style bas reliefs from Chalcatzingo in the state of Morelos portrays crocodilians breathing rain clouds from their upturned mouths. Portable green stone Olmec sculptures depict crocodilians in similar positions, indicating that they are probably also breathing. In the Maya tzolk'in, the day Cipactli corresponds to Imix. In the Mayan Popol Vuh, the name of the earthquake demon, Zipacna, apparently derives from Cipactli.[5]Sipakna is the demon Sipak of 20th century Highland Maya oral tradition. In Migian, Cipactli is Quanai. In other versions, Cipactli is called Tlaltecuhtli, a deity referred to as the "earth monster".
Then we come to Tlaltecuhtli:
Tlaltecuhtli is a pre-Columbian Mesoamerican deity worshipped primarily by the Mexica (Aztec) people. Sometimes referred to as the "earth monster," Tlaltecuhtli's dismembered body was the basis for the world in the Aztec creation story of the fifth and final cosmos.[5]In carvings, Tlaltecuhtli is often depicted as an anthropomorphic being with splayed arms and legs. Considered the source of all living things, she had to be kept sated by human sacrifices which would ensure the continued order of the world. According to a source, in the creation of the Earth, the gods did not tire of admiring the liquid world, no oscillations, no movements, so Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl thought that the newly created world should be inhabited. And for this, they made Tlalcihuatl, 'Lady of the earth', come down from heaven, and Tlaltecuhtli, 'Lord of the earth', would be her consort.[1]Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl create the Earth from the body of Cipactli, a giant alligator/crocodile self-created in the Omeyocan. Tlaltecuhtli is known from several post-conquest manuscripts that surveyed Mexica mythology and belief systems, such as the Histoyre du méchique,[6]Florentine Codex, and Codex Bodley, both compiled in the sixteenth century.
Tlaltecuhtli is typically depicted as a squatting toad-like creature with massive claws, a gaping mouth, and crocodile skin, which represented the surface of the earth. In carvings, her mouth is often shown with a river of blood flowing from it or a flint knife between her teeth, a reference to the human blood she thirsted for. Her elbows and knees are often adorned with human skulls, and she sometimes appears with multiple mouths full of sharp teeth all over her body. In some images, she wears a skirt made of human bones and a star border, a symbol of her primordial sacrifice. Many sculptures of Tlaltecuhtli were meant only for the gods and were not intended to be seen by humans. She was often carved onto the bottom of sculptures where they made contact with the earth, or on the undersides of stone boxes called cuauhxicalli ("eagle box"), which held the sacrificial hearts she was so partial to. In reference to her mythological function as the support of the earth, Tlaltecuhtli was sometimes carved onto the cornerstones of temples, such as the pyramid platform at El Tajin.
According to Alfonso Caso,[10]there were four earth gods — Tlaltecuhtli, Coatlicue, Cihuacoatl and Tlazolteotl. In the Mexica creation story, Tlaltecuhtli is described as a sea monster (sometimes called Cipactli) who dwelled in the ocean after the fourth Great Flood. She was an embodiment of the chaos that raged before creation.[8]One day, the gods Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca descended from the heavens in the form of serpents and found the monstrous Tlaltecuhtli (Cipactli) sitting on top of the ocean with giant fangs, crocodile skin, and gnashing teeth calling for flesh to feast on. The two gods decided that the fifth cosmos could not prosper with such a horrible creature roaming the world, and so they set out to destroy her. To attract her, Tezcatlipoca used his foot as bait, and Tlaltecuhtli ate it. In the fight that followed, Tezcatlipoca lost his foot and Tlaltecuhtli lost her lower jaw, taking away her ability to sink below the surface of the water. After a long struggle, Tezcatlipoca and Quetzalcoatl managed to rip her body in two — from the upper half came the sky, and from the lower came the earth.[6]She remained alive, however, and demanded human blood as repayment for her sacrifice.
The other gods were angered to hear of Tlaltecuhtli's treatment and decreed that the various parts of her dismembered body would become the features of the new world. Her skin became grasses and small flowers, her hair the trees and herbs, her eyes the springs and wells, her nose the hills and valleys, her shoulders the mountains, and her mouth the caves and rivers.[6]
According to a source, all the deities of the earth are female, except the advocation of Tezcatlipoca, which is Tepeyollotl, 'heart of the mountain', and Tlaltecuthli, 'lord earth', which the latter is formed by the center of the body of Cipactli, which is It owes its other name, Tlalticpaque, 'lord of the world'. Tlaltecuhtli meets Coatlicue as a consort as the devourer, and Coatlicue as the one who gives continuous birth to new beings, men and animals.
Since Tlaltecuhtli's body was transformed into the geographical features, the Mexica attributed strange sounds from the earth as either the screams of Tlaltecuhtli in her dismembered agony, or her calls for human blood to feed her. As a source of life, it was thought necessary to appease Tlaltecuhtli with blood sacrifices, especially human hearts. The Aztecs believed that Tlaltecuhtli's insatiable appetite had to be satisfied or the goddess would cease her nourishment of the earth and crops would fail.[12]
The Mexica believe Tlaltecuhtli to swallow the sun between her massive jaws at dusk, and regurgitate it the next morning at dawn. The fear that this cycle could be interrupted, like during solar eclipses, was often the cause of uneasiness and increased ritual sacrifice.[13]Tlaltecuhtli's connection to the sun ensured that she was included in the prayers offered to Tezcatlipoca before Aztec military campaigns.[13]
Finally, because of Tlaltecuhtli's association with fertility, midwives called on her aid during difficult births—when an "infant warrior" threatened to kill the mother during labor.
Kavadi Aattam is a ceremonial act of sacrifice and offering to Murugan practiced by his devotees.[106]Its origin has been linked to a mythic anecdote about Idumban.[107]It symbolizes a form of debt bondage through the bearing of a physical burden called Kavadi (lit.'burden'). The Kavadi is a physical burden which consists of two semicircular pieces of wood or steel which are bent and attached to a cross structure in its simplest form, which is then balanced on the shoulders of the devotee. By bearing the Kavadi, the devotees processionally implore Murugan for assistance, usually as a means of balancing a spiritual debt or on behalf of a loved one who is in need of help or healing. Worshipers often carry pots of cow milkas an offering (pal kavadi). The most extreme and spectacular practice is the carrying of el kavadi, a portable altar up to 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) tall and weighing up to 30 kg (66 lb) decorated with peacock feathers, which is attached to the body of the devotee through multiple skewers and metal hooks pierced into the skin on the chest and back.
Once all sages and gods assembled in Kailasha, the abode of Shiva, which resulted in the tilting of Earth due to an increase in weight on the hemisphere where the gathered stood. Shiva asked sage Agasthya to move towards the south to restore the balance. Agasthya employed an asura named Idumban to carry two hills called Sivagiri and Sakthigiri (Mountains of Shiva and Shakti) on his shoulders to be placed in the south, to balance the weight. Idumban carried the hills and set southward, stopping en route to place them down for a while and rest. When he tried to lift them again, he was unable to move one of the hills. He found a youth standing atop the hill and fought with him, only to be defeated. Agasthya identified the youth as Kartikeya, and the two discussed the dispute. The hill was left to remain at its resting location, which later became Palani. Kartikeya later resurrected Idumban as his devotee. The mythology behind Idumban carrying the hills on the shoulder may have influenced the practice of Kavadi.
Worshipers also practice a form of mortification of the flesh by flagellation and by piercing their skin, tongue or cheeks with vel skewers.[111]These practices are suppressed in India, where public self-mutilation is prohibited by law. Vibuthi, a type of sacred ash, is spread across the body, including the piercing sites. Drumming and chanting of verses help the devotees to enter a state of trance.[111]Devotees usually prepare for the rituals by keeping clean, doing regular prayers, following a vegetarian diet, and fasting while remaining celibate.[114]They make pilgrimage to the temples of Kartikeya on bare feet and dance along the route while bearing these burdens.[115]
Tonsuring is performed by devotees as the ritual fulfillment of a vow to discard their hair in imitation of the form that Kartikeya assumed in childhood. Newborns may undergo a ritual of tonsuring and ear piercing at temples dedicated to Kartikeya. Panchamritam (lit. 'mixture of five') is a sacred sweet mixture made of banana, honey, ghee, jaggery and cardamom along with date fruits and Sugar candies, which is offered to Kartikeya. It is believed to have been prepared before by Ganesha to soothe his brother Kartikeya after their battle for the divine fruit of knowledge. The practice is followed in modern times in temples where the devotees are provided the mixture as a prasad.
The Asians in their Taoist and Vegetarian festivals would imbue this same practice (See "Thoth is Enoch: Saturn and the Black Cube worship and symbolism"). They say it's done towards Murugan as the Peacock angel, but this is based on Dagon, but now that I look at the film "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" details a hidden truth about what was going on before these religions were "cleaned up", because the same exact thing the apparent Aztecs and Mayans were doing is based on the same practices towards Dagon. The wearing the skin of the victims is where Halloween is based on as this strange cult is the flaying of human skin. Siva and Kali who is Mahakala and Mahakali are known for the Graveyard and the dead and are known for the symbolism of the dead and death. The "Skatkona" is based on the union of Mahakala (Siva) and Mahakali (Kali) as Baal and Ashtoreth in the Bible.
Now, let's see Ignatius Donnelly's book "Atlantis: The Antediluvian world". In part 5 "Colonies of Atlantis: The Central America and Mexican Colonies" details this:
The western shores of Atlantis were not far distant from the West India Islands; a people possessed of ships could readily pass from island to island until they reached the continent. Columbus found the natives making such voyages in open canoes. If, then, we will suppose that there was no original connection between the inhabitants of the main—land and of Atlantis, the commercial activity of the Atlanteans would soon reveal to them the shores of the Gulf. Commerce implies the plantation of colonies; the trading—post is always the nucleus of a settlement; we have seen this illustrated in modern times in the case of the English East India Company and the Hudson Bay Company. We can therefore readily believe that commercial intercourse between Atlantis and Yucatan, Honduras and Mexico, created colonies along the shores of the Gulf which gradually spread into the interior, and to the high table—lands of Mexico. And, accordingly, we find, as I have already shown, that all the traditions of Central America and Mexico point to some country in the East, and beyond the sea, as the source of their first civilized people; and this region, known among them as "Aztlan," lived in the memory of the people as a beautiful and happy land, where their ancestors had dwelt in peace for many generations.
Dr. Le Plongeon, who spent four years exploring Yucatan, says:
"One-third of this tongue (the Maya) is pure Greek. Who brought the dialect of Homer to America? or who took to Greece that of the Mayas? Greek is the offspring of the Sanscrit. Is Maya? or are they coeval?.. . The Maya is not devoid of words from the Assyrian."
That the population of Central America (and in this term I include Mexico) was at one time very dense, and had attained to a high degree of civilization, higher even than that of Europe in the time of Columbus, there can be no question; and it is also probable, as I have shown, that they originally belonged to the white race. Désiré Charnay, who is now exploring the ruins of Central America, says (‘North American Review’, January, 1881, p. 48), "The Toltecs were ‘fair, robust, and bearded’. I have often seen Indians of pure blood with blue eyes." Quetzalcoatl was represented as large, "with a big head and a heavy beard." The same author speaks (page 44) of "the ocean of ruins all around, not inferior in size to those of Egypt" At Teotihuacan he measured one building two thousand feet wide on each side, and fifteen pyramids, each nearly as large in the base as Cheops. "The city is indeed of vast exten.... the whole ground, over a space of five or six miles in diameter, is covered with heaps of ruins——ruins which at first make no impression, so complete is their dilapidation."
He asserts the great antiquity of these ruins, because be found the very highways of the ancient city to be composed of broken bricks and pottery, the débris left by earlier populations. "This continent," he says (page 43), "is the land of mysteries; we here enter an infinity whose limits we cannot estimate. . ... shall soon have to quit work in this place. The long avenue on which it stands is lined with ruins of public buildings and palaces, forming continuous lines, as in the streets of modern cities. Still, all these edifices and balls were as nothing compared with the vast substructures which strengthened their foundations."
We find the strongest resemblances to the works of the ancient European races: the masonry is similar; the cement is the same; the sculptures are alike; both peoples used the arch; in both continents we find bricks, glassware, and even porcelain (‘North American Review', December, 1880, pp. 524, 525), "with blue figures ona white ground;" also bronze composed of the same elements of copper and tin in like proportions; coins made of copper, round and T-shaped, and even metallic candlesticks.
Désiré Charnay believes that he has found in the ruins of Tula the bones of swine, sheep, oxen, and horses, in a fossil state, indicating an immense antiquity. The Toltecs possessed a pure and simple religion, like that of Atlantis, as described by Plato, with the same sacrifices of fruits and flowers; they were farmers; they raised and wove cotton; they cultivated fruits; they used the sign of the Cross extensively; they cut and engraved precious stones; among their carvings have been found representations of the elephant and the lion, both animals not known in America. The forms of sepulture were the same as among the ancient races of the Old World; they burnt the bodies of their great men, and enclosed the dust in funeral urns; some of their dead were buried in a sitting position, others reclined at full length, and many were embalmed like the Egyptian mummies.
When we turn to Mexico, the same resemblances present themselves.
The government was an elective monarchy, like that of Poland, the king being selected from the royal family by the votes of the nobles of the kingdom. There was a royal family, an aristocracy, a privileged priesthood, a judiciary, and acommon people. Here we have all the several estates into which society in Europe is divided.
There were thirty grand nobles in the kingdom, and the vastness of the realm may be judged by the fact that each of these could muster one hundred thousand vassals from their own estates, or a total of three millions. And we have only to read of the vast hordes brought into the field against Cortez to know that this was not an exaggeration.
They even possessed that which has been considered the crowning feature of European society, the feudal system. The nobles held their lands upon the tenure of military service.
But the most striking feature was the organization of the judiciary. The judges were independent even of the king, and held their offices for life. There were supreme judges for the larger divisions of the kingdom, district judges in each of the provinces, and magistrates chosen by the people throughout the country.
There was also a general legislative assembly, congress, or parliament, held every eighty days, presided over by the king, consisting of all the judges of the realm, to which the last appeal lay "The rites of marriage,” says Prescott, "were celebrated with as much formality as in any Christian country; and the institution was held in such reverence that a tribunal was instituted for the sole purpose of determining questions relating to it. Divorces could not be obtained until authorized by a sentence of the court, after a patient hearing of the parties."
Slavery was tolerated, but the labors of the slave were light, his rights carefully guarded, and his children were free. The slave could own property, and even other slaves.
Their religion possessed so many features similar to those of the Old World, that the Spanish priests declared the devil had given them a bogus imitation of Christianity to destroy their souls. "The devil," said they, "stole all he could."
They had confessions, absolution of sins, and baptism. When their children were named, they sprinkled their lips and bosoms with water, and "the Lord was implored to permit the holy drops to wash away the sin that was given it before the foundation of the world."
*The priests were numerous and powerful. They practiced fasts, vigils, flagellations, and many of them lived in monastic seclusion.
The Aztecs, like the Egyptians, had progressed through all the three different modes of writing——the picture—writing, the symbolical, and the phonetic. They recorded all their laws, their tribute—rolls specifying the various imposts, their mythology, astronomical calendars, and rituals, their political annals and their chronology. They wrote on cotton—cloth, on skins prepared like parchment, on a composition of silk and gum, and on a species of paper, soft and beautiful, made from the aloe. Their books were about the size and shape of our own, but the leaves were long strips folded together in many folds. They wrote poetry and cultivated oratory, and paid much attention to rhetoric. They also had a species of theatrical performances...."
Now, I already know where the true origin of Christianity came from and don't buy the nonsense as the people had blue eyes as Quetzalcoatl being a white god with a beard, but one thing he had detailed is the Cross and Christian practices of "self-flagellation" which states the same thing done amongst the Christians was also done here in Ancient America. The real question is "who" brought this culture to the Americas, because it's shown that Black God on the cross is Quetzalcoatl and is real reason why the Spanish travelers saw this remarkable resemblance to their religion of Christianity.
CHAPTER V. THE PYRAMID, THE CROSS, AND THE GARDEN OF EDEN.
No fact is better established than the reverence shown to the sign of the Cross in all the ages prior to Christianity. We cannot do better than quote from an able article in the Edinburgh Review of July, 1870, upon this question:
"From the dawn of organized Paganism in the Eastern world to the final establishment of Christianity in the Western, the Cross was undoubtedly one of the commonest and most sacred of symbolical monuments; and, to a remarkable extent, it is so still in almost every land where that of Calvary is unrecognized or unknown. Apart from any distinctions of social or intellectual superiority, of caste, color, nationality, or location in either hemisphere, it appears to have been the aboriginal possession of every people in antiquity——the elastic girdle, so to say, which embraced the most widely separated heathen communities——the most significant token of a universal brotherhood, to which all the families of mankind were severally and irresistibly drawn, and by which 'their common descent was emphatically expressed’, or by means of which each and all preserved, amid every vicissitude of fortune, a knowledge of 'the primeval happiness and dignity of their species’. Where authentic history is silent on the subject, the material relics of past and long since forgotten races are not wanting to confirm and strengthen this supposition. Diversified forms of the symbol are delineated more or less artistically, according to the progress achieved in civilization at the period, on the ruined walls of temples and palaces, on natural rocks and sepulchral galleries, on the hoariest monoliths and the rudest statuary; on coins, medals, and vases of every description; and, in not a few instances, are preserved in the architectural proportions of subterranean as well as superterranean structures, of tumuli as well as fanes."
The extraordinary sanctity attaching to the symbol, in every age and under every variety of circumstance, justified any expenditure incurred in its fabrication or embellishment; hence the most persistent labor, the most consummate ingenuity, were lavished upon it. Populations of essentially different culture, tastes, and pursuits——the highly—civilized and the demi-—civilized, the settled and nomadic——vied with each other in their efforts to extend the knowledge of its exceptional import and virtue among their latest posterities. The marvellous rock—hewn caves of Elephanta and Ellora, and the stately temples of Mathura and Terputty, in the East, may be cited as characteristic examples of one laborious method of exhibiting it; and the megalithic structures of Callernish and Newgrange, in the West, of another; while a third may be instanced. in the great temple at Mitzla, 'the City of the Moon,' in Ojaaca, Central America. also excavated in the living rock, and manifesting the same stupendous labor and ingenuity as are observable in the cognate caverns of Salsette——of endeavors, we repeat, made by peoples as intellectually as geographically distinct, and followers withal of independent and unassociated deities, to magnify and perpetuate some grand primeval symbol...
"Of the several varieties of the Cross still in vogue, as national or ecclesiastical emblems, in this and other European states, and distinguished by the familiar appellations of St. George, St. Andrew, the Maltese, the Greek, the Latin, etc., etc., there is not one among them the existence of which may not be traced to the remotest antiquity. They were the common property of the Eastern nations. No revolution or other casualty has wrought any perceptible difference in their several forms or delineations; they have passed from one hemisphere to the other intact; have survived dynasties, empires, and races; have been borne on the crest of each successive wave of Aryan population in its course toward the West; and, having been reconsecrated in later times by their lineal descendants, are still recognized as military and national badges of distinction...
Among the earliest known types is the ‘crux ansata', vulgarly called 'the key of the Nile,’ because of its being found sculptured or otherwise represented so frequently upon Egyptian and Coptic monuments. It has, however, a very much older and more sacred signification than this. It was the symbol of symbols, the mystical Tau, 'the bidden wisdom,’ not only of the ancient Egyptians but also of the Chaldeans, Phoenicians, Mexicans, Peruvians, and of every other ancient people commemorated in history, in either hemisphere, and is formed very similarly to our letter T, with a roundlet, or oval, placed immediately above it. Thus it was figured on the gigantic emerald or glass statue of Serapis, which was transported (293 B.C.) by order of Ptolemy Soter from Sinope, on the southern shores of the Black Sea, re—erected within that famous labyrinth which encompassed the banks of Lake Moeris, and destroyed by the victorious army of Theodosius (A.D. 389), despite the earnest entreaties of the Egyptian priesthood to spare it, because it was the emblem of their god and of 'the life to come.’ Sometimes, as may be seen on the breast of an Egyptian mummy in the museum of the London University, the simple T only is planted on the frustum of a cone; and sometimes it is represented as springing from a heart; in the first instance signifying goodness; in the second, hope or expectation of reward. As in the oldest temples and catacombs of Egypt, so this type likewise abounds in the ruined cities of Mexico and Central America, graven as well upon the most ancient cyclopean and polygonal walls as upon the more modern and perfect examples of masonry; and is displayed in an equally conspicuous manner upon the breasts of innumerable bronze statuettes which have been recently disinterred from the cemetery of Juigalpa (of unknown antiquity) in Nicaragua."
When the Spanish missionaries first set foot upon the soil of America, in the fifteenth century, they were amazed to find the Cross was as devoutly worshipped by the red Indians as by themselves, and were in doubt whether to ascribe the fact to the pious labors of St. Thomas or to the cunning device of the Evil One. The hallowed symbol challenged their attention on every hand and in almost every variety of form. It appeared on the bass—reliefs of ruined and deserted as well as on those of inhabited palaces, and was the most conspicuous ornament in the great temple of Gozumel, off the coast of Yucatan. According to the particular locality, and the purpose which it served, it was formed of various materials-—of marble and gypsum in the open spaces of cities and by the way—side; of wood in the teocallis or chapels on pyramidal summits and in subterranean sanctuaries; and of emerald or jasper in the palaces of kings and nobles.
When we ask the question how it comes that the sign of the Cross has thus been reverenced from the highest antiquity by the races of the Old and New Worlds, we learn that it is a reminiscence of the Garden of Eden, in other words, of Atlantis.
CHAPTER Il. THE IDENTITY OF THE CIVILIZATIONS OF THE OLD WORLD AND THE NEW MOSAICS AT MITLA, MEXICO
‘Architecture.'-—Plato tells us that the Atlanteans possessed architecture; that they built walls, temples, and palaces.
We need not add that this art was found in Egypt and all the civilized countries of Europe, as well as in Peru, Mexico, and Central America. Among both the Peruvians and Egyptians the walls receded inward, and the doors were narrower at, the top than at the threshold.
"The obelisks of Egypt, covered with hieroglyphics, are paralleled by the round columns of Central America, and both are supposed to have originated in 'Phallus—worship'. "The usual symbol of the Phallus was an erect stone, often in its rough state, sometimes sculptured." (Squier, "Serpent Symbol," p. 49; Bancroft's "Native Races," vol. iti., p. 504.) The worship of Priapus was found in Asia, Egypt, along the European shore of the Mediterranean, and in the forests of Central America...."
"...Among the early Greeks Pan was the ancient god; his wife was Maia. The Abbé Brasseur de Bourbourg calls attention to the fact that Pan was adored in all parts of Mexico and Central America; and at 'Panuco’, or ‘Panca’, literally 'Panopolis', the Spaniards found. upon their entrance into Mexico, superb temples and images of Pan. (Brasseur's Introduction in Landa's "Relacion.") The names of both Pan and Maya enter extensively into the Maya vocabulary, Maia being the same as Maya, the principal name of the peninsula; and ‘pan’, added to 'Maya’', makes the name of the ancient capital 'Mayapan'. In the Nahua language ‘pan’, or ‘pani’, signifies "equality to that which is above," and Pentecatl was the progenitor of all beings. ("North Americans of Antiquity,” p. 467.)"
A writer in the Popular Science Monthly (April, 1881, p. 828) points out the fact that there is an absolute identity between the folk—lore of the negroes on the plantations of the South and the myths and stories of certain tribes of Indians in South America, as revealed by Mr. Herbert Smith's "Brazil, the Amazons, and the Coast." (New York: Scribner, 1879.) Mr. Harris, the author of a work on the folk—lore of the negroes, asks this question, "When did the negro or the North American Indian come in contact with the tribes of South America?"
‘Customs.'-—Both peoples manufactured a fermented, intoxicating drink, the one deriving it from barley, the other from maize. Both drank toasts. Both had the institution of marriage, an important part of the ceremony consisting in the joining of bands; both recognized divorce, and the Peruvians and Mexicans established special courts to decide cases of this kind. Both the Americans and Europeans erected arches, and had triumphal processions for their victorious kings, and both strewed the ground before them with leaves and flowers. Both celebrated important events with bonfires and illuminations; both used banners, both invoked blessings. The Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Egyptians practised circumcision. Palacio relates that at Azori, in Honduras, the natives circumcised boys before an idol called Icelca. ("Carta," p. 84.) Lord Kingsborough tells us the Central Americans used the same rite, and McKenzie (quoted by Retzius) says he saw the ceremony performed by the Chippeways. Both had bards and minstrels, who on great festivals sung the deeds of kings and heroes. Both the Egyptians and the Peruvians held agricultural fairs; both took a census of the people. Among both the land was divided per capita among the people; in Judea a new division was made every fifty years. The Peruvians renewed every year all the fires of the kingdom from the Temple of the Sun, the new fire being kindled from concave mirrors by the sun's rays. The Romans under Numa had precisely the same custom. The Peruvians had theatrical plays. They chewed the leaves of the coca mixed with lime, as the Hindoo to—day chews the leaves of the betel mixed with lime. Both the American and European nations were divided into castes; both practised planet—worship; both used scales and weights and mirrors. The Peruvians, Egyptians, and Chaldeans divided the year into twelve months, and the months into lesser divisions of weeks. Both inserted additional days, so as to give the year three hundred and sixty—five days. The Mexicans added five intercalary days; and the Egyptians, in the time of Amunoph L., had already the same practice.
Humboldt, whose high authority cannot be questioned, by an elaborate discussion ("Wues des Cordilleras," p. 148 'et. seq.', ed. 1870), has shown the relative likeness of the Nahua calendar to that of Asia. He cites the fact that the Chinese, Japanese, Calmucks, Mongols, Mantchou, and other hordes of Tartars have cycles of sixty years' duration, divided into five brief periods of twelve years each. The method of citing a date by means of signs and numbers is quite similar with Asiatics and Mexicans. He further shows satisfactorily that ‘the majority of the names of the twenty days employed by the Aztecs are those of a zodiac used since the most remote antiquity among the peoples of Eastern Asia.' Cabera thinks he finds analogies between the Mexican and Egyptian calendars. Adopting the view of several writers that the Mexican year began on the 26th of February, be finds the date to correspond with the beginning of the Egyptian year.
The American nations believed in four great primeval ages, as the Hindoo does to this day. "In the Greeks of Homer," says Volney, "I find the customs, discourse, and manners of the Iroquois, Delawares, and Miamis. The tragedies of Sophocles and Euripides paint to me almost literally the sentiments of the red men respecting necessity, fatality, the miseries of human life, and the rigor of blind destiny." (Volney's "View of the United States.")
The Mexicans represent an eclipse of the moon as the moon being devoured by a dragon; and the Hindoos have precisely the same figure; and both nations continued to use this expression long after they had discovered the real meaning of an eclipse. The Tartars believe that if they cut with an axe near a fire, or stick a knife into a burning stick, or touch the fire with a knife, they will "cut the top off the fire." The Sioux Indians will not stick an awl or a needle into a stick of wood on the fire, or chop on it with an axe or a knife.
Cremation was extensively practised in the New World. The dead were burnt, and their ashes collected and placed in vases and urns, as in Europe. Wooden statues of the dead were made. There is a very curious and apparently inexplicable custom, called the "Couvade," which extends from China to the Mississippi Valley; it demands "that, when a child is born, the father must take to his bed, while the mother attends to all the duties of the household." Marco Polo found the custom among the Chinese in the thirteenth century.
The widow tells Hudibras——
"Chinese thus are said To lie—in in their ladies’ stead."
The practice remarked by Marco Polo continues to this day among the hill—tribes of China. "The father of a new-born child, as soon as the mother has become strong enough to leave her couch, gets into bed himself, and there receives the congratulations of his acquaintances." (Max Miiller's "Chips from a German
Workshop," vol. ii., p. 272.) Strabo (vol. iti., pp. 4, 17) mentions that, among the Iberians of the North of
Spain, the women, after the birth of a child, tend their husbands, putting them to bed instead of going themselves. The same custom existed among the Basques only a few years ago. "In Biscay," says M. F. Michel, "the women rise immediately after childbirth and attend to the duties of the household, while the husband goes to bed, taking the baby with him, and thus receives the neighbors' compliments.” The same custom was found in France, and is said to 'exist to this day in some cantons of Béarn'. Diodorus Siculus tells us that among the Corsicans the wife was neglected, and the husband put to bed and treated as the patient. Apollonius Rhodius says that among the Tibereni, at the south of the Black Sea, "when a child was born the father lay groaning, with his head tied up, while the mother tended him with food and prepared his baths." The same absurd custom extends throughout the tribes of North and South America. Among the Caribs in the West Indies (and the Caribs, Brasseur de Bourbourg says, were the same as the ancient Carians of the Mediterranean Sea) the man takes to his bed as soon as a child is born, and kills no animals. And herein we find an explanation of a custom otherwise inexplicable. Among the American Indians it is believed that, if the father kills an animal during the infancy of the child, the spirit of the animal will revenge itself by inflicting some disease upon the helpless little one.
"For six months the Carib father must not eat birds or fish, for whatever animals he eats will impress their likeness on the child, or produce disease by entering its body." (Dorman, "Prim. Superst.," p. 58.) Among the Abipones the husband goes to bed, fasts a number of days, "and you would think,” says Dobrizboffer, "that it was he that had had the child." The Brazilian father takes to his hammock during and after the birth of the child, and for fifteen days eats no meat and hunts no game. Among the Esquimaux the husbands forbear hunting during the lying—in of their wives and for some time thereafter.
Here, then, we have a very extraordinary and unnatural custom, existing to this day on both sides of the Atlantic, reaching back to a vast antiquity, and finding its explanation only in the superstition of the American races. A practice so absurd could scarcely have originated separately in the two continents; its existence is a very strong proof of unity of origin of the races on the opposite sides of the Atlantic; and the fact that the custom and the reason for it are both found in America, while the custom remains in Europe without the reason, would imply that the American population was the older of the two. The Indian practice of depositing weapons and food with the dead was universal in ancient Europe, and in German villages nowadays a needle and thread is placed in the coffin for the dead to mend their torn clothes with; "while all over Europe the dead man had a piece of money put in his hand to pay his way with." ("Anthropology,” p. 347.)
The American Indian leaves food with the dead; the Russian peasant puts crumbs of bread behind the saints’ pictures on the little iron shelf, and believes that the souls of his forefathers creep in and out and eat them. At the cemetery of Pére—la—Chaise, Paris, on All—souls—day, they "still put cakes and sweetmeats on the graves; and in Brittany the peasants that night do not forget to make up the fire and leave the fragments of the supper on the table for the souls of the dead." (‘Ibid’.. p. 351.)
The Indian prays to the spirits of his forefathers; the Chinese religion is largely "ancestor—worship;" and the rites paid to the dead ancestors, or lares, held the Roman family together.” ("Anthropology," p. 351.)
We find the Indian practice of burying the dead in a sitting posture in use among the Nasamonians, tribe of Libyans. Herodotus, speaking of the wandering tribes of Northern Africa, says, "They bury their dead ‘according to the fashion of the Greeks'.... They bury them sitting, and are right careful, when the sick man is at the point of giving up the ghost, to make him sit, and not let him die lying down." The dead bodies of the caciques of Bogota were protected from desecration by diverting the course of a river and making the grave in its bed, and then letting the stream return to its natural course. Alaric, the leader of the Goths, was secretly buried in the same way. (Dorman, "Prim. Superst.," p. 195.)
CHAPTER Il. THE KINGS OF ATLANTIS BECOME THE GODS OF THE GREEKS.
Lord Bacon said:
"The mythology of the Greeks, which their oldest writers do not pretend to have invented, was no more than a light air, which had passed from a more ancient people into the flutes of the Greeks, which they modulated to such descants as best suited their fancies."
This profoundly wise and great man, who has illuminated every subject which he has touched, guessed very close to the truth in this utterance.
The Hon. W. E. Gladstone has had quite a debate of late with Mr. Cox as to whether the Greek mythology was underlaid by a nature worship, or a planetary or solar worship. Peru, worshipping the sun and moon and planets, probably represents very closely the simple and primitive religion of Atlantis, with its sacrifices of fruits and flowers. This passed directly to their colony in Egypt. We find the Egyptians in their early ages sun and planet worshippers. Ptah was the object of their highest adoration. He is the father of the god of the sun, the ruler of the region of light. Ra was the sun—god. He was the supreme divinity at On, or Heliopolis, near Memphis. His symbol was the solar disk, supported by two rings. He created all that exists below the heavens. The Babylonian trinity was composed of Idea, Anu, and Bel. Bel represented the sun, and was the favorite god. Sin was the goddess of the moon.
The Phoenicians were also sun—worshippers. The sun was represented by Baal—Samin, the great god, the god of light and the heavens, the creator and rejuvenator.
"The attributes of both Baal and Moloch (the good and bad powers of the sun) were united in the Phoenician god Melkart, "king of the city," whom the inhabitants of Tyre considered their special patron. The Greeks called him "Melicertes," and identified him with Hercules. By his great strength and power he turned evil into good, brought life out of destruction, pulled back the sun to the earth at the time of the solstices, lessened excessive beat and cold, and rectified the evil signs of the zodiac. In Phoenician legends he conquers the savage races of distant coasts, founds the ancient settlements on the Mediterranean, and plants the rocks in the Straits of Gibraltar. ("American Cyclopedia," art. 'Mythology’.)
The Egyptians worshipped the sun under the name of Ra; the Hindoos worshipped the sun under the name of Rama; while the great festival of the sun, of the Peruvians, was called Ray—mi.
Sun—worship, as the ancient religion of Atlantis, underlies all the superstitions of the colonies of that country. The Samoyed woman says to the sun, "When thou, god, risest, I too rise from my bed." Every morning even now the Brahmans stand on one foot, with their hands held out before them and their faces turned to the east, adoring the sun. "In Germany or France one may still see the peasant take off his hat to the rising sun." ("Anthropology,” p. 361.) The Romans, even, in later times, worshipped the sun at Emesa, under the name of Elagabalus, "typified in the form of a black conical stone, which it was believed had fallen from heaven.” The conical stone was the emblem of Bel. Did it have relation to the mounds and pyramids?
Then we go full circle to Acts 19:
30And when Paul would have entered in unto the people, the disciples suffered him not.
Now, based on the cult of Dagon shows this powerful influence to have come from Lemuria which is the submerged continent where Noah's flood is based on. This would be the true reason why they destroyed those books because this details the root of the religion of Christianity to which had surprised the Spanish travelers. Then when you put two and two together only then this Gods coming forth from the seas came to American and India to which the latter travels to Europe. Manly P. Hall had stated on the seven headed serpent and the Islands of Poseidon coming from the Atlantic, but that wouldn't be true because this came from a group of black people that had spread this cult out of India to which becomes Hinduism, Buddhism then Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
Now, what about the Giants? There are the red-haired Giants, to which they are stated to be tall white people and would most likely be responsible for the larger monuments all over the world. Based on the Olmec video Frank Joseph details how there were 3 groups that came from the sunken continent of Mu. One is the blacks in which are the Asiatic negritos and Australian types, the second are the brown people to which maybe the Polynesians but I think they are the Mayans. And the last are the white people to which he doesn't give enough information. He states that the white people coming from there did not develop civilizations compare to the brown and the black, but had gone to China and at some point, intermingled with the population there. It doesn't give me much, but I think at that time he was in front of a black audience that he didn't want to give much info. I think they would be those "red haired" white people that probably settled in China after the flood, came to Western China and those legends states that some of them had six fingers and toes. However, based on the latter may indicate that they are a totally different people from the Lemurians and may had some cross breeding with another race because based on "Survive the Jive's Red Heads of China, details that only certain individuals had six fingers, though they weren't giants. The Mummies of the Tarim Basin details that they originate in Central and Western China, and though tall, but they don't display the six fingers and toe characteristic to the Giants. He does state that the Vikings would contribute to the Americas along with the Chinese. It's evident that there would be artifacts of blonde- and red-haired people like the mummies and elongated skulls so there is a rather interesting connection. But why and how are they connected? The Viking theory can't be denied of course, but a specific practice that is done amongst this group of people with skulls elongated with red hair is not something the Vikings would do, unless influenced.
Now, based on the documentary "Skeleton under the carpet" the narrator details the Dolmens in their location which is interesting. They had mentioned the "little people" in the first Documentary "Skeleton in the cupboard" but had stated that they were those people that had traveled from places like Persia and Peru. There are legends of the little people and their supposed connections to these Dolmens in which I had addressed in the "Alien Mysteries" series.
So, based on the first Documentary on the woman who had her DNA tested states that her ancestors came from Persia and then traveled to Egypt, then to Peru before making their settlements on the Polynesian Islands. Now, based from Brien Foerster's research on the video "Pararcas Elongated Skulls of Peru: The DNA results, morphological anomalies, blood type surprises" states that the DNA of the elongated skulls tells that they came from between the Caspian Sea and the Black sea, then down to Iran and Iraq, and then finally settling in Peru Paracas. This is pretty much the same travel laid out by the woman's ancestor as stated from Skeleton in the Cupboard Documentary. There are descendants living in the Pacific Islands and New Zealand.
Now, if that is the case, then why would this group of people do such a practice? Are they the same people that had settled from Peru to the Pacific Islands? Anyway, based on Brien Foerster states that these skulls are genetic and have no relations to the Native American haplogroup O originally aside from those intermingled and they all come from the black sea region which is interesting. Well, considering their descendants coming from that region tells me that despite having red hair, they have no relations to the ancient people of Mu nor the Giants apparently, but certainly came from what he states is between the Caspian and the Black Sea region. They sound like a different hominid of sorts, at least according to Brien on describing the skeleton structure being different than the rest. Then based on the Ancient Aliens details that the DNA from one skull came from Scotland in which connects to the Iberian or Celtic peoples. They are said to have a high portion of "Rh-negative blood".
In any case, the Paracas elongated skulls would have no relations to the ancient people of Mu as they have a totally different origin. It seems that if they had passed through Egypt, then even those sculptures of Egyptians with elongated heads may have a definite connection to these people. Perhaps those Mummies with blonde and red hair can connect as well, as those were people traveling through the lands until they came the Americas, and perhaps don't have anything to do with the two Gods mentioned.
Now, based on the connection of the Giants to Lemuria. Hence, once I started to learn about the location where Thoth's people came from only then I had only this in question. What is this God's connection to the Giants? We know that the Gods coming forth from the seas is Thoth and the "Lemurians" bringing their culture to the whole world. They are also "Noah" and his people in which when broken down have a connection to "Dagon". They are the Nommo, the Chitauri, Vishnu, Oannes, Votan, Quetzalcoatl, to Dagon. What's interesting is that Dagon has a connection to the Giants in the Bible through the people called "Philistines". Let's see the verses for these connections:
1 Samuel 5:5:
When the Philistines took the ark of God, they brought it into the house of Dagon, and set it by Dagon.3And when they of Ashdod arose early on the morrow, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the earth before the ark of the LORD. And they took Dagon, and set him in his place again.4And when they arose early on the morrow morning, behold, Dagon was fallen upon his face to the ground before the ark of the LORD; and the head of Dagon and both the palms of his hands were cut off upon the threshold; only the stump of Dagon was left to him.5Therefore neither the priests of Dagon, nor any that come into Dagon's house, tread on the threshold of Dagon in Ashdod unto this day.
1 Chronicles 10:10: “And they put his armour in the house of their gods, and fastened his head in the temple of Dagon.”
Judges 16:23: “Then the lords of the Philistines gathered them together for to offer a great sacrifice unto Dagon their god, and to rejoice: for they said, our god hath delivered Samson our enemy into our hand.”
Now, we have Philistines as the worshipers of Dagon. We know that Dagon is Thoth the God that brought "culture" to the whole world. Now, why would there be Giants still on the earth afterwards if God had destroyed population with a flood? Before going further based on Blavatsky's "The Secret Doctrine" she had stated that Noah was a "demon", a giant in that matter or an Asura. His people were the serpent worshipers or the "Druids" that pertains to the worship of the Dragon god which is Dagon. So, the Giants that survived are the people of Noah to which after landing in their "Arks" became these legends like the Nommo, Chitauri, Oannes, Quetzalcoatl, Vishnu and the Tuatha de Danan. So, based on the Philistines battling the children of Israel details their connection to the Lemurian continent and is also where those Giants came from which is why Goliath and his family were giants. These Giants are a part of the children of Danu which are the children of Agni/Siva.
When the God of the Aryans had led the people into the land, it's been shown that they had encountered giants with established civilizations, thus the people of Noah are the Giants amongst the Philistines and the Phoenician Canaanites under those names. It's weird that Dagon would be worshiped by the Philistines and would have Giants with six fingers and toes, and then we see Christianity worshiping this God who is posted on the Cross. Here we see the "Gods coming forth from the sea" as Noah's descendants and based on these details the coming of their God Dagon who is Thoth. This is something that has to be addressed and that is based on Adam and the serpent's lineage reveal that they are a family of "Angels" or the "Sons of God". This is why the passage Genesis 3:15 has nothing to do with mankind but is based on two groups of forces which we can call Michael's angels and the Dragon's angels, and considering this means they are the Sons of God going back to Adam and the Serpent.
Everything is synchronized if you can understand this about Dagon. Noah and his descendants were Giants, and Dagon is their God or rather the God that is Enki. Then if you can figure that out, then everything make sense as to why the Giants were on the Earth "after" the flood as the Bible states.
Now, it's important to understand that this is section is based on the category of Giants, and you will see how this makes sense. The story of the Jinn is the story of the Giants. They are "gingers" which is where the term Jinn plays upon. If Adam was a Jinn, then he would be a giant. In Islamic and Indian lore, it said that he had landed in Sri Lanka, in which "ironically" speaks on the Gods coming towards that region after the sinking of Lemuria, which is Paradise or the Garden of Eden.
In order to connect this lot, let's see this segment on Enoch from the website "slife.org" states this:
Hermes Trismegistus
"Sayyid Ahmed Amiruddin has pointed out that Hermes Trismegistus is the builder of the Pyramids of Giza and has a major place in Islamic tradition. He writes, “Hermes Trismegistus is mentioned in the Quran in verse 19:56-57:‘Mention, in the Book, Idris, that he was truthful, a prophet. We took him up to a high place‘”. The Jabirian corpus contains the oldest documented source for the Emerald Tablet of Hermes Trismegistus, translated by Jābir ibn Hayyān (Geber) for the Hashemite Caliph of Baghdad Harun al-Rashid the Abbasid. Jābir ibn Hayyān, a Shiite, identified as Jābir al-Sufi, was a student of Ja’far al-Sadiq, Husayn ibn ‘Ali’s great grandson. Thus, for the Abbasid’s and the Alid’s, the writings of Hermes Trismegistus were considered sacred, as an inheritance from the Ahl al-Bayt and the Prophets. These writings were recorded by the Ikhwan al-Safa, and subsequently translated from Arabic into Persian, Turkish, Hebrew, Russian, and English. In these writings, Hermes Trismegistus is identified as Idris, the infallible Prophet who traveled to outer space from Egypt, and to heaven, whence he brought back a cache of objects from the Eden of Adam and the Black Stone from where he landed on earth in India."
India is the place where the Gods had landed, but I'll say that Lemuria is connected here too. Blavatsky in "The Secret Doctrine" states this: "The Origin of the Satanic myth" pg. 394
"Before the creation of Adam, two races lived and succeeded each other on Earth; the Devs who reigned 7,000 years, and the Peris (the Izeds) who reigned but 2,000, during the existence of the former. The Devs were giants, strong and wicked; the Peris were smaller in stature, but wiser and kinder. Here we recognize the Atlantean giants and the Aryans, or the Rakshasas of the Ramayana and the children of Bharata Varsha, or India; the ante- and the post-diluvian of the Bible. Gyan (or rather Gnan, true or occult Wisdom and knowledge), also called Gian-ben-Gian (or Wisdom, son of Wisdom), was the king of the Peris.* He had a shield as famous as that of Achilles, only instead of serving against an enemy in war, it served as a protection against black magic, the sorcery of the Devs. Gian-ben-Gian had reigned 2,000 years when Iblis, the devil, was permitted by God to defeat the Devs and scatter them to the other end of the world. Even the magic shield, which, produced on the principles of astrology, destroyed charms, enchantments, and bad spells, could not prevail against Iblis, who was an agent of Fate (or Karma)."
Hermes Trismegistus is Enoch who is the seventh line from Adam and were a race of Giants. This is why based on Cain's line they were "inventing" things, but it's also interesting that there were other people, but for now let's concentrate on Adam's lineage. Enoch being taken up to Heaven is identified as Iblis who is Satan, and would be instructed to fight against the Jinn due to being wicked (as Islamic source states). This scene shows Iblis as Michael the Archangel who then fights the Giants who are his race that was causing havoc which would be the race of Adam. This is where we see the Book of Enoch coming in with the Angels and the Giants fighting, but without the humans being involved. Then we see the Gods battling the Titans, the Devas battling the Asuras, the Anunnaki battling the Igigi, and the Angels battling the Jinn or Satan and his forces. This is the confusion I had stated prior, that Satan or Iblis in the Islamic version is shown to be Michael the Archangel, but he fights against Jann bian Jann who is the actual Satan the Red Dragon. Here we see that the Islamic source isn't correct at all but that Scholar who stated on Jann bian Jann as the leader of the Jinn is Iblis, who fought against the apparent Iblis (which is Michael) and the heavenly armies is basically correct.
Now, based on the Islamic sources is another mix up because when Iblis says that he won't bow down to Adam and will turn their hearts away, is based on the fallen angels teaching mankind the things of Heaven based on the Book of Enoch. Again, Satan making man eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil are based on the 200 fallen angels exposing the knowledge of heaven. It's allegorically setting up the wrong individuals, and they don't know that Iblis is Enoch who came from Adam's lineage which are the Jinn race, though there is more to this. It's written down as Adam's lineage goes to Enoch who is actually the "Red Dragon" that went to live in heaven. This is where the "Sun Wukong" story takes place as the "red haired" monkey that went to Heaven to live with the Gods until he rebelled and fought against the armies of heaven. The same story takes place as Sun Wukong is the "Red Dragon" that fought against Michael and his angels. Then we come to the story of the flood that had occurred. This flood is the destruction from the Gods to destroy this specific race, and we know this as the flood of Noah. Hence, Jann is the God of fire as the Red Dragon that fought against the Gods in Heaven.
Then we come to the God called "Loki" who was actually a "Giant" that had lived with the Gods in Asgard. There again ties to the story of Iblis who went to live with the Gods in Heaven, then to Rahu who disguised as one of the Gods to steal the Amrit. Then to Sun Wukong story as he was taken up to Heaven and the same can be said for Typhon as well. Then we come to "Python" who was killed by Apollo. Here is an excerpt:
Python:
"Typhon's story seems related to that of another monstrous offspring of Gaia: Python, the serpent killed by Apollo at Delphi, suggesting a possible common origin. Besides the similarity of names, their shared parentage, and the fact that both were snaky monsters killed in single combat with an Olympian god, there are other connections between the stories surrounding Typhon, and those surrounding Python. Although the Delphic monster killed by Apollo is usually said to be the male serpent Python, in the Homeric Hymn to Apollo, the earliest account of this story, the god kills a nameless she-serpent (drakaina), subsequently called Delphyne, who had been Typhon's foster-mother. Delphyne and Echidna, besides both being intimately connected to Typhon—one as mother, the other as mate—share other similarities. Both were half-maid and half-snake, a plague to men, and associated with the Corycian cave in Cilicia.
Python was also perhaps connected with a different Corycian Cave than the one in Cilicia, this one on the slopes of Parnassus above Delphi, and just as the Corycian cave in Cilicia was thought to be Typhon and Echidna's lair, and associated with Typhon's battle with Zeus, there is evidence to suggest that the Corycian cave above Delphi was supposed to be Python's (or Delphyne's) lair, and associated with his (or her) battle with Apollo."
Now, keep this in mind on "Dephi" the serpent because this is mentioned in Robert Temple's book "The Sirian Mystery":
Pg 193: "We must note Stecchini's remarks about Delphi as follows :38 The god of Delphi, Apollo, whose name means 'the stone', was identified with an object, the omphalos, 'navel', which has been found. It consisted of an ovoidal stone. . .. The omphalos of Delphi was similar to the object which represented the god Amon in Thebes, the 'navel' of Egypt. In 1966 I presented to the annual meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America a paper in which I maintained that historical accounts, myths, and legends, and some monuments of Delphi, indicate that the oracle was established there by the Pharaohs of the Ethiopian Dynasty. This is the reason why the Greeks portrayed Delphos, the eponymous hero of Delphi, as a Negro."
Pg 185: "In Plate 12 the reader may see for himself the surviving omphalos stones of Delphi and of DelosBd - both of which are spread with 'nets' representing a latitudinal and longitudinal geodetic mesh.26 It is this mesh which is probably carried at all times by Oannes (see Plates 6, 7, 8 and 9) as a 'basket'. For the 'warp and woof of the sacred basket of Oannes/Dagon - surviving as the lyknos basket of Greek Demeter (who succeeded the Philistine fish-tailed Dagon as agricultural deity, keeping Dagon's 'basket') - represent perfectly the warp and woof of latitude and longitude." "The Dogon have traditions of the religious and mythological importance of 'warp and woof in weaving, and of sacred baskets 'which are not baskets', all of which may be found described in many places in Le Renard Pale."
Then based on "Delphi" states this: "Delphi, in legend previously called Pytho, was an ancient sacred precinct in central Greece. It was the seat of Pythia, the major oracle who was consulted about important decisions throughout the ancient classical world. The ancient Greeks considered the centre of the world to be in Delphi, marked by the stone monument known as the Omphalos of Delphi. The term omphalos was the Greek word for "navel." According to the Suda, Delphi took its name from the Delphyne, the she-serpent (drakaina) who lived there and was killed by the god Apollo (in other accounts the serpent was the male serpent (drakon) Python). The sacred precinct occupies a delineated region on the southwestern slope of Mount Parnassus. It is now an extensive archaeological site, and since 1938, it has been a part of Parnassos National Park. The precinct is recognized by UNESCO as a World Heritage Site in having had a great influence in the ancient world, as evidenced by the various monuments built there by most of the important ancient Greek city-states, demonstrating their fundamental Hellenic unity."
Then we come to "Delphos" or Delphus states this in the wiki:
In Greek mythology, Delphus was the person from whom the town of Delphi was believed to have derived its name.
Biography:
Delphus was said to be the son of Poseidon and Melantho (Melantheia), daughter of Deucalion. In other accounts, he was the son of Apollo by Celaeno, the daughter of Hyamus and granddaughter of Lycorus, and, according to others, by Thyia, the daughter of the autochthon Castalius, or by Melaina, the daughter of Cephissus. He is further said to have had a son, Pythis, who ruled over the country about Mount Parnassus, and from whom the oracle received the name of Pytho. In yet another version, his mother is Melanis, a daughter of Hyamus and Melantheia, and father is not mentioned; Delphus is said to have inherited his grandfather's kingdom in the neighborhood of Mount Parnassus, to have married Castalia, and to have had two children, a son Castalius and a daughter Phemonoe, the first person to write hexameters. His grandson through Castalius was Laphrius, and his great-grandson through Laphrius was Noutius.
Here, Delphos or "Delphus" was said to be the son of Poseidon while other accounts say he was he the son of Apollo, however there is a connection stating the former. Delphos' father is Poseidon and Melantho would be the daughter of Deucalion which is the Biblical Noah. Based on this info I already know that the "Oracle of Delphi" is the "Black stone" or "Omphalos stone" that fell from heaven, and the guardian would be the Python who is symbolically the Dragon god that is slain by Apollo who is Michael the Archangel and Huitzilopochtli. It is also called "Poseidon's flint stone" in the Americas. Hence, Typhon is Python who is the Red Dragon, to Poseidon, Yamm, Oannes, Coyolxāuhqui and Dagon amongst those epithets.
Now, based on this details that the "Red Dragon" is the one that had saved his race by having them survive on a boat or an "Ark". We see this in the story of Prometheus who instructs Deucalion and Pyrrha to save themselves on a boat. Then Enki instructing Ziusudra, Utnapishtim or Atrahasis to build a boat and save their kind. Vishnu in the form of Matsya telling King Manu and the seven sages to save themselves because Siva was going to cast a flood upon them. Then in the Aztec story states this on "Xelhua" the Giant. Based from the Wiki states this:
Xelhua is one of the seven giants in Aztec mythology who escaped the flood by ascending the mountain of Tlaloc in the terrestrial paradise and afterwards built the Great Pyramid of Cholula. One of the six giants sons of Mixcoatl,[2]the personification of the Milky Way:
Surrounded the Earth by the seas and submerged in them for a long time, the old frog, with a thousand jaws and bloody tongues, and the strange name it takes, Tlaltecuhtli; Iztac-Mixcoatl, the fierce white cloud serpent, who lives in Citlalco, joins her in sweet collusion. And six tla came with love engender; the six brothers on earth dwell and are the trunk of various races: the first-born, the giant Xelhua, of Itzocan and Epatlan, and Cuauquechollan, the cities he founded. Tenoch, the great Aztec claudillo, in Mexico stops the march of his people, and builds the great Tenochtitlan, a lake city. The strong Cuetlachoapan founds Ulmecatl, and gives its indolent people a seat. On the shores of the gulf, Xicalancatl, the brave Mixtecatl takes refuge. Of Mixtecapan in the sour lands; Otomitl, the xocoyotl [younger son], always lives in mountains near Mexico, and there it thrives in rich populations such as Tollan, Xilotepec and Otompan[3]
—Gerónimo de Mendieta (1525–1604)
They are Thoth and the Atlanteans in the Emerald Tablets, but we know them as Lemurians. Thoth and the Giants is where they are represented with the God called "Dagon" or the Dragon Gods coming forth from the seas to which they encountered the primitive humans. This is where these legends of the "Reptilians" starts to come into play and how the Pyramids were built by Noah's people who were the Giants that survived the flood. Their descendants go to Nimrod who started to build the tower of Babel to which is obviously the Pyramids. Apparently, they were defying the Gods by building the Pyramids to reach to Heaven until the Gods confounded their language. Based on the book "The Azteca: The History of the Indies from New Spain" mentions the Giants surviving the flood and Xelhua would be the Noah figure whose descendants came from the Arks. Then these Giants which are a part of the people of Agni are responsible for construction of the Pyramids, Ziggurats, the strange giant monuments, Dolmens and mounds as seen all over the world. This is where the story of the "Serpent Gods" comes into play and how they will connect to Saturn. Based on The Secret Doctrine by Blavatsky states this on the "Druids" from "Origin of the Satanic myths" pg379.
"....We find (a) the priests assuming the name of the gods they served; (b) the "Dragons" held throughout all antiquity as the symbols of Immortality and Wisdom, of secret Knowledge and of Eternity; and (c) the hierophants of Egypt, of Babylon, and India, styling themselves generally the "Sons of the Dragon" and "Serpents"; thus the teachings of the Secret Doctrine are thereby corroborated. There were numerous catacombs in Egypt and Chaldea, some of them of a very vast extent. The most renowned of them were the subterranean crypts of Thebes and Memphis. The former, beginning on the western side of the Nile, extended towards the Lybian desert, and were known as the Serpent's catacombs, or passages. It was there that were performed the sacred mysteries of the kuklos anagkes, the "Unavoidable Cycle," more generally known as "the circle of necessity"; the inexorable doom imposed upon every soul after the bodily death, and when it has been judged in the Amenthian region.
In de Bourbourg's book,Votan,the Mexican demi-god, in narrating his expedition, describes a subterranean passage which ran underground, and terminated at the root of the heavens, adding that this passage was a snake's hole, "un agujero de colubra"; and that he was admitted to it because he was himself "a son of the snakes," or a serpent. ("Die Phoinizier," 70.)
This is, indeed, very suggestive; for his description of the snake's hole is that of the ancient Egyptian crypt, as above mentioned.
The hierophants, moreover, of Egypt, as of Babylon, generally styled themselves the "Sons of the Serpent-god," or "Sons of the Dragon," during the mysteries. "The Assyrian priest bore always the name of his god," says Movers. The Druids of the Celto-Britannic regions also called themselves snakes. "I am a Serpent, I am a Druid," they exclaimed. The Egyptian Karnak is twin brother to the Carnac of Bretagne, the latter Carnac meaning the serpent's mount. The Dracontia once covered the surface of the globe, and these temples were sacred to the Dragon, only because it was the symbol of the sun, which, in its turn, was the symbol of the highest god -- the Phoenician Elon or Elion, whom Abraham recognised as El Elion.* Besides the surname of serpents, they were called the "builders," the "architects"; for the immense grandeur of their temples and monuments was such that even now the pulverized remains of them "frighten the mathematical calculations of our modern engineers," says Taliesin.**
De Bourbourg hints that the chiefs of the name of Votan, the Quetzalcoatl, or Serpent deity of the Mexicans, are the descendants of Ham and Canaan. "I am Hivim," they say. "Being a Hivim, I am of the great race of the Dragon (snake). I am a snake myself, for I am a Hivim." ("Cartas," 51;"Isis Unveiled, "Vol. I., 553,et seq.)
Now, the reader can also look up Jim Vieira's Giants on his YouTube Channel, as I find he does great research on this subject of the Fish Gods, the Giants, the Megalithic stone structures and connections to the Stone Masons. In the video called "The Androgynous Creator Gods & Edgar Cayce's lost civilization", he details the Giants having six fingers and six toes, to them being androgynous, how they connect to the Oannes figure, and how there may have been a connection to the animal human hybrids like the Centaurs, Satyrs and such and how they also are shown with "six fingers and toes". He mentions Edgar Cayce's statement on the Egyptians surgically removing the animal parts from those particular humans. Hence, interestingly there was this video labeled "Underground Reptilians in Egypt" based on a rumor of a sudden discovery of people living in underground Egypt and how the workers were seeing "people with tails".
There would be American Indian stories on the cataclysm and that during a certain age of destruction, there were people that had survived by climbing trees turning to monkeys and those that survived the flood turning into fish. In the Aztec and Mayan mythology, I think them turning into monkeys and fish may have a connection to those cryptids like the Sasquatch or bigfoot creatures, to the Mer-beings or fish people. Jim does detail the winged people, the bull people, and those lizard people of the Ubaid culture. I had stated before on the connections of Oannes as Satan and their Androgynous connections to the attire of the Dogons when they would do their ceremonial dances. Here they would put fake breast on themselves, stand on stilts and some wear the crest on their heads. I think the standing on stilts indicates that these beings were the Giants, but it's definite that the crest is based on these entities called the Nommo. The crest is where the "Phrygian" cap is based on and they would have breast as they were androgynous and bearded. The Nommo are these Giants which are the Lemurians I find and are the ones that came to these people to which had taught them their culture of Dagon. This is Thoth and the Atlanteans meeting the primitive people and how this tie into "2001: a Space Odyssey" on the symbolism of the black Monolith (Black Stone) amongst the primitives.
Now, do you know the God called "Dagon" also speaks in the Bible? So, based on the Mythologies it's shown that the God Zeus would be the one to have cast destruction upon the people, but Prometheus goes to save a certain group of people (Deucalion). Same thing as the Sumerian story as Enlil casts a flood and Enki saves mankind, to the Hindu story of Siva casting the flood upon the earth and Vishnu telling King Manu to save themselves. However, it's shown that those people that survived are the Giants going back to Adam's lineage which is interesting, because that means Genesis doesn't involve the "people on Earth" but the Giants. Let's see Genesis Chapter 6:
6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
8But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.
10And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
11The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
22Thus did Noah; according to all that God commanded him, so did he.
Genesis Chapter 9:
4But flesh with the life thereof,which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat.
6Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
7And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.
8And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,
9And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you;
13 I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.
19These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread......
Now, why would Dagon be worshiped by the Philistines and the Giants are among them, when this God is identified as the one who brought "culture" to the whole earth and is symbolize with the dragon?
Now, people will state that the Giants were born from the intermingling of angels and man, but this isn't what it's talking about. The true story states that the flood was due to the war between the Angels and the Jinn in which I had stated prior, as Michael or Iblis was sent to destroy the Giants/Jinn for their rebellion. This is the "Book of Enoch" with the destruction the flood but its due to wiping out this particular race or "races" not due to mankind. These apparent "fallen angels" only interacted with mankind "after" the flood not before. That is the lie we've been told because this is where the legends of the "Gods coming forth from the seas" is based on. Again, Thoth and the Atlanteans then interact with the primitives after the flood, it wasn't due to intermingling with mankind. Then when we dissect Genesis as God is going to destroy mankind and tells Noah to build a boat, well there are two Gods being dealt with, and that is the one Michael and his angels is set to destroy the Giants while the Red Dragon tells his people to gather on a vessel and go out before the destruction takes place. This is where we get images of Michael defeating Satan and his angels, but through this symbolism of the flood details the cause was from the war between two races.
So, what does it mean that Noah had also taken up the "animals" by pairs? Well, there is a strange indication that these apparent animals are those hybrids that was conducted, like the two-faced Giants, Cyclops, half-men and half horse, reptilians, satyrs, Mer-beings, bigfoot creatures etc. And those being six fingered and toed to which are a totally different species of non-human origin. This is based on Siva's Ganas or "Siva's friends" which are described as these strange entities of the paranormal. Whether they are the "Ant people" of Massau'u amongst the Hopi people and the "reptilians", there is some connection being hidden as these would be the "creatures" that was onboard Noah's ark. These Ark vessels are then told in those stories of the coming "Chitauri" or Nommo in which are identified as Satan and his fallen angels. Things can get stranger from here on end because the Bible has been altered thinking that it's based on the human race on earth but isn't. In the Book of Enoch, it details the Giants "sinning" against the animals, meaning that they were experimenting creating human animal hybrids.
Here the Devil with peacock imagery on his wings depicts him as Satan the fallen angels, and those with him are depicted as monstrous creatures connected to the monsters of Greek mythology. Hence, we then come to the "Nag Hammadi" scriptures as those Gods that made mankind were described as being androgynous having breast but with the "faces of beast". Based on the Dogon's description of the Nommo details this same account but gets weirder because these demons and devils are a part of Noah's people which is Thoth's people, the Giants & little people, Titans, Shiva's Ganas to Satan and his fallen angels.
Now, considering the cult of Saturn as this the God called Dagon, the
reader should know that Jordan Maxwell knew that they are the same deity. Saturn is Dagon and Dagon is Saturn. Then in the video on the "secrets of Saturn", he states that Saturn is inhabited and is told that there is something going on as a massive army is being produced there. Well, when one of the audiences ask who the Scientist is, he then states that it was Dr. Norman Bergrun. Yes, the Scientist who wrote the book "The Ring Makers of Saturn" and the one who was in Kerry Cassidy's Camelot Project to which he detailed on seeing pictures of tall black Extraterrestrials coming off the ships. It becomes obvious that Saturn is Dagon and based on Godfrey Higgins book "The Anacalypsis" details the Black people's connection to Dagon who is Saturn. Information on this solidifies on the "Raymond L Finch: Jordan Maxwell/Pyramids" which is a 2-and-a-half-hour interview, where around 3:00, Jordan talks about the six-pointed star's connection to Saturn and that Saturn is the God of the Philistines and Canaanites. The Philistines are the worshipers of Dagon going back to the submerged continent of Lemuria which is very telling.
Now, I had come to this conclusion before, as the people of Noah would be Satan and his fallen angels leading to Siva's Ganas. It's further noted that Sun Wukong would gather his "animal" friends to fight against the Heavenly armies only to get defeated. This is the Red Dragon story going back to Typhon and Vritrasura. Then considering the lineage starting from Genesis 3:15 is what needs to be addressed again because it seems there's been changes. You see, if Noah and his people are allegorically Thoth and the Atlanteans and they are then identified as the Nommo or Chitauri and the apparent Dragon gods in which are the Gods that "came forth from the seas", then we have to go back to this verse. Based on the content of Genesis 3:15 states that the Gods had put enmity between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent, but we see that the latter's seed isn't mentioned except Seth and Cain. Cain's lineage is similar to Seth's lineage through name as they would both have "Enoch" as an example, but then the Bible discontinues and instead focuses on Seth's lineage. People would state that the "Sons of God" in which had interacted with mankind, but based on these details the would be after the flood and not before, because the "Giants" or the Jinn were at war against the Angels, and thus occur the flood. Though it's noted that the Book of Enoch has been changed as well, because the fallen rebel angels are the Asuras which are the Jinn.
