Since we already know about Dagon on the Cross then everything that we know about "Christian History" is a lie. Based on the three Abrahamic faiths details how these religions originated from Hinduism, but as it reached the different lands they were split up and became the different names that we know of today. The Naga God called "Christ" is the Black God that was brought from India who is the Buddha and Bacchus the God of the Eucharist practice. Then when we break that down then we can see that this is Dagon who is Saturn that is on the Cross, and Dagon is mentioned in Judges as this way before the New Testament Jesus that everyone knows. Even when we go to Ezekiel and Jeremiah the Bible "clearly" details the people getting into the worship of the Queen of Heaven, to decking the trees with Gold and Silver which is the Christmas tree that still goes back to "Saturnalia" who is Bacchus. And remember, the God of fire told the people to rest on the "Sabbath" which is Saturday or "Saturn" is Bacchus. This was mentioned in "The Anacalypsis" as Godfrey Higgins details the practice of "Holi" which is where "Holiday". So, was it the Devil that brought the practice of the Passover? It seems that this wasn't anything new because the whole world also worshiped these same Gods.
Based from this excerpt from the Anacalpysis states this: "If the religions of Moses and the Hindoos were the same, it was reasonable to expect that we should find the celebrated Egyptian festival of the Passover in both countries, and it is found accordingly. We have in it the most solemn of the religious rites of the Brahmins, the sacrifice of the Yajna or the Lamb."
"… This history of the passage of the sun and of the passage of the Israelites from Egypt, affords a very remarkable example of the double meaning of the Hebrew books. Before the time of Moses, the Egyptians fixed the commencement of the year at the vernal equinox. … In the Oriental Chronicle it is said, that the day the sun entered into Aries, was solennis ac celeberrimus apud Egyptians. But this Egyptian festival commenced on the very day when the Paschal lamb was separated."
"… In this festival the Israelites marked their door-posts, &c., with blood, the Egyptians marked their goods with red. The Hebrew name was (.5 psh pesach, which means transit. The Lamb itself is also called Pesech, or the Passover."
"In India, the devotees throw red powder on one another at the festival of the Huli or vernal equinox. This red powder, the Hindoos say, is an imitation of the pollen of plants, the principle of fructification, the flower of the plant. Here we arrive at the import of this mystery. A plant which has not this powder, this flower or flour, is useless; it does not produce seed."
"This Huli festival is the festival of the vernal equinox; it is the Yulé; it is the origin of our word holy; it is Julius, Yulius. The followers of Vishnu observes the custom, on grand occasions, of sacrificing a ram. This sacrifice was called Yajna; and the fire of the Yajna was called Yajneswara, of the God fire. The word "Yajna, M. Dubois says (p.316,) is derived from Agni fire, as if it were to this God that the sacrifice was really offered. I need not point out the resemblance of the word Agni and the Latin Ignis."
"And I suppose I need not point out the resemblance of the word Agni to the Latin Agnus, to those who have seen the numerous extraordinary coincidences in the languages of Italy and India, which I have shewn in this work and in my Celtic Druids. In this ceremony of sacrificing the lamb the devotees of India chaunt with a loud voice, When will it be that the Saviour will be born ! When will it be that the Redeemer will appear ! The Brahmins, though they eat no flesh on any other occasion, at this sacrifice taste the flesh of the animal : and the person offering the sacrifice makes a verbal confession of his sins* and receives absolution.**"
"… The Hindoos have a sacred fire which never dies, and a sacrifice connected with it, called Oman.*** They have also the custom of casting out devils from people possessed, by prayers and ceremonies,**** which is also practiced by the people of Siam. All this is very important. * Loubière says, auricular confession is practiced by the Siamese. ** Travels and Letters of the Jesuits, translated from the French, 1713; London, 1714, pp. 1423, signed Bouchet. *** ON the generative power of OM. **** Travel and Letters of the Jesuits, pp. 14-23. Page 262 The first sentence of the Rig-Veda is said to be Agnim-ile, I sing praise to fire."
"Here we are told that Agnim means fire. When we reflect upon the slain lamb, and the call for the Saviour, we must be struck with the scene in the fifth chapter of the Apocalypse, from verse five to ten, where praise is given to the slain Lamb. The identity of the Mythoses cannot be denied."
Now, let's view Rene Guenon's "The King of the World" and see what he states:
"ACCORDING to Ossendowski's report, the 'Lord of the World' formerly appeared several times in India and in Siam, 'blessing the people with a golden apple surmounted with a lamb'. This is an extremely important detail when it is compared with Saint-Yves's description of the 'cycle of the Lamb and the Ram'. 1 It is even more remarkable that there exist in Christian symbolism innumerable representations of the Lamb on a mountain from which flow down four rivers that are clearly identical with those four rivers of Terrestrial Paradise."
"2 As already mentioned, Agarttha possessed a different name before the onset of the Kali-Yuga; it was called Paradesha, which in Sanskrit means 'supreme country', and which applies well to the spiritual centre par excellence, also called the 'Heart of the World'. It is the word from which the Chaldeans formed Pardes, and Westerners Paradise. Such is the original sense of this last word, which should make it clear why, in one form or another, it always signifies the same thing as the Pardes of the Hebrew Kabbalah. On summing up what has been discussed about the symbolism of the 'Pole', it is not difficult to understand that the mountain of Terrestrial Paradise is the...."
(They literally cut off the location of this mountain, so the closest information would have to be from Mercator's map in which details a mountain in the North Pole....)
"1 We should be reminded here of the allusion, already made elsewhere, to the connection that exists between the Vedic Agni and the symbol of the Lamb (L’Esoterisme de Dante (1957 edn.), pp. 69-70; Man and his Becoming according to Vedanta, p. 44); in India the ram represents the vehicle of Agra'. Furthermore, Mr Ossendowski points out on several occasions that the cult of Rama still exists in Mongolia; hence there is something more than Buddhism there, contrary to what most of the orientalists maintain."
"From another side, we have had communications about the memories of the 'Cycle of Ram', which are said to still subsist in Cambodia, giving information which appeared so extraordinary that we have preferred not to remark on it; we therefore mention it only as a reminder. Note also the representation of the Lamb on the book sealed by seven seals mentioned in the Apocalypse; Tibetan Lamaism also possesses seven mysterious seals, and we doubt if this connection is purely accidental."
Basically, the Buddha is Kriophoros who is Hermes or Thoth the Lamb bearer which all goes back to the Black God of the Nagas. This is why we see Jesus holding the lamb to Hermes, Dagon and Bacchus as the God of wine. This is why the God of fire would be offered wine in the practices from the people, and also the strange customs of animal sacrifice as wringing the necks of birds and animals and "sprinkling" the blood on the people all goes back to the same practice done in the Vodun religion. In the Book "King of the World" details Agni and the lamb, and Godfrey Higgins details Agni and the lamb's connection to "Holi" which is Holiday or Christmas which is Saturnalia. I had to critique Godfrey Higgins' account on the Yule connecting to Vishnu or as he states connected to Agni, but the Yule was spoken against by the other God as this pertains to the Christmas tree along with the worship of Tammuz and the Queen of Heaven. This pertains to Hermes who is shown with the hair of a negro, is the "Prince of this world" that Jesus had spoken against is the "lamb bearer", so something is wrong with these accounts.
Jeremiah Chapter 10
1Hear ye the word which the LORD speaketh unto you, O house of Israel:
Now, here was one of the recommended books from Jordan Maxwell is called "Jesus and Moses are buried in India, birthplace of Abraham and the Hebrews", to which obviously details the hidden history of the Aryans to which are the people that was brought there by their God. When watching the Documentary, it's shown that those Aryans that converted Islam where very upset based on the rumors bringing DNA analyst and Historians coming to prove this either way. Turns out that to prevent any information from getting out, they either set up a fake facility with a fake grave, or had moved the grave to another location, to which for the latter I would doubt this would be the case. Then based on the Muslims' behavior seems like this would threaten the religion of Islam and their teachings. It even seems like the Scribes and Pharisees that Jesus was dealing with are these Shieks and Imams, as the Aryans had gotten into the religions of Baal and Ashtoreth worship. Since Jordan Maxwell had recommended this book, then the reader should know that he knows the current land called Israel has no history, and that the Bible is based on the Brahmins/Aryans and the people going towards India.
Then comes the Jesus who was buried in Japan as mentioned in Thiaooubia Prophecy. But first let's see what the website
"culturacolectiva.com" states:
The Strange Japanese Legend That Claims Jesus Died In Japan:
For most people who grew up in countries with a Christian majority, the story of Jesus’ life ends with his resurrection and rising to heaven. However, for thousands of people in Japan, that was not the case. This Japanese theory narrates the story of one Daitenku Taro Jurai, better known as Jesus Christ, who is said to have arrived in Japan with the intention of studying theology when he was 21 years old. During his stay, he learned Japan’s customs, as well as its language, under the tutelage of a great master who lived near Mount Fuji. Thus, he lived until he was 33 years old—that is, during the period of his life not included in the New Testament—, point at which he decided to return to Judea. Anyone would think that his crucifixion and resurrection came next. But that’s not what this strange theory claims. Instead, Daitenku managed to elude his Roman pursuers, and the person who ended up dying nailed to the cross was Isukiri, his younger brother. Isukiri’s story is practically non-existent, so his motivation for taking his brother’s place remains a mystery, as does the details of his earlier life.
Jesus’ life as Daitenku is far more fleshed out. For instance, it is said that he ran away into exile to Japan in order to escape the Roman regime, carrying with him little more than his brother’s ears and a lock of Mary’s hair. He supposedly married a woman named Miyuko, with whom he had three daughters, and dedicated the rest of his life to a peaceful existence, growing garlic in a small farm. So he lived until he was 106 years old. After Daitenku died, his body was left exposed in a hill for four years, according to custom, before his bones were buried. Thousands of visitors consider Jesus’ burial site a sacred place as they travel for many miles to the Shingo region in order to pay their respects.
In addition to this seemingly crazy theory, there are also people in Japan who claim to de descendants of Jesus, even though they practice Buddhism and don’t celebrate even Christmas, their supposed ancestor’s birthday (of course, I take it none of us actually celebrate the birthdays of our own ancestors, so there’s that). The museum erected in Shingo to honor Daitenku’s presence is dedicated not only to Jesus’ life, but also tells the story of how Shingo came to be a safe haven for one of the lost tribes of Israel.
In spite of the putative evidence showcased in the museum for this particular narrative of the Jesus story—such as some texts purported to be Jesus’ final testament—, some scholars can explain this cultural phenomenon as a feature of the very core of Japanese society. Richard Fox Young, professor of religious history at the Princeton Theological Seminary, explains:
“[Japanese culture finds] spiritual fulfillment in being eclectic. That is, you can have it all: A feeling of closeness—to Jesus and Buddha and many, many other divine figures—without any of the obligations that come from a more singular religious orientation.”
And indeed, it’s common to find foreign influence mixed with local folklore in Japanese culture—a relatively curious fact given the fact Japan remained closed off to the rest of the world for centuries, to the point where Christians themselves were persecuted there a while ago. Though there’s no convincing evidence to support the tale of Daitenku, its fame has allowed Shingo to thrive. And the story isn’t actually harming anyone, so there’s that.
(Now, based on this version of Jesus states that his brother took his place while he had his ear. I learned about this through Michel Desmarquet's book "Thiaooubia Prophecy" as Thiao mentions this about Jesus going to Japan. So, when I had come across this only then I started to see where the Japanese started to called Jesus a "Tengu", because of his nose like a bird. However, nothing was said on the connections of the Japanese having the practice of the Jews, because the Article here states the Japanese being in Buddhism, but they were never Buddhist to begin with. The Japanese came there and had the original locks like the Jews and also have the practice of the Yajna fire like the Hindus and the "fire man" with the wrathful demeanor who is Mahakala. This was detailed in The Anacalypsis as the Chinese would have an idol of the physical God who turns out to be Mahakala who is the same God as Acala or Fudo Myoo of the Japanese. Then there is the Garuda God who is Susanoo to which they would also worship as the God of Heaven, thus the Aryans would worship two Gods amongst their many changes and corruption.
So, then when we break this down then the real Jesus who came to Japan was never from Israel because those lands don't have History but is based on the Jesus who came from either India or Central Asia. Then this Jesus being buried with the Cross was never his symbol because that's based on Bacchus who is the Black God on the Cross. There are many things wrong with this picture and it's something to do with the Jesuits. The real Jesus would have traveled to those lands to "gather" the House of Israel, which is why he would be in India, Central Asia, China, Japan to even possibly the Americas because they have the story of the "Peacemaker".
Then comes the Iroquois legend on the "Peacemaker", as this was a Prophet that came to gather the people together before the coming of the Europeans. The Mormons would state this similar event to be Jesus that had met with the American Indian people as they are the people of the book.
Here in the Wiki states this from "The Peacemaker":
"The Great Peacemaker (Skén:nen rahá:wi [skʌ̃.nːʌ̃.ɾahaːwi] in Mohawk), sometimes referred to as Deganawida or Tekanawí:ta (as a mark of respect, some Iroquois avoid using his personal name except in special circumstances) was by tradition, along with Jigonhsasee and Hiawatha, the founder of the Haudenosaunee, commonly called the Iroquois Confederacy. This is a political and cultural union of six Iroquoian-speaking Native American tribes residing in the present-day state of New York, northern Pennsylvania, and the eastern portion of the province of Ontario, Canada."
"The Great Peacemaker's name means "Two River Currents Flowing Together". Some of the numerous legends about the Great Peacemaker have conflicting information. It is reported that he was born a Huron, and by some accounts, his mother was a virgin, making the birth miraculous. Others say he was born an Onondaga and later adopted by the Mohawk. By all accounts, the Great Peacemaker was a prophet who counseled peace among the warring tribes."
"According to some legends his first ally was Jigonhsasee, who became known as the Mother of Nations. She lent her home for the meeting of the leaders of the rival tribal nations. The Great Peacemaker's follower Hiawatha, an Onondaga renowned for his oratory, helped him achieve his vision of bringing the tribes together in peace." "According to the archaeologist Dean Snow, the Great Peacemaker converted Hiawatha in the territory of the Onondaga; he traveled alone to visit the Mohawk tribe who lived near what is now Cohoes, New York.[full citation needed] Other traditional accounts hold that the Great Peacemaker consulted with Jigonhsasee about which tribal leaders to approach and she facilitated that meeting to create the confederacy."
"According to some legends, initially the Mohawk rejected the message of the Great Peacemaker, so he decided to perform a feat to demonstrate his purity and spiritual power. After climbing a tree high above Kahon:ios (Cohoes Falls), the Great Peacemaker told the Mohawk warriors to chop the tree down. Many onlookers watched as the Great Peacemaker disappeared into the swirling rapids of the Mohawk River. They believed he had died but the next morning they found him sitting near a campfire. Greatly impressed by the Great Peacemaker's miraculous survival, the Mohawk became the founding tribe of the Iroquois Confederacy. The tribes gathered at Onondaga Lake, where they planted a Tree of Peace and proclaimed the Great Binding Law of the Iroquois Confederacy."
Dates: "The dates Dekanawida lived, and thus the founding of the Confederacy, have not been identified with certainty. Historians and archeologists have researched an incident related in the oral history of the founding of the Confederacy. As recorded by later scholars, one account relates there was a violent conflict among the Seneca, who were the last Iroquois nation to join the confederacy as a founding member. Their violence stopped when the sun darkened and the day seemed to turn to night. Since 1902 scholars have studied the possibility that this event was a solar eclipse, as William Canfield suggested in his Legends of the Iroquois; told by "the Cornplanter".
"As scholars have learned more about the representation of natural events in oral histories, scholars into the 21st century have noted eclipses that could serve to date the founding of the Confederacy, in addition to the archeological evidence. Scholars referring to an eclipse have included (chronologically): Paul A. W. Wallace, Elizabeth Tooker, Bruce E. Johansen, Dean R. Snow, Barbara A. Mann and Jerry L. Fields, William N. Fenton, David Henige, Gary Warrick, and Neta Crawford. Since Canfield's first mention, and the majority view, scholars have widely supported a date of 1451 AD as being of a known solar eclipse and the likely founding date based on this oral account and other evidence. Some argue it is an insufficient fit for the description, and favor a date of 1142, when there was also a documented solar eclipse. A few question dating the founding of the confederacy based on the mention of the eclipse. Archeological investigation has contributed to discussions about the founding date, as its evidence can be dated and correlated to natural events."
"In 1982 archeologist Dean Snow said that evidence from mainstream archeology did not support a founding of the confederacy for any dates of an eclipse before 1350 AD (thus ruling out the 1142 AD date.) By 1998 Fenton considered an eclipse earlier than the 1451 AD majority view unlikely, but possible as long as it was after 1000 AD. By 2007/8 reviews considered an 1142 AD eclipse as a possible point of reference, even if most scholars supported 1451 AD as the safe choice."
Let's see what Luke 13:34 states: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee; how often would I have gathered thy children together, as a hen doth gather her brood under her wings, and ye would not!"
It seems that with the similarities of the Peacemaker gathering the tribes together is similar to the great Prophet Jesus trying to gather the Children of Israel together.
Now, I find that there is interesting connection between Jesus’ life and a man called “Guru Nanak” among the Sikhs. From observing the Sikh customs and festivals, they seem to have a similar custom to the Nazarites in the bible. In Numbers chapter 6 states, that they could not drink wine, nor cannot cut their hair due to a “vow” made to the God of fire. And strangely, Jesus was said to have been born a Nazarene (lands of Nazareth and Nazarite), who are a people that don’t cut their hair. Samson was said to be a Nazarite, and wasn’t allowed to have his hair cut because it was the source of his strength. So, seeing the Sikh culture connections and how don’t cut their hair, I would state is this a coincidence? Let’s examine the word “Singh”, for the word was said to mean “Lion” which kind connects to Jesus as a Nazarite and was considered the “Lion of the tribe of Judah”. It's noted that the real Lands of Judah is where the land of Northern India, Central Asia and China is located. There is a district called "Dharamsala", which sounds like Jerusalem. Then lands like Gilgit, Baltistan of Northern India is where the land of Gilgal is located, and is the place where Aryans stayed after going over the Indus river.
Now, when Guru Nanak disappeared into the river for three days, two accounts were made about this event. One version states that as he went under water and came out, He heard God’s calling to dedicate himself completely to the service of God and to humanity. This is similar to the holy spirit coming down to Jesus and being called "preach the two greatest commandments", which is to “Love the true Creator with all thy heart, soul and mind and to love thy neighbor as you love yourself.”
Then the second version states that when he went into the river, he disappeared for three days until he came back and said “I had went to God’s court” and there is “no Hindu and no Muslim”. Now when Guru Nanak said, “I went to God’s court”, this can connect this to the “ascension" to heaven that the Prophet Muhammed had went to and rode upon a creature called the "Buraq" to God’s court. Based on Michel Desmarquet's book "The Thiaoobia Prophecy", he mentioned seeing creatures with faces of humans, but having bodies of horses. So, there is similarities here, but also the term no Hinud and no Muslim actually means that they are Aryans, but they were in these different religions which had separated them and had to come back to gather the people together.
So, as the Prophet Muhammed went to heaven and came back to earth, the same "coincidently" happens in the same way to Guru Nanak and Jesus. Then in Guru Nanak’s life as a child, it states that he would astound the teachers and doctors with his intellect and wisdom. This can surely connect to Jesus' life in Luke 2:46,47: “And it came to pass, that after three days found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions. And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers”.
The "Golden Temple" of the Sikh people and the practice is what the real Jesus had taught as no matter what religion they will feed the individual. Not sure if they know this, but they actually practice the two greatest commandments that Jesus in the Bible had taught.
Now, an interesting note from the Bible details that Jesus was actually not of the Judah but of the Levitical tribe which are the Priest from the house of Aaron. We are told that he was a Jew, to which the Jew is considered from the tribe of Judah and not the whole house of Israel. This will detail how the term "Judaism" was never a religion for the tribe of Judah because God never made the House of Judah to be Priest but was towards the House of Levi only. Let's see the lineage here.
Matthew Chapter 1
1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
2Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;
3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;
4And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;
5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
6And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the
7And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;
8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;
9And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;
10And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;
11And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:
12And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;
13And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;
14And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;
15And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;
16And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
25And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.
The reason why Joseph was going to put her away was because he knew the child wasn't his. This is why the People thought that he was born from fornication because as you see the lineage goes to Joseph's line not Mary's. We are told that he was of the House of David from Joseph's lineage, but he wasn't for he was of the House of Levi. Mary was actually of the Levitical line from the house of Aaron. Let's see Luke 1:
Luke Chapter 1
4That thou mightest know the certainty of those things, wherein thou hast been instructed.
26And in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth,
30And the angel said unto her, Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God.
33And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
34Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
37For with God nothing shall be impossible.
So, it states in verse 5 that Zecharia's wife Elisabeth was of the "daughters of Aaron", and when you go to verse 36 it states that Mary and Elisabeth are "cousins" meaning that they are both of the House of Aaron of the Levitical tribe. So, John the Baptist and Jesus were both of the House of Levi and not of Judah interestingly enough. So, since the term Judaism would never have been the true name of the religion, especially when it's named after the tribe of Judah is absurd. If you're an avid Bible reader than you would know that the House of Levi was chosen by God because of their righteousness and are considered the law keepers. What is also interesting is that the House of Levi was only supposed to marry amongst themselves and not out of their tribe, meaning they can't marry any other tribe other than their own. So, I find this interesting that Joseph was going to wed a woman from the House of Levi when that wasn't never their tradition. So, we have some discrepancies based on the tribe of Judah becoming priests.
So, there is a theory that if he was of the house of Levi, then could he have been not a cousin of John but secretly a brother? After the Angel Gabriel had spoken to Mary on having a child, she goes to live with her cousin for three months then goes back to her country. This is where we fill the gap in Matthew 1:19 and 20 as Joseph didn't know who she slept with when she came back pregnant from her cousin's place. This is where the idea that Elisabeth's child John was filled with the holy spirit and also Mary was in the same manner. This maybe the case that Zecharia may have been the father as a Levitical priest of the House of Aaron, but again a theory, nonetheless.
So, let’s see what Jesus says in John 14:30 “Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the Prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me”.
This means that the real Jesus spoke against the “God of this world” and the “prince of the world”. Now, who is the Prince of this world? If you read the verses where he was tempted by the devil saying for him to “bow down” and worship him because he has all the kingdoms of the world. When finding out the true identity of the Dragon that fell down from the skies, it becomes a fact that this is where these religions came out of as they go back to Hinduism. The Bacchic religions are based on the "Lord of Sirius" as the Cross connects to the Black Cube in Islam and the Black stone to the Goddess Aphrodite and the Black God Siva. The Old Testament states that this particular God rules all the nations and Kingdoms and yet, the nations would have their own gods, but we see that they are the same Gods just with different epithets throughout the world. A God can't be a sole ruler of the Earth if there are other gods that people are worshiping, but as these practices are exposed it's shown that the whole world worshiped the same Gods.
Just as stated, the story of Job reveals a deal made between "Satan" and "God" on testing Job’s faith, it then states that Satan can cast "fire" from above as he destroyed Job's flocks of sheep. The same was done when Elijah had his conflicts against the Baal worshiper. Then comes this strange statement:
Hosea 13:
1When Ephraim spake trembling, he exalted himself in Israel; but when he offended in Baal, he died.2And now they sin more and more, and have made them molten images of their silver, and idols according to their own understanding, all of it the work of the craftsmen: they say of them, Let the men that sacrifice kiss the calves.3Therefore they shall be as the morning cloud, and as the early dew that passeth away, as the chaff that is driven with the whirlwind out of the floor, and as the smoke out of the chimney.4Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no god but me: for there is no saviour beside me.
So, when the real God said to the Jews to "not" worship the Queen of Heaven, nor make "groves" to Baal (Christmas tree), it's shown that these Gods were already worshiped all over the world. It's shown that the “Ephesians” would worship the black goddess Diana, as Acts 19 27-35 details that the “whole world” worships this Goddess to this day. So, with all the symbolisms in place, it isn’t hard to figure out who was ruling the world then and now.
Luke 4:13: “the devil leaving him for a season”, only means that he will come back "again", to probably undo what Jesus was trying to do, which is about revealing who the real God is. He clearly states in John 14:30: “the prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me”.
In John 18:36 “My kingdom is not of this world, for if my kingdom is of this world then would my servants fight for me, and not be delivered to the Jews”.
So, this ties into Jesus coming from "Above" whereas there are those that came from "below". This also ties into the Nag Hammadi texts like the Gospel of Judas as the Jesus was trying to tell them they were worshiping the "wrong" God and how he was sent from another God that they did not know of. This was what brought further evidence on the Aryans worshiping the wrong gods as they were of the Garuda who is Michael the Archangel. It's stated that in the Book of Daniel.
Daniel 10:21:
“But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.”
Daniel 12:
“And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”
Here states that Michael is the Prince of the people, not the God of fire who represents Saturn. This is why there were encounters to the Extraterrestrial forces and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob as the Bible states, were intervened.
Now, among some said sources, states that Jesus was supposed to have had red hair along with the Prophet Muhammed, who also was supposed to have had red hair. In fact, the current Monarch line of Queen Elizabeth the 2nd’s lineage to have come from the Prophet Muhammed himself, meaning the whole lineage of Prince Charles and the children are all descendants of the Prophet Muhammed. Now, when I was learning about Islam and Sufiism, my late Sufi teacher would talk about how Prince Charles and his mother are deeply connected to Islam based on their ancestor.
Now there is a movie called “The Message” made in 1977, which is about the life of the Prophet Muhammed and how he struggled against the persecution of his own people, as he was telling the truth about the One true God. Jesus states in Mark 6:4 “A Prophet is not without honor, but in his own country and among his own kin, and in his own house”. Here he calls himself a “Prophet”, who goes through a similar situation as the Prophet Muhammed.
Now, as Jesus spoke against the Scribes and Pharisees about how these "traditions" are of men and not of God, so did the Prophet Muhammad, as he also spoke against the Priests of the Kaaba and their traditions of Idolatry in Mecca. Since Jesus spoke about the vain repetitions of men then the same can account for Guru Nanak, who also spoke about the vain repetitions as these "traditions" being done in Islam and Hinduism are without no thought or spirituality.
Matthew 10:33-37 "But whosever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven. Think not that I come to bring peace on earth: I came not to send peace but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against His father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother-in-law. And a man's foes of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me".
The Prophet Muhammed would speak about the end of days and how these signs would come as well as the resurrection. Even Jesus speaks of “rumors of wars in the end of days” and how the “sun would be darkened, the moon not giving her light and the stars falling” in Mark 13. These are the similar signs as stated in throughout the Quran. Even though there are similarities, the Quran has gone through corruption from based on translation text and will detail why. However, it's shown that Jesus is Guru Nanak and will later detail him as another figure.
In the movie "The Message" of 1977, shows the Prophet Muhammed riding upon a camel towards Medina (also called Yathrib the city of the Jews). And upon arrival he was greeted with Palm leaves as he entered the city. This can connect to Matthew 21:5 -11:
"Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. And the disciples went, and did as Jesus commanded them, And brought the ass, and the colt, and put on them their clothes, and they set him thereon. And a very great multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut down branches from the trees, and strawed them in the way. And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest. And when he was come into Jerusalem, all the city was moved, saying, Who is this? And the multitude said, This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee."
"In Zechariah 9:9 and Mark 11:1-11 shows the people shouting to Jesus saying “Hosanna of the highest” as he came to Jerusalem. Then the same would be done for the Prophet Muhammed, as he is called “Ahmed” meaning the “praised one”. Based on a Documentary I saw, details Jesus being the "Greatest traveler". TheThe Bible states that Jesus came gathering the Israelites who were scattered all over the different parts of the world, this would relate to why he is considered the “greatest traveler on earth".
Now, here states this Matthew 10:34: “I didn’t come to bring peace on earth but a sword”. Now, does that sound like the Prophet Muhammed warring against the different tribes in Mecca? These are just some examples based on this interesting connection between the two.
Matthew 3:12 “Whose fan is in hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner, but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire”
This is the true version of the Prophet Muhammed in these pictures. Now could Jesus and Muhammed be the same person? The Prophet Muhammed would have the fire on his head symbolizing the holy spirit, and would be bringers of light out of the world of darkness”. Now, my late Sufi teacher would tell us about the "holy spirit fire" that was taught in the original Sufi culture. A lot of people don't know that the Muslims used to "baptize" people with water, but in the "original" Sufi culture the people would be baptized with fire.
Based from Godfrey Higgin's book "The Anacalypsis" states this:
"VOLUME II - BOOK II - CHAPTER III Page 128 "Whenever the Holy Ghost was described as given to man, it was in the form of fire, if visible to the eye. Its effects always were, wisdom accompanied by power; but the power was never supposed to exist independently of the wisdom. This wisdom was the Holy Ghost, as we have seen, and whenever we closely analyze this, we always find the igneous principle at the bottom. Is it, then, a wonder, that we find the ancient Indian, Chaldean, or Collidean Ioudi, and the Persians in the earliest and most uncorrupted state of their religion, offering their adoration to the solar fire, either as the emblem of the creative wisdom, or as the Wisdom and Power itself ?Is it not surprising that the popes, in their anxiety to support this doctrine, should have yielded to the popular wish in adopting the rites and ceremonies with which the ancient system, in fact the system of the real Jesus (?), was always accompanied?"
Now, if Muhammed was "accepted" by the Jews who lived in Yathrib which is modern day Medina, then this should tell you that this is Jesus who was greeted by the Jews. The only indications is what happened? Here we are told the Muhammed was of Ishmeal, but I find they changed the life of Muhammed as they knew he was Jesus. Based on the Muslims worshiping the Queen of Heaven who is the Goddess of the Black stone (as stated in Ephesians 19) and why the women are wearing the "Hijab" Burqas and Niqabs, are all under the worship of the Goddess of the veil, which is witchcraft. This shows how and why they changed their history and why they are in the state of "arrested development because they "still" worship Saturn to whom Muhammed had fought against those "Pagan Arabs". I will details how the Arabic speaking people are those "Jews" that were already into the worship of these Black Gods and how Jesus was trying to tell them they were worshiping the wrong god. J.A. Rogers details that the "real" Arabs were black, but I already know the spread of the cult of Dagon along with the Black stone connecting to the Black gods. Everything fits in place.
Then in the movie “The Message” (1977 version), details how the Prophet's Sahabas (disciples) will be hated by the people because of him and his teachings. This would also mirror to what Jesus had said in Mark 13:9 “But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the Synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them.”
Based from "The Anacalypsis states this: VOLUME II - BOOK III - CHAPTER II Page 219: "Jesus and Mohamed were philosophers, preachers of wisdom and morality to their countrymen, and, like Socrates and Pythagoras, neither of them left a single word of writing behind him. Some persons believe Jesus to have been murdered by the priests, others state that he escaped them; but at all events, he seems to have offered no active opposition. Mohamed, on the contrary, when struck, returned the blow and beat his enemies. But in each case the moment the preacher was gone, books enow were manufactured by those whose interest it was to establish a dominion over their fellow-creatures."
"In each case, I have no doubt, the early actors in the drama were well-meaning fanatical devotees. I doubt not that in India and in Europe millions went over from the religions of the two Cristnas (the God of India and the God of Rome), to that of the new Avatar, who, in the West, protected them by his arms against the sectaries of the old Avatar. For though the followers of the new Avatar never persecuted, the followers of the old one always did. It is not surprising under these circumstances, that the new Avatar should have protected his followers by his arms. This would excuse, if it did not justify, the wars of Mohamed, and also account for his success."
I want to show these segments from "The Anacalypsis" VOLUME I - BOOK X - CHAPTER V Page 668 :"It seems almost certain that the Brahmins of Madura, in their sacred books, must have had a history of a Moses, and Exod, and also a history similar to that told by the Sibyl. Had they a Pentateuch ? Had they any other Jewish books ? Had they any books about Tobit, or Saul, David, or Daud-potri, or Solumannee, or Solomon ? I do not mean the Solomon, whose magnificent empire was invisble to Herodotus, when searching for kingdoms in Judæa, but the Solomon who gave names to the mountains in Raja-poutana, and who built the temple in Cashmere, near which Moses was buried, and where his tomb remains, and the other Tect-Solomons in India. …"
Page 684 "In the province of Oude or Judæa, in North India, the people still flatter themselves with the hopes of a Saviour, of whom they know nothing, except that he is to be the tenth Outar or Ontar. He is to be called the "spotless," because he is to be born of a pure virgin. He is expected to appear in the province of Oude, i.e. Youdia. He will destroy all distinctions, and establish happiness on the earth.* As these people did not accept Mohamed for their last Avatar or incarnation, and all their seminaries of sacred learning were destroyed, they still, like the Jews, continue in expectation of they know not what. * Col. Broughton's Popular Poetry, notes, p.152. The prejudices of modern Christians entirely blind them to the undeniable fact, that every Mohamedan is as really a Christian as themselves. If this be the case, it is in perfect keeping with their possession of the magnificent church or mosque of St. John, at Damascus, where his head is preserved, and so much venerated, that the Turks will not permit even one of their own religion to look at it, and never permit a Christian to go into the church or mosque.* * Maundrel's Journey, p.170."
It seems that Jesus, Guru Nanak and Muhammad were Prophets with similar lives, persecutions, teachings, and who tried to get the people back to the worship of the One true God. Now, is this all a coincidence? Could the "victors of history" tear the Prophet's life into two (or many) to fool the masses to thinking that they are different people with different timelines? In history, they want people to focus on the timelines that is in and beyond 1000 years and yet, the formation of the "Gregorian calendar" came into the 1500s? So, how can this be if we are told it's true based on what they state is history?
Now, this man called "Muhammed" wouldn't have created Islam, because it's based on Hinduism going back to India and it's based on the worship of the black Gods. The religion of Islam appeals to the black goddess worship, as Acts 19:35 states and the "image" that fell down from heaven (The black stone). Even the real Jesus wouldn't be advocating for the Cross worship, because it still goes back to the worship of the black god Dagon. This shows that the "Council of Nicaea", (Priests of Dagon) had to change the life of the real Jesus to the black God Dagon/Osiris who is the "Prince of this world", and thus had amalgamated them together. The real Jesus would be of "Turkic Mongolian" descent as those Jews are of the same people.
CONCLUSION of the "The Anacalypsis" Page 449: "I now conclude with a simple statement of what, (as it appears to me,) an unprejudiced and dispassionate inquirer after truth may reasonably believe respecting Jesus and his doctrines. If any learned and liberalminded priest shall think that I have mistaken any fact, or erred in the conduct of any argument, or in any conclusion which I may have drawn, I shall be extremely happy to receive this correction."
"I shall notice it, with the respect it deserves, in an appendix, which I shall publish for this and other purposes.* In the time of Tiberius appeared a man of the name of John. He was a Nazarite, of the monastic order of the Pythagorean Essenes, and lived the life of a hermit. He was put to death by Herod, for rebuking him for his vices. About the same time lived a person, who was his cousin, whose original name has probably been changed, like that of Abraham, Jacob, Joshua, Pythagoras, &c., but who has since been known by the name of JESUS CHRIST. This person was also a Nazarite, of the same sect or monastic order—the Pythagorean Essenes. He, like his cousin John, was a philosopher, a teacher of morality and of reformation of manners to his Jewish countrymen. He was put to death** by the priests of the Pharisees, the prevailing or orthodox sect, at that time, in Judea, against whose vices he loudly declaimed, and whose hypocrisy he exposed. He was a person of a most virtuous life and amiable manners—the Socrates or Pythagoras of his day."
"We know that he taught a very strict and pure morality, the unity of God, the immortality of the soul, and that this life is only a state of probation for a state of future existence, in which every person will be rewarded or punished according to his merits or demerits. These are the facts which we know respecting Jesus and his doctrines,— and as I believe that the facts are real, and that the doctrines are true, I consider that I am his follower, his disciple, and a Christian. *
“In the midst of life we are in death.” Two years and a half before this sentence was printed, the Author was numbered with the dead ! Editor." ** "As this part of the Author’s MS. was transmitted, by his direction, to the printer, unaltered, it may admit of doubt whether he was fully satisfied with the evidence adduced from Irenæus in proof that Jesus Christ was not crucified, but attained the age of fifty. See supra, pp. 120-123, 142, 228. Editor."
(It's very close to the age of the Prophet Muhammed's death at age 61 or 62, who again would have children....) Here, Jesus was said to have brothers and sister (or considered "half") that were looking for him along with his mother. Matthew Chapter 12:46 "While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48But he answered and said unto him that told him, who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother."
Matthew 13 "54And when he was come into his own country, he taught them in their synagogue, insomuch that they were astonished, and said, Whence hath this man this wisdom, and these mighty works? 55 Is not this the carpenter's son? is not his mother called Mary? and his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? 56And his sisters, are they not all with us? Whence then hath this man all these things? 57And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house."
Luke Chapter 8 "19Then came to him his mother and his brethren, and could not come at him for the press. 20And it was told him by certain which said, Thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to see thee. 21And he answered and said unto them, My mother and my brethren are these which hear the word of God, and do it."
Now, here is the "Lord's prayer" and "Al Fatiha" prayer and see their comparisons between Muhammed and Jesus....
It's interesting as the "Lord's Prayer", states for God to "not lead us into temptation", when we are told that the Devil is the one who has tempted us. And when you compare this verse to the "Al Fatiha", it also states for "Allah to guide us into the straight path, and not those that earn your anger, or those that are misguided." Does this show Jesus and Muhammed stating the same subject of "not being led astray", but to be guided? They are the same prayer as we see their similarities.
Now, based from youtube's "Kroft talks about movies on the Prometheus script" states some interesting connections to Jesus and Muhammed.In the movie "Prometheus" by Ridley Scott would detail an interesting part of the script revealing why the engineer aliens wanted to destroy mankind on earth. The script indicates that the engineers had took a man up to heaven and taught him their laws and ways on spirituality, and had sent him down to teach mankind.However, this man was killed by the people, who would be mankind's last hope to change. It's revealed that this man that had went up to the heavens was revealed to be Jesus, who was "taken up to heaven".
This story synchronizes with the "ascension" of the Prophet Muhammed, who had gone up to the heavens riding on the creature called the Buraq. The same was said for the story of Guru Nanak, who was said to have also gone up to the heavens to "God's court". This shows that the Prophet Muhammed, Guru Nanak and Jesus are one and the same, but based on this story wasn't put into the movie due to being too close to the truth...
Now, the book "Thiaoouba Prophecy" by Michel Desmarquet states of him observing a horse like being with the "head of a woman with long hair". He couldn't understand what they were, but it seems that these would be the "Buraq", as you see above that the Prophet Muhammed rode upon.
Now, there is supposed to be a Hadith detailing how the Prophet Muhammed had "red hair", and as you see these Muslims would put "red henna" on their hair and beards because of this Hadith. Now, I had stated before that one of the terms linking the "Jinn" is in "Ginger" as this may have this connection to the legend of the red-haired giants. However, the God Mahakala, who is the devil, has red hair and black skin. So, based on learning about the Black stone in Islam belonging to the Black Gods and their leader was said to have "red hair", then this details this significant connection as "The Lord of Sirius" in the Chapter "An Najm" book of the star who is the devil is Shiva the Black God with red hair. Remember, the black stone and the Black cube are based on the God of this world who is Dagon. This hadith has nothing to do with the real Jesus who was stated to be Muhammed having red hair, when it's actually to imitate the Devil who has red hair.
There was a German man named Gunter Luling, who had studied the Arabic languages along with Sociology, Theology and Islamic sciences. And in his studies, he came to a very interesting conclusion detailing the Quran to, basically being compiled with "Arabic Christian Hymns", which was later transformed into the Quran itself. He states how the Kaaba was formerly a "Byzantine Church", and that the true story of the "real" Prophet Muhammed was based on fighting against the "Christian Arabs", thus the considered 360 "idols" he destroyed in the Kaaba are none other than images of "Christian saints" Crosses and the Queen of Heaven. This details how the Vatican Church knew about the Roman Catholicism and Islam's connection to the black stone and the Black Cube symbolism all leading to Dagon. The Burqas, Niqab and Hijab are forms of worship towards the Queen of Heaven, because even the Christian women would wear head coverings and scarves in the same manner as the Muslim women.
Then comes the information from the Ex-Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera who had exposed how the Vatican Church created Islam. He states how Khadija who was a devout Catholic was sent by the Church to turn the young Muhammed to create the religion of Islam. There is a correlation here because the Black stone had come from Rome to which was called the stone of Elagabalus or stone of Aphrodite. This is the image of Diana of Ephesians as this pertains to the same manner as the Muslims in Acts 19. This is different than what Gunther states as Muhammed battling against the "Christian Arabs" to which the Kaaba was ordained with Jesus and Mary, Crosses and Saints. The Arabs would have already worshiped these Gods prior to Muhammed because the 3 daughters of Allah all come from Hinduism so there wouldn't be any different than the Catholic Church.
So, based on this Chapter, the reader should know the significance of the "Black Stone" and how this is based on the worship of the Goddess Cybele. Then from there, the information so far stated from Gunter is correct because these Muslims that are bowing down towards the Kaaba are basically "Catholics" or rather "Hindus" and are worshiping the Black Gods. This is why when the Muslims do Hajj or Umrah, they wear the same toga attire as the Buddhist and Hindus which is an African dress code. The Muslims depending on the Quran are labeled "people of the book", and many of them are the Aryans that speak Arabic along with other nations.
This is why the people are in the state of arrested development and why we see those Muslim countries compared to the other nations. They don't have their beautiful dress code before this Islam came to them, they all dress the same which is the foundation of "Communism". Islamists are Communist. The same issue was happening in Europe when the Catholicism would ostracize the people for being "red headed" as people thought they were the spawn of Satan (ironic enough) to clergies and Priest belittling the Scientific developments of the European inventors. The people that came to the Americas weren't Christians nor did they have the Cross because they knew that it's based on Dagon. Here in this country, Christmas wasn't allowed because it's based on the worship of Bacchus, and the Catholicism religion based on the cult of Saturn. The same is shown amongst those Jews with heavy conservative value and yet, don't know that the Vatican Church rules over them. So, to correct everything, it was not the religion of Christianity, Islam and even Judaism that did not bring enlightenment, but free thinking and questioning. Any religion that opposes this is Communism, and I don't need to address how the Vatican supports Communism.
As stated from the "The Lord of Sirius" Chapters, the Gods that brought this religion are based on the Dragon Gods that came down from the skies to which had landed in India with the Black stone. This is where the real Jesus who is the Prophet Muhammed would battle against the Christians, because they are the worshipers of Dagon. After finding that Michael the Archangel is really based on the Garuda bird and the Angel that defeated Dragon, it just shows why the Nagas went all over the world deceiving people to worship the Black gods and the nations and under their religions. This why when bringing out the information on the black stone worship, to the origin of the Cross, the true identity of these Gods, and why real Jesus spoke against the "Prince of this world" who is Osiris and Isis the Lords of Sirius, details how people tried to erase this Prophet's teachings and change everyone history.
