The Children of Agni

Now, based on my old information I had compiled somewhat the connections of the Hindu cultures to the Bible. Hence, there is a theory of two manner of nations from these two Angels, as one is based on the Naga, and the other is based on the Garuda. This theory states that the Asians and the Africans are twins whereas the Indians and the Europeans are also twins (Twin race theory). When I came to learn about the Nazi parade based on Atlantis with the God Zeus and the Eagle symbolism, it's shown that the narrator states they wanted to find the origin of their people and that they claim this is the God of the Europeans and Indians (namely Turkic native American and Persian to Central Asian). The "Roman nose" is generally presented as having aquiline features amongst the Europeans, but what's interesting is that this feature is shown mostly amongst Middle East, Eastern Europeans, Indian, Native American and Asia and not the true European counterpart. Now, based on this concept I had found that they were trying to find their origin and thought this would be the case until they went towards Tibet. Even finding out that the Jews were intermingling with the people to the extent that the generation was coming out with blonde and red hair with blue eyes and why they had to be further identified and separated due to the assimilation.

Now, based on observing the features of the Africans, I find many of them having Asian features with oriental eyes and as many would point out to the Khoisan people. But interestingly the Khoisan are considered the oldest of the race and yet are not black in complexion so what does that tell you? Based on the Egyptian ethnicity even though there were different nations, it seems that the Tutsi people would have some kind of connection to the Ancient Egyptians as they have straighter features, but turns out they have more than 50% "Eurasian" in them compared to the other African Tribes. Many black people tend to justify how the Asians and other races came from them even while denying their ancestry's interracial involvement with them. Doing DNA test on the people in East Africa, to West Africa then to South Africa will conjure up results on their interracial involvement, thus already a melting pot from the other nations. There was white slavery going on and how the descendants are those coming down from North Africa to the South as there were admixtures. There is a reason why the term "ethnic cleansing" takes place in certain areas as they know those types of people are not "pure" blooded like them. It's understood that kind begats own kind unless there is mixing of races and is integrated further into a new type of race or sub race in that matter.

There are many Africans with the blood of the Aryans which whose ancestors went to Africa but still retained their Aryan features even if they have black skin, but interesting enough, most of the Asians in China would have negroid features even though they have straight hair.  I tend to find Chinese with the nose of the black race to those that have the hook nose of an Aryan. There would be some Chinese, Thais, Koreans and Tibetans and such that have the strong Aryan features, but wonder how much of the people have been mixed when they came into the land as they were never there to begin with. I find the Japanese to have mostly straighter features (with hook and long noses) compared to Chinese, though there are the mysterious Jomon people and the Ainu that were there in the land who are stated to be of Caucasian, Negroid and Australoid stock (as the Japanese tend to be a racial stock). Though I had found Chinese, Koreans, Tibetans, Thais, Northern Indians and Mongolian people that have the Aryan features more so than the other individuals, it's shown that the Central Asian people are not mixed with the Nagas unlike those that went deeper into East Asia. Since they were black people before the East Modern Asians came into the land, then the question is where did the Asians migrate from? This is where I find the connections on the Turkic Mongolian people as the migrating Aryans, even include those people that are "now" called Chinese, Koreans and Japanese etc.  

Now, Jordan maxwell would mention the book "Fire in the Minds of men" by James h. Billington. Here Maxwell details a crucial key point, and that is the God that stole fire called "Prometheus" is generally the God of the Illuminati. Here I already know that Prometheus as Agni, had stolen fire from the Gods in the form of a bird, monkey, dog and in most cases a Serpent, to which had brought this fire to mankind. This links to Sirius as this represents the Gods that fell but came with a sense of wisdom to rule others. This is why there are these myths on one God who fought against the Asuras over the Amrita Elixir which represents the "tree of knowledge of good and evil", and in an interesting twist, how Prometheus as Lucifer the fallen Angel uses it to "rule over mankind" with the wisdom that they received. Rahu the Asura was able to drink it, then we come to Sun Wukong to whom became immortal, then to Siva, then we come to the stone pillar who represents Aphrodite the Goddess who was cast down from Heaven. That is why we see these religions coming forth out of India, as we all have this religion all under the same ideology (as this is the "fire" or Prometheus), hence making it easier to bring the "New World Order". This brings the idea on how the Queen of Heaven is now worshiped throughout the world as well.

Now, we can identify this black God as Shiva, who is Krishna and Buddha which relates to Thoth or Hermes. This God is also Osiris who is known for the constellation Sirius as the Bright and morning star (Lucifer). Based on understanding the fire god Shiva these depictions of Shiva having straight features is not the true image of this Angel, but is shown to be a negroid God originally and which becomes Fudo Myoo and Acala. Just as I had stated on the Sirius symbolism, Shiva who is Osiris is the considered God or King of this world as the book "King of the world" states. Now, just because I had stated this portion of the Aryans as worshipers of Shiva, it's noted that they "originally" worship the God that defeated him who is Indra representing the Garuda bird. Shiva and Kali as Osiris and Isis is Baal and Ashtoreth in the Bible for when you read the Bible, it details how they constantly would worship Baal and Ashtoreth who is the Black gods of those nations.

Based on the Bible does detail the sons of Jacob having children with some of the inhabitants of the land, thus the Canaanites. Judah and Simeon and even Esau had children from the Canaanite people to which would show that the people had already interracial marriages before they came into the land. The term "Canaanites" is really a broken term for Canine, who is Dog, Dogon, Dagon to the people connected to the Lord of Sirius. This is why Jesus in the Bible detailed that subtle instance of calling the Canaanite woman a dog who eats the breadcrumbs from the table. Here, "that" man called Jesus is not a black man, but of the Aryans for there was already Dagon on the cross pertaining to the religion of the black nations (Christianity existed prior to this man called Jesus). When Jesus states on the wheat and the tares parable, this details the coming of the Dragon and his children and how they influenced the whole world. The land of Canaan is China which was populated with the black nations in the land. This is somewhat the Mahabharata was supposed to be based on, as the Aryans were mixing with the Nagas and how there were wars and truces between the two races. This is somewhat based on the book "The Thiaooubia Prophecy" on the wars between the black and Asiatic races.

Then when they went into the land as Judges starts, they have not gotten rid of those nations but instead had intermingled with them in greater flesh and worshiped their Gods. History is lying to people about this Buddhism, because Buddha is a negroid God with curly hair and negroid features and not an Aryan. Here, Buddha is Krishna who is the God of the cross. When we see the clothes as they always wear the toga there is a connection to the Black nations as Hinduism and Buddhism are all based on Dagon worship (we see this in Roman clothing and in Islam for the pilgrimage to Hajj). The Aryans were never Buddhist nor Hindu, because Indra gave his people and the lineages a different culture that had nothing to do with the Black people and their religions. The Japanese that came there to the land were the considered "Children of Susanoo", and they came from the West. The Ainu and other nations were already there "prior" to the arrival of these people, so these Japanese were never the original natives as they think. Considering the Adam and Eve story on Cain and Abel, it's noted that neither of them was of Adam's image which tells me that Eve had the children with the serpent. So, who was that race that came from that lineage?

When the Aryans came into the land, it's shown that the black nations already were there (as well the other nations), but some didn't cast them out and instead had lived with them intermingled and learned their ways which is the current Hindu and Buddhist culture. There are red haired people that were said to have inhabited certain parts of Western China and Central Asia, to even the legends of Giants with six fingers and six toes. This details further that if the Aryans had encountered the red-haired people along with other nations, then the red- and blonde-haired people were also older and were never considered "Aryans" to begin with. The New Zealand Documentary "Skeleton in the Cupboard" details that there was blonde- and red-haired nations there along with the black nations of Asia prior to the Mauri people.

Based on the Gnostic text can connect to why Jesus was sent from a different God than the God that the Aryans had been worshiping. There are two accounts to this, and that is if Shiva just chose the people out of all the nations, then this would exclude Indra being their original God as this deity has nothing to do with this world. Now, based on Marco Polo states on them having the idol of the "Black God" Mahakala who is the Kitchen God of fire and is undoubtably the wrathful deity in the Bible known as the "Red Dragon" (when it's really the "black dragon"), and based from this would pertain to them being people chosen by Shiva. Based on this version details why the Dragon symbolism remains strong because this is the "Satan of Asia" as stated from Blavatsky. Based on the Chapter "Thoth is Enoch: The Children of the Dragon, Sons of God and the Black Extraterrestrial connection", I had detailed the God of the black nations is Shiva who is depicted as having the curly hair of an African. He may have red hair, which is unique, but this God is a black God originally with negroid features along with his consort Kali. Since the God Shiva came from Agni as Vritra, Bacchus and Osiris, then it's shown that the Nagas that were in the land (black nations) are the Children of Agni who is Mahakala and Shiva, and the "Children of Saturn".

In the Bible, it is mentioned God fighting the Dragon, but the attributes of the God of fire that took the Israelites is the Red Dragon who is Shiva and not the other God. This would make me believe that they were worshiping two Gods or more, even this info is backed by Godfrey Higgins. Based on the "Priest of the most high" Melchizedek as the offering of wine and bread is based on the occult practice of the "Eucharist", then the pillar practice of "abhishekam" which is the anointing of the pillar of Shiva, tells me that this version details the Israelites making a covenant towards the Devil. These are just some of the things that I find how the Bible was changed because the other God was almost written out. It seems that the true legend details how the Aryans original God was actually Indra who would be the one to bring them into the land, but as they betrayed their God for the strange gods (Baal and Ashtoreth) in the land then everything had changed. This would be the reason why the real man called Jesus was sent down from what the Gnostic text (Gospel of Judas) can describe as the higher God, and would try to get the Aryans back together but of course we saw how that went. Based on seeing how these religions all go back to Hinduism we can see how much everybody has been engulfed in the worship of these Black Gods amongst their epithets throughout the world (as it make sense). That's why even based from Jordan maxwell's words, he states that the whole world is under the hand of the Devil, but the problem is understanding the identity of the Devil who is known for the pillar...

Now, people will state that the Greeks were blonde haired people and so forth, and though that could be true, but as far as the Gods to having black complexion and negroid features, I'm finding this otherwise. Sir Godfrey Higgins has been correct so far as to the Ancient Greek Gods, the Black Buddha, the Black Virgin Goddess and child worship as shown throughout the world, were originally black, and in most cases haven't changed the colors at all. You can see the Italians having the "Black Madonna and Child" to this day, in which is basically "Baal and Ashtoreth", and the Black Goddess "Diana of the Ephesians" in the Bible. And after seeing how the Kings were Black in Europe, now I know that History is not what it seems. Here you could see the original Gods to being black complexioned, and to the inhabitants is telling. Here the Goddess of witchcraft "Circe" is where the name "Church" came from. Based from the etymology, the Church is based from "Kirke" which is Circe as the Goddess. Jordan Maxwell broke this down as the Church is based on the "Mother" as those Arches has specific symbolism when you enter her domain....

Now, it's known that Shiva is the God of the Black nations and were known for the pillar worship. It made sense as to why the Britannica states this:

"Dasyus, an aboriginal people in India who were encountered by the Indo-European-speaking peoples who entered northern India about 1500bce. They were described by the Indo-Europeans as a dark-skinned, harsh-spoken people who worshipped the phallus. Some Western scholars who view the lingam (a Hindu votary object) as a phallic symbol have conjectured that it originated with the dasyu; others hold that this description of the dasyu may have referred to their sexual practices...."

The Phallic symbolism came from the Black nations, but there is something more to this and this a problem. How can a God who tells the people to destroy the pillars and images in the land be the very same God that was already worshiped in the land? As Shiva who is known for the pillar! Deuteronomy 12:3 “And ye shall overthrow their altars, and break their pillars, and burn their groves with fire; and ye shall hew down the graven images of their gods, and destroy the names of them out of that place.” So, what happened? If Jacob had made a pillar towards the "Almighty God" in Genesis 28, 31 and 35, then why state this if this is the same God? I can detail how much there has been changes to the Bible and the culture of the Aryan people, as the Aryan invasion is based on Indra and not really Agni as the latter connects to Shiva who is really a black God who is worshiped with the pillar. I also had the notion that they both could be black gods but had a civil war against each other, but then other stories also state that they were different races. It's noted that the pillar of Jacob symbolism belongs to the black nations as they were already in the land, and the Aryans never had anything to do with them, and their national God was Indra originally. This is the real reason why we are "made in the image of our God" is based on, because we are made in the image of a particular God whether from the Garuda or the Naga. This will be addressed as the twin race theory connecting to Genesis 3:15 in another chapter. 

Then It's shown that the Olmecs were sacrificing the people to the Dragon God on these Pyramids, which is the base of their symbol as the Dragon in America and then in the East as the Naga. The God called "Huitzilopochtli" is Michael the Archangel who is the God of war who then defeats the Dragon Goddess "Coyolxauhqui", who is then cut into pieces. The Black stone which is the Yoni and Lingam has always been their symbol as this represents the Dragon as Bacchus. The symbol of the Naga race was always based on the serpent and not the eagle, but it's shown that these Gods are based on the two races that have History with each other. Now, what is interesting is that amongst certain Native American Tribes would detail how their ancestors came from the Underworld, whereas those have some legends of how they came from the Heavens or some star system. The God of the underworld would be based on the serpent whereas the Sky world is based on the bird.

Based on the book the Anacalypsis reveals how these images and symbolism all got mixed up in these religions. The real God of the Aryans had brought a different culture to his people, but are then mixed with the Naga race's symbolism and their religions. This is why everything has been confusing and the corruption based on these books from Hinduism and the Rig Vedas as they demoted Indra who represented the Aryans, are then upholding the Black Gods of the Naga races as their symbol and gods to be worshiped. Now, but based on the Chinese and other Asian neighbors, its' shown that when they did the DNA on the Chinese tribes, the results are shown to have black in them (every one of them that did the DNA). This is where the term "Dragon faced" is based on, as this is having "negroid features" and how the people had taken up the black people's culture with Buddhism and the dragon symbolism.  

Now, comes this book from J.A Rogers. In J. A. Rogers' book "Nature Knows no Color-line" states this in Chapter "Where did the color problem originate? And Why?. Here he goes through mentions of finding the root (or roots) of the prejudice shown throughout History. Since reading this first chapter I wanted to reveal what he states on the Aryan invasion to India.

"The first recorded instance of color prejudice I have been able to find is in India of some five thousand years ago when the Aryas or Aryans, invaded the valley of the Indus and found there a black people- the Dasysus. In any case we find very clear evidence of it in Aryan writings. In the Rig Veda (Book9 Hymn 42:1) Indra, their national God, is depicted as "blowing away with supernatural might from earth and from the heavens the black skin which Indra hates." The black were called "Anasahs" (noseless people). Book 5 Hymn 29:10, tells how Indra "Slew the flat-nosed barbarians. India's caste system was based on color. The word varna (caste) literally means "color". Arya Varna (white skin); Krishna varna (black skin). "The Aryans of India", says the Encyclopedia of religion and Ethics, "prided themselves on their fairer skins and more aquiline features and held in derision the black color and flatter physiognomies of the aborigines, regarded them much as conquering whites regarded blacks in Africa."

A little excerpt details this segment: 2) The Aborigines were not the Barbarians Aryan legends say they were. These blacks, now known as "Dravidians", had a mighty civilization of their own. From them came the Buddhas, James Bird (Historical Researches on the Origin of the Buddhas) says, "Buddhist of a black complexion are common in the Fresco paintings of Ajunta and that of the Arishtanemi, or race of Vishnu, who is the twenty second Jain saint is described as of a black complexion on the authority of the Hemachandras vocabulary".

As stated, there are large number of factors connecting Krishna, Vishnu and the Black Buddha together, even before the start of the Aryans changing that part of the History. Here he does mention with this note, Godfrey Higgin's "The Anacalypsis" and the origin of Christianity from Buddhism. He does mention this interesting segment from Gerald Massey's works. "The next evidence of it I have been able to find is in Ancient Egypt. Gerald Massey, perhaps the greatest of all authorities on Ancient Egyptian Lore, said "On the monument the dark people are commonly called "the evil race of Kush", but when the Ethiopian element dominates the dark people retort by calling the light complexions, the pale, degraded race of Arvad." (4) But this prejudice of fair for dark and the converse was, it is safe to say, never nearly as strong as in India. The whites did not come in any considerable number of Egypt until the Ptolemaic invasion of the third century B.C., by which time intermixture had already taken too firm a root for any appreciable degree of color prejudice, as I shall show later..."

It states Indra to being the original God of the Aryans whereas these Gods like Krishna, Vishnu, Buddha and Shiva were the original Gods of the Black people. Below they state the Brahmins to being light skinned, but based on the clothing details it's really based on the Ancient Black God and the Naga culture, and which leads me to find the corruption in Brahminism, as I see the Brahmins that are the color of Black people and some with negroid features (even from old photos). So, with all the apparent caste system, it defeats the purpose on race difference, unless there was later corruption to admissions like the Tamil and blacks into Brahminism. Based on a Documentary on the Thai Kingdom, it's stated that the Brahmins would be brown skin (as if they were Native American looking) and would be the ones to bless the King in the coronation ceremony, and based on the practices is shown to be similar to the Levitical Priest in the Bible. However, considering the Aryans as the Turkic Mongolian origin, I doubt the God of the Aryans ever gave them this Hindu/Buddhist culture because of where it came from. What was the original culture and religion of the Aryan prior to the changes? I see the Aryans in Hinduism and Buddhism are into worshiping the black gods like Shiva, Vishnu to Murugan, Parvati, and Kali, Buddha all belonging to the Gods of the Naga race to this day.

Considering the Caste system, since the Gods mentioned were black in complexioned, then with this issue with the Aryan racism shows that they love these black Gods even if they had changed their image. This is like the KKK clan members who are all about the white National Christian ideology and thinking Jesus Christ is white while having the cross, and yet they don't know that the cross is based on the black god Christ or Krishna from India (the irony). Below, the hair style with the top is based on the Buddha hair bundled up also shown on Shiva to which later in Mithraism becomes the "Phrygian cap" to Mithra and Cybele. Buddhism is Hinduism and are one and the same. Then there is the Egyptian priest to which they bald themselves in the same manner as Buddhist priest.

Now, based on his book details that the Aryan features were "Aquiline", thus looking like a bird resembling the Garuda. They would look something like the Native Americans, Persians and Mayans with the fashion of the bird like nose. Then based on Dr. Henrik Clarke who does a Documentary on the Nagas of Asia and their Dragon God the Buddha, he states that the Naga symbolism was originally their symbol, and that I find is a fact. Here the Buddha, connects to Vishnu, Krishna, Buddha, Thoth as Hermes, and then to Shiva going back to Agni, who is the black God and the Dragon that has his Kingdom on this Earth, but Asia as the Seat of his Kingdom. This is discussed in Rene' Guenon's book "The King of the World" and Godfrey Higgins' book "The Anacalypsis" as this reveals the Black stone and black cube symbolism connecting to the Black Gods. Even Robert Temple's book "The Sirius Mystery" had detailed how the Oracle of Delphi as the priest is a negro, thus detailing this Atlantean or rather the Lemurian culture came from the black nations which is the Buddhist culture.

Then I start to see the symbolism of Krishna, Shiva and Buddha who apparently defeats the serpent is actually based on the serpent God and are of the Titans and Asuras. Vishnu and Buddha are shown with the seven headed serpent symbolism connecting to the Ancient Dragon god. So, the Aryans started to make the black gods whose symbolism is the serpent as their apparent Gods in the Rig Vedas, like Vishnu, Shiva/Rudra, Pushan to even Krishna to be worshiped. This is what I find the Srimad Bhagavatam and the Bhagavad-Gita as Krishna is shown to the national hero in the Aryan stories, is really a negroid God whose original origins are obscured to this day. Krishna, who is Buddha, is not shown the real image nor the real story of this deity. The Buddhist claim they don't believe in God and yet worship Buddha with these huge, erected Idols in their temples which is hypocritical.

So, when I had started this in 2018, I wanted to understand what is really going on in this world and thus the Creator had led me to learn about Hinduism. Then after Hinduism I had naturally started to understand the Bible to even the practices described in the Bible. Though I didn't have the full understanding, but my first initial thought was Agni connecting to Garuda, and how the Agnicayana which is the Brahminic practice of fire worship and how this connects to the God that had led them into the land of India. Based on the first phase of this website, I had thought the story of Buddha defeating Sun Wukong is based on the Black God as Michael defeating the red dragon who is in the form of Garuda. This was due to the connection of Garuda being a fiery God who is depicted in the Bible who then I find is really Shiva. Then comes Shiva who is Agni, and Osiris who is known for the pillar, and then from there somethings just didn't add up, because the pillar came from the black nations and not these people dubbed the Aryans. Shiva who is deemed the dragon was actually the God of the black nations and not Indra as I had thought, because everything from the Anacalypsis, Gerald Massey's works and "King of the world" by Rene Guenon details the Black god rules the world and not the Garuda or Indra. There were many significant changes like "Indra's cross" but this was actually based on Agni who is known as Matarisvan as Prometheus the black God that stole the fire who is then crucified. This is why people think Michael the Archangel represents the religion of Christianity, when it's actually based on the Gods that was defeated by him as the Dragon God and his angels that came to Earth.

Then finding Azazil who is Satan to being Michael as the angel that had battled against the Jinn race, but had not connected this to the ancient war between the Gods and the Titans till later on. The Jinn is based on Shiva the Dragon God as Jann ibn Jann the leader of the Jinn who had challenged Azazil who is really Michael. There are also corruption and misinformation in the Islamic lore because they don't know that Azazil being sent by God is based on Michael the Archangel who was sent by God to defeat the Jinn who are the Asuras/Nagas. That's why one person had stated that Iblis is Jann ibn Jann who is the father of all the Jinn who battled against the "tribe of angels" to which are based on the Anunnaki battling the Titans. There are certain theories that this war was due to the blood shed against each other, but I find that isn't the case for the Jinn are the Asuras. The term "Tribe of angels" are another race of Extraterrestrial beings, and then the Jinn who was said to be made from smokeless fire is where Shiva who is Mahakala is based on as he is the "Consuming fire" who is Saturn in the Bible.

Then based on the fire God Fudo Myoo who is depicted with some images of the Garuda was one of the things that threw me off, because the original symbolism of Garuda was based on Indra, whereas Fudo Myoo/Acala was originally based on the dragon God Shiva (They fused them together). So, as I had more time to do more research into these books, it then becomes clear as to the many changes in the Rig Vedas along with other Hindu books is just full-on corruption because they added the Gods that were pre-Vedic. The Aryans were changing and fusing the Gods and started to make up stories based on these Gods. In the Rig Vedas they state that Indra would have blonde hair or blonde beard, but I have to question this because of the changes in the books. I find that the British having colonized India may had something to do with changing up somethings along with the books, especially when they know that the land of India is the true Egypt and how these religions came from Hinduism.

Then based on the Demiurge story, we know this God as Melek Taus, Yaldabaoth, Mithras kronos and thus is "Natigai" of the Chinese connecting to Mahakala the Black God of fire. But I have to question: How can this God be the mediator and yet be the God of the black nations (the Lord of Sirius) who are of the Titans that was defeated by the other Angels which are then cast to the Earth? It's shown that Shiva was never a mediator to begin with, but just took over the Earth as these Gods had landed in India. It's revealed that the God of fire in the Bible is Saturn, Dagon and Bacchus to which the wine connects to the Bacchic Eucharist symbolism in Christianity. Another version states in the Angel/Jinn war are when Satan and his race didn't want to bow down to Adam, then God had sent his Angels against them. Then based on Jaan ibn Jann who is dubbed "the Red Dragon" in Revelations 12 (defeated by Michael/Azazil) as he and his angels are then cast to Earth, then comes the Sons of God, which is really the Dragon Gods that came down from the skies and thus had influenced the whole world. This would then connect to Hinduism, Buddhism and Christianity, Judaism and Islam are one and the same going back to the culture of the Nagas. The Rig Vedas along with others is corrupted. I don't care what anyone says because when deconstructing who the identity of the Gods, it's shown there were so much corruption to these books and makes it difficult to understand the real origins of these Gods. Mahakala, who is Dagon, is the God of the black nations. 

Then based on Jacob erecting the pillar, which is towards the Black God Saturn who is Shiva, states that the Dasyus who are the Nagas (Black Inhabitants) were already doing this as a practice towards their God. This practice from what Jacob did was based on the Nagas not the Aryans. In the Bible, Shiva wouldn't be the one to instruct the people to destroy the pillars that were in the land (as the Shiva lingams were already in the land), but Indra who told the people to destroy those pillars and altars to Shiva and Kali as they are the Gods of the Nagas. It's shown that Indra is the one who brought his people out of Egypt, which is India, to whom gave them a different culture, which was not Buddhism or Hinduism (as this makes more sense). The Aryans that had come down to India were Mughals based on the Khans (Turkic Mongolians), though they connect to the Brahmins, but it's shown there were changes as the attire of the Brahmins is basically Buddhism, so I wonder what it used to be before these changes. It's noted that even though Turkic Mongols had exploited India, the Mughals have a totally different culture and are the ones that built the great Taj Mahal (as they came from Central Asia) and are mostly the people shown in these Bollywood movies. 

Now, based on the term "Judaism", it's noted that if you are an avid Bible reader then you should know that the religion that God gave to the people was never called "Judaism" because that's named after the tribe of Judah. The practices that were based on the Priestly tribe was from the Levites and not of Judah, for it was the Levites that God chose to be closer to him and not the tribe of Judah. Here shows that the people of "Judah" calling themselves priests and Rabbis had never inherited the priesthood as it's supposed to be towards the Levites. In any case, this shows that the religion is eclectic mixing with Brahminism, Zoroastrianism and Islam. The term Jew has been utilized and become generic overtime that even other nations converting to Judaism is merely the same as people converting to Christianity or Islam. This is why I don't see all of those people in the current land as real people that the Bible is supposed to be based on, and based on the term Jew and Israel has no History because they weren't in the land to begin with. 

It's shown that there were other nations that became "Jewish" and "Israeli", and though they are distinguished from one and the other, still everything is mixed in with false History on location and religion. It seems that most of those that are of European descent are mainly European and have no affiliation nor lineage going to the Turkic Mongolian nations. Judaism was created by the Vatican Church to control the people and based in Jordan Maxwell's research, the land of Israel was formed and created by the British Zionist Israeli Freemasons. So, the Vatican, the Knights of Malta, the Knights of the Templar, the Jesuits to the Society of Islamic Brotherhood and their associations are just some of the groups that are part of the fake history needed to be provided for their agenda. There are Jews that are against the Zionist movement because it is another Mafia group connecting to the British freemasons. Then based on those real Aryans that have taken a part of the Zionist and the Islamic movements (as those that was cast out of the land), it's noted that the Bible describes how the people became so evil that they were even worse than the nations that was there prior to them.

Now, I had already established Shiva's different epithets around the world as he is called Osiris, Bacchus, the Red Dragon, the Buddha, Krishna, Dagon to Agni and so nothing has changed and why Buddhism and Hinduism still remain there (they changed the Bible). Then comes the God called Indra who is Garuda, and he is Michael the Archangel the Indo-European God who defeated the Dragon God. Now, based on the said origins on Indra was said to be unclear (as they state) and yet, based on J.A. Rogers' book details the people of Indra battling against the Nagas whose Gods consist of Krishna and even Shiva. This details that there was an amalgamation of the Gods as they started to integrate amongst the original inhabitants of the land along with their Gods. Then there is Indra who is the God of Heaven based on the Garuda symbology who is of the Aryan people. This is why when people started to change Indra's true origin as this is Garuda, and the symbol of this God is the Bird or Eagle, then we can see how much corruption was done to deviate the people from the truth. This is the real God of the Aryan people who came to the lands of Central Asia, China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, the Americas and India. This is where we start to understand the "Children of Indra"......

Now, this is from old information. So, when I came across learning about the Occult (Secret Knowledge), and would listen to different accounts of the secrets of the Bible, one source had stated that the movie "Raiders of the Lost Ark", had nothing to do with the land of Israel. He states that people think that the Ark had something to do with Israel, but is really based on "Egypt" or "Khem". If you saw the movie, then you will see that Indiana Jones does "not" go to Israel to look of the "Ark of the Covenant", but to "Tibet" and then to "Egypt". When he said this, I immediately went to watch the movie (and the other three Indiana Jones movies) and see that he was correct. If you saw it, then you will see that Tibet was the very first stop, as Indiana's ex-girlfriend was carrying an Amulet that goes back to Ancient Egypt. Then with this Amulet, he goes to Egypt, uncovers the location of the Ark in of the Temples, and of course, the Nazi's were on his tail....

Does this sound very much like the Nazi's going to Tibet for an expedition to learning about the Aryans? There is a reason why the envoys were sent to "Tibet", then going to meet the Dalai Lama. Now, why would the "blonde headed blue eyed" Germans who believe are a supposed "Master race", go to Tibet and meet the Dalai Lama? I have heard that there are German women wanting to be impregnated by the people so their baby can have the Aryan blood in them. There is a reason why they came to Tibet, and it turns out that they state these people are the considered "descendants" of the Aryans. Though to be specific, they are the Aryans. All of those people that came over there with their God Indra, had taken them to that part of the land called China, Korea, Thailand, Indonesian, Japan. Then there are those Aryans that didn't go over the Indus River, but remained in the lands of Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the Central Asian lands (as the lands of Persia). These people though there are some other nations, are shown to have strong straighter features compared to the flat nosed brethren. 

If you read the Chapter "New World Order", then you should understand that the German people do have some "oriental" blood, and Hitler's right-hand man (Heinrich Himmler) would have this "oriental" look. And if you look below and compare Reinhard Heydrich's (Former Director of the Reich Main Security Office) features to that of the Tibetan, the Indian, the Japanese and the Native American features, you will see a comparison. If you look at the features of the actual blonde German compared to the Jewish boy, you will see that distinct "hook" nose. I generally find the people of Indra was supposed to look like "birds", as the Aryans were described as having Aquiline features, but this is not features amongst those Europeans with blonde or red hair, as the "Roman nose" is shown amongst people of Middle East, Indian, Arabian, Native American and Asia. Whereas the people of the Black God Vishnu, Shiva or Buddha or Krishna just to name a few, would have the flat features as it pertains to the dragon God, but based on the Documentary on the Germans going to Tibet, it's shown that the people in Tibet were stated as the "descendants" of the Aryans, though the real statement should be is that "they are the Aryans". Then those that heavily mixed in with the Europeans and why they don't look like the Jewish boy below, as many would get nose jobs and such to look more "European". Nowadays, the Jews I see that are supposed to be Mongolian and Turkic looking are then mixed with the other nations from the different lands. I also try to find Asian actors with the natural straight features and not rhinoplasty or facial surgery, as I see how models and actors are mostly used because of this.

Now, when looking up the Documentary on Journey of Man, they did a segment on the relationship between the American Indians and this particular man from Kazakhstan. When observing the people of Central Asia, it's noted that certain Native American tribes resemble these types of people which is interesting. Here is what the segment "Journey of Man" states of what the man from Kazakhstan looks like, then compared to the other people in the other regions of the world. Here I compare him to a Peruvian man. Hence "corn" is mentioned in the Bible as this details when this edition of the Bible was written before 1611. This indicates the apparent new world was already discovered, and corn was the food to be distributed all over the world. Since the book of Jeremiah revealed the Christian religion already existing before the New Testament (as the Jews were worshiping the Queen of Heaven as Christianity existed prior to the man they call Jesus) then we must understand the timelines that we are told are all lies, plus, they know who those people were when they came to America. These people are the real Aryans as they depicted as having the aquiline nose, whereas this type is also called the "Roman nose", but we see this amongst the American Indian nations and the Middle East. I have detailed in the Chapter "Legend of the Aryans: Deconstructing the dragon gods of America, and the Aryan migration to America", when the Aryans came to America they had met the Olmec people who were the Black people, and how there were wars between each other to the people being ruled by the black nations, and being sacrificed to their Gods, to intermingling between the two races (As there are many Mexicans with black blood in them just as the Aryans in Asia). As you see the term "Roman Nose" is generally deemed as an aquiline type of nose, however, but the aquiline nose is not a true European feature for this is more common amongst people of Middle Eastern, Arabian, Indian, Asia and Native American. In some cases, there are accounts of the Roman nose being distinct compared to the Roman nose.

When learning about the People called the Yezidis, I see that their origins are really towards the lands of India. There are questionable accounts on Melek Taus as the peacock symbolism either belonging to the devil or Michael, but based on the former details that this would be the case as it's based on the Naga God "Quetzalcoatl" who is Bacchus the Black God of fire. Then comes another group of people that came from India towards the lands of Europe, and they are called "Roma". Apparently, when learning about the Roma people, there are many Documentaries detailing how they got into the worship of the "Queen of Heaven", to which is the Goddess Kali. This was not surprising to me, for I begin to see the correlations of those that wanted to go to the lands of Egypt (as it's written down in the Bible in Jeremiah), and the coincidental curse that is shown amongst the Roma people.

Jeremiah 44:8,12-14 states “In that ye provoke me unto wrath with the works of your hands, burning incense unto other gods in the land of Egypt, whither ye be gone to dwell, that ye might cut yourselves off, and that ye might be a curse and a reproach among all the nations of the earth? And I will take the remnant of Judah that set their faces to go into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, and they shall all be consumed and fall in the land of Egypt; they shall even be consumed by the sword and the famine: they shall die, from the last even unto the greatest by the sword and by the famine: and they shall be an execration, and an astonishment, and a curse, and a reproach. For I will punish them that dwell in the land of Egypt, as I have punished Jerusalem, by the sword, by the famine, and by the pestilence: So that none of the remnant of Judah, which are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall escape or remain that they should return into the land of Judah, to which they have a desire to return to dwell there: for none shall return but such as shall escape.”

This sounds like this God cursing the people, because they wanted to go to land of Egypt, and to worship the Queen of Heaven. It synchronizes with the book of Jeremiah, as it states, as "soon as they went to Europe", then they became a “reproach and a curse.” Then comes the term “the curse of the Gypsies” and how it became infamous, even though they are called the "Roma" nowadays, however it's shown that they came from India. Though I can't detail this proper location of Egypt (as the locations are changed in the Bible), as Egypt would be in North Africa, but also be India to which is where the Dragon Gods had fell. Since Thoth and the Atlanteans were said to have landed in Egypt, it's shown that through understanding where these religions came from, and Hinduism being the mother of all religions, it would mean that this particular culture came from the East to the West and not the other way around.

Genesis 47:27: “And Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions therein, and grew, and multiplied exceedingly.” Now, there is a place called "Cochin" which is now called "Kochi", located in southern India, and there are a group of Jews still there to this day. Would this place be Goshen of Egypt? If this is the case, then that means a certain God had brought them out of Egypt which is India and not into India because this was the "Exodus" which the Mahabharata is supposed to base on. The Bible details the Jews wanting to go to Egypt to escape punishment and may have this connection to this story. This connects to them being the Children of Indra, as these people resemble the Aryans from the Stans (even though some got mixed) as there are those that have straight features resembling the Garuda. 

(Below is a Peruvian woman and a Roma woman)

Based on understanding the Aryan features of the people, I find this to be shown amongst the Iranians, Middle Easterners, to India, Japan and Central Asia. I have also seen Japanese and some Chinese and Thais with the Aquiline features as well. I think the Aryans were sent to Japan to preserve their culture compared to the Chinese, because based on the accounts of the Japanese culture being similar to the Jews, details their hidden connection and how they are the Children of Susanoo or Indra. I remember when visiting Japan, the tour guide had stated on the Korean virgin women were sent to populate the island (to keep their blood pure). In any case, the people of Indra were straight featured people compared to what occurred amongst the other tribes, but they are still based on the people of the book because they were brought there by their God (despite the mixing). There is a term called the "true blood and the true bone", as protecting the lineage and features of their people. There are natural features of the people and then there are those that obviously mixed in with other people. I have seen Koreans and Chinese that have aquiline nose, so it's not everyone that have the flat features. 

Then there were those Aryans who were either taken away or sent to the different parts of Africa. And you can see that they are very different than the original African tribes just by their features alone. The Israelites that went to Africa came from the Reubenites of Persia aka Central Asia. The Tribes of Judah would have a stronger look more so than their other brethren, as you can see the "bird-like" features on them and oriental look. Some would have flat noses but would be fairer compared to the African people.

When their DNA is taken, most of their results tend to end up in Iran or Central Asia. I can observe the features from certain tribes of the Yoruba, Ashanti, Fulani, Ethiopian etc., as those would be the Israelites that came there, and had mixed in with the people. As I've researched the subjects of the Israelites and where they got scattered to, I've always come to an interesting result. There would be particular practices, and interesting similarities between the people of West Africa and Persia. You can clearly see how they look very much like "Persians" or Middle Easterners. It's noted that the Aryans have the nose like that of the Garuda compared to the Asians that got mixed in with the black nations. When the Aryan intermingles with another nation, most will still have the strong and straight features even if they are mixed with the black in them. Many of these Aryans that were taken to Ethiopia and are not the true Ethiopians but are of Indra's people. Even those that came to other parts of Africa still shows that strong features. I have seen this amongst the Native American tribes that have those strong bird-like features, even if they were mixed with black. They can be mixed to this extent but still have a connection to the Aryan people. Here Rosa Parks who was labeled as black in America actually had Native American and Irish, and here you see the older she got she looked like the Brahmin people of India.

Now, I needed to connect the dots based on the Ancient Persian Kingdom, and where they ruled from to its decline. Again, the Reubenites got scattered to the different parts of the world, but it doesn't end there....

Now, when I was looking into a YouTube video called "Italian people trying American foods", and people's vlogs of going to Italy. I started to see a "resemblance", as these Italians are very much mixed with the Jews. Now, I have heard many times that the Italians were not considered "white", and that they got mixed with the Black moors etc. Though there were Black People in that part of the region (as Christianity is their religion to their Gods), I can't state that the people are technically mixed with Black blood. Now, the term "Black" can mean "Black" as in African, and then there is "Black" as in having "Black hair". The latter is based on the People coming from the "Middle East", Mediterranean, and Eastern European parts of the world. This is why many Italians would have "Black hair", and a Middle Eastern look compared to the real European counterpart, to which they started to intermingle with. Now, when I was looking up Italian people, actors, singers etc. I started to see why some of the Italians were not considered "white" like the actual Europeans. There is amount of Persian influence. Let's observe:

It seems that some of the Italians could pass as Iranians and Central Asians as well. It's important to look at the features of People, because it determines what they have in their blood (Which is why the Germans studied the features between the Jews and the blonde haired Europeans).

Then from there connects to those Jews that were forced into Roman Catholicism, and to which led to the "1492" Diaspora of the Jews that was trying to get away from the persecution. Many were forced into it, while others was said to have been called "Moranos", which is deemed a derogatory term as "pig eaters" (Though it's based on the Jews secretly practicing their faith, while they pretend to be Catholics), when others state "Crypto Jew". Then from there was the spread of the Jews to the Americas and the West Indies.

Now, there have been interesting information based on Christopher Colombus to being a Jew himself (specifically Sephardic Jew) though he had a different name under "Cristobal Colon". Here is an Article "www.timesofisrael.com/christopher-columbus-the-hidden-jew", and it states:

"Christopher Columbus — the hidden Jew?: Two fleets set sail from Spain’s Port of Palos on August 3, 1492, floating together down the Rio Tinto. On one vessel was the final batch of expelled Jews, who, rather than repudiate their faith and become conversos (Christian converts) in the face of death if they remained in their home country, set out for an unknown fate in a new world. Leading the other ships, named the Pinta, Niña, and Santa María, was a little known explorer named Christopher Columbus. Whether fact or legend, there are those who say that Columbus set out with the expelled Jews because he had stalled his voyage, originally set for August 2, by one day; that year, August 2 was the commemoration of Tisha B’Av, a fast day of mourning for the fall of the Jewish Temples."

"For some scholars, the shared launch date is more than coincidental. Is it possible that Columbus too was a Jew in search of a better future? Since the late 1800s, Columbus historians have diligently worked to unearth the true origin story behind the man who set sail for India in 1492 and instead unwittingly found a new world. The man most believe to have been born in Genoa has been variously described as an heir to nobility or a pirate. Some early 19th century Spanish scholars claimed he was actually born Cristobal Colon in Pontevedra, a large Galician port in northern Spain."

"Others writers, including Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal, who wrote a popular book “Sails of Hope” on the explorer, think he was a Jew. Unfortunately, there is no physical historical evidence of Columbus’s roots, according to Prof. Ram Ben-Shalom, director of Hebrew University’s Center Hispania Judaica. That paucity of proof, he said in a phone call on Monday, Columbus Day, is probably intentional on the part of the explorer. “His past is murky — apparently purposefully so,” he said. Despite the consensus of opinion, there is no official documentation that Columbus hailed from Genoa."

“There are indications that he was even Spanish,” he said, due to Columbus’s better fluency in the language in his writings. During the reign of Isabella and Ferdinand, Columbus could have many reasons to rewrite his own personal history. Perhaps, Ben-Shalom said, the would-be voyager was from a poor trading family (one theory is he comes from a family of weavers), and he wanted to impress potential patrons with a better lineage. But did he obfuscate his past because he was a converso? “There is no direct evidence, but the idea of him blurring his past because he was of Jewish ancestry is very possible,” said Ben-Shalom."

"By the time Columbus reached court in the 1480s, the Catholic monarchs’ Spanish Inquisition was in full swing, and the scrutinization of conversos was particularly cruel. According to a 1934 JTA article discussing then-breaking edge research indicating Columbus’s Sephardic Jewish origins, “In Spain, it was fatal to admit being a Jew, because there was more chance of being favorably accepted in Madrid as a foreigner rather than as a native from Galicia, which at that time was not in the good graces of the ruling provinces of Castile and Aragon.”

"However, it is from a group of conversos who had reached the highest echelons of Christian society in the church and court — the “oligarchs” of the day, said Ben-Shalom — that Columbus received his chance for greatness. “Columbus’ voyage was not, as is commonly believed, funded by the deep pockets of Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos and another prominent Jew. Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez advanced an interest free loan of 17,000 ducats from their own pockets to help pay for the voyage, as did Don Isaac Abarbanel, rabbi and Jewish statesman,” writes a 2012 CNN article, “Was Columbus secretly a Jew?”

"According to the 1934 JTA article, that support from members of the conversos community is proof enough of his Jewish roots. “The help afforded him by Jewish scientists and financiers of that time can be explained only in the light that he was of the same race,” the writer concluded and cited the 1892 work, “Columbus and his Discovery of America,” in which Herbert B. Adams wrote: “Not jewels, but Jews were the real financial basis for the first expedition of Columbus.”

"It is perhaps then fitting that Columbus’s first announcement of his voyage’s discoveries went to the treasurer of Aragon, the former Jew, de Santangel."

"In the 1493 letter, Columbus describes the many islands he has discovered and the indigenous peoples living on them, whom Columbus writes he hopes to convert. “To the first island I discovered I gave the name of San Salvador, in commemoration of His Divine Majesty, who has wonderfully granted all this,” Columbus writes. All of Christendom should rejoice, Columbus writes to the former Jew, “with fervent prayers for the high distinction that will accrue to them from turning so many peoples to our holy faith.”

"This missionary language is in keeping with the chartered purpose of Columbus’s voyage, said Dr. Aliza Moreno-Goldschmidt, head of the Judaica reading room collection at the National Library of Israel, who specializes in conversos culture in the New World. The fact that Columbus wrote of promoting Christianity “doesn’t prove anything whether he was a Jew or not,” she said. “One of the main stated goals of the Spanish colonization was to convert the new continent into Christianity, much before the inquisition was instituted, especially through the natives of the territories,” said Moreno-Goldschmidt. Columbus would have been well aware of this goal — and the atmosphere in Spain for those who did not comply. “There is no doubt that there were at the time many conversos, some of them Crypto Jews. Before 1492, there were several waves of Jews converting to Christianity; it was a very vivid reality in Spain at the time,” said Moreno-Goldschmidt."

"Even after converting to Christianity, those with Jewish roots were discriminated against and their ancestors were “very busy” proving the purity of their blood. At the same time, said Moreno-Goldschmidt, “The truth is that in the scholarly world, it’s not very accepted [to say] he was a Jew. I tend to believe he was not.” Likewise, laughed, Ben-Shalom, “I’m not going to be able to solve the mystery — there’s no birth certificate stating that he is Jewish.”

The question is, if Christopher was a secret practicing Jew, then why would he bring the Roman Catholic religion to America? Unless the Vatican was sending people to convert the Jews into the religion of Dagon which is why the great diaspora in 1492 was the escape from Europe to the America. There is a reason why the Dominicans, Puerto Ricans and Jamaica would have the Jewish blood.

Now, when I had traveled to the Dominican Republic, I came to see some Dominicans with fair skin and the same oriental features like that of the Jews. Then there are those that have been mixed with the Black Blood, but some still retain that strong Indian look. Could the Conquistadors that came to America try to find the Jews, but met other tribes to which they slaughtered almost to extinction? I remember watching a small clip of this Documentary, detailing how the Spanish consisted of not just white soldiers, but also black soldiers as well. I've been trying to find the title of this program though it's been years since. In any case I find that the Jews are mixed up with other nations, as again, is hard to tell the true features based from the original. They could be Mongolian, and they could be German to which I do find those European Jews to mainly be those Europeans converted to Judaism. 

Now, I also see Selena Quintanilla to have that Aryan look, and despite Israel as having a diverse look in their army as they are considered Jews, there are people especially the women that Central and South American looking. It's noted that not all of those people in the current land called Israel Aryans as they are of other nations and then there are those Jews that are mixed in with other nations. Ignatius Donnelly's book "Atlantis the Antediluvian world" had mentioned the connection between the Mexicans and the Jews....

Then there is the "Scottish Declaration of Independence", as the Website "declaration.scot" details this: "2020 marks the 700th anniversary of the Declaration of Arbroath, this was the letter sent to the pope by the nobles and barons of Scotland following the defeat of the English by the Scots at Bannockburn asking the pope to recognise Robert the Bruce as the King of Scotland. The letter informed the pope that Scotland was an ancient kingdom under the protection of Saint Andrew and that the English king had attempted to conquer what did not belong to him, committing all kinds of crimes and sacrilege in the process. The letter went on to state that the Scots had chosen Robert the Bruce to be their king and would resist all attempts at English conquest, even if just one hundred of them remained alive. But they went further and declared that if King Robert ever gave in to the English they would depose him and choose another king. This is a clear indication that the Scots regarded the kingship as being contractual and that the people of Scotland were soveriegn, even over the King. The Scots had no wish to be ruled over by their English neighbours, and one of the most quoted excerpts from the letter is this one... For as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule. It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself."

"To the most Holy Father and Lord in Christ, the Lord John, by divine providence Supreme Pontiff of the Holy Roman and Universal Church, his humble and devout sons Duncan, Earl of Fife, Thomas Randolph, Earl of Moray, Lord of Man and of Annandale, Patrick Dunbar, Earl of March, Malise, Earl of Strathearn, Malcolm, Earl of Lennox, William, Earl of Ross, Magnus, Earl of Caithness and Orkney, and William, Earl of Sutherland; Walter, Steward of Scotland, William Soules, Butler of Scotland, James, Lord of Douglas, Roger Mowbray, David, Lord of Brechin, David Graham, Ingram Umfraville, John Menteith, guardian of the earldom of Menteith, Alexander Fraser, Gilbert Hay, Constable of Scotland, Robert Keith, Marischal of Scotland, Henry St Clair, John Graham, David Lindsay, William Oliphant, Patrick Graham, John Fenton, William Abernethy, David Wemyss, William Mushet, Fergus of Ardrossan, Eustace Maxwell, William Ramsay, William Mowat, Alan Murray, Donald Campbell, John Cameron, Reginald Cheyne, Alexander Seton, Andrew Leslie, and Alexander Straiton, and the other barons and freeholders and the whole community of the realm of Scotland send all manner of filial reverence, with devout kisses of his blessed feet."

"Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today."

"The Britons they first drove out, the Picts they utterly destroyed, and, even though very often assailed by the Norwegians, the Danes and the English, they took possession of that home with many victories and untold efforts; and, as the historians of old time bear witness, they have held it free of all bondage ever since. In their kingdom there have reigned one hundred and thirteen kings of their own royal stock, the line unbroken a single foreigner."

"The high qualities and deserts of these people, were they not otherwise manifest, gain glory enough from this: that the King of kings and Lord of lords, our Lord Jesus Christ, after His Passion and Resurrection, called them, even though settled in the uttermost parts of the earth, almost the first to His most holy faith. Nor would He have them confirmed in that faith by merely anyone but by the first of His Apostles - by calling, though second or third in rank - the most gentle Saint Andrew, the Blessed Peter's brother, and desired him to keep them under his protection as their patron forever."

"The Most Holy Fathers your predecessors gave careful heed to these things and bestowed many favours and numerous privileges on this same kingdom and people, as being the special charge of the Blessed Peter's brother. Thus our nation under their protection did indeed live in freedom and peace up to the time when that mighty prince the King of the English, Edward, the father of the one who reigns today, when our kingdom had no head and our people harboured no malice or treachery and were then unused to wars or invasions, came in the guise of a friend and ally to harass them as an enemy."

"The deeds of cruelty, massacre, violence, pillage, arson, imprisoning prelates, burning down monasteries, robbing and killing monks and nuns, and yet other outrages without number which he committed against our people, sparing neither age nor sex, religion nor rank, no one could describe nor fully imagine unless he had seen them with his own eyes. But from these countless evils we have been set free, by the help of Him Who though He afflicts yet heals and restores, by our most tireless Prince, King and Lord, the Lord Robert."

"He, that his people and his heritage might be delivered out of the hands of our enemies, met toil and fatigue, hunger and peril, like another Macabaeus or Joshua and bore them cheerfully. Him, too, divine providence, his right of succession according to or laws and customs which we shall maintain to the death, and the due consent and assent of us all have made our Prince and King. To him, as to the man by whom salvation has been wrought unto our people, we are bound both by law and by his merits that our freedom may be still maintained, and by him, come what may, we mean to stand."

"Yet if he should give up what he has begun, and agree to make us or our kingdom subject to the King of England or the English, we should exert ourselves at once to drive him out as our enemy and a subverter of his own rights and ours, and make some other man who was well able to defend us our King; for, as long as but a hundred of us remain alive, never will we on any conditions be brought under English rule."

"It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself. Therefore it is, Reverend Father and Lord, that we beseech your Holiness with our most earnest prayers and suppliant hearts, inasmuch as you will in your sincerity and goodness consider all this, that, since with Him Whose Vice-Regent on earth you are there is neither weighing nor distinction of Jew and Greek, Scotsman or Englishman, you will look with the eyes of a father on the troubles and privation brought by the English upon us and upon the Church of God."

"May it please you to admonish and exhort the King of the English, who ought to be satisfied with what belongs to him since England used once to be enough for seven kings or more, to leave us Scots in peace, who live in this poor little Scotland, beyond which there is no dwelling-place at all, and covet nothing but our own. We are sincerely willing to do anything for him, having regard to our condition, that we can, to win peace for ourselves."

"This truly concerns you, Holy Father, since you see the savagery of the heathen raging against the Christians, as the sins of Christians have indeed deserved, and the frontiers of Christendom being pressed inward every day; and how much it will tarnish your Holiness's memory if (which God forbid) the Church suffers eclipse or scandal in any branch of it during your time, you must perceive. Then rouse the Christian princes who for false reasons pretend that they cannot go to help of the Holy Land because of wars they have on hand with their neighbours."

"The real reason that prevents them is that in making war on their smaller neighbours they find quicker profit and weaker resistance. But how cheerfully our Lord the King and we too would go there if the King of the English would leave us in peace, He from Whom nothing is hidden well knows; and we profess and declare it to you as the Vicar of Christ and to all Christendom. But if your Holiness puts too much faith in the tales the English tell and will not give sincere belief to all this, nor refrain from favouring them to our prejudice, then the slaughter of bodies, the perdition of souls, and all the other misfortunes that will follow, inflicted by them on us and by us on them, will, we believe, be surely laid by the Most High to your charge."

"To conclude, we are and shall ever be, as far as duty calls us, ready to do your will in all things, as obedient sons to you as His Vicar; and to Him as the Supreme King and Judge we commit the maintenance of our cause, casting our cares upon Him and firmly trusting that He will inspire us with courage and bring our enemies to nought. May the Most High preserve you to his Holy Church in holiness and health and grant you length of days. Given at the monastery of Arbroath in Scotland on the sixth day of the month of April in the year of grace thirteen hundred and twenty and the fifteenth year of the reign of our King aforesaid."

It's interesting as the Scottish Declaration states how they came from the lands of "Scythia", to which pertains to the Scythians. Ignatius Donnelly had mentioned the Scythians and their connections to the Turkic-Mongols and some American Indian tribes, as they would "scalp" their victims and keep the hair lock as trophies. Now, when I would put the people called the "Scythians", they would show images looking like this:

There seems to be debates as to who the Scythians are, as they seem to be a group of Eurasians, or Turkic-Mongolians (Though others considered themselves to be just Turkish). However, when I was looking up Irish people detailing their Dna results, I had found an interesting group to which seems to fit into the category of the Scythians. On Youtube there is an Irish man who calls himself "Leather Jacket Guy" of "Are ya having that", to which they try different snacks, alcoholic beverages and play some games.

Anyhow, he has an episode where his friends would give their Dna results to see how Irish are they. Then (much to my surprise) shows that two of his friends would have around 90% Irish along with other mixtures, but when he gave his result, it turns out that he is "100%" Irish! This was shocking to me, because his Dna results states 100% Irish, and yet he has black hair, and looks somewhat like Turkic-Mongolian/Japanese. The funny thing is when looking at Alexander the Great's Armor (See the Previous Chapter), it shows that it is similar to the Turkic-Mongolian and Japanese armor, and he is shown with "black hair", not blonde or red hair. So, could this be what the term "Black Irish" is based on? Remember the term "Black" means that they are a people with black hair, thus not fitting into the Blonde or red headed category.

So, when I was learning about the people called the "Milesians", it seems that there could be a connection from there. In the Wiki states this: "In the Lebor Gabála Érenn, a medieval Irish Christian pseudo-history, the Milesians (Irish: gairthear Mílidh Easpáinne) are the final race to settle in Ireland. They represent the Irish people. The Milesians are Gaels who sail to Ireland from Iberia (Hispania) after spending hundreds of years travelling the earth. When they land in Ireland they contend with the Tuatha Dé Danann, who represent the pagan gods. The two groups agree to divide Ireland between them: the Milesians take the world above, while the Tuath Dé take the world below (i.e. the Otherworld)."

"Whether the word "Milesians" came before or after the name Míl Espáine, which is the Irish form of the Latin Miles Hispaniae ("Soldier of Hispania") is uncertain. Joseph Lennon writes that "no Irish-language cognate of the word exists." and that "the word Milesian is not used to refer to the Irish with any regularity until the eighteenth century..." Scholars believe that the tale is mostly an invention of medieval Christian writers."

"The Lebor Gabála, which was written in the 11th century AD by Christian monks, purports to be a history of Ireland and the Irish (the Gaels). It tells us that all mankind is descended from Adam through the sons of Noah, and that a Scythian king named Fénius Farsaid (descendant of Noah's son Japheth) is the forebear of the Gaels. Fénius, a prince of Scythia, is described as one of 72 chieftains who built the Tower of Babel."

"His son Nel weds Scota, daughter of an Egyptian pharaoh, and they have a son named Goídel Glas. Goídel crafts the Goidelic (Gaelic) language from the original 72 languages that arose after the confusion of tongues. Goídel's offspring, the Goidels (Gaels), leave Egypt at the same time as the Israelites (the Exodus) and settle in Scythia. After some time they leave Scythia and spend 440 years wandering the Earth, undergoing a series of trials and tribulations akin to those of the Israelites, who spent 40 years wandering in the wilderness."

"Eventually, they reach Hispania by sea and conquer it. There, Goídel's descendant Breogán founds a city called Brigantia, and builds a tower from the top of which his son Íth glimpses Ireland. Brigantia refers to Corunna in modern-day Galicia, in Spain, (which was then known as Brigantium) and Breogán's tower is likely based on the Tower of Hercules, which was built at Corunna by the Romans. Íth sails to the island with a group of men. He is welcomed by its three kings: Mac Cuill, Mac Cecht and Mac Gréine."

"These three are members of the Tuatha Dé Danann, who ruled Ireland at the time. Evidence suggests that Tuath Dé were the main pagan gods of Ireland. Íth is then killed by unnamed attackers and his men return to Iberia. The eight sons of Íth's brother Míl Espáine (whose given name was Galam), lead an invasion force to avenge his death and take Ireland. After they land, they fight against the Tuath Dé and make for Tara, the royal capital."

"On the way, they are met on three mountains by Banba, Fódla and Ériu – the wives of Ireland's three kings. They are believed to have been a trio of land goddesses. Each woman says that the Gaels will have good fortune if they name the land after her. One of the Gaels, Amergin, promises that it shall be so. At Tara, they meet the three kings, who defend their claim to the joint kingship of the land. They ask that there be a three-day truce, during which the Gaels must stay a distance of nine waves from land."

"The Gaels agree, but once their ships are nine waves from Ireland, the Tuath Dé conjure up a great wind that prevents them sailing back to land. However, Amergin calms the wind by reciting a verse. The surviving ships return to land and the two groups agree to divide Ireland between them. The Gaels take the world above, while the Tuath Dé take the world below (i.e. the Otherworld) and enter the sídhe, the ancient burial mounds that dot the Irish landscape. Amergin divides the kingship between Éremon, who rules the northern half of Ireland, and Éber Finn, who rules the southern half."

"This division of the land was probably invented by the writers to explain and justify the 7th/8th-century division between the royal capitals of Tara and Cashel. The Lebor Gabála then traces Ireland's dynasties back to Milesian Gaels such as Éremon and Éber. Modern scholars, however, believe that these were fictional characters and that the writers were attempting to give the medieval dynasties more legitimacy. The Historia Brittonum—which was written before the Lebor Gabála—gives another account of the Milesians. It says that "three sons of a Spanish soldier" sailed from Iberia to Ireland with thirty ships, each carrying thirty wives."

"They see a glass tower in the middle of the sea with men on top of it, but the men do not answer their calls. The Milesians set out to take the tower, but when they reach it, all but one of their ships are sunk by a great wave. Only one ship makes it to land, and its passengers are the ancestors of all the Irish. In the Lebor Gabála, it is the earlier Nemedians who are drowned while trying to take a tower....."

This can connect to the book by Anne Wilkes' "Ireland: Ur of the Chaldees", to which Abraham's name may connect to the "Iberian" areas, and where the term "Hebrews" is supposed to be based on. Now, this would contradict to what they state the "Gael" or Milesians are the sons of Japheth, as Abraham was supposed to be of Shem. I have also heard from Robert Sepehr that the term "Japheth" is based on the Thunder god "Jupiter", to which comes the people relating to one of the sons of Noah. This is based from Robert Sephre's works as he would try to detail the descendants of Noah to the European race, however, I don't agree with this theme. I definitely know that Noah's race would be of one race or group of people and not multiple races that is suggested, because kind begets his own kind unless there was intermingling at some point.

Anyway, here is what the man looks like as his DNA result is shown to be 100% Irish. He looks just like the Turkic people from the Stans. There are people called "Black Irish" though they were said to have jet black hair, ivory skin that doesn't burn in the sun with green to blue eyes.

Now, when I was learning about the Aryans (real Aryans), I came across this YouTube video based on travelers exploring the mountains of Pakistan, to which there is an Aryan tribe that exist there. Upon revealing the tribes, I was astounded to see that their features are very similar to that of the Yezidi and the People of Central America. Here is what they called "The Aryans of Ladahk".

Here is an article based from the website:

"http://atithidevotourandtravels.blogspot.com/2013/12/aryan-race-in-kargil-indian".

Here states this: "The Batalik area of Kargil adjacent to the Line of Control is famous for the strange tribes known as Drokhpas believed to be the only surviving pure Aryan Race. There are many theories about the origin of these tribal people who are unlike other inhabitants of Ladakh. The area is approachable both from Leh through Khalsi and from Kargil through Batalik. Earlier tourists were allowed only through Khalsi up to Dah and Hannu."

"Now they can visit these places through Kargil also. The beautiful Darchik village in Batalik is nestled on the banks of the mighty Indus and across the Pakistan border. Its inhabitants are the last surviving members of the pure Aryan race in Ladakh. While not as old as the Harrapan and Mohenjadaro villages, Darchik, along with the peer villages of Dah and Hannu, are dated to somewhere between a 1,000 and 1,200 years old."

'People there are called Drokhpas or High Landers and are said to have migrated from Dardistan, somewhere west of Afghanistan. Their occupation involves agriculture and animal husbandry while their main source of income comes from selling apricots and grapes, which grow in plenty here, to the markets in Kargil and Leh. Structurally, their houses are just stone and wood."

"There are five villages of Drogpas in the Kargil district of Dah, Hannu, Garkon, Darchik and Biama, around 260 kilometres from Srinagar. These people have very strange customs and a different lifestyle. They are allergic to cow. They do not eat eggs and chicken. The source of their main supply of meat and milk is goat. They eat goat cheese and store it for years. They worship deities whom they call Lha and Lhu. Their deities come from within the earth as well as from the sky and these also have some connection with fairies."

"These people trace their Aryan ancestors to the Indus Valley and their villages boast of extensive anthropological and ethnographic links. The most important occasion to know their true history is the harvest festival, which they call Banono. During that the Drogpas wear colourful and traditional outfits. The Drogpas have been an attraction for tourists and anthropologists because of their colorful lifestyle, sheepskin clothing and rich jewelry."

"The area grows grapes from which these people make excellent wine. This is an event full of gaiety. On this occasion people from different villages assemble in one place and celebrate for five days. The festival begins with the head of the tribe relating the story of their arrival in Ladakh. The festival is a place to drink, dine, dance and make free love! It is reported that many German families had been visiting the area to share their love with pure Aryan blood!"

"The head of the tribe recites 18 hymns relating to their history according to which they are supposed to have come through Gilgit. On the other side of the border, there is a similar tribe called Kalash. In fact, there are strong theories that these tribes living on the two sides of the border in Ladakh, including the Hunzakuts, are remnants of Alexander’s Army."

"Some research scholars from Macedonia have conducted studies on the Hunza people and claim they are Macedonians who remained behind after Alexander’s Army left the area. Apparently, the people inhabiting these villages are distinctly of non-Mongoloid stock. Some of these people are very much like Europeans. Good looking, with aquiline noses and quite a few of them are blonde!"

Now, this is where the term "Aryans" has been abused to fit the narrative of the Eurocentric concept, when in reality there are many shades of people in Europe, and all don't look the same at all. In the Chapters "New World Order" and "Changing the Bible", I detail how many Germans would have "oriental" features, thus detailing that it had nothing to do with the White European class, but is towards the Children of Israel who came from Central Asia and India. 

Now, the narrative of "Alexander the Great" going over there and having leaving remnants behind is only a means to share the idea of origin of these people to being blonde haired and blue eyed, but that wouldn't be the case as majority do tend to share the broad nose, fair to ruddy colored, having oriental features, black hair and aquiline noses. It may be true as far as their ancestors to being from the "Caucasian" stock (Like Abraham out of Ireland perhaps) but then shows that people would have some European mixtures as there were other nations. I also heard that the German women would go those lands to be impregnated with having Aryan traits. If this is the case, then it defeats the ideology of the Aryan blonde haired and blue eyes as this is dominate amongst the Germanic peoples as they find the real Aryans are of Tibetan or Turkic Mongolian descent. 

The land of "Gilgit" is the land of Gilgal in the Bible, from which Joshua and the Children of Israel had led "War parties" against the inhabitants of the lands. It definitely states that there were people that stayed in the lands of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran etc. while the rest came over the Indus River (Jordan River) and started to battle against the nations in those lands. Based on James Adair's book "History of the American Indians" connect the practices of the Israelites to the different Indian tribes in America. The Turkic Mongolian nations connect to the Native American people as they are of Central Asian descent. These are the people of Indra. I remember when visiting the Mohawk tribe, the Chief Tom Porter had stated how the Eagle was symbol of the people before it was borrowed by the coming European nations. Makes me wonder how Rome came about to have the Eagle symbolism belonging to Zeus considering the God of the Aryans whose people were described as having aquiline features came to be. 

Now, based on the website "warpaths2peacepipes" details this segment "Native American Fringe":

Native American Fringe: Facts and information about the History of Clothing and regalia of Native American Indians and the use of the fringe on their clothes. Many different types of clothing worn by various tribes featured fringes on dresses, jackets, shawls, bags, moccasins and shirts. The fringed additions served for both practical and decorative purposes. Buckskin clothing was adopted by pioneers, frontiersmen and mountain men complete with the fringes favored by the Native Indians."

Native American Clothing: "Fringes The history of traditional or ceremonial dress and regalia worn by Native American Indians is a fascinating subject. The following fact sheet contains interesting facts and information on the the fringe that featured on the clothes of many tribes. A Fringe was added to many articles of clothing including jackets, dresses, leggings, shirts and shawls. Fringes were also added to other items such as moccasins, bags (called a parfleche), knife sheaths, quivers and tobacco pouches."

"Native American Fringe Fact 1: A fringe consisted of a border or edge of hanging threads, cords, tassels or strips, and was often found on garments made from leather and buckskin.

Native American Fringe Fact 2: Fringes were made separately and sewn on garments, or other important Native Indian items. Fringes were either twisted or plaited together or added as narrow, hanging strips of leather.

Native American Fringe Fact 3: The purpose of the fringe on Native Indian clothing was two-fold. Fringes were added for purely decorative reasons or had a practical use.

Native American Fringe Fact 4: The practical reason for fringes were that they helped to repel rainwater from the wearer. As the fringe moved the water ran down to the tips and was shed faster than with no fringe allowing the clothes to dry faster.

Native American Fringe Fact 5: Fringes were added to a garment in different ways. When making a dress, shirt, skirt of jacket it was a common practice not to trim the leather hides when sewing seams. Instead the excess leather was cut to create the fringes.

Native American Fringe Fact 6: Native American Indians tried never to waste anything. This included leather, that had taken a long time to prepare. Surplus leather was cut into strips and a band of fringing was sewn on to the clothing. Some surplus leather strips were kept and used to decorate other items such as pouches, bags, quivers and knife sheaths

Native American Fringe Fact 7: When making Moccasins the surplus leather was used for fringing the shoes and for making the straps. Moccasin fringes often trailed on the ground.

Native American Fringe Fact 8: Long thongs of leather were tied together in pairs to create a different fringed effect.

Native American Fringe Fact 9: Beads were also added to fringes to achieve and even more decorative effect. This was especially popular with the women of the tribes, as was the older tradition of adding brightly colored seeds and shells. Fringes were also painted.

Native American Fringe Fact 10: Fringes were most commonly added to the shoulders and bottoms of jackets, dresses and shirts. They were also added to the side seams of leggings.

Fringe Fact 11: The fringed leather tunic or shirt, worn by Native Americans was called a 'wamus'. According to tradition if a warrior had scalped his enemy, he was allowed to trim his tunic, or wamus, with a human hair fringe in addition to the buckskin fringe.

Fringe Fact 13: Fringed Jackets, shirts and tunics - The wamus was the name given to these garments that slipped over the head of the wearer."

Fringe Fact 12: The style of fringes differed from tribe to tribe. The Comanche and Kiowa wore long, twisted fringes, often tied in bunches. Other Great Plains tribes favored long, straight fringes, especially along the sleeves. The fringes worn by Woodland tribes were shorter so they did not get caught up or tangled in the underbrush."

Fringe Fact 14: Fringed Dresses featured fringes that hung down the front at the bust. Fringes also hung down from the hem, sleeves, and back. Fringe Fact 15: Breechclouts would often will often have fringes attached and be decorated with different colors."

Fringe Fact 16: The fringed Buckskin clothing was copied by backwoodsmen, frontiersmen, pioneers and mountain men. The fringes were knotted to the inside of seams. The men wore so much fringe that some tribes gave them the nickname of the "Fringe People".

Based from the Bible is shown these two verses on "fringes".

Deuteronomy 22:12 “Thou shalt make thee fringes upon the four quarters of thy vesture, wherewith thou coverest thyself.”

Numbers 15:38 “Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue:”

Interestingly, you do see the bird God having these fringes in the same manner. Based on this subject details God telling the Children of Israel to have fringes on their garments as part of the culture. Now, there is the Jewish Tassel to which the religion tries to portray the same description, however, this modern Jewish religion is "eclectic" and is not ancient as people are told. It seems that when observing the native American garments, there are certain tribes that ordain themselves with these fringes like normal and seeing the "crest" of the bird gods, looks like those apparels that the Indian dancers would wear on their heads in Pow wows.

Now in Hinduism, it's also said that when a devotee looks upon the "Garuda" bird after being bitten by the poison of the serpent, then they will get healed. This is similar to the fiery serpent on the pole that was set up by Moses, so that the Israelites can be healed from the fiery serpents sent upon them. I think this would be the true version of the situation. So, instead of the red serpent on the pole, the Garuda bird must connect to this account because it doesn't make sense for the serpent to be looked upon for the healing from the serpents, for the Garuda is the considered enemy of the Nagas. This is based on Indra who is the God that defeated the Dragon God.

Now, based on Indra I had wondered why there were so many changes to this God as they made this God lesser than these non-Vedic deities like Vishnu, Krishna and Shiva. It seems that Indra of course, wasn't just the God of those that came to India and China, but amongst the Slavic nations as well (Though they would have Veles the God of the Underworld as well).  The passing over the fire on "Ivan Kupula day" called "Nevruz" is similar to the Persian word "Nowruz", as they would also pass over the fire (The Turkish do this as well).Then I also see the Ancient Japanese clothing of the Yayoi people as the men having the hairlocks on the sides and this particular Queen named Himiko who was said to have ruled Japan at some point. I think there is a connection on the Slavic nations as they are of the nations of Abraham, but based on these Japanese people with the hair locks are shown to be people of Susanoo. I have made a statement that Moses may have married an Ethiopian when it's really a "European woman" because when his brother Aaron and sister Miriam had criticized him for this it states God had made Miriam white as leprosy in retaliation. And Abraham may have had other women as well, so it's debatable. 

Then I came across the God called "Taranis" it states that this God would carry a wheel and a thunderbolt. Simply it is the God Zeus, Jupiter, Thor, Indra and of course Micheal the Archangel. 

Taranis (sometimes Taranus or Tanarus) is a Celtic thunder god attested in literary and epigraphic sources.

The Roman poet Lucan's epic Pharsalia mentions Taranis, Esus, and Teutates as gods to whom the Gauls sacrificed humans. This rare mention of Celtic gods under their native names in a Latin text has been the subject of much comment. Almost as often commented on are the scholia to Lucan's poem(early medieval, but relying on earlier sources) which tell us the nature of these sacrifices: in particular, that the victims of Taranis were burned in a hollow wooden container. This sacrifice has been compared with the wicker man described by Caesar.

These scholia also tell us that Taranis was perhaps either equated by the Romans with Dis Pater, Roman god of the underworld, or Jupiter, Roman god of weather. Scholars have preferred the latter equation to the former, as Taranis is also equated with Jupiter in inscriptions. Both identifications have been studied against Caesar's lapidary remarks about the Gaulish Jupiter and Gaulish Dis Pater.

The equation of Taranis with Jupiter has been reason for some scholars to identify Taranis with the "wheel god" of the Celts. This god, known only from iconographic sources, is depicted with a spoked wheel and the attributes of Jupiter (including a thunderbolt). No direct evidence links Taranis with the wheel god, so other scholars have expressed reservations about this identification. Various inscriptions attest to Taranis's worship, dating between the 4th century BCE to the 3rd century CE. Scholars have drawn contrary conclusions about the importance of Taranis from the distribution of these inscriptions.

The wheel god (Radgott) is a figure of Celtic religious iconography, a god wielding a spoked wheel. The wheel god is often depicted with the attributes of Jupiter: thunderbolt, sceptre, and eagle. The spoked wheel was an important religious motif for the Celts. Metal votive wheels (known as rouelles [fr]) are known from Iron Age Europe.^{[22]: 68, 73} The Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae lists 15 depictions of the wheel god. Some are statuettes of the god dressed in Gaulish garb, with a wheel in one hand and a thunderbolt in the other. A mosaic from Saint-Romain-en-Gal shows a woman and a man leaving sacrifices to such a statuette. An obscure scene on the Gundestrup cauldron perhaps shows a leaping devotee offering a wheel to the wheel god. The so-called Jupiter columns, religious monuments widespread in Germania, are frequently crowned with an equestrian god, who sometimes wields a wheel.^{[23]: 844}

Because both were identified with Jupiter, Taranis has been repeatedly equated with the wheel god (for example, by Pierre Lambrechts, Jean-Jacques Hatt [fr], and Anne Ross). However, nothing connects the gods directly. No inscription links Taranis with wheel iconography.^{[18]: 81} Some scholars have rejected this equation. Green rejects it, and argues that the wheel god was a solar deity, naturally identifiable with Jupiter, but distinct from the thunder god Taranis.^{[10]: 41} Gerhard Bauchhenß [de] and Peter Noelke[de]both express scepticism in their studies of Jupiter columns in Germany. Árpád M. Nagy described the equation as "probable, but not binding". In any case, the combination of the thunderbolt and wheel as attributes is not unique to one deity: Hercules is occasionally depicted with these attributes in the Latin West, and a female deity with a thunderbolt and wheel is known from a statue in Autun.

Now, they would state him to being "Dis pater" as the God of the underworld, however, it's shown Taranis stomps on a Halfman half serpent deity to which we can identify as the Dragon god Typhon. So, based on that there is still debate as to Taranis being worshiped with human sacrifice similar to Cernunnos, but I don't find this the case because Cernnunos is the Dragon God who is Shiva. Taranis riding on the Horse and defeating the Dragon is Perun who defeats Veles the God of the Underworld. The cult of Dagon has been shown to connect to these apparent strange practices of bloodletting and probable human sacrifices and such. Then what about him carrying the wheel? Well, it's pretty much a shield basically. 

Well, the Angel that wields the Shield is really Michael the Archangel who connects to Taranis has this shield. It is also Perun's symbol to which probably some call it "Kolovrat". It's similar to Vishnu's Sudarshana weapon or the disc that us used against the demons and Krishna carrying the wheel from his chariot to attack the opposing foes. They even call it the Dharma wheel of the Buddha. Vishnu having the Garuda as his vehicle is pretty much Zeus having the Eagle as his symbol, despite the Post Vedic stories intertwining the Dagon/Vishnu/Shiva with Indra, as it's noted that original God was Indra and is the considered protector of mankind who always battles against the Asuras when they get out of control. I would enjoy watching the Vishnu Puran as Vishnu would battle against the Asuras, which in the Post Vedic story, he is worshiped by the Devas, whereas Shiva is worshiped by the Asuras and Nagas. I find Indra's symbol to be the Garuda and not the Airavata the three headed Elephant, as this is where the symbolism of Garuda battling the Nagas would be based on. Vishnu is really a Post Vedic God based on Krishna and Siva who is Dagon the God of the Black nations as the seven headed serpent and the Buddha, whereas Indra would be the original God of the Aryans to whom has been changed and demoted over time. 

Then in Daniel 10:21 states this: ⁸Then there came again and touched me one like the appearance of a man, and he strengthened me,¹⁹And said, O man greatly beloved, fear not: peace be unto thee, be strong, yea, be strong. And when he had spoken unto me, I was strengthened, and said, Let my lord speak; for thou hast strengthened me.²⁰Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come.²¹But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. 

Daniel 10:13: “But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.”

Daniel 12:1: “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

Based from the wiki states this on Tengri:

Tengri is the all-encompassing God of Heaven in the traditional Turkic, Yeniseian,Mongolic, and various other nomadic religious beliefs.^[3]Some qualities associated with Tengri as the judge and source of life, and being eternal and supreme, led European and Muslim writers to identify Tengri as a deity of Turkic and Mongolic peoples.^[4]According to Mongolian belief, Tengri's will (jayayan) may break its own usual laws and intervene by sending a chosen person to earth. It is also one of the terms used for the primary chief deity of the early Turkic and Mongolic peoples. Worship surrounding Tengri is called Tengrism. The core beings in Tengrism are the Sky Father (Tenger Etseg) and the Earth Mother (Umay Ana). It involves ancestor worship, as Tengri was thought to have been the ancestral progenitor of mankind in Turkic regions and Mongolia,^[6]shamanism, animism, and totemism.

Tengri was the national god of the Göktürks, described as the "god of the Turks" (Türük Tängrisi).^[7]The Göktürk khans based their power on a mandate from Tengri. These rulers were generally accepted as the sons of Tengri who represented him on Earth. They wore titles such as tengri kut, kutluġ or kutalmysh, based on the belief that they attained kut, some sort of heavenly and spiritual force granted to these rulers by Tengri. Prior to foreign influences, the Turkic conception of tengri was regarded as the heaven or the will controlling heaven, probably some sort of force. Out of this, the concept of a personal being developed. First, when Turkic people took over other religions, the term tengri became the name of a (personal) god or "higher being". Tengri was the chief deity worshipped by the ruling class of the Central Asian steppe peoples in 6th to 9th centuries (Turkic peoples, Mongols and Hungarians).^[23]It lost its importance when the Uighur khagans proclaimed Manichaeism the state religion in the 8th century.^[24]The worship of Tengri was brought into Eastern Europe by the Huns and early Bulgars. Tengri is considered to be the chief god who created all things. In addition to this celestial god, they also had minor divinities (Alps) that served the purposes of Tengri.^[25]As Gök Tanrı, he was the father of the sun (Koyash) and moon (Ay Tanrı) and also Umay, Erlik, and sometimes Ülgen.

Tengri was the main god of the Turkic pantheon, controlling the celestial sphere.^[26]Tengri is considered to be similar to the Indo-European sky god,*Dyeus, and the structure of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European religion is closer to that of the early Turks than to the religion of any people of Near Eastern or Mediterranean antiquity.^[27]In Christian Turkish usage Tengri is used for the father of Jesus, who is referred to as "Tengri Oghli" (Son of God) and "Mshikha Tengri" (Messiah God). Tengri is also compared to Allah and Khuda. Apart from foreign religious influences, as far as known today, the original Turkish concept of Tengri was that of "heaven" or a spirit ruling in heaven. This spirit was probably imagined as some sort of force, corresponding to "mana" in modern ethnology.

The most important contemporary testimony of Tengri worship is found in the Old Turkic Orkhon inscriptions, dated to the early 8th century. Written in the so-called Orkhon script, these inscriptions record an account of the mythological origins of the Turks. The inscription dedicated to Kul Tigin includes the passages (in the translation provided by the Language Committee of Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan): "When the blue sky [Tengri] above and the brown earth below were created, between them a human being was created. Over the human beings, my ancestors Bumin Kagan and Istemi Kagan ruled. They ruled people by Turkish laws, they led them and succeeded" (face 1, line 1); "Tengri creates death. Human beings have all been created in order to die" (Old Turkic: Öd Teŋri yasar kisi oγlu qop ölgeli törürmis), (face 2, line 9); "You passed away (lit.: 'went flying') until Tengri gives you life again" (face 2, line 14). Khagans ruled by the will of Tengri thought the ancient Turkic people and preserved these thoughts in the texts of the Orkhon inscriptions in the following way: "I, Tengri-like and Tengri-born Turk Bilge Kaghan, succeeded to the throne at this time" (Old Turkic: Teŋiriteg Teŋiride bolmuš Türük Bilge Qaγan bü ödüke olurtum).

In one Turkic myth, Tengri is a pure, white goose that flies constantly over an endless expanse of water, which represents time. Beneath this water, Ak Ana ("White Mother") calls out to him saying "Create". To overcome his loneliness, Tengri creates Er Kishi, who is not as pure or as white as Tengri and together they set up the world. Er Kishi becomes a demonic character and strives to mislead people and draw them into its darkness. Tengri assumes the name Tengri Ülgen and withdraws into Heaven from which he tries to provide people with guidance through sacred animals that he sends among them. The Ak Tengris occupies the fifth level of Heaven. Shaman priests who want to reach Tengri Ülgen never get further than this level, where they convey their wishes to the divine guides. Returns to earth or to the human level take place in a goose-shaped vessel.

Now, you can tell there isn't much information on Michael the Archangel, in fact Daniel 12:1 seems there was supposed to be more information but was cut off. Here states Michael is the prince of the people and how he is their protector and is the true God of the Aryans. So, based on this segment details the Aryans having the features of a bird, thus relating to Garuda.